The overall discussion reflects strong agreement with the article, as many posts highlight the continuum of replicator strategies—from selfish to cooperative—using words like 'decisive' and 'misguided' to underscore paradigm shifts. The tone is analytical and thoughtful, emphasizing the importance of redefining how viruses are conceptualized in biology.
AgreementModerate agreement
Most discussions align with the article's view that the old debate about whether viruses are alive is misguided, emphasizing the replicator paradigm as a clearer framework.
InterestHigh interest
Participants show high interest, with references to the paradigm, biological spectrum, and philosophical implications, indicating engagement with deep scientific questions.
EngagementHigh engagement
Many posts discuss concepts like selfish versus cooperative replicators, and cite specific examples like lytic and temperate viruses, demonstrating active and in-depth engagement.
ImpactModerate impact
The discussions seem to influence current understanding by challenging traditional notions and emphasizing a paradigm shift, thus having a moderate to high impact on the scientific discourse.
Abstract in brief
The debate over whether viruses are alive is considered misguided because it depends on arbitrary definitions of life, while the replicator paradigm offers a clearer way to understand their role in biology.
Within this framework, viruses are seen as selfish replicators, with some, like lytic viruses, being highly selfish, while others, such as temperate viruses, are closer to cooperative forms, illustrating a spectrum of replication strategies.
The evolution of life is driven by parasite-host interactions, where selfishness and cooperation among replicators, including viruses and other mobile elements, have shaped biological complexity through coevolution and ongoing adaptive "arms races."
32)
Referencias:
Al borde entre lo vivo y lo inerte:
2016. Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an old but misguided question
doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.016
https://t.co/lG7Lpb4M5s
Mar 9, 2020 · 79 likes · 8 shares · 67,232 followersView post →
DU
DNA&RNA Universe
@DNA_RNA_Uni · X
Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an old but misguided question
https://t.co/4EKktl9ygL
very interesting and readable paper
Dec 6, 2020 · 14 likes · 3 shares · 39,332 followersView post →
Dג
(((Dan Graur))) ダン דן גראור
@DanGraur · X
The world of viroids. The old misguided question "Are Viruses Alive" needs to be decisively and permanently buried and forgotten. https://t.co/1YzZpun29G
https://t.co/1qnSNDl1Vg
Mar 6, 2025 · 1 like · 1 share · 3,355 followersView post →
G
Gar✌
@9uillermo_A · X
@MrsDespechos Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an ... https://t.co/U4bzTRTEE0
Jan 22, 2020 · 1 like · 1,630 followersView post →
ÓP
Óscar{T} sci-phi
@Oscar_Teix · X
RT @DrBioblogo: 32)
Referencias:
Al borde entre lo vivo y lo inerte:
2016. Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light…
Mar 10, 2020 · 8 shares · 8,426 followersView post →
NF
Nigel Ten Fleming
@TenFleming · X
Authority opinion. “The question whether or not "viruses are alive" has caused considerable debate over many years.” (Eugene V Koonin).
https://t.co/rMEos1SSfn
What is the truth about viruses They evolve, grow, and can be killed by our immune system but are they actually alive Learn all about these ferocious little things in this new episode of SciShow hosted by Michael Aranda
The debate over whether viruses are alive is considered misguided because it depends on arbitrary definitions of life, while the replicator paradigm offers a clearer way to understand their role in biology. Viruses are…
The world of viroids. The old misguided question "Are Viruses Alive" needs to be decisively and permanently buried and forgotten. https://t.co/1YzZpun29G
https://t.co/1qnSNDl1Vg
Mar 6, 2025 · 1 like · 1 share · 3,355 followersView post →
ZG
Zorro guardapavos
@drxaverius.bsky.social · Bluesky
koonin al final lo llamaba misguided como pregunta, pero el approach que hay aquí es más cercano al mío que el systems biology del anti del otro paper y creo que es fácil ir de aceptar este paradigma a considerarlso vivos pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26965225/
@jensensuther @sckimbriel @deontologistics @lastpositivist example:
'Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an old but misguided question'
https://t.co/qSgkbL9fsL
And at least one philosopher (Carol Cleland) has written a book on https://t.co/V2uguHHd0B
Diverse continuum. “Selfish replicators not only belong to the biological realm but are intrinsic to any evolving system of replicators.” (Eugene V Koonin).
https://t.co/rMEos1SSfn
Diverse continuum. “Within this range, typical, lytic viruses represent the selfish extreme whereas temperate viruses and various mobile elements occupy positions closer to the middle of the range.” (Eugene V Koonin).
https://t.co/rMEos1Tq4V
Diverse continuum. “All biological replicators form a continuum along the selfishness-cooperativity axis, from the completely selfish to fully cooperative forms.” (Eugene V Koonin).
https://t.co/rMEos1SSfn
Authority opinion. “Yet, the question is effectively without substance because the answer depends entirely on the definition of life or the state of "being alive" that is bound to be arbitrary.” (Eugene V Koonin).
https://t.co/rMEos1SSfn
Authority opinion. “The question whether or not "viruses are alive" has caused considerable debate over many years.” (Eugene V Koonin).
https://t.co/rMEos1SSfn
Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an old but misguided question
https://t.co/4EKktl9ygL
very interesting and readable paper
Dec 6, 2020 · 14 likes · 3 shares · 39,332 followersView post →
M
markangelodelacruz27
@markangelo_dc27 · X
Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an old but misguided question https://t.co/HRzg9uX5zF
32)
Referencias:
Al borde entre lo vivo y lo inerte:
2016. Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an old but misguided question
doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.016
https://t.co/lG7Lpb4M5s
Mar 9, 2020 · 79 likes · 8 shares · 67,232 followersView post →
G
Gar✌
@9uillermo_A · X
@MrsDespechos Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an ... https://t.co/U4bzTRTEE0
Jan 22, 2020 · 1 like · 1,630 followersView post →
G
Gar✌
@9uillermo_A · X
Son seres vivos los virus? #Science Are viruses alive? The replicator paradigm sheds decisive light on an ... https://t.co/U4bzTRTEE0.
#ParaProfundizarEnNuestraIgnorancia.
2.2 Are Viruses Alive - The Replicator Paradigm Sheds Decisive ...
News
pends on the definition of life or of the “state of being alive”. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.016 1369-8486/Ó 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd ...
in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Science. 59: 125–134. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.016. PMC 5406846. PMID 26965225. Rybicki, EP ( ...
Had'N Archean Proterozoic Pha.: Jump To Navigationjump To ...
News
doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.016. PMC 5406846. PMID 26965 225. 33. ^ Rybicki, EP (1990). "The classification of organisms at the edge of life, or problems ...