Overall, the discussions reveal a strong mistrust of the WHO, with many examples citing conflicts of interest, industry ties, and scientific studies on harmful effects of RF radiation. The tone often includes skepticism and critical analysis, demonstrating high engagement and interest in the topic's broader implications.
AgreementLow agreement
Most discussions express skepticism or outright disagreement with the WHO's findings, highlighting conflicts of interest and industry influence as reasons to doubt the safety assessments.
InterestHigh interest
The discussions demonstrate high curiosity, with many referencing scientific studies, conflicts of interest, and implications on public health, indicating active engagement.
EngagementHigh engagement
Participants go beyond surface-level comments, citing specific research, criticizing institutions, and discussing potential health hazards, reflecting deep engagement.
ImpactModerate impact
The debates are aimed at questioning the credibility of the WHO and industry influence, which could influence public opinion or policy considerations, though actual policy change is not evident.
Abstract in brief
The WHO's 2011 evaluation classified radiofrequency (RF) radiation as a Group 2B possible human carcinogen, citing increased risks of glioma and acoustic neuroma based on epidemiological studies that have become more convincing over time.
Despite these findings, most countries have not taken significant action to reduce RF radiation exposure or raise awareness of its potential health hazards, and ambient levels of RF radiation have continued to rise.
The WHO's efforts to review RF health risks, including a draft monograph in 2014, have been criticized due to conflicts of interest within the expert group and the dismissal of non-thermal biological effects, leading to concerns about the WHO’s commitment to addressing health risks associated with RF radiation.]
OMS, radiación de radiofrecuencias y salud -una nuez dura de partir (revisión). Prof. Lennart Hardell
https://t.co/PKT7rzNv95
Dec 30, 2019 · 3 likes · 2 shares · 531 followersView post →
NG
NO5GNI
@No5Gni · X
ICNIRP: private members club, pulling "recommended safety level" referred to by @BBCClick's piece on #5G out their backsides
World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review' Professor Lennart Hardel: )https://t.co/INH60wmr48 https://t.co/9vnRERLDFh
Nov 9, 2019 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 520 followersView post →
NL
No 5G on Coombe Lea
@stop5Ghove · X
Industry bias & conflicts of interest at the heart of #ICNIRP radiation regs. @WHO & UK government ignoring mounting evidence of long term health & environmental impacts. STOP #5G #Hove mast landgrab https://t.co/GOm6FU2FmK @peterkyle @HoveLabourParty @Gary4Hove @BHGreenCllrs https://t.co/qJNKRuYnjL
How much faith are we to put in an organisation that receives funding from and is influenced by the very industries that they are supposed to be protecting us from?
https://t.co/wAvgaRxXu6
#5G #5GMyths #5GDangers #No5G #5GMemes #5gnetwork #5GMythbusters #SafeTechnology https://t.co/QX0pb07lSt
May 17, 2020 · 1 like · 2,129 followersView post →
FO
Fa11outShelter
@Fa11outS · X
World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) https://t.co/HR62BDQej6
Apr 29, 2023 · 1 like · 1,860 followersView post →
MA
Mikko Ahonen
@ahosmikko · X
WHO International EMF Project -wrongdoings are discussed in academic articles: https://t.co/ODi3WyStKl , https://t.co/jNE8ZDNZIj , https://t.co/56G1X0w0Is , https://t.co/5zGggfjgr8 + the Microwave News articles/documents (thanks) are worth reading.
This video examines the possible link between cell phone use and cancer, analyzing scientific studies, and discusses methods to protect against radiation exposure.
The current regulation on RF in Mexico, Telmex and Telcel trials for 5G, and studies on electromagnetic exposure risks highlight the importance of understanding potential health impacts of radiofrequency radiation.
This video discusses the health impacts of 5G and radiofrequency radiation, focusing on the WHO's 2011 classification of RF as a possible carcinogen, ongoing concerns about rising exposure levels, and conflicts of…
World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) https://t.co/HR62BDQej6
Apr 29, 2023 · 1 like · 1,860 followersView post →
BE
Big-Endian
@t_endian · X
@DrAseemMalhotra The WHO is corrupt and has been for years. See also: Big Wireless and ICNIRP revolving door situation, whilst brain cancer in children increases year on year.
https://t.co/HniNJ13Ako
@noren_elisabeth @HeikkiRay WHO has conflicts of interest in this issue. I have been following this research for about 15 years.
https://t.co/FDN49ce9hi
@frankdevocht @Tomisla65429669 @MartinRoosli @IARCWHO @blogBRHP Well, there is this curious paper from Hardell et al where they found the WHO headquarters in Geneva had surprisingly low levels of RF-EMF. But I guess we should not get into that territory. https://t.co/BaUbmEUEvH
Industry bias & conflicts of interest at the heart of #ICNIRP radiation regs. @WHO & UK government ignoring mounting evidence of long term health & environmental impacts. STOP #5G #Hove mast landgrab https://t.co/GOm6FU2FmK @peterkyle @HoveLabourParty @Gary4Hove @BHGreenCllrs https://t.co/qJNKRuYnjL
@KevinBardosh And a particular favourite of mine:
World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack, Lennart Hardell
https://t.co/fgtCiMNg0P
WHO International EMF Project -wrongdoings are discussed in academic articles: https://t.co/ODi3WyStKl , https://t.co/jNE8ZDNZIj , https://t.co/56G1X0w0Is , https://t.co/5zGggfjgr8 + the Microwave News articles/documents (thanks) are worth reading.
@jamorro @NeilClark66 Unlike in the UK, osteopaths in the US have a full general medical training behind them. The WHO is not such a great authority. Look at this article on the WHO EMR project (different topic, though) and the personnel involved: https://t.co/nQDlSY1fKh I can tell you more too!
@heeeeeyaaaaaaa @OuranosMK @Conflits_FR https://t.co/WrLGksxtnG l’OMS elle-même a classé la 5G comme fréquence POTENTIELLE cancérigène, donc je dis pas qu’il faut l’interdire mais qu’on doit d’abord être sûr que c’est pas dangereux
@Ben__Rickert https://t.co/6fxjJaaQTj
Please read this as it says things have been omitted from 5 g studies, talks about conflict of interest and how the who has 5 of the 6 members on the board.
@PanamericanaTV En Ecuador existen antenas 5 G existe una relación entre los síntomas del covid-19 y la radiación de las antes 5G
https://t.co/hbeOwRs4AF
@Jazzel65 @JOSE_UNEDIANO @DFD_74 Nada hombre. Mira mejor este pequeño video de YouTube. En los comentarios te enlazan a varios artículos científicos que aseguran su afecto nocivo en la salud. https://t.co/iecU360tXE
How much faith are we to put in an organisation that receives funding from and is influenced by the very industries that they are supposed to be protecting us from?
https://t.co/wAvgaRxXu6
#5G #5GMyths #5GDangers #No5G #5GMemes #5gnetwork #5GMythbusters #SafeTechnology https://t.co/QX0pb07lSt
May 17, 2020 · 1 like · 2,129 followersView post →
SR
Salvatore Restuccia
@RestucciaSalv · X
Con datos científicos efectos dañinos radio frecuencias y 5G https://t.co/8mGTceIvmu di @YouTube
@FernandoM76 @RSR_SereneLogic @imjustbrum All it takes is a few moments of your time to read about non-ionizing radiation damage. Here let me give you some insight on the situation. Start here World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review): https://t.co/5sHGvbnTxG
RT @Stop5G: #Stop5G If we want to understand why our RF Radiation safety standards are so questionable, look at the source of the cover up,…
Feb 12, 2020 · 2 shares · 836 followersView post →
TN
Terapias Naturales
@ttnn_podemos · X
RT @drchosaludEyQS: OMS, radiación de radiofrecuencias y salud -una nuez dura de partir (revisión). Prof. Lennart Hardell
https://t.co/PKT7…
Dec 30, 2019 · 2 shares · 1,740 followersView post →
JR
Jardín Radiado
@JardinRadiado · X
RT @drchosaludEyQS: OMS, radiación de radiofrecuencias y salud -una nuez dura de partir (revisión). Prof. Lennart Hardell
https://t.co/PKT7…
Dec 30, 2019 · 2 shares · 111 followersView post →
ES
EHS x derecho-salud
@drchosaludEyQS · X
OMS, radiación de radiofrecuencias y salud -una nuez dura de partir (revisión). Prof. Lennart Hardell
https://t.co/PKT7rzNv95
Dec 30, 2019 · 3 likes · 2 shares · 531 followersView post →
B
bam
@bam57581565 · X
RT @No5Gni: ICNIRP: private members club, pulling "recommended safety level" referred to by @BBCClick's piece on #5G out their backsides
W…
Nov 9, 2019 · 2 shares · 2,052 followersView post →
NG
NO5GNI
@No5Gni · X
ICNIRP: private members club, pulling "recommended safety level" referred to by @BBCClick's piece on #5G out their backsides
World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review' Professor Lennart Hardel: )https://t.co/INH60wmr48 https://t.co/9vnRERLDFh
Nov 9, 2019 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 520 followersView post →
VC
vita ann coppedge
@vitacoppedge · X
RT @Stop5G: #Stop5G If we want to understand why our RF Radiation safety standards are so questionable, look at the source of the cover up,…
Oct 19, 2019 · 2 shares · 2,341 followersView post →
SG
Stop5G
@Stop5G · X
#Stop5G If we want to understand why our RF Radiation safety standards are so questionable, look at the source of the cover up, with ICNRIP , the private organization funded by the industry:
https://t.co/gI0Qo7vu2u
Oct 17, 2019 · 1 like · 2 shares · 1,268 followersView post →
MM
Maria Minno
@mariaminno · X
World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review) https://t.co/UvHaNpJoh3
World Health Organization, Radiofrequency Radiation and Health ...
News
Received April 1, 2017; Accepted June 6, 2017. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4046. Abstract. In May 2011 the International Agency for Research 6. Exposure to RF ...
To the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe and governments of all ...
News
doi:10.3892/ijo.2017.4046. 93 Pall M. 5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and international health: Compelling evidence for eight distinct types of great harm ...
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4046. 35. Pall ML. "Глава 7: Как ракът може да бъде причинен от излагането на електромагнитни полета (ЕМП) с микровълнова честота ...
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4046. Epub 2017 Jun 21. 1. 1376, Targeting the effector domain of the myristoylated alanine rich C-kinase substrate enhances lung cancer ...
News
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4046. Epub 2017 Jun 21. 1. 1376, Targeting the effector domain of the myristoylated alanine rich C-kinase substrate enhances lung cancer ...
Recent EMF Papers PDF | PDF | Electromagnetic Radiation ...
News
Open access paper: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2018.4606/download ... 2017.4046. Abstract. In May 2011 the International Agency for ...