Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall tone reflects skepticism, with posts like 'Les charlatans de l'ostéopathie' and references to non-scientific practices such as hairdressers moving skull bones showing dismissiveness. Posts citing the 2016 systematic review highlight the lack of reliable evidence, reinforcing a narrative that the practice is ineffective and unscientific, often expressed through dismissive or confrontational language.
Most discussions strongly oppose cranial osteopathy, emphasizing the lack of scientific support and calling the practice bogus.
The posts show moderate interest, primarily focused on criticizing or dismissing the procedure without deeply exploring its implications.
Several discussions only briefly mention skepticism or share strong opinions, indicating superficial engagement rather than detailed analysis.
While the posts influence opinions against cranial osteopathy, they do not seem to result in widespread behavior change or policy impact, judging by tone and content.
Nuestros resultados demuestran, de manera consistente, que la evidencia metodológicamente sólida sobre la confiabilidad de los procedimientos de diagnóstico y la eficacia de las técnicas y estrategias terapéuticas en osteopatía craneal es casi inexistente. https://t.co/wY979aqrph
@nferrara1002 It’s a winner
@AshisArmyPhysio Reliability of Diagnosis and Clinical Efficacy of Cranial Osteopathy: A Systematic Review https://t.co/MvKzK8ZAj5 https://t.co/Szb2F7Tt9b
【頭蓋(クラニアル)セラピーの今】
https://t.co/e9A8ghE8Lj revisión de la literatura científica sobre la Osteopatía craneal sobre su fiabilidad diagnóstica y la eficacia clínica. Spoiler: Nooooo hay buenos resultados!!!
@Fraslin Les charlatans de l'ostéopathie : https://t.co/AdaNPNoEFd
This video reviews the reliability and clinical efficacy of cranial osteopathy, highlighting that scientific evidence supporting its effectiveness remains weak and inconsistent. It emphasizes the need for high-quality…
For over a century, debates around osteopathy have focused on its benefits and limitations. This video explores its origins, theoretical basis, regulatory status, and examines scientific research on its efficacy…
@HallaMartin @HO2604 „Our results demonstrate, consistently with those of previous reviews, that methodologically strong evidence on the reliability of diagnostic procedures and the efficacy of techniques and therapeutic strategies in cranial osteopathy is almost non-existent.“https://t.co/ApYJGmkxuk
@sabine_kohne @Agippo_Vermith @CBGSpender Ich lüge nicht. https://t.co/yArs5bEFLW https://t.co/zISIK4A79L https://t.co/bRR61QPuo7
https://t.co/DacirYcIJQ
@Fraslin Les charlatans de l'ostéopathie : https://t.co/AdaNPNoEFd
Les coiffeurs aussi font bouger les os du crâne
@Ventilusse @CitronAlcalin @DocPepper_FR "Quelle étude irait prouver le contraire ?" https://t.co/jvbQ2ZtGSK https://t.co/ynIrtuf1dX
@GaryR850R @steflilu @NEFTraveller Erst denken, dann pöbeln. https://t.co/bRR61QPuo7 https://t.co/uumBmyK8l2 https://t.co/X60l0MKoqe https://t.co/RrbYuVk8EP
RT @AndrsLogrono: Nuestros resultados demuestran, de manera consistente, que la evidencia metodológicamente sólida sobre la confiabilidad d…
RT @AndrsLogrono: Nuestros resultados demuestran, de manera consistente, que la evidencia metodológicamente sólida sobre la confiabilidad d…
RT @AndrsLogrono: Nuestros resultados demuestran, de manera consistente, que la evidencia metodológicamente sólida sobre la confiabilidad d…
Nuestros resultados demuestran, de manera consistente, que la evidencia metodológicamente sólida sobre la confiabilidad de los procedimientos de diagnóstico y la eficacia de las técnicas y estrategias terapéuticas en osteopatía craneal es casi inexistente. https://t.co/wY979aqrph
@Sate0161 @_Gwennax @K0haa_ Alors c'est pas les miennes hein, moi je donne pas mon avis contrairement à vous, et ensuite tiens en voilà quelque unes mais je vais pas retourner internet pour toi 1) https://t.co/HLUpUklAwe 2) https://t.co/4pdhsTbEeQ 3) https://t.co/n5X9I0u68S 4) https://t.co/o0nCqJaray
@Barbuzard @st__gu @malika_lambry @AviScene_ https://t.co/CpmAvi15R6 ???¿? https://t.co/plqDaKFe5E nan mais vraiment, c'est étrange. Vous voulez que je continue avec d'autres pratiques ?
@ian_rodd @apsmunro @Abi_Rimmer https://t.co/6fvFA7vNR9 A 2016 review showing that diagnostic reliability and efficacy of cranial osteopathy is “almost non-existent”
RT @TrainerWao: 【頭蓋(クラニアル)セラピーの今】
【頭蓋(クラニアル)セラピーの今】
@VintageKidsNL @aliettejonkers @B_de_Boer @artinspector @Cath77777 Daar is @kwakzalverij het duidelijk niet mee eens. https://t.co/lGnm8DMiVS
@AshisArmyPhysio Reliability of Diagnosis and Clinical Efficacy of Cranial Osteopathy: A Systematic Review https://t.co/MvKzK8ZAj5 https://t.co/Szb2F7Tt9b
@CharleneGyt Enfin de façon générale la littérature ne soutient pas l'efficacité de l'ostéopathie crânienne. https://t.co/0HrPjQ4iro
@autonomusfisiu1 @ColFiCat Por cierto, te paso conclusiones de otra revisión sistemática de craneal: Guillaud A, Darbois N, Monvoisin R, Pinsault N (2016) Reliability of Diagnosis and Clinical Efficacy of Cranial Osteopathy: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0167823. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167823
https://t.co/e9A8ghE8Lj revisión de la literatura científica sobre la Osteopatía craneal sobre su fiabilidad diagnóstica y la eficacia clínica. Spoiler: Nooooo hay buenos resultados!!!
@nferrara1002 It’s a winner
id=10.1371/journal.pone. 0167823. Reliability of Diagnosis and Clinical Efficacy of Cranial Osteopathy: A Systematic Review. JOURNALS.PLOS.ORG. Reliability of ...
PLoS ONE, 11(12), e0167823. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0167823 L'épisode est disponible ici : http://www.scepticisme-scientifique.com/episode- 367 ...
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012321 oceanog.2012.18. Gollner, S., B. Govenar ... doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7823-y ability of the TAG non-buoyant plume, 26 N ...
one 11 (12), e0167823. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167823. Hawk, C.; Phongphua, C.; Bleecker, J.; Swank, L.; Lopez, D.; Rubley, T. (1999): Pre-. liminary ...
PloS one 11, 12, e0167823. https://doi. 8. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167823. Nuotio A (2022) Johdatus biodynaamiseen kra- Guillaud A, Darbois N, Monvoisin R ...
2016;11:e0167823. https://doi.org/10.1371/ 1. Abbott JH, Wilson R, Pinto D, Chapple CM, 12. Chimenti RL, Frey-Law LA, Sluka KA. A mecha- journal.pone.0167823
2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0167823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167823. PMID: 27936211; PMCID: PMC5147986. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles ...
2016, 11:e0167823. 10.1371/journal.pone.0167823 99. Crow WT, King HH, Patterson RM, Giuliano V: Assessment of calvarial structure motion by ...
2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0167823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167823. PMID: 27936211; PMCID: PMC5147986. #osteopathie #osteo #osteopathiecranienne.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0167823; Jakel A, et al. (2011). Therapeutic effects of cranial osteopathic ...
... ;11(12):e0167823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167823. PMID: 27936211; PMCID: PMC5147986. . . https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27936211 ...
x [6]:Guillaud A et al.; PLoS ONE 2016, 11(12): e0167823. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167823 [7]:Guillaud et al. BMC Complementary and ...
... e0167823. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167823 [7]:Guillaud et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2018) 18:65. doi: 10.1186/s12906 ...
It has no meaning for to stop quackery. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0167823. Reply. Osteopathie Praxis ...
... journal may be the exception and not the rule. True enough, the results ... 10.1371/journal.pone.0167823 · https://bmccomplementalternmed ...
http://journals.plos. org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal. pone.0167823. journals.plos.org. Reliability of Diagnosis and Clinical Efficacy ...
... e0167823. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167823 L'épisode est disponible ici : http://www.scepticisme-scientifique.com/episode-367 ...
AL
ɹP
O鍼
JS
PR
DR
GP
ÁP
IR
P
D
LB
JH
S
OD
CA
FV