Overall, the discussions strongly support the article’s findings, emphasizing the statistical evidence that Black Americans are significantly more likely to be shot unarmed than White Americans. Words like 'bias,' 'research,' and 'significant' convey seriousness, while references to peer-reviewed studies and detailed data illustrate deep engagement with the research’s implications. Despite some skepticism, the tone generally underscores the importance and impact of the findings on discussions about systemic racism.
AgreementStrong agreement
Most discussions reinforce the study’s conclusion that racial bias influences police shootings, highlighting the statistic that unarmed Black individuals are about 3.5 times more likely to be shot than unarmed White individuals.
InterestHigh interest
Posts demonstrate high interest by referencing detailed research, methodological debates, and statistical figures, indicating engagement with the topic’s complexities.
EngagementModerate engagement
Many social discussions cite specific studies and challenge differing viewpoints, showing active engagement with research methods and implications, though some dismiss opposing claims without deep analysis.
ImpactHigh impact
The widespread sharing of peer-reviewed research, along with comments highlighting systemic issues, suggests these discussions could influence public perception and policy debates on racial bias in policing.
Abstract in brief
This study uses advanced statistical modeling to analyze data from the US Police Shooting Database, focusing on racial bias in police shootings across different counties between 2011 and 2014, and finds that unarmed Black Americans are significantly more likely to be shot by police than unarmed White Americans.
The results show that racial bias varies widely across different counties, with some counties having much higher risks for Black individuals, especially in larger cities with lower incomes and higher inequality, and this bias does not appear to be related to local crime rates.
The findings suggest that the racial bias in police shootings is influenced more by county-level factors like metropolitan size, income, and racial composition rather than actual crime levels, indicating systemic and regional differences rather than a direct response to crime.]
@deonteleologist lol even if you just do a simple, naive analysis and try to control for "violence" by using "carrying a weapon" as a proxy, it turns out black men are not 16 times less likely than whites to be killed by police. they are 3.5 times MORE likely https://t.co/m1VaV5pXUR
@Tremblaym01 @ourownwells @himchalla1 https://t.co/REHtPnx8kJ
Also the author of the study (from the video) didn't take into account major data points making the "no-bias" account to be completely useless. Not accounting for obvious data doesn't make you a bad person, just a bad researcher.
Feb 20, 2024 · 12 likes · 1 share · 726 followersView post →
T
TFW
@lIlIlIIIlIlIIlI · X
@tryhard_cj @VaushV No they wouldn't actually, multiple such studies exist, and they support the claim that the system is racist.
https://t.co/gIZj57xJqP
Jan 27, 2023 · 7 likes · 1 share · 80 followersView post →
WR
Wilfred Reilly
@wil_da_beast630 · X
@roderickgraham It depends what you mean. Most studies - this one is a good example (https://t.co/JhCgW8tWhJ) - find substantial B/W differences in (whatever metric) BEFORE the obvious adjustment for victim-reported crime rate.
@jdeneharris @michaelharriot @SkepticReview89 @JohnHMcWhorter (2) Similarly, the claim that rising crime rate doesn't predict Black as vs. white shootings is kinda meaningless. The question is whether the B/W crime GAP does. Yes: as I note in TABOO and many critics of this paper have...https://t.co/JhCgW8LxGj
In 2015, Ross analysed 701 cases of police shootings from the US Police Shootings Database and found that the probability of being black, unarmed, and shot by police, is 3.5 times the probability of being white, unarmed, and shot by the police. https://t.co/jIWCmNQfWv https://t.co/fXulCQef3Q
Jun 3, 2020 · 3 likes · 1 share · 54 followersView post →
This study employs multi-level Bayesian analysis of the US Police Shooting Database, revealing significant racial bias where unarmed Black Americans are more likely to be shot than unarmed White Americans, with bias…
This video explores a study analyzing racial bias in police shootings across US counties from 2011 to 2014. It highlights that unarmed Black Americans are disproportionately shot compared to unarmed White Americans…
@groyperderiver @monstruogigante mmm no se a, yo lo miraria de nuevo tu modo de pensar.
https://t.co/Q7vqZ9sY8G
https://t.co/faJZnIqr7X
https://t.co/bmaixSGfRQ
aqui dice que si, de unas revista importante, no de un foro de telegram.
@RodneyKeap @Sneak0o @sneako @onenightsteiny @TheOmniLiberal But… statistically African Americans are killed by police officers more than other races. I’ll list one study
@BeaLeydier Another reason this is false. County level racial bias in police shootings has no relationship with county level crime rates (or race specific crime rates)
https://t.co/shw7iMit6N
@lamps_apple @Yamiche Nah, that’s a dumb race realist meme. All your Twitter heroes are bluffing when they appeal to the consensus of research.
https://t.co/Uj2KeJO4yr
https://t.co/uxbERWnH8I
@NOTICEAUTHORITY @CMastrocola « Fryer's paper A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011--2014 found that the chance of being Black, unarmed, & shot by the police was about 3.5 X the chance of being white, unarmed, and shot by the police »
@dijoni Wtf is this idiot talking about? She is so dumb that she does not provide any studies for her point that white, unarmed people are more likely to die by the police. There is a study that totally debunks her ridiculous claim. https://t.co/R2JyCvDw6P https://t.co/lpzEstpdEs
Jul 26, 2024 · 1 like · 1 share · 35 followersView post →
?
⋆｡°✩
@asceticchialist · X
@HolisticPrepar1 @p3rcept1on @3Sandy7_ @elonmusk @SchmittNYC “the probability of being {black, unarmed, and shot by police} is about 3.49 times the probability of being {white, unarmed, and shot by police} on average.”
https://t.co/EWTPgkykGF
@Genio_Gigante @Gwydion_Wolf @deangloster @VictorSquireLee @iamyesyouareno Bias Part 2 (If you think the policing side is the only part of my data, you're in for a rude awakening)
but Part 2:
- https://t.co/ly463me4fx
- https://t.co/PI9vAEhvN4
- https://t.co/nhVqIVSFPX
- https://t.co/QJDoGdBWto
- https://t.co/QJDoGdBWto
- https://t.co/fQ1qBamF5W
@AgroyperF @celluxies found them all outside a paywall or within an articule just for you. studies aren't opinions and dont care about your feelings. cope groyper https://t.co/ky2ckklWWs… https://t.co/cBVHwGEkFB… https://t.co/Qp0vzxXMaz… https://t.co/3JbiRxGfgp… https://t.co/pJwBt8wyPw
RT @Infernal_struct: @Tremblaym01 @ourownwells @himchalla1 https://t.co/REHtPnx8kJ
Also the author of the study (from the video) didn't ta…
Feb 20, 2024 · 1 share · 1,800 followersView post →
PD
Proletariat Distribution
@Infernal_struct · X
@Tremblaym01 @ourownwells @himchalla1 https://t.co/REHtPnx8kJ
Also the author of the study (from the video) didn't take into account major data points making the "no-bias" account to be completely useless. Not accounting for obvious data doesn't make you a bad person, just a bad researcher.
Feb 20, 2024 · 12 likes · 1 share · 726 followersView post →
L
LexData
@ImigrantPatriot · X
A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011–2014 | PLOS ONE
Wonder how white hispanics were treated in this dataset. It appears that there may be some undercounting of white hispanics. https://t.co/9dISxY3Qpn
@DavidLBernstein @markr360 @spvkythghst @ProfJoshuaA Lastly, in the area of racism in policing: Cody T. Ross, A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011–2014, 10 PLoS ONE (2015).
@HildaPumpernic1 @RampantMadness @MarkDice @realchrisrufo @politico @unecgh “There is no relationship between county-level racial bias in police shootings and crime rates, meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates”: https://t.co/bVV3FfG2HZ via @PLOSONE.
@AceWolfSavage Depending on the studies' methodology, it's not a simple question.
Found police bias in shootings: https://t.co/UkSXvOAnym
Interesting psych analysis, also found bias in police shootings:
https://t.co/bcNj5kbKh7
Controversial study found mixed results: https://t.co/pIfyA9zgQY
Jul 23, 2023 · 1 like · 3,427 followersView post →
K
Kai
@KaiKalliosta · X
@Laspaa1 @jlehtira @TeroMphotos Yhteys rikollisuuden ja ammutuksi joutumisen välillä ei kuitenkaan näytä tutkimuksen valossa olevan sellainen kuin esität.
https://t.co/buPamWqzwm
@ScienceAccount1 @realchrisrufo @Nature “There is no relationship between county-level racial bias in police shootings and crime rates, meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates”: https://t.co/bVV3FfG2HZ.
@JagmeetScheer @varkingavian @RepThomasMassie I’m well aware B/B violence dwarfs W/B. I am also well aware that unarmed Bs are *far* more likely to be shot by LEO than unarmed Ws: https://t.co/djwJM2CfTG
If that isn’t systemic racism then the term has no meaning.
@tryhard_cj @VaushV No they wouldn't actually, multiple such studies exist, and they support the claim that the system is racist.
https://t.co/gIZj57xJqP
Jan 27, 2023 · 7 likes · 1 share · 80 followersView post →
AP
An Observer *Trump's an Epstein pedo*
@KB052276 · X
@siggirl777 @BreeNewsome Also, this peer-reviewed, published study, which found that "the probability of being {black, unarmed, and shot by police} is about 3.49 times the probability of being {white, unarmed, and shot by police} on average."
https://t.co/vYRAnRZqFf
@luckylaughter1 @BeachHouse2049 @wpcguy @impeachqueen @gregowoc @zipthwung @johngorman76 @Megavolt1 @tk_the_kitsune @dirk_fasshauer @Anti_Psychopath @_truthswordsa @Canna420Uk @EdgeZeto @ThatGuyM88 @umfpt @OnkelFester @GaGSD64 @PatricktheB @LeannEAF @HaircutSpock @ScientiaPercept @taygee @skipkick2000 @DeanoMartino1 @depth_ocean_ @againststrawmen @PeterFi98279139 @Tanya_terrell1 @odktiger @JaTapps @garymotion @RJDownard @imkimaaron @SplinterSimba @jools6691 @TheWestonMike @Friendof_Darwin @manchestermelly @PG13ScottWatson @geraldpayne25 @htownsmitty @Aaron23582125 @NelsonMKerr @tklforgiven @Cern_lXXl @tarbosaur @NaturalBAtheist @Atheist_1978 @ABranesample Okay...
"The results provide evidence of a significant bias in the killing of unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans."
But as I said...be skeptical. The paper I linked earlier points out that the data is questiona
There is significant bias in the killing of unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans.
The probability of being black, unarmed, and shot by police is ~3.5 times the probability of being white, unarmed, and shot by police on average.
https://t.co/wZScSjGo00
@GandeeJeffrey Not sure why looking at "all deaths caused by police violence" is a problem.
References cited above link to several studies that look at encounter-conditional use-of-force including:
https://t.co/S07j2PuQ7L
https://t.co/GvNcfaixvY
https://t.co/MrGjalbC4s
https://t.co/xZIkzWthL5
@CivilLost @Xpressionable This study (https://t.co/yvIZsshPee)
It shows that if you are black and armed in the US, you are 2.94 times more likely to be shot by the police than if you are white and armed.
It also shows that if you are black and unarmed, you are 3.49 times more likely to be shot.
@jakenos @Trish_NI As I said, this is AFTER the data has been adjusted for local crime rates. Here's the study. I look forward to your response after you read it.
https://t.co/jHJAFF6qfD
@jakenos @Trish_NI Again, here's the study. Why don't you read it then explain what other explanation there is beyond racial bias?
https://t.co/jHJAFF6qfD
@Rationalist69 @sullydish @TheEconomist @theintercept Cody Ross et al *agree* with not benchmarking by population size - that’s why it’s the first sentence of the paper - and “use the causal model of lethal force by police *conditional on relative crime rates*” - as done with other databases in the past: https://t.co/QAiI2Lbe7t.
@nicholasb44 @TheOmniLiberal And what is wrong with looking at potential racial bias in police shootings (both structural and psychological) and saying that is a problem?
https://t.co/rLFFC4qvgD
@ScienceAccount1 @ggreenwald @shartnado42069 @NathanJRobinson Also: “There is no relationship between county-level racial bias in police shootings and crime rates, meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates”: https://t.co/bVV3FfG2HZ.
@naturalcentrist @McCormickProf “There is no relationship between county-level racial bias in police shootings and crime rates, meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates”: https://t.co/bVV3FfG2HZ.
@BrianLeiter It's a messy picture, that's my impression: quite a bit of geographical variation that doesn't always track class/income, difference between shooting and killing, etc. Reed's probably closer to the truth than the simplistic media stories, but still. E.g.: https://t.co/T5rUgL3qZV
@BrianLeiter But there is for example this, and then a reply by Fryer, and then various contributions by others, and so I'm just not sure the picture is as clear-cut as Reed says (though it's certainly not as clear cut as the media consensus says it is either) https://t.co/T5rUgL3qZV
@roderickgraham @Diogenes3000 @jondavidchurch @iguthrie10 I've read most of this stuff. The same problems keep recurring. This famous, otherwise well-done paper literally doesn't adjust for the group gap in crime rates...https://t.co/JhCgW8LxGj
Sep 12, 2021 · 1 like · 158,957 followersView post →
L
libereso
@dubioushandle · X
@redneck_kemp Absolutely not true lol. https://t.co/hG7MyuYgQL
@Eddy63887683 @45rapeKatiejohn Depending on the location and year, black people are between 2.5-6x more likely to get shot by a cop than a white person.
1. https://t.co/YJGsc3ryln
2. https://t.co/vhf5keA9Uy
3. https://t.co/LwhAOoB9v4
4. https://t.co/iISTgW5nrK
5. https://t.co/Sv7NM7k7we
@JesusMagneto @PsycheFlame @deonteleologist Yes, it did and that's what I wanted to add. Many critiqued the study, saying it could have FURTHER controlled for statistical bias. And there have been other studies that have found a bias in shootings at the county level.
https://t.co/rLFFC4qvgD
@hoppercolly @catturd2 @BarbaraJHarris8 It's not "my" objective reality; it's just objective reality, backed by peer-reviewed research.
You seem very emotional perturbed by this, but that actually doesn't matter. Objective reality remains non-negotiable. Facts do not care about your feelings.
https://t.co/vYRAnRZqFf
@DumbocratD @theotherfishin1 @catturd2 @BarbaraJHarris8 I'm so "full of shit" that my claims are backed by peer-reviewed research.
https://t.co/vYRAnRZqFf
@JackMeoff1776US @catturd2 @BarbaraJHarris8 Actually, police kill black people at about 3-4 times the rate of white people, not explainable as a response to local crime rates.
THAT is an example of white privilege.
That's the funny thing about facts: they don't care about your far-right feelings.
https://t.co/vYRAnRZqFf
@kaznorbury @prageru But here you go. Here’s a study that shows racial bias in police shooting. Not something you’re interested in, I’m sure
https://t.co/rLFFC4qvgD
@AshantiVanBuren @lhfang “There is no relationship between county-level racial bias in police shootings and crime rates, meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates”: https://t.co/bVV3FfG2HZ.
@StruggleSeshi @BeApi_io @Albertahunt1950 @DanPriceSeattle depending on the location/year, black people are 2.5-6x more likely to be shot by a cop:
1. https://t.co/vhf5keiz30
2. https://t.co/LwhAOojyDw
3. https://t.co/YJGsc3J9JX
4. https://t.co/iISTgVNMAc
5. https://t.co/Sv7NM7BIUO
6. https://t.co/kE2HoYEIBW
7. https://t.co/tGHm1G2IrM
@JMU2012 “There is no relationship between county-level racial bias in police shootings and crime rates, meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates”: https://t.co/bVV3FfG2HZ.
@Petar_DRC @willwilkinson @benshapiro "The results provide evidence of a significant bias in the killing of unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans..."
Ross 2015 https://t.co/1lTul9yNe3
@Morty6of7 @cosmicdust911 @x24R6 @travissram @Ted42786704 @djboothEIC @Raiders This shows the relativity of statistics in populations size vs sample size
https://t.co/wM02kunx1H
@Morty6of7 @cosmicdust911 @x24R6 @travissram @Ted42786704 @djboothEIC @Raiders Also when looking at basic statistics, there is population size vs. sample size. There is a big difference.
https://t.co/NKqXaMxySV
@jdeneharris @michaelharriot @SkepticReview89 @JohnHMcWhorter (2) Similarly, the claim that rising crime rate doesn't predict Black as vs. white shootings is kinda meaningless. The question is whether the B/W crime GAP does. Yes: as I note in TABOO and many critics of this paper have...https://t.co/JhCgW8LxGj
@MikeShor @roderickgraham (2) What I generally find is that - while small racial effects may occur, as anywhere - studies that find giant gaps generally simply fail to adjust for B/W differences in crime. This is a good example...https://t.co/JhCgW8tWhJ
@roderickgraham It depends what you mean. Most studies - this one is a good example (https://t.co/JhCgW8tWhJ) - find substantial B/W differences in (whatever metric) BEFORE the obvious adjustment for victim-reported crime rate.
@HammadSheikh @ME_McCullough The brain works on priors. But ordinary people have no experience of crime base rates. It’s rubbish in rubbish out, based on stereotypes and media bias. Police use of force is not related to race disparities in crime. https://t.co/VNDfoYbwei
Apr 12, 2021 · 1 like · 4,638 followersView post →
AC
Alexander - Sex Critical
@etotheipie · X
@Pathdom @JudiciaIreview @rasmansa @lastpositivist ...that particularly high (as in, over the average) disparities in crime v. police killings would coincide, but this might not be the case.
https://t.co/w6FWlGowgY
@deonteleologist lol even if you just do a simple, naive analysis and try to control for "violence" by using "carrying a weapon" as a proxy, it turns out black men are not 16 times less likely than whites to be killed by police. they are 3.5 times MORE likely https://t.co/m1VaV5pXUR
@LauraMStuart9 I'm only talking about the US, even the most lenient methodology can show they are violent disproportionately towards black people https://t.co/jem44blxLF
@NiceMangos @NiceMangos could you please take a look at this? https://t.co/jem44blxLF this gentleman goes over the data and shows how @SamHarrisOrg is wrong on BLM
Not sure if he has Twitter, i would give him credit by tagging him
@SamHarrisOrg Why it’s always important to probe further before hewing to your “principles,” which can cloud judgment. Very disappointing podcast.
https://t.co/8ps14RhdBK
@RaymondKooyenga Source
Ross, Cody T. (2015-11-05). "A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States
I just have to bump this every now and again.
A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011–2014 https://t.co/UbaHnRojo6
1/4 On the corner this morning with #BLM poster-white couple told me more unarmed whites are shot by cops. NOPE! Between 2011-14 the probability of being shot while unarmed+Black was 3.49 times higher than being shot while unarmed+White. From @mindismoving https://t.co/yKyhhGmwlC
Edwards, F., Esposito, M. H., & Lee, H. (2018). Risk of police-involved death by race/ethnicity and place, United States, 2012–2018.
Ross, C. T. (2015). A multi-level Bayesian analysis of racial bias in police shootings at the county-level in the United States, 2011–2014.
@Amity_blue_line @DerDude75322397 @Swinkles2 @IB_Redaktion @polenz_r Selbstverständlich habe ich auch tatsächliche empirische Beweise, z.B. https://t.co/GcgDrfb3rT
Da dir wie du ja bereits in der Vergangenheit offenbart hast sowas allerdings zu hoch ist, wirst du es wieder abtun und lieber irgendwelche Videos gucken.
@Ward37279177 @LDouthy @Michael99478603 @CNN Your comment shows you’ve got no clue. I doubt if you’d grasp “Bayesian Analysis”, but here’s a peer reviewed doc for you: Ross, C. T. (2015). A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011-2014. PloS One, 10(11)
Jun 22, 2020 · 2 likes · 1,229 followersView post →
MM
Miguel Muñoz
@SaetaRubia33 · X
@Trukob @GolfoMaltes @10dekike1 @Aeon_Dan @salazar_capitan Mira aquí tienes una de las muchas referencias:
A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011–2014
Cody T. Ross
Published: November 5, 2015
https://t.co/7rJch955dA
A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011–2014
#BlackLivesMatter
#RacialBias
https://t.co/jgLYnR0y8N
In 2015, Ross analysed 701 cases of police shootings from the US Police Shootings Database and found that the probability of being black, unarmed, and shot by police, is 3.5 times the probability of being white, unarmed, and shot by the police. https://t.co/jIWCmNQfWv https://t.co/fXulCQef3Q
Jun 3, 2020 · 3 likes · 1 share · 54 followersView post →
DF
Dami Falastini
@OlofFrank · X
@FredricMorenius @FruCharlotte Nej. Källa: Ross, Cody. 2015. “A Multi-Level Bayesian
Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings
at the County-Level in the United States,
2011-2014.” PLoS ONE 10
RT @ken_crichlow: A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011–2014 ht…
May 31, 2020 · 1 share · 1,179 followersView post →
KC
ken crichlow
@ken_crichlow · X
A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011–2014 https://t.co/Wm8YAf0Ucb
May 31, 2020 · 1 like · 1 share · 3,968 followersView post →
Q
Qise
@AxmedQise · X
@ZachG932 Police tend to ignore the black community when it comes to violent crimes but over-police for petty crimes like drug use.
https://t.co/Re6oKA2Yai https://t.co/3YThe0l8Q8
@miaomiao10 @sarahrimmington @geederowski @blake_hoffman_ @Iyrytish @SidKau808 @DeveSever @OnlineDetective @RexChapman A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011–2014 - Cody T. Ross
"The results provide evidence of a significant bias in the killing of unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans"
May 24, 2020 · 1 like · 1,500 followersView post →
WH
Woody Hallstone
@peloton_of_1 · X
@MrMichaelLee article a masterpiece! cop shoots of unarmed Blacks 3.5x of whites, 20x higher in some counties not explained by crime levels. Ross(2015) A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011–2014
A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the US http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141854 h/t @gbchange
g=598338&p=4142165 This article was also fantastic: https://journals.plos. org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone. 0141854 [Any others? – This was a ...
Heather M. Garvin (Editor) - Natalie R. Langley (Editor) - Case ...
News
PLOS ONE 10(11), e0141854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141854. Smith, O. C., Berryman, H. E., & Lahren, C. H. (1987). Cranial fracture patterns and estimate ...
Race, Gender, and The Contexts of Unarmed Fatal | PDF ...
News
PLoS ONE10(11): e0141854. Available. from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141854. Savali, Kirsten W. 2014. Black women are killed by police, too. 24 ...
प्रो रे नाटा ब्रूअरी चार्ली किर्क के लिए मेमोरियल होस्ट कर रही है : r ...
Reddit
... पेपर पढ़ लो, तो शायद इस प्रकाशित अध्ययन को भी देख लो? https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141854 · TheSto1989. • 2 माह ...
Jun 18, 2025 ... http://journals.plos. org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone. 0141854 Read over the abstract and give your thoughts. Feel free to tag ...
Facebook
http://journals.plos. org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone. 0141854 Read over the abstract and give your thoughts. Feel free to tag ...
... journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0141854. jim. 2017-01-11 09:27:25. 0, 0. #. no tyler, you are a coward who is trying ...
BU
PD
T
WR
MB
C
WT
A
TH
L
V
?
B
RM
EL
ST
L
AM
G
TM
WH
K
FT
JD
ES
BV
AP
?
C
FG
T
NL
KM
M
TC
K
K
EP
BW
SH
ER
RB
L
BN
C
AP
K
KP
AC
M
PM
F
CP
NA
MM
DN
AO
MM
HA
SB
DF
M
KC
Q
DK
WH