Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reveal a consensus around the idea that high LDL cholesterol may actually be beneficial for longevity, with phrases such as 'high cholesterol is linked to longevity' and references to significant studies lending credibility to this view. Additionally, users express their intent to further explore the implications for treatment standards, portraying a tone of urgency and curiosity about reevaluating traditional beliefs about cholesterol and heart health.
Most discussions reflect a strong agreement with the study's findings that higher LDL cholesterol may not be harmful and can even be protective for the elderly.
Participants show significant interest in the topic, indicating its relevance to ongoing debates about cholesterol management in older adults.
While some discussions delve into the scientific details, others remain more surface-level, suggesting a moderate level of engagement overall.
Many participants perceive the study's findings as having a significant impact on how cholesterol is viewed in relation to aging and mortality.
Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique que le cholestérol LDL est en réalité "inversement associé à la mortalité" chez les + de 60 ans
"There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Drugs & PPI Heartburn Medicines Cited Research: https://t.co/hGjvGuv9VH https://t.co/stA4sYzvxM https://t.co/UgZ6El26Yx https://t.co/KZejrRfRDZ
13) Here are DOIs of our papers on the topic. 10.1371/journal.pone.0205138 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.09.019 10.1080/17512433.2018.1519391 10.1586/17512433.2015.1102009 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010401 10.1586/17512433.2015.1012494 I'll cover this at: https://t.co/FKka3JoSaZ
People with high LDL live longer than those having low LDL. https://t.co/p6IMJgOADB
@DoctorTro @hormonedietdoc If I had an ldl problem I’d keep reading this over and over: https://t.co/O11mwjG1ng
@cremieuxrecueil Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review https://t.co/6a0rEw6Y9l
Scientifically dismantling misconceptions about cholesterol, this video discusses a systematic review examining the relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and mortality in individuals aged 60…
This video delves into the fundamental principles of quantum physics, exploring its implications and applications in modern science. Gain insights into key concepts and discover how quantum mechanics shapes our…
Dr. Nasha Winters discusses the lack of a clear relationship between LDL cholesterol levels and mortality in the elderly, highlighting recent findings that suggest higher LDL-C may not be as harmful as once believed…
LDL cholesterol has been termed 'the bad cholesterol' for years, but new insights challenge this notion. This video unveils the latest research suggesting that higher LDL levels in older adults may not pose as much risk…
RT @BradCLemley: @DoctorTro @hormonedietdoc If I had an ldl problem I’d keep reading this over and over: https://t.co/O11mwjG1ng
RT @BradCLemley: @DoctorTro @hormonedietdoc If I had an ldl problem I’d keep reading this over and over: https://t.co/O11mwjG1ng
@DoctorTro @hormonedietdoc If I had an ldl problem I’d keep reading this over and over: https://t.co/O11mwjG1ng
@cremieuxrecueil Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review https://t.co/6a0rEw6Y9l
@kb_french @cremieuxrecueil https://t.co/6a0rEw6Y9l Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review
@Fynnderella1 @tatiann69922625 @LDLSkeptic I'm interested, as I will be writing about the link between statins and dementia/AD progression.
@mics4truth @bamajayt High cholesterol is linked to longevity. Ravnskov et al., “Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review” (Published in BMJ Open, June 2016) Here’s the vaccine schedule: https://t.co/Epq15PpMml
@DrNeilStone Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review https://t.co/nmtKbcG7gi That high LDL-C may be protective is in accordance with the finding that LDL-C is lower than nl in pts with MIs.
@ValerieAnne1970 Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review https://t.co/nmtKbcG7gi That high LDL-C may be protective is in accordance with the finding that LDL-C is lower than nl in pts w MIs
「LDL-Cと高齢者の死亡率は逆相関しているか、相関がなかった」 https://t.co/rshnsN4Uen
@askamys @ifixhearts Read this study for example https://t.co/znxxBbmolh
@ifixhearts I know about this one https://t.co/znxxBbmolh
@seconds_0 https://t.co/5J86gm2JqN claims the quoted study did not control for selection effects. would be interesting to see someone do a full review but i am not yet convinced
I have a degree in nutrition. We've known this Citation: Ravnskov, U., Diamond, D. M., Hama, R., et al. (2016). Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review. BMJ Open, 6(6), https://t.co/grOb9NshwF
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
@TvlCampagnol Pareil
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
RT @PanDanTag: Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique…
Beaucoup de risques pour gagner 3 à 4 jours d'espérance de vie non ? D'autant que cette étude publiée en 2016 nous indique que le cholestérol LDL est en réalité "inversement associé à la mortalité" chez les + de 60 ans
@cbm64 Triglycerides:HDL is what matters (Marion Holman posts on this platform for studies). High LDL is likely actually protective. https://t.co/2QuoTZWoG3
Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review https://t.co/2TNk43J8ib --「高LDL（悪玉コレステロール）は、殆どの60歳以上の死亡率を下げる
@pharesFIRE2023 https://t.co/hGjvGuv9VH the higher your Cholesterol, the longer you live.
RT @busnek0: Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a s…
@PeterFaberSP @reallyoptimized @nicknorwitz @realDaveFeldman Or may be not! See: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.05.030 or 10.1371/journal.pone.0287923, or 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010401, or 10.1080/17512433.2018.1519391 ...
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
@SkepticalCent @miketra521 The reverse is actually true if you live over 60 (and most of us will cholesterol has a reverse correlation "Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review" BMJ study 2016. Even with
@Losing200Pounds @MT072018 Sources: https://t.co/vyLeHhP6o3 https://t.co/SheM7iZhIQ > High LDL-C is inversely associated with mortality in most people over 60 years. This finding is inconsistent with the cholesterol hypothesis (ie, that cholesterol, particularly LDL-C, is inherently atherogenic)
@ifixhearts Totally agree! I was surprised by the research confirming that high LDLC levels are not generally linked to shorter lifespan . https://t.co/5n8pW776lF
RT @arunkumar3112: People with high LDL live longer than those having low LDL. https://t.co/p6IMJgOADB
People with high LDL live longer than those having low LDL. https://t.co/p6IMJgOADB
A systematic review!! https://t.co/hAzbsbn0wb
@Carol_Kay1234 @ElieJarrougeMD Most reliable date IMHO is total mortality in large populations vs. LDL. Either no correlation or low LDL is the worst. No evidence that higher LDL is dangerous. The fasting insulin to blood glucose ratio, hardly ever tested, is the one to worry about. https://t.co/EI5mga8ZfW
@judeonevone @PamPickard @toobaffled yep that's it https://t.co/foPPpAshSS
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
@RAHulYadav0101 @VigilantFox The study Dr. Marik referenced is "Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review" by Ravnskov et al., published in BMJ Open, June 2016. It analyzed 19 cohort studies and found high
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
Study puts into question the cholesterol hypothesis... "Elderly people with high LDL-Choleterol live as long or longer than those with low LDL-Cholesterol" SHOULD DOCTORS STOP PRESCRIBING STATINS? https://t.co/a84G4FwZxj
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
RT @VigilantFox: Next, Marik showcased a staggering study from The British Medical Journal, often referred to as one of the most reputable…
@Dr_dreamchaser @johnbugay @ElieJarrougeMD @JeffKnowles57 Really? https://t.co/cn5Ex9B5zO or https://t.co/P4b0QsT57M
@Metabolic_Mind @ProfTimNoakes Right, not to mention this: https://t.co/O11mwjG1ng
RT @BradCLemley: @LDLSkeptic @ianriddockmd @JohnKastelein @thalesnemo @ProfTimNoakes @DoctorTro @DominicDAgosti2 @lowcarbGP @SBakerMD @etha…
RT @Aldhissla45: @bryan_johnson Incorrect: ‘Lack of an association or an inverse association between LDL cholesterol and mortality in the…
RT @Aldhissla45: @bryan_johnson Incorrect: ‘Lack of an association or an inverse association between LDL cholesterol and mortality in the…
@bryan_johnson Incorrect: ‘Lack of an association or an inverse association between LDL cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review’ https://t.co/2HJjZ2kKO4 https://t.co/onaVfawAlh
@MonikaWysocka9 @PBasiukiewicz @Flis10Flis @pamiechomeblog Do tego zmierzam, że nie LDL nie może być demonizowany ani traktowany w oderwaniu od innych wyników. Na diecie low-carb wysoki LDL jest naturalny: https://t.co/y5gN34bn8p A u osób starszych jest wręcz odwrotnie skorelowany ze współczynnikiem śmiertelności: https://t.co/cn5Ex9AxKg
@healthsentry @drscottyk If you are really interested, pay attention to this: https://t.co/9eUXvNgzvd https://t.co/CPlZpYs1HT https://t.co/0AFeLKzw2d I can add more, but this is enough to understand - you need to stay away from statins as much as possible.
@SBakerMD 6.Statins prevent heart attacks. https://t.co/CPlZpYs1HT
@TomaszLaszcz @Konrad06527208 @MoritzSant @maciejbanach "Wysoki poziom LDL-C (cholesterolu LDL) jest odwrotnie związany ze śmiertelnością u większości osób powyżej 60. roku życia. To odkrycie jest niezgodne z hipotezą cholesterolową, która sugeruje, że cholesterol, zwłaszcza LDL-C powoduje miażdżycę". https://t.co/RwFBnZnnZc
@Konrad06527208 @TomaszLaszcz @MoritzSant @maciejbanach https://t.co/RwFBnZnnZc https://t.co/JPVw8w0yC4 https://t.co/BtLkU4RfZy https://t.co/dRt8mH6DSh https://t.co/D6zIIHxZwP
@ParolDamian Nie twierdzę, że nie i się nie mądrzę, pytam mądrzejszego, ale jak to się ma do meta analiz wskazujących odwrotną zależność i wręcz zawierających sugestię podniesienia norm? https://t.co/gceQjlDj4N https://t.co/7RA9WSnY5L Nie mam o tym bladego pojęcia ale umiem w google foo i
3/5 One study involving over 68,000 elderly individuals found that higher LDL cholesterol was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. https://t.co/ppaM5UhOtj #HealthResearch #Aging #303bbq #thehealthypitmaster
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
"There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Drugs & PPI Heartburn Medicines Cited Research: https://t.co/hGjvGuv9VH https://t.co/stA4sYzvxM https://t.co/UgZ6El26Yx https://t.co/KZejrRfRDZ
RT @ValerieAnne1970: "There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Dr…
"There's No Relationship Between Cholesterol & Heart Disease" @DrPeterGlidden Stop Taking Immediately.... Statin Drugs & PPI Heartburn Medicines https://t.co/hGjvGuv9VH https://t.co/stA4sYzvxM https://t.co/UgZ6El26Yx https://t.co/ZNHXvGfsKt
@P_McCulloughMD https://t.co/pchoW2NzMQ
@bigfatsurprise Dear @PatsyDiabetes Not even you would survive without a high LDL as LDL is essential for microbe fighting and a long life. Remember a researcher tries to prove a hypothesis while a scientist tries to falsify a hypothesis. We falsified the LDL cause CVD https://t.co/Vghsdgqxy4
@JeremyM71562220 @G_Rhodenizer @umlaut @heartandsoilHQ 1. https://t.co/E9lehxzR8C 2. https://t.co/bs806DX5GF
Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review https://t.co/Xs7hRJVS9h
@DoctorTro @realDaveFeldman Confirmation of our 2016 article Uffe Ravnskov, et al Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review BMJ Open Jun 2016, 6 (6) e010401; DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010401
Use of the epithet ‘denier’ bespeaks a profound misunderstanding of what science is and what scientists do. Science is this: does that model fit this data? And nothing more. This article by Diamond has >350 citations: DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010401 https://t.co/9Ip9qmE2eB
@MichaelAlbertMD LDL is not directly measured on a standard blood test ! There is RCT proof of causation of LDL as reported on a standard blood test with any disease process. 1️⃣ https://t.co/ySLQ4teXWm 2️⃣ https://t.co/6S32S4I01y 3️⃣ https://t.co/X2f6HMRrHw
RT @thalesnemo: @MattBMartin @annavwellness @Losing200Pounds In a standard blood test LDL is calculated NOT measured nor is it centrifuged…
@MattBMartin @annavwellness @Losing200Pounds In a standard blood test LDL is calculated NOT measured nor is it centrifuged to differentiate large fluffy LDL vs small dense damaged LDL particles! https://t.co/J1wb4NwWEN ➡️ https://t.co/ySLQ4teXWm ➡️ https://t.co/6S32S4I01y ➡️ https://t.co/X2f6HMRrHw
@Sano2h8 @drmarkhyman Please post (DOIs) the RCT evidence which proves that LDL is CAUSAL to any disease process . 1️⃣ https://t.co/ySLQ4teXWm 2️⃣ https://t.co/6S32S4I01y 3️⃣ https://t.co/X2f6HMRrHw 4️⃣ https://t.co/IduxfJ3mrR
@renatodumbra @Plant_proof 2 / 1️⃣ https://t.co/ySLQ4teXWm 2️⃣ https://t.co/6S32S4I01y 3️⃣ https://t.co/X2f6HMRrHw 4️⃣ https://t.co/IduxfJ3mrR 5️⃣ https://t.co/9dCaoquSvh https://t.co/5KZ1bpZUvR
RT @LDLSkeptic: @troglowbyte @nicknorwitz @grahamsphillips @MalagaMilly @CarolHo03279746 @PharmacistPaleo @PeterAttiaMD @FatEmperor @UKLowC…
RT @LDLSkeptic: @troglowbyte @nicknorwitz @grahamsphillips @MalagaMilly @CarolHo03279746 @PharmacistPaleo @PeterAttiaMD @FatEmperor @UKLowC…
@troglowbyte @nicknorwitz @grahamsphillips @MalagaMilly @CarolHo03279746 @PharmacistPaleo @PeterAttiaMD @FatEmperor @UKLowCarbPod @DanGreef SGC - Yes, I've been contacted by cardio docs & I've had the pleasure to work with cardio docs, e.g., @DrAseemMalhotra who are scholars. I've also published with cardiologists on LDL/CHD: doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010401 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111412 the times they are a changing
@dylanarmbruste3 @AarushP1 @hormonedietdoc Your comment up thread is an appeal to “your authority “ you offer NO evidence, NO data , there it is dismissed without a scintilla of doubt!1️⃣ https://t.co/MsoBKqcRuV 2️⃣ https://t.co/X2f6HMRrHw 3️⃣ https://t.co/6S32S4I01y 4️⃣ https://t.co/IduxfJ3mrR 5️⃣ https://t.co/vF1aAYiaXG https://t.co/pypTASVjrt
@TylerCartwright @The_Nutrivore @JesseLunsford @mosca_matthew @BiggestComeback @NutritionMadeS3 Graph or not the key question, not yet answered, is that LDL has not been shown to be causative when all confounders are subtracted . No Association of LDL with any disease process 16 out 19 trials https://t.co/6S32S4I01y Review > BMJ Open . 2016 : https://t.co/X2f6HMRrHw .
@The_Nutrivore @JesseLunsford @TylerCartwright @mosca_matthew @BiggestComeback @NutritionMadeS3 2/2 No Association of LDL with any disease process 16 out 19 trials https://t.co/nFtBrvVUdO Review > BMJ Open . 2016 Jun 12 ; 6 ( 6 ) : 4010401 . doi : https://t.co/X2f6HMRrHw .
Lancet 2001; 358:351-55, https://t.co/Ai0423qo6M Estos estudios contradicen la "sabiduría popular" y de muchos médicos, que está alimentada por los intereses de la industria farmacéutica.
@noCHObro @DaveKeto @FatEmperor Total cholesterol is a mix of HDL+LDL, so it's not an ideal measure. We have the only review paper I know of linking high LDL-C to longevity in the elderly: doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010401
RT @LDLSkeptic: @julestw9 @neeche41 @mrc314 @holmanm @FatEmperor https://t.co/5N2q5czZP8
@julestw9 @neeche41 @mrc314 @holmanm @FatEmperor https://t.co/5N2q5czZP8
@Plantbiased @gerdosi @newyorker1213 2016 SR (19 studies, 30 cohorts, n=68094) on LDL-C and ACM in elderly is concordant doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010401. Talking about LDL-C without context of metabolic health is pretty meaningless IMO. Even in the "best case" elevated LDL-C has 1.5HR, while MetS is 4-6.
@Allan1246 @drmarkhyman my CVD-related pubs: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205138;10.1016/j.mehy.2018.09.019; 10.1080/17512433.2018.1519391;10.1586/17512433.2015.1102009; 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010401;10.1586/17512433.2015.1012494 for diet pubs: https://t.co/zJycBVKjUm @zoeharcombe @DrAseemMalhotra @FatEmperor
13) Here are DOIs of our papers on the topic. 10.1371/journal.pone.0205138 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.09.019 10.1080/17512433.2018.1519391 10.1586/17512433.2015.1102009 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010401 10.1586/17512433.2015.1012494 I'll cover this at: https://t.co/FKka3JoSaZ