Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Discussions emphasize re-evaluating the traditional understanding of scapular dyskinesis and stabilization, with phrases like 'time to rethink' and 'flawed paradigm' reflecting a critical and curious tone. The inclusion of references to recent research and questions about common beliefs demonstrate active engagement and a desire to deepen understanding of the topic.
Most discussions reflect a cautious support for rethinking traditional views on scapular stabilization, with some acknowledging the flaws in previous paradigms.
Posts show high interest, with many questioning established beliefs and highlighting the need for updated perspectives.
Several commenters engage deeply by referencing specific research, definitions, and challenging common assumptions, indicating a thoughtful level of participation.
While influential ideas are shared, the overall impact seems moderate, as professionals appear to be debating rather than adopting the new perspectives permanently.
https://t.co/JeJzHxk0LJ Critical and Theoretical Perspective on Scapular Stabilization: What Does It Really Mean, and Are We on the Right Track? “the current clinical scapu- lar stabilization paradigm is ambiguous, is flawed, and has limited support from current evidence.” https://t.co/6mJvla1kEU
Assessing scapula motion remains important, but dyskinesia should not be automatically regarded as impairment; dissimilar scapula motion patterns bilaterally could suggest normal variability rather than impairment. https://t.co/jk9xSLdGl8
@Sport_Ex_Dr @AndrewVCuff Hmmm... but is asymmetry of the scapula movement the problem, or is it perhaps the solution! Are you seeing the defect or the the defence? https://t.co/13Lgezf3Yi
See https://t.co/QAYim13ICN 2)most folks in real world setting.
@AdamMeakins One of my favorite reviews on this topic: https://t.co/pP6OXz0OHr https://t.co/0jdJDoAOpW
@AdamMeakins I also love asking people to properly define scapular stability. They usually can’t give you a good answer. This paper has some good discussion about that: https://t.co/FQfIRFTdfA
This video explores scapular dyskinesis and its relationship to shoulder pain. Contrary to common belief, recent studies indicate that scapular dyskinesis is not more prevalent in those experiencing shoulder pain…
This video discusses the misconceptions about scapular stabilization exercises and their effectiveness. It critically examines current beliefs, explores scapular motion, and presents evidence-based insights to improve…
Nelson and Matas analyze scapular dyskinesis and its prevalence in individuals with and without shoulder pain, challenging the assumption that it is more common in those with pain. They emphasize the impact of examiner…
RT @JaredPowell12: Assessing scapula motion remains important, but dyskinesia should not be automatically regarded as impairment; dissimila…
Assessing scapula motion remains important, but dyskinesia should not be automatically regarded as impairment; dissimilar scapula motion patterns bilaterally could suggest normal variability rather than impairment. https://t.co/jk9xSLdGl8
Have you been told your shoulder blade doesn’t move right? You may have been lied to The magic ratio of 2:1 (arm:shoulder blade) isn’t quite accurate Ratios of 1:1 to 6:1 have been seen in pain free populations It’s time to rethink scapular dyskinesis https://t.co/4LtTMYAFUd
RT @KH_Movement: @AdamMeakins I also love asking people to properly define scapular stability. They usually can’t give you a good answer.…
@AdamMeakins I also love asking people to properly define scapular stability. They usually can’t give you a good answer. This paper has some good discussion about that: https://t.co/FQfIRFTdfA
RT @Retlouping: https://t.co/JeJzHxk0LJ Critical and Theoretical Perspective on Scapular Stabilization: What Does It Really Mean, and Are…
RT @Retlouping: https://t.co/JeJzHxk0LJ Critical and Theoretical Perspective on Scapular Stabilization: What Does It Really Mean, and Are…
RT @Retlouping: https://t.co/JeJzHxk0LJ Critical and Theoretical Perspective on Scapular Stabilization: What Does It Really Mean, and Are…
RT @Retlouping: https://t.co/JeJzHxk0LJ Critical and Theoretical Perspective on Scapular Stabilization: What Does It Really Mean, and Are…
RT @Retlouping: https://t.co/JeJzHxk0LJ Critical and Theoretical Perspective on Scapular Stabilization: What Does It Really Mean, and Are…
https://t.co/JeJzHxk0LJ Critical and Theoretical Perspective on Scapular Stabilization: What Does It Really Mean, and Are We on the Right Track? “the current clinical scapu- lar stabilization paradigm is ambiguous, is flawed, and has limited support from current evidence.” https://t.co/6mJvla1kEU
@t_fibi I don’t think I said it was black or white anywhere?
Food for thought…
Causal mechanisms of a scapular stabilization intervention for patients with subacromial pain syndrome: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial https://t.co/YSFsE0NpVW
@scoombsdpt @BJSM_BMJ https://t.co/0qzmudFIq5
9/ Critical and Theoretical Perspective on Scapular Stabilization... https://t.co/zsROCGZSy6 Observational Scapular Dyskinesis... https://t.co/6zZITUZbD7 @LoriMichener The narrative on scapular dyskinesis has changed over the years and these highlight some contemporary ideas
@Sport_Ex_Dr @AndrewVCuff Hmmm... but is asymmetry of the scapula movement the problem, or is it perhaps the solution! Are you seeing the defect or the the defence? https://t.co/13Lgezf3Yi
@Lentini_PT A fun read to challenge biases surrounding the role of scapular activation patterns. Let me know if you need help with access. https://t.co/emqC0NKoLP
@AdamMeakins One of my favorite reviews on this topic: https://t.co/pP6OXz0OHr https://t.co/0jdJDoAOpW
See https://t.co/QAYim13ICN 2)most folks in real world setting.
@SeanGTGibbons 3/n Id argue what we label as scap generated pain should fall into this because A. Lots of heterogeneity in biomech studies suggesting wide kinematic variety and resting scap positions https://t.co/hguPuUB4Wl https://t.co/GljwCLpqlf