Discussions reflect a nuanced view, with some posts noting the study's findings on increased tooth decay and methodological limitations, while others question the interpretation or relevance of the data. The tone varies from cautious acknowledgment to skepticism, with references to specific data such as the comparison between Calgary and Edmonton and mentions of the importance of ongoing research.
AgreementModerate agreement
Most discussions express slight agreement or acknowledgment of the study’s findings, particularly around the increase in dental caries after fluoridation cessation.
InterestModerate interest
The discourse shows moderate interest, with participants referencing specific data points and study limitations, indicating engagement with the scientific content.
EngagementModerate engagement
Posts demonstrate active engagement by referencing studies, sharing sources, and discussing implications, showing a desire to understand the topic deeply.
ImpactModerate impact
The group collectively recognizes the potential implications of the study, especially related to public health policies on fluoridation, suggesting perceived significance.
Abstract in brief
This study compares the impact of stopping water fluoridation on dental caries in Grade 2 children from Calgary (where fluoridation stopped in 2011) and Edmonton (where it continued), analyzing changes in tooth decay over time, especially on smooth surfaces where fluoride's effect is most significant.
The researchers found that overall primary tooth decay increased more in Calgary after fluoridation stopped, suggesting an adverse short-term effect, while trends for permanent teeth showed a possible early negative impact that needs further monitoring.
The study emphasizes the importance of ongoing data collection to better understand the long-term effects of fluoridation cessation on children's dental health.]
"For example, in Canada alone since 2005, more than 30 communities have opted to discontinue fluoridation. To inform fluoridation decision-making, high-quality research on the impact of cessation is needed." https://t.co/WLnm7sYNyg
Jan 8, 2021 · 1 like · 2 shares · 442 followersView post →
YL
Yossarian's Locker
@YossarianLocker · X
@TJStiles_Author If there’s strong evidence one way or the other it’s definitely not in the study you cite, which is very measured and notes significant confounding variables. https://t.co/HngQFBo0kM
@Mmm80085 @TMrealityczech @JJCrosstrainers @JeromyYYC That study’s from 1997 and you’ve presented an uncorroborated summary from a 3rd party website. Here’s the actual new data (from the source) since we took fluoride out and our comparison to Edmonton: https://t.co/Ue7JCN7Od2. Findings showed dental health got much worse for us.
This study compares the effects of stopping water fluoridation on dental caries in Grade 2 children from Calgary and Edmonton, analyzing changes over time, particularly on tooth surfaces most affected by fluoride. The…
This episode discusses the short-term effects of stopping water fluoridation on dental caries in children, analyzing changes in tooth decay, especially on smooth surfaces, highlighting the importance of ongoing data…
"...and for all tooth surfaces (this manuscript, Table 1a) was muted when we focused on smooth surfaces only; and for mean DMFS among those with DMFS>0, the direction of change became positive (though non-significant)."
https://t.co/mSUFZRQ7y9
@dancapobianco13 @CDotterson @ShitpostGate A man of science eh? Please be reasonable and have a gawk at this:
https://t.co/1V2ANk2kXR
https://t.co/6uCAwcFusF
A paper published in this journal, "Measuring the short-term impact of fluoridation cessation on dental caries in Grade 2 children using tooth surface indices,"…
Source: PubMed https://t.co/0A7ikCP3vA
@TJStiles_Author If there’s strong evidence one way or the other it’s definitely not in the study you cite, which is very measured and notes significant confounding variables. https://t.co/HngQFBo0kM
@TJStiles_Author Here is the study: https://t.co/tmCqPxyMuA
It reports an increase in tooth decays in both locations (including the one where fluoride remained in the water) and no significant increase in tooth decay for permanent teeth.
The study further acknowledges weak study design...
@TonyRuizCSUDH @HeatherThomasAF @RobertKennedyJr Typical left-wing moron from Calgary posts repeated pictures of….search results from some of the least credible news sources on the planet. Try this Tony:
https://t.co/cdKPvs6bzs
https://t.co/QvzkuIb3tw
https://t.co/kOpclKxFnw
And those are just studies related to Calgary
Grunkle Stan (he/him) | Vaxed | Masked | Elbows up
@worstninjaever · X
@nyscof @jwilcox79 @sjohn2000 A 2016 study that compared tooth decay in children in Calgary and Edmonton (which maintained fluoridation) from 2004-2014.
There was "...an increase in primary tooth decay... in both cities, but the magnitude of the increase was greater in Calgary..."
https://t.co/WeWJk8Epsf
@dr_coffman @AlpacaAurelius They should focus on how tooth decay rates went down in the permanent teeth in Calagary in that study. "For all tooth surfaces among permanent teeth (Table 1a), there was a statistically significant decrease in Calgary, for the overall mean DMFS" https://t.co/OuOxoZVbfp
Measuring an increase in treatment for caries is not a good measure of a populations tooth decay. This is a variable that is modifiable. https://t.co/kwMbVCqBMe
RT @POH_Smiles: "For example, in Canada alone since 2005, more than 30 communities have opted to discontinue fluoridation. To inform fluorida…
Jan 8, 2021 · 2 shares · 1,540 followersView post →
P
POH
@POH_Smiles · X
"For example, in Canada alone since 2005, more than 30 communities have opted to discontinue fluoridation. To inform fluoridation decision-making, high-quality research on the impact of cessation is needed." https://t.co/WLnm7sYNyg
Jan 8, 2021 · 1 like · 2 shares · 442 followersView post →
AW
Artificial Drinking Water
@FluorideFreeYYC · X
In summary a lot of data clearly shows there is little to minimum advantages by adding chemicals to #YEG water to treat tooth decay... What we can educate on diet change, less soda drinks & cotton candy. We are exposed to Fluoride enough. Leave it out.✍️
@Mmm80085 @TMrealityczech @JJCrosstrainers @JeromyYYC That study’s from 1997 and you’ve presented an uncorroborated summary from a 3rd party website. Here’s the actual new data (from the source) since we took fluoride out and our comparison to Edmonton: https://t.co/Ue7JCN7Od2. Findings showed dental health got much worse for us.