Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions mainly revolve around the research findings, with users emphasizing that grouped super-setting offers minimal gains but increases muscle damage, as shown in phrases like 'minimal increase in gains' and 'grouped is bad to recover from.' The tone is informative and cautious, reflecting a focus on practical implications rather than emotional reactions.
Most discussions agree that the article indicates minimal differences in strength gains between training methods, supported by statements like 'minimal increase in gains' and acknowledgment of muscle damage concerns.
The posts show moderate interest, as they focus on specific findings about muscle damage and recovery, reflecting curiosity but not deep passion.
The exchanges are brief and mostly summarizing the findings, with little in-depth analysis or personal reflection, indicating a neutral engagement level.
Participants recognize the importance of the research for training strategies and recovery, suggesting the study could influence practice or perspectives in strength training.
@orth0girl https://t.co/PnrQggyA0C Essentially it states there is minimal increase in gains in grouped compared to separated, while there is a highly significant increase in creatine kinase, a substance that is released due to muscle damage. So basically grouped is bad to recover from.
RT @bigdickazrael: @orth0girl https://t.co/PnrQggyA0C Essentially it states there is minimal increase in gains in grouped compared to separ…
Over the years we have been introduced to countless training approaches all claiming to work better than the last. This video examines 5 popular training strategies that are ineffective for muscle growth, helping you to…
Does performing supersets help build muscle and improve progress? I review the science to explain how to maximize results with supersets and whether they are beneficial. Follow for more insights on training techniques.
RT @bigdickazrael: @orth0girl https://t.co/PnrQggyA0C Essentially it states there is minimal increase in gains in grouped compared to separ…
@orth0girl https://t.co/PnrQggyA0C Essentially it states there is minimal increase in gains in grouped compared to separated, while there is a highly significant increase in creatine kinase, a substance that is released due to muscle damage. So basically grouped is bad to recover from.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1847-1858. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001511. PubMed PMID: 27243916. Prestes J, A Tibana ...
2017;31(7):1847-1858. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001511. Isn't this a strength training routine rather than a muscle size building routine? If you are asking ...
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001511. 16.1.2022.]. Dostupno na: https://eurodrg ... doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003230. 10.1177/0269215514546770. 36 ...
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001511. PMID: 27243916. 2) Schoenfeld BJ, Pope ZK, Benik FM, Hester GM, Sellers J, Nooner JL, Schnaiter JA, Bond ...
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1847-1858. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001511. ‣ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27243916 Robbins DW, ...
AM
S