A diferencia de #Sgarbossa original, en los Criterios Smith: Tener 1 de los 3 criterios es suficiente. Ad+ mejora la sensibilidad hasta un 80%, manteniendo especifidad del 99% (cohorte de validación externa https://t.co/o21UO3g2w6) https://t.co/rEdfsy1ChX
Validation of the modified Sgarbossa criteria for acute coronary occlusion in the setting of left bundle branch block: A retrospective case-control study.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jun 2019 – Mar 2023Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter8 posts
-
Blogs6 articles
-
News3 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Several contributions praise the improved sensitivity of the Smith criteria, with comments like 'Ad+ improves the sensitivity up to 80%' and discussions about how having just one criterion is now sufficient. The tone reflects curiosity and recognition of the clinical significance, but mostly within a professional context that limits the perceived broad impact.
Most discussions affirm the study’s findings, emphasizing that the modified Sgarbossa criteria improve detection accuracy.
Posts show high interest, with some mentioning the clinical importance of understanding these revised criteria and their practical implications.
Participants actively discuss specific aspects of the study, such as the criteria’s sensitivity and specificity, indicating thoughtful engagement.
While some posts recognize the potential influence on emergency medicine and ECG interpretation, the overall perceived impact appears moderate, mainly relevant to clinicians and researchers.
Abstract in brief
- The study validated the modified Sgarbossa criteria, which replaced the third criterion with a proportional measure of ST elevation, showing improved sensitivity for detecting acute coronary occlusion (ACO) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB).
- Conducted across multiple emergency departments, the retrospective study involved reviewing patient charts, measuring specific ECG features, and confirming ACO through angiographic and biomarker data, with the new criteria demonstrating significantly higher sensitivity (80%) compared to older criteria.
- While the specificity of the modified criteria was comparable to the original weighted criteria, it was higher than the original unweighted criteria, indicating that the modified approach is more effective in correctly identifying true cases of ACO without increasing false positives.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyBibliografía: https://t.co/uCcX54Edoe https://t.co/E3Kq3Hdoxi https://t.co/NmnNlfuHDd https://t.co/D6TGDk1xV8
@Basalus @RobertHermanMD @trimmer02 @ecgrhythms @DidlakeDW @EM_RESUS @StephenRahm @The_Nanashi_O @DocNikko @smithECGBlog @PendellM @DrRajeshG1 @DrRazi4 https://t.co/OQto05RtV6
What’s Pacheco Reading? The Smith Modified Scarbossa criteria. This came up on shift and I realized I did not know this as well as I should. Great article demonstrating improved sensitivity and really laying out the important definitions. https://t.co/gxjQUpNzfO
RT @JSweenen: @Basalus @RobertHermanMD @trimmer02 @ecgrhythms @DidlakeDW @EM_RESUS @StephenRahm @The_Nanashi_O @DocNikko @smithECGBlog @Pen…
How to find STEMI in Paced Rhythm (feat. Dr Sgarbossa) https://t.co/NXg7lXivY6 via @YouTube
All mentions
Identifying STEMI in Paced Rhythms Using Sgarbossa Criteria
Learn how to detect STEMI in patients with ventricular paced rhythms. Elena Sgarbossa and colleagues explore the use of the Sgarbossa Criteria, including the Smith-modified version, for accurate assessment in emergency…
Identifying STEMI in Ventricular Paced Rhythms Using Sgarbossa Criteria
This video explains how to detect STEMI in patients with ventricular paced rhythms using Sgarbossa Criteria. It discusses the application of the original and Smith-modified criteria, highlighting their improved…
RT @JSweenen: @Basalus @RobertHermanMD @trimmer02 @ecgrhythms @DidlakeDW @EM_RESUS @StephenRahm @The_Nanashi_O @DocNikko @smithECGBlog @Pen…
@Basalus @RobertHermanMD @trimmer02 @ecgrhythms @DidlakeDW @EM_RESUS @StephenRahm @The_Nanashi_O @DocNikko @smithECGBlog @PendellM @DrRajeshG1 @DrRazi4 https://t.co/OQto05RtV6
RT @SeguraCardio: A diferencia de #Sgarbossa original, en los Criterios Smith: Tener 1 de los 3 criterios es suficiente. Ad+ mejora la sens…
RT @SeguraCardio: A diferencia de #Sgarbossa original, en los Criterios Smith: Tener 1 de los 3 criterios es suficiente. Ad+ mejora la sens…
Bibliografía: https://t.co/uCcX54Edoe https://t.co/E3Kq3Hdoxi https://t.co/NmnNlfuHDd https://t.co/D6TGDk1xV8
A diferencia de #Sgarbossa original, en los Criterios Smith: Tener 1 de los 3 criterios es suficiente. Ad+ mejora la sensibilidad hasta un 80%, manteniendo especifidad del 99% (cohorte de validación externa https://t.co/o21UO3g2w6) https://t.co/rEdfsy1ChX
What’s Pacheco Reading? The Smith Modified Scarbossa criteria. This came up on shift and I realized I did not know this as well as I should. Great article demonstrating improved sensitivity and really laying out the important definitions. https://t.co/gxjQUpNzfO
How to find STEMI in Paced Rhythm (feat. Dr Sgarbossa) https://t.co/NXg7lXivY6 via @YouTube
DR
S
GP
A
DZ