アトルバスタチン vs プラセボのRCTで報告された筋関連有害事象、ノセボ効果の検証。 二重盲検期:ア2.03% vs プ2.00% →HR=1.03 [95%CI: 0.88-1.21] 盲検解除後:ア1.26% vs プ1.00% →HR=1.41 [95%CI: 1.10-1.79] Lancet.389(10088):2473-2481,(2017) PMID:28476288 https://t.co/SQKCkEyyer
Adverse events associated with unblinded, but not with blinded, statin therapy in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial and its non-randomised non-blind extension phase.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
May 2019 – Apr 2025Where it's discussed
-
News112 articles
-
Facebook32 posts
-
Blogs14 articles
-
X / Twitter8 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The overall tone reflects moderate agreement, with comments highlighting the significance of blinding in accurately assessing adverse events, such as references to hazard ratios and trial phases. Posts show engagement through technical analysis and concern about bias, emphasizing the relevance of rigorous trial designs for clinical safety assessments.
Most posts acknowledge the study’s findings, emphasizing that unblinded therapy may overstate adverse events, showing cautious agreement.
Discussions reveal a moderate level of curiosity, with some posts referencing specific data like HR figures and trial details.
Several posts analyze the methodology and implications, discussing the relevance of blinding and observational biases.
The collective discussions suggest recognition of the study’s importance in clinical trial design and drug safety evaluation, indicating a moderate impact.
Abstract in brief
- The study compares adverse events (AEs) associated with unblinded versus blinded statin therapy, finding that unblinded (nonblind) treatments report more AEs than blinded (e.g., placebo-controlled) trials.
- In the randomized, double-blind phase of the ASCOT-LLA trial, patients taking atorvastatin showed few adverse events, which were rigorously classified and adjudicated; however, a nonblind extension phase revealed higher rates of certain AEs in patients aware of their treatment.
- The study emphasizes that awareness of treatment (unblinded therapy) may influence the reporting and incidence of adverse events, highlighting differences between trial phases and the importance of blinding in accurately assessing drug safety.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@CardiacJoshi @ProfDConnelly @BHFScotland @fi_strachan @DrKate_Miller @ProfDFrancis 260 persons double blind more relevant than unblinded observation in 260 million. Not convinced, try this analysis from ASCOT https://t.co/yHT5R88ITT
RT @Fizz_DI: アトルバスタチン vs プラセボのRCTで報告された筋関連有害事象、ノセボ効果の検証。 二重盲検期:ア2.03% vs プ2.00% →HR=1.03 [95%CI: 0.88-1.21] 盲検解除後:ア1.26% vs プ1.00% →HR=1.4…
@MJA_Editor Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2473-2481. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31075-9. Epub 2017 May 2. Adverse events associated with unblinded, but not with blinded, statin therapy in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA):
Open Access UCL Research: Adverse events associated with unblinded, but not with blinded, statin therapy in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA) https://t.co/KaD5SUJIEM
Adverse events associated with unblinded, but not with blinded, statin therapy in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial and its non-randomised non-blind extension... https://t.co/BqxAU7BQoU
All mentions
Managing Side Effects and Risks of LDL Cholesterol Lowering Medications
This video reviews side effects and risks associated with LDL cholesterol medications, including statins, ezetimibe, and novel therapies. It discusses strategies to minimize adverse effects and optimize treatment safety…
Effective Treatment Strategies for Drug-Resistant Hyperlipidemia
This Harvard Medical School Continuing Education video reviews key strategies for lowering LDL cholesterol, including pharmacological options and managing drug resistance, with insights from experts at Massachusetts…
Adverse events associated with unblinded, but not with blinded, statin therapy in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial and its non-randomised non-blind extension... https://t.co/BqxAU7BQoU
RT @Fizz_DI: アトルバスタチン vs プラセボのRCTで報告された筋関連有害事象、ノセボ効果の検証。 二重盲検期:ア2.03% vs プ2.00% →HR=1.03 [95%CI: 0.88-1.21] 盲検解除後:ア1.26% vs プ1.00% →HR=1.4…
アトルバスタチン vs プラセボのRCTで報告された筋関連有害事象、ノセボ効果の検証。 二重盲検期:ア2.03% vs プ2.00% →HR=1.03 [95%CI: 0.88-1.21] 盲検解除後:ア1.26% vs プ1.00% →HR=1.41 [95%CI: 1.10-1.79] Lancet.389(10088):2473-2481,(2017) PMID:28476288 https://t.co/SQKCkEyyer
Adverse events associated with unblinded, but not with blinded, statin therapy in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial and its non-randomised non-blind … https://t.co/BqxAU7BQoU
@CardiacJoshi @ProfDConnelly @BHFScotland @fi_strachan @DrKate_Miller @ProfDFrancis 260 persons double blind more relevant than unblinded observation in 260 million. Not convinced, try this analysis from ASCOT https://t.co/yHT5R88ITT
スタチンの臨床試験。盲検期間は大丈夫だったが、その後の延長試験で非盲検になったら有意にスタチン群で筋症状が出現していた。Lancet https://t.co/QEhGpsBZPT
@MJA_Editor Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2473-2481. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31075-9. Epub 2017 May 2. Adverse events associated with unblinded, but not with blinded, statin therapy in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA):
Open Access UCL Research: Adverse events associated with unblinded, but not with blinded, statin therapy in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA) https://t.co/KaD5SUJIEM
FY
NM
長
TR
UD
に
い