¿Cuál es ✅ para perder masa grasa; HIIT
The effects of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Feb 2019 – Oct 2025Where it's discussed
-
News68 articles
-
X / Twitter42 posts
-
Facebook15 posts
-
YouTube3 videos
-
Bluesky2 posts
-
Blogs2 articles
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Various social discussions highlight that both high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity training (MICT) effectively reduce body fat and waist size, emphasizing the comparable results across studies. The tone varies from supportive to skeptical, with some noting the modest impact and high individual variability; phrases like 'no clear advantage' and 'effects are modest' shape the perception that while the findings are relevant, their practical significance might be limited or context-dependent.
Most discussions convey support or acknowledgment of the research findings, indicating general agreement that both training methods similarly impact body composition and time efficiency.
Posts demonstrate high relevance and curiosity, with many referencing the comparison between HIIT and MICT, indicating strong engagement with the topic.
Several discussions cite specific results, such as 'both types reduce body fat' or mention statistical details like '40% less training time,' reflecting moderate but meaningful engagement.
The overall tone suggests users see the study as recognizing modest but important effects, emphasizing practical implications like time savings and variability in responses.
Abstract in brief
- This study compares the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on body composition in overweight and obese adults, and finds that both types of exercise significantly reduce body fat and waist size with no clear advantage of one over the other.
- The research indicates that HIIT can achieve similar results in less training time, making it a potentially more time-efficient option for weight management programs.
- Results also show that running exercises were more effective for fat loss in both HIIT and MICT, while cycling did not lead to significant fat reduction, suggesting exercise type plays a role in effectiveness.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@bonillarob @tednaiman @BayeDrew @BioLayne @donlayman @drbenbo @LawrenceMNeal This is a reasonable interpretation based on the available evidence e.g. https://t.co/H8yCjFd2Hg https://t.co/VyJ73DEq2G Modest changes with HIIT or MICT and some debate re any potential time savings with the former. Large individual variability in responsiveness.
@jeffvallance Perhaps, but key message in article and review cited is solid: no ‘best’ approach, effects are modest, intervals may save some time, and lots of variability, a conclusion reinforced by other work https://t.co/WAOCmYFaqq
MiniPILDORAS sobre AF y Salud en 1min…
El objetivo de este
All mentions
Understanding HIIT Benefits and Effectiveness for Weight Loss
This video explains high-intensity interval training (HIIT), highlighting its time efficiency, cardiovascular benefits, and impact on body composition. It emphasizes that both HIIT and moderate exercise reduce body fat…
HIIT: More Effective for Fat Loss Than Steady State Cardio
Join Thrive Market today to get 40 off your first order AND a FREE gift httpThriveMarketcomThomasDeLauer. HIIT versus continuous cardio for fat loss is debated, with research showing both significantly reduce body fat…
Effective Weight Loss Strategies: Comparing HIIT and MICT Exercise Methods
This video explores the effects of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition. Find out how both methods reduce body fat and waist size, with HIIT offering a quicker…
This 12-week randomized controlled trial compared the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on cardiometabolic markers in 90 middle-aged adults with metabolic syndrome.
A recent study looked at the effects of high intensity interval training (protocol below) vs lifestyle advice over an 8 year period on 47 middle-aged people with metabolic syndrome. All currently taking medication to control the condition. Both groups slowed their development of metabolic syndrome
https://t.co/iN1kdC1llF https://t.co/or0fWBiSYh https://t.co/Rp9L9ZNFjK https://t.co/NT6jZ74Kq0 https://t.co/RcKJkfWKU5 https://t.co/QQEQUHdLDt
The 2019 JAMA study focused on middle-aged and older adults. Results: high-intensity interval training produced similar cardiovascular and muscular benefits compared to moderate-intensity continuous training, but HIIT required ~40% less training time https://t.co/sSn5nTgWsl
@7989p1 @Akc_134 Sure brother. I will try to help as much as I can. I still train almost everyday (not for height, but fitness) - high speed running and football. https://t.co/3z7SPobqLH Also, join gym, do weight training, eat protiens (I eat 100g peanuts everyday)
What is HIIT | 5 Things You Need to Know about High Intensity Interval T... https://t.co/WTipoLAX9W @YouTubeより
https://t.co/PuqZE9BDFk Los efectos del entrenamiento por intervalos de alta intensidad frente al entrenamiento continuo de intensidad moderada sobre la composición corporal en adultos con sobrepeso y obesidad: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. El entrenamiento con
@NY_Jhenna high-intensity interval training (HIIT) https://t.co/wwFWSBBN7h
Wewege, et al. (2017). The effects of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://t.co/SpC5DWUScm
@VazquezMella @DrMauricioGon Y más evidencia contradictoria: https://t.co/Z5FtznBomV
@VazquezMella @DrMauricioGon Es solo un artículo con muestra reducida (43personas), que concluye que el entrenamiento moderado de larga duración no tiene ventajas sobre el de intervalos intensos, excepto porque la gente requiere menos tiempo. Además hay más evidencia contradictoria: https://t.co/Z5FtznBomV
@Ryohlan いくつか論文流し読みしましたけど、この論文が一番良い感じでした。 https://t.co/nMb086An01 結論として、HIITは腹部及び内臓脂肪の燃焼効果としてはやっぱりかなり高いと言えそうです。でも時間効率で言えば40%良いというくらいなので、4分で30分の有酸素運動より〜は流石に言い過ぎかと。
El objetivo de este
RT @LwangaMD: Several #SysRev and #metaanalysis have found that HIIT is a time efficient way to improve your body composition and reduce bo…
Several #SysRev and #metaanalysis have found that HIIT is a time efficient way to improve your body composition and reduce body fat https://t.co/aycNZxeybO https://t.co/w1UbaS01Ps https://t.co/BWwILOp6po
El objetivo de este
https://t.co/3K8qVG0ACj OBJ
O al menos eso sugiere los resultados de este estudio donde comparan el entrenamiento en intervalos de alta intensidad (HIIT) y el entrenamiento continuo de intensidad moderada (MICT) y su efecto en la perdida de grasa corporal. https://t.co/Qcf0VKhGkF
New article: The Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Inflammatory Markers, Body Composition, and Physical Fitness in Overweight/Obese Survivors of Breast Cancer: A Randomized… https://t.co/Iuf3uHRB6H #breastcancer #oncology https://t.co/WMeC6UMvEM
Interestingly, it found that both HIIT and traditional moderate-intensity exercise can reduce body fat and waist circumference (Source (https://t.co/M4XnbVM400)).
HIIT and Traditional Cardio May Have Similar Effects on Weight Loss Research examining more than 400 overweight and obese adults found that HIIT and traditional cardio reduced body fat and waist circumference to similar extents (Source (https://t.co/M4XnbVM400)).
RT @pildorabreve: MiniPILDORAS sobre AF y Salud en 1min…
RT @pildorabreve: MiniPILDORAS sobre AF y Salud en 1min…
RT @pildorabreve: MiniPILDORAS sobre AF y Salud en 1min…
MiniPILDORAS sobre AF y Salud en 1min…
RT @gibalam: @bonillarob @tednaiman @BayeDrew @BioLayne @donlayman @drbenbo @LawrenceMNeal This is a reasonable interpretation based on the…
RT @gibalam: @bonillarob @tednaiman @BayeDrew @BioLayne @donlayman @drbenbo @LawrenceMNeal This is a reasonable interpretation based on the…
@bonillarob @tednaiman @BayeDrew @BioLayne @donlayman @drbenbo @LawrenceMNeal This is a reasonable interpretation based on the available evidence e.g. https://t.co/H8yCjFd2Hg https://t.co/VyJ73DEq2G Modest changes with HIIT or MICT and some debate re any potential time savings with the former. Large individual variability in responsiveness.
RT @nachoafysalud: ¿Cuál es ✅ para perder masa grasa; HIIT
RT @nachoafysalud: ¿Cuál es ✅ para perder masa grasa; HIIT
RT @nachoafysalud: ¿Cuál es ✅ para perder masa grasa; HIIT
RT @nachoafysalud: ¿Cuál es ✅ para perder masa grasa; HIIT
RT @nachoafysalud: ¿Cuál es ✅ para perder masa grasa; HIIT
RT @nachoafysalud: ¿Cuál es ✅ para perder masa grasa; HIIT
RT @nachoafysalud: ¿Cuál es ✅ para perder masa grasa; HIIT
RT @nachoafysalud: ¿Cuál es ✅ para perder masa grasa; HIIT
¿Cuál es ✅ para perder masa grasa; HIIT
週3回10週間、肥満の成人(18-45歳)のダイエット効果を見た論文。HIIT(めちゃきついインターバル)とMICT(ほどほど)で比較。ともに、体脂肪とウエストが減少。ただし、HIITは最大 40%の時間を短縮できた。 何でかランでは効果あるけどサイクリングは効果なかった。 https://t.co/YDJh15v8oQ
Kaynak makale: "The effects of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis" https://t.co/uOvkfpENti
@kireiniyaseru_n 筋トレ後は疲れているのでMICTがいいでしょうね。過体重者を対象とした下記のメタアナリシスでは短期のMICTとHIITの効果サイズはほぼ同じで、一方、自転車運動よりもランニングのほうが脂肪減少効果は大きくなっていますね。https://t.co/suvUjFglyI
RT @gibalam: @jeffvallance Perhaps, but key message in article and review cited is solid: no ‘best’ approach, effects are modest, intervals…
@jeffvallance Perhaps, but key message in article and review cited is solid: no ‘best’ approach, effects are modest, intervals may save some time, and lots of variability, a conclusion reinforced by other work https://t.co/WAOCmYFaqq
高強度インターバルトレーニング(HIIT)vs中強度持久トレーニング(MICT) https://t.co/P0Y4Tx9yIv 巷でブームのHIITとMICTの体組成への影響のメタアナリシス HIIT、MICTともに体脂肪と胴囲の優位な減少がありました。