Sugary drinks and chronic disease Khan TA, Sievenpiper JL. Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease and diabetes. Eur J Nutr. 2016 Nov;55(Suppl 2):25-43
Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease and diabetes.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2019 – Jul 2025Where it's discussed
-
Facebook16 posts
-
X / Twitter15 posts
-
News8 articles
-
YouTube4 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The overall tone reflects a strong interest in scientific evidence, as seen in posts citing systematic reviews and high-quality studies, such as Sievenpiper's work, which argue that fructose isn't more harmful than other sugars when calorie intake is matched. The words and tone highlight a critical, evidence-based approach that encourages re-evaluating common assumptions about sugars and health, fostering deep engagement among participants.
Most discussions support the article's main conclusion that sugars, including fructose, are not uniquely harmful when caloric intake is controlled, showing alignment with the publication's findings.
The discussions demonstrate high interest, with many posters referencing detailed studies and engaging in nuanced debates about sugar's health effects.
Posts include references to specific research and methodological critiques, indicating deep engagement with the topic.
The discussions could influence opinions about dietary sugar, especially by challenging common perceptions, though they may have limited immediate influence beyond academic and health-conscious communities.
Abstract in brief
- Systematic reviews and high-quality studies have not proven that fructose-containing sugars are more harmful than other digestible carbohydrates when it comes to obesity, heart disease, or diabetes; their effects are primarily linked to the excess calories they provide.
- Observational studies suggest a connection between sugary drinks and health risks like obesity and diabetes, but this is likely because these drinks are part of an overall unhealthy lifestyle, not solely because of the sugar content.
- Focusing solely on sugar content isn't enough for a healthy diet; it's important to consider the entire dietary pattern and lifestyle, including nutrient quality and calorie balance, rather than just restricting specific sugars.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyNow consider this MA of isocaloric substitution trials: https://t.co/yxft6jPPI0 Fructose was exchanged for other CHO under energy-matched conditions. We can see that fructose has no uniquely harmful effect, when it’s substituted in place of other sugars and carbohydrates
@arodriguezllach Le añado info al debate: 1.El azúcar añadido a las bebibas es más perjudicial que en comidas https://t.co/dTwVa9A8Ex 2. Se puede mejorar el diseño del impuesto https://t.co/OyL10STsjS 3. Casi toda la región tiene algún tipo de impuesto, menos Colombia https://t.co/TU1HR0QrVa https://t.co/fcZfCM2mH2
@ascentovalhalla @CakeNutrition @edgefitnessper1 @Caveman_1975 @CanenePhd @ahhite @rustnutrition @Wendi_Irlbeck @StephHfitness @RDValerie @BioLayne @DNSatUofI Fructose on it own is only supported by ecological studies, animal models of overfeeding and select human intervention studies with supraphysiological doses or lack of control for energy. Read this (science vs uncontrolled "DocSci" (sim to BroSci
@ACShilton @6thsensemoment In that case I will tell you that there is no evidence fructose is any worse than other sugars when ingested in excess (or in moderation). UofT prof Sievenpiper has done a dozen studies on this. All sugar is equally as bad - major data here: https://t.co/K5rcRnFd7S
@MyNutritionSci @MattMadore576 @Alecsplaining @NutritionMadeS3 @krosenque @ScepticalDoctor @drmatthewnagra @fumimamu @JohnG_UK @TheVeganRD @JackNorrisRD @deirdre_tobias Similar to the fructose story: robust evidence from SR & MA of controlled trials doesnt show a "unique" fructose risk (obesity/T2DM) ie fructose-containing sugars don't behave any diff from other forms of carbohydrtaes {when in surplus} https://t.co/K5rcRnnBJi
All mentions
Effects of Cutting Sugar for 7 Days: What You Need to Know
Discover what happens when you eliminate sugar for a week. The video explores the effects on your body and dispels common myths about sugar's role in health, emphasizing the importance of overall dietary habits over…
The Truth About Sugar and Weight Management
This video explores the relationship between dietary sugar intake and body weight. It highlights findings from systematic reviews indicating that reducing sugar consumption can lead to weight loss in adults, while…
Effects of Eliminating Sugar for 7 Days Personal Experiment and Insights
What happens when you give up sugar for 7 days? This video explores the physical, mental, and daily impacts based on current studies, personal experiences, and surprising revelations. Focus on overall diet and lifestyle…
Debunking Myths About Fruit Consumption and Health Risks
Many believe that eating fruit is unhealthy, but this is false. Scientific evidence shows fruit consumption is beneficial and not directly linked to obesity or diabetes when consumed as part of a balanced diet.
291: La fruta provoca cáncer y diabetes
Now consider this MA of isocaloric substitution trials: https://t.co/yxft6jPPI0 Fructose was exchanged for other CHO under energy-matched conditions. We can see that fructose has no uniquely harmful effect, when it’s substituted in place of other sugars and carbohydrates
砂糖に関する論争: 肥満、心血管代謝疾患、糖尿病に関するシステマティック レビューControversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease a… https://t.co/B91E37RTrZ
@ACShilton @6thsensemoment In that case I will tell you that there is no evidence fructose is any worse than other sugars when ingested in excess (or in moderation). UofT prof Sievenpiper has done a dozen studies on this. All sugar is equally as bad - major data here: https://t.co/K5rcRnFd7S
RT @omedinacruz: @arodriguezllach Le añado info al debate: 1.El azúcar añadido a las bebibas es más perjudicial que en comidas https://t.c…
@arodriguezllach Le añado info al debate: 1.El azúcar añadido a las bebibas es más perjudicial que en comidas https://t.co/dTwVa9A8Ex 2. Se puede mejorar el diseño del impuesto https://t.co/OyL10STsjS 3. Casi toda la región tiene algún tipo de impuesto, menos Colombia https://t.co/TU1HR0QrVa https://t.co/fcZfCM2mH2
@MyNutritionSci @MattMadore576 @Alecsplaining @NutritionMadeS3 @krosenque @ScepticalDoctor @drmatthewnagra @fumimamu @JohnG_UK @TheVeganRD @JackNorrisRD @deirdre_tobias Similar to the fructose story: robust evidence from SR & MA of controlled trials doesnt show a "unique" fructose risk (obesity/T2DM) ie fructose-containing sugars don't behave any diff from other forms of carbohydrtaes {when in surplus} https://t.co/K5rcRnnBJi
@MrFibbers I tried to find something specifically on sugar. This says sugar isn't really different from any other carbohydrate, but that on an individual level removing sugary drinks from your diet is good strategy: https://t.co/XGMlhNs1gI
RT @DrMauricioGon: Sugary drinks and chronic disease Khan TA, Sievenpiper JL. Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews…
RT @DrMauricioGon: Sugary drinks and chronic disease Khan TA, Sievenpiper JL. Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews…
RT @DrMauricioGon: Sugary drinks and chronic disease Khan TA, Sievenpiper JL. Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews…
Sugary drinks and chronic disease Khan TA, Sievenpiper JL. Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease and diabetes. Eur J Nutr. 2016 Nov;55(Suppl 2):25-43
@Bjorn_the_Beefy @BioPhysChemMark @rdbsmiles @DaveKeto @DoctorTro @BioLayne https://t.co/wPucklQN8B https://t.co/H9UXBRyOlJ https://t.co/qg6ZeD5iLZ https://t.co/3Z7QBgxCeb https://t.co/MOgl2emqFU https://t.co/Xj4R5fPqrz
RT @NanciGuestRDPhD: @ascentovalhalla @CakeNutrition @edgefitnessper1 @Caveman_1975 @CanenePhd @ahhite @rustnutrition @Wendi_Irlbeck @Steph…
@ascentovalhalla @CakeNutrition @edgefitnessper1 @Caveman_1975 @CanenePhd @ahhite @rustnutrition @Wendi_Irlbeck @StephHfitness @RDValerie @BioLayne @DNSatUofI Fructose on it own is only supported by ecological studies, animal models of overfeeding and select human intervention studies with supraphysiological doses or lack of control for energy. Read this (science vs uncontrolled "DocSci" (sim to BroSci
Controversies about sugars: results from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on obesity, cardiometabolic disease and diabetes https://t.co/mc1IFoHWKp