Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions frequently reference the specific review paper by Tarazona et al., emphasizing differences between European and IARC assessments, with tone and word choices like 'clarity' and 'support' suggesting a nuanced support for the scientific findings, which underscores the community's engagement in the ongoing scientific discourse.
Most discussions acknowledge the findings, especially regarding the differences between EU assessments and IARC, showing general support for the scientific review.
The discussions reveal high engagement with the topic, citing specific studies and responses, indicating strong interest in the scientific and regulatory debates.
Participants reference detailed articles, like Tarazona et al.'s review, and make interpretive comments about the implications, demonstrating moderate to deep engagement.
While the discussions are active and cite scientific sources, the overall influence on policy or public health perceptions appears moderate rather than transformative.
Info para que ustedes puedan corroborar o usar cuando la necesiten. Primero: papers que explican que no pasa nada con el glifosato y que para nada es ese demonio que dicen los ecologistas que Monsanto creó https://t.co/8c9BJ2gbDp https://t.co/fV2yStSvlJ https://t.co/2pzh8UIoC2
グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
@FreeBeYouMe @TheMeso @_atanas_ @Joyce46758618 @PepperPell @4q35U @LiscanoBinladan @av693 @jeff_keelan @Nsteacherstar @darkcola2 @proaging_tips Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. Arch Toxicol. 2017 Aug;91(8):2723-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
@KatieHerringt13 @thecaitdiaries https://t.co/FrXmOZulOM Research has opposing opinions. This review of the glyphosate health assessment conducted by the EU renewal process, and explains the differences in the carcinogenicity assessment with IARC which concluded in March 2015 that it is probably carcinogenic.
@Thoughtscapism Report: Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC https://t.co/VPmE9usV3A
@leotrasande @TraceyJWoodruff @NIH #cough Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC https://t.co/Kyq33MV0xO
Glyphosate, a common herbicide, is considered low risk by regulatory agencies, but IARC classified it as probably carcinogenic in 2015. The EU review used different data and methods, resulting in no carcinogenic hazard…
Are GMOs a health threat? This video explores what GMOs are, safety assessments by experts and agencies, and recent studies on glyphosate, a herbicide linked to carcinogenicity debates, providing an evidence-based…
@redpillb0t 3. I have no idea where you are getting the impression that glyphosates are found in vaccines. However, research regarding their inclusion in food products does not indicate that they pose a hazard when used properly. https://t.co/l0PmIh0NF2 https://t.co/Q8IKcdGGlM
Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC: Published on PMC, reviews the scientific basis of the European Union’s assessment of glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity.
@PooreRicha15091 Try growing a crop at scale, profitably, and getting a successful harvest without pesticides. https://t.co/9nEdCqtas9
@AnnaMag88311194 @Santi_MBarajas @tonnirubio88 La ventaja del glifosato es que se descompone rápidamente después de ser usado y eso evita que pueda propagarse a cauces. En cuanto a que es cancerígeno es cuestionable, ya que no hay evidencias por ahora. https://t.co/OqpVr39kty
@IowaSenate Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC
@marro_bert @EEtted @OneHealthspeci1 @AvvocatoAtomico Sono problemi di qualunque sostanza chimica usata in agronomia. Rispetto le alternative il glifosato è più sicuro sia per l'ambiente che le persone, e dato che è molto efficace funziona bene anche a basse concentrazioni. https://t.co/vRd0PbX6mC
@yvan_novichok @Babar_le_Rhino @eric_fallourd (...)qui consiste à balancer des slogans publicitaires hypnopédiques
@TheFranklinSyn1 @MLiamMcCollum Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC- https://t.co/XkYUTzIvYd Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate-https://t.co/AUqbfdawCl
Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC https://t.co/KYCkM8bQwO
@soyulde @ivordonez @periodistan_ https://t.co/TS7GwZNs0E https://t.co/ePcvKntDHp
@jeroen291066 @Ludo_ssk @JohannesBeers @lientje1967 Zoals hier https://t.co/3qzx4kzgHC. :”Both, scientific publications and mandatory industry-sponsored studies, were primary sources in the EU evaluation.” Hahaha!die weet wat lobbyen is hier in Brussel: weet dan genoeg!!
@d_malabry @Gargantu3squ3 @TretornEdgar @bapt_vigneron @Lazard_W @ZabouF @Ccesoir @Gemenne Je ne suis pas expert du sujet, mais avec une recherche rapide sur scholar, notamment ce review paper indique qu'il n'y a pas de preuves de toxicité / d'une incidence sur les cancers dans les doses utilisées en Europe : https://t.co/Itu3V5qYEQ
@SeppiWackes Tarazona J, Court-Marques D, Tiramani M et al. Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: A review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91(8):2723-2743. doi:10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @hontounokotoga1: グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
日本では稲作に除草剤が欠かせない。除草剤ラウンドアップは草だけでなく環境も破壊し人間の健康も破壊する。ラウンドアップ反対！ https://t.co/40wi9CNVZs
グリホサートの毒性と発がん性：欧州連合の評価の科学的根拠とIARCとの違いのレビュー https://t.co/FJBKmVn5SS モンサントに忖度しなければ発がん性は認められている モンサントが事実を握りつぶしている
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Info para que ustedes puedan corroborar o usar cuando la necesiten. Primero: papers que explican que no pasa nada con el…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Info para que ustedes puedan corroborar o usar cuando la necesiten. Primero: papers que explican que no pasa nada con el…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Info para que ustedes puedan corroborar o usar cuando la necesiten. Primero: papers que explican que no pasa nada con el…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Info para que ustedes puedan corroborar o usar cuando la necesiten. Primero: papers que explican que no pasa nada con el…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Info para que ustedes puedan corroborar o usar cuando la necesiten. Primero: papers que explican que no pasa nada con el…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Info para que ustedes puedan corroborar o usar cuando la necesiten. Primero: papers que explican que no pasa nada con el…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Info para que ustedes puedan corroborar o usar cuando la necesiten. Primero: papers que explican que no pasa nada con el…
Info para que ustedes puedan corroborar o usar cuando la necesiten. Primero: papers que explican que no pasa nada con el glifosato y que para nada es ese demonio que dicen los ecologistas que Monsanto creó https://t.co/8c9BJ2gbDp https://t.co/fV2yStSvlJ https://t.co/2pzh8UIoC2
@cenmag This is an absolute lie. It is a known carcinogen. The International Agency for Cancer research concluded in 2015. The WHO said its a probable carcinogen in 2015. https://t.co/ARLNsNr537
@MariaFdaCabal Señora @MariaFdaCabal le adjunto los DOI de algunos artículos científicos que respaldan la toxicidad del glifosfato. Eso no se lo inventaron. Le urge entre tantos asesores, un asesor científico https://t.co/pTvoaZYz2t, https://t.co/RrG8eUIMd3, doi:10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5 https://t.co/7qYF8OYaLr
@KatieHerringt13 @thecaitdiaries https://t.co/FrXmOZulOM Research has opposing opinions. This review of the glyphosate health assessment conducted by the EU renewal process, and explains the differences in the carcinogenicity assessment with IARC which concluded in March 2015 that it is probably carcinogenic.
@winzo77 @OrlandoMejaRiv1 Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC Jose V Tarazona et al. Arch Toxicol. 2017 Es openAcces
@eoind @Muinchille IARC classified as probably carcinogenic in 2015 (more recent than 2009, also much less biased by concerns on US farming industry than EPA). Besides as this article (much more recent than 2009 too and academic) point debate is wider than cancer https://t.co/QyOKjg2tVk
Aquí se explica muy bien porque la IARC y la UE discrepan sobre la carcinogeniciidad del #glifosato https://t.co/osRCpkUf9w
@BridgetHolmstro @RoyPentland @farmingganja @Narvuntien @Barbarajdurkin @adamjsims @Bananenrijperij @Over400ppm @torpet002 @MedBennett @RustyAway @BrianTu85458331 @cjtjgeol @thinks_about_it @Dardedar @Climatehope2 @riktheozfrog @Fauntleroy1934 @Coconutdog01 @redforged42 @ReckedRik @FeynmanFreaky @TheDisproof @jimdtweet @BubbasRanch @d_e_mol @IBergwiesel @RijpeW @MikeDel21893959 @Skrued1 @DigDougFTW @bluestflame1 @Biggieol6 @HalleVerkehrt @no2wind @JohnSmi50968113 @AJamesW2 @csfc67 @ttyEngland @PaprikaLady @Jamz129 @drewman_drew @TyotoRiffle @Tutkija5 @TQMKA @ShhSami @EcoSenseNow @SlugBub @GavinKreijkes @DawnTJ90 Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. https://t.co/hKYU85olxr https://t.co/RdKs7fCEjX
@Macronomicus @RoyPentland @Tracy37114076 @cjtjgeol @gray_sphere @JosephsEddy @DougGra79750897 @PaprikaLady @TyotoRiffle @Climatehope2 @thinks_about_it @simonahac @DawnTJ90 @austbondlover @roger_clague @Narvuntien @Fauntleroy1934 @RijpeW @csfc67 @Barbarajdurkin @poynton_j @GeraldKutney @mtnman0038 @no2wind @documentavi @Richard25972121 @Jamz129 @ReckedRik @BridgetHolmstro @free_wales @EcoSenseNow @BKzork @scaramangi @cup_high @AlaMerQld @EdSmith288 @drwaheeduddin @JWSpry @Geoff4273 @Bergeonline @mccaffreydanie1 @dbirch214 @HiFiWhiPhi @Damo__73_ @JaggerMickOZ @steve_holyoake @beefyfarmer @LouHou @FernandoLeanme @JsharkJill Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. https://t.co/hKYU85olxr https://t.co/BeK4UD55PZ
RT @JeanRostand8: @Angelcommente Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of t…
RT @JeanRostand8: @EmmanuelMacron Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of…
RT @JeanRostand8: @Angelcommente Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of t…
@leotrasande @TraceyJWoodruff @NIH #cough Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC https://t.co/Kyq33MV0xO
@GrosMtl @gorskon @UCSF @UofCalifornia There's no evidence supporting claims of harms from glyphosate. Unless you're a plant. 'Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC' https://t.co/Kyq33MV0xO
RT @scientistbiomed: @FreeBeYouMe @TheMeso @_atanas_ @Joyce46758618 @PepperPell @4q35U @LiscanoBinladan @av693 @jeff_keelan @Nsteacherstar…
RT @scientistbiomed: @FreeBeYouMe @TheMeso @_atanas_ @Joyce46758618 @PepperPell @4q35U @LiscanoBinladan @av693 @jeff_keelan @Nsteacherstar…
RT @scientistbiomed: @FreeBeYouMe @TheMeso @_atanas_ @Joyce46758618 @PepperPell @4q35U @LiscanoBinladan @av693 @jeff_keelan @Nsteacherstar…
RT @scientistbiomed: @FreeBeYouMe @TheMeso @_atanas_ @Joyce46758618 @PepperPell @4q35U @LiscanoBinladan @av693 @jeff_keelan @Nsteacherstar…
RT @scientistbiomed: @FreeBeYouMe @TheMeso @_atanas_ @Joyce46758618 @PepperPell @4q35U @LiscanoBinladan @av693 @jeff_keelan @Nsteacherstar…
@Thoughtscapism Report: Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC https://t.co/VPmE9usV3A
RT @JeanRostand8: @EmmanuelMacron Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of…
RT @JeanRostand8: @Angelcommente Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of t…
RT @JeanRostand8: @EmmanuelMacron Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of…
@EllavsPhysics @TheMarker בשימוש לפי ההתוויה, שזה כולל שימוש חקלאי, לא נחשב למסרטן. בחיות בדקו חשיפה גדולה בהרבה מהמותר וגם לא מצאו עדויות משכנעות לקרצינוגניות https://t.co/ttG0mp78GG
RT @scientistbiomed: @FreeBeYouMe @TheMeso @_atanas_ @Joyce46758618 @PepperPell @4q35U @LiscanoBinladan @av693 @jeff_keelan @Nsteacherstar…
RT @scientistbiomed: @FreeBeYouMe @TheMeso @_atanas_ @Joyce46758618 @PepperPell @4q35U @LiscanoBinladan @av693 @jeff_keelan @Nsteacherstar…
@FreeBeYouMe @TheMeso @_atanas_ @Joyce46758618 @PepperPell @4q35U @LiscanoBinladan @av693 @jeff_keelan @Nsteacherstar @darkcola2 @proaging_tips Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. Arch Toxicol. 2017 Aug;91(8):2723-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
Fuentes (DOI): 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.01.042 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.309 10.1021/acs.est.7b00012 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.008 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.01.021 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.114
RT @JeanRostand8: @EmmanuelMacron Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of…
@EmmanuelMacron Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5 attention article payant .... Pourtant conclusions claires ?
#Glyphosate #toxicity and #carcinogenicity: a review of the #ScientificBasis of the #EuropeanUnion assessment and its differences with @IARCWHO https://t.co/Q12h9iSs7p | via @SpringerTox
RT @JeanRostand8: @Angelcommente Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of t…
@Angelcommente Re: Tarazona et al. (2017): Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5 attention article payant .... Pourtant conclusions claires ?
@BertrandM19 @brutofficiel 2/ toute personne qui n'est pas d'accord est au choix payé, intéressé ou idiot... Tenez un peu de lecture pour la soirée : https://t.co/r6tDFbtvQb https://t.co/kGmf9CnPUR https://t.co/qaCZOkzp7B https://t.co/r64G8HlnMH
AA
し
EP
RH
BN
CW
AT
DJ
RH
M
JB
P
GC
TH
FS
AG
S
CM
R
M
教
ひ
宿
K東
ふ
M
WW
T
Z現
マ
ま
D
LM
OM
LN
RP
R
A
G
NV
ES
FP
CL
S
JR
AL
JC
Nל
YD
J
N
FK