Pleased to share our new paper just published in @JAMACardio Link:
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Among Men With Primary Elevations of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels of 190 mg/dL or Above: Analyses From the WOSCOPS (West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study) 5-Year Randomized Trial and
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2019 – Nov 2025Where it's discussed
-
News106 articles
-
X / Twitter21 posts
-
Facebook14 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Blogs2 articles
-
Bluesky1 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Discussions highlight the importance of the WOSCOPS findings, with users referencing statistics like a 27% reduction in heart disease risk and debates on the long-term benefits of statins, emphasizing both their relevance and transformative potential in preventive cardiology. The tone reflects a mix of scientific interest and advocacy, making the overall discourse highly meaningful and impactful.
Most discussions acknowledge the positive findings of the WOSCOPS study, supporting statin use in high LDL cases.
The discussions show high engagement with the topic of LDL levels and statin benefits, indicating a strong interest in primary prevention.
Participants delve into details like long-term effects, adherence data, and risk reduction, demonstrating deep engagement.
Many posts emphasize the significant clinical implications, advocating for proactive treatment to prevent cardiovascular events.
Abstract in brief
- * The analysis utilized data from the WOSCOPS trial to evaluate the cardiovascular benefits of lowering LDL-C in individuals without existing heart disease, comparing those with LDL-C <190 mg/dL and those with ≥190 mg/dL.
- * Results indicated that pravastatin reduced coronary heart disease risk by 27% and major cardiovascular events by 25%, showing consistent effectiveness regardless of LDL-C levels.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@tinytim0101 Cancer: https://t.co/pj4pZDwyEn Cerebrovascular: https://t.co/rv1Q0Fh2wU https://t.co/lqsXPfRfIq Coronary: https://t.co/ePSxAI04fl Diabetes: https://t.co/YJrOrpTgFk Aging: https://t.co/tae3aFc4pR Hypertension: (Pfizer) https://t.co/Ezyo2tq4A1 Pneumonia: https://t.co/RYicUmSFEb ..
@DoctorTro @LDLSkeptic @holmanm @mrc314 @doctor original WOSCOPs was published in 1992 & 1995, burying the adherence data the supplementary data of this 2017 analysis of WOSCOPS revealed how in the first 5 years both groups took pravastatin at similar rates (35.2% control vs 37.8% intervention) https://t.co/9LuVGE0vem https://t.co/z5LaIL6DBO
@venkmurthy @CaptRockyBob @VietHeartPA @khurramn1 @MichaelJBlaha @mdmiedema @DavidLBrownMD @boback @rauldsf_santos @almallahmo @MBittencourtMD @MethodistHosp @NadeenFaza @MasriAhmadMD @WilliamZoghbi @pabeda1 @JJheart_doc @pnatarajanmd @thebyrdlab RTC data on statins in primary prevention pts with LDL 190 or above. Short, intermediate, and long term benefits including lower mortality. Benefits dramatically outweigh risks across the board. Why wait till advanced to plaque or an event? Prevent it. https://t.co/qJXb0VznsL
@jengates WOSCOPS: https://t.co/dHJ7svrHN4
@endocrinorosero @DrFisioloco @drpablocorral La evidencia del riesgo en pacientes con LDL>190 esta dada básicamente en pacientes con HF. El beneficio de la intervención está soportado en el resultado pos hoc del estudio WOSCOPS como RCT 5 años y como cohorte 20 años. Debe completarle el estudio. https://t.co/u9YvZeS4TP
All mentions
Examining the Truth Behind Unhinged Diet Advice
In this video, Abbey Sharp analyzes the most outrageous diet advice circulating online today. With a focus on educating viewers, she emphasizes the importance of consulting healthcare providers about personal health…
Impact of Rosuvastatin on Cardiovascular Health Metrics
This video discusses the effectiveness of rosuvastatin in preventing cardiovascular events in healthy individuals with high C-reactive protein levels. The study showed that rosuvastatin significantly reduced LDL…
11. 5年の展望 永続使用されるstatinが数年≦継続試験:殆ど
#WOSCOPS enrolled 6595 men aged 45 to 64 years, who were randomly assigned to pravastatin 40 mg/d or placebo. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28877913/ 18% benefit in mortality over 20 years. Significant. Raised baseline LDLc benefited slightly more.
@drcateshanahan @DennisBegos In your book, you reference this analysis of data from WOSCOPS (https://t.co/ER5M0TAhxC) (indirectly, via a BMJ summary and bit by David Diamond, refs 26 and 27 in chapter 7) as showing small benefits of statin therapy.
RT @ahmed_sayed_98: Pleased to share our new paper just published in @JAMACardio Link:
RT @ahmed_sayed_98: Pleased to share our new paper just published in @JAMACardio Link:
Pleased to share our new paper just published in @JAMACardio Link:
RT @raphaels7: @DoctorTro @LDLSkeptic @holmanm @mrc314 @doctor original WOSCOPs was published in 1992 & 1995, burying the adherence data t…
@DoctorTro @LDLSkeptic @holmanm @mrc314 @doctor original WOSCOPs was published in 1992 & 1995, burying the adherence data the supplementary data of this 2017 analysis of WOSCOPS revealed how in the first 5 years both groups took pravastatin at similar rates (35.2% control vs 37.8% intervention) https://t.co/9LuVGE0vem https://t.co/z5LaIL6DBO
@SergiEscanes here just in case you are serious start with these.. https://t.co/pgu9uU5cMS https://t.co/caqh4PoAlF https://t.co/6C3wByHZGA https://t.co/3OOJYjh7cm I know that you really dont want information though
RT @jsenior64: @endocrinorosero @DrFisioloco @drpablocorral La evidencia del riesgo en pacientes con LDL>190 esta dada básicamente en pacie…
@endocrinorosero @DrFisioloco @drpablocorral La evidencia del riesgo en pacientes con LDL>190 esta dada básicamente en pacientes con HF. El beneficio de la intervención está soportado en el resultado pos hoc del estudio WOSCOPS como RCT 5 años y como cohorte 20 años. Debe completarle el estudio. https://t.co/u9YvZeS4TP
@sean_bernstein I´ve seen that pattern reported yes https://t.co/Uy86PhfYV7
@NutritionMadeS3 @MichaelAlbertMD Interesting! https://t.co/k5CSnbxktH
@jengates WOSCOPS: https://t.co/dHJ7svrHN4
Similar analysis of woscops https://t.co/BNC7UAqJdJ
RT @veryvirology: @tinytim0101 Cancer: https://t.co/pj4pZDwyEn Cerebrovascular: https://t.co/rv1Q0Fh2wU https://t.co/lqsXPfRfIq Coronary: h…
RT @veryvirology: @tinytim0101 Cancer: https://t.co/pj4pZDwyEn Cerebrovascular: https://t.co/rv1Q0Fh2wU https://t.co/lqsXPfRfIq Coronary: h…
@tinytim0101 Cancer: https://t.co/pj4pZDwyEn Cerebrovascular: https://t.co/rv1Q0Fh2wU https://t.co/lqsXPfRfIq Coronary: https://t.co/ePSxAI04fl Diabetes: https://t.co/YJrOrpTgFk Aging: https://t.co/tae3aFc4pR Hypertension: (Pfizer) https://t.co/Ezyo2tq4A1 Pneumonia: https://t.co/RYicUmSFEb ..
Now we have Odds Ratios published showing possibly a 30% relative risk benefit in the shorter term. Epi studies for this period are closer to 0.5%. @ProfKausikRay https://t.co/c3jO9FHeBC. Using this data, my question is. Should statins be used for primary prevention of ASCVD?
However the WOSCOPs 20 year follow up @ProfKausikRay suggested that there MIGHT be a small advantage ( 4.5% absolute benefit) to statins long term. https://t.co/mxTWwC2mxk
RT @gcfmd: @venkmurthy @CaptRockyBob @VietHeartPA @khurramn1 @MichaelJBlaha @mdmiedema @DavidLBrownMD @boback @rauldsf_santos @almallahmo @…
@venkmurthy @CaptRockyBob @VietHeartPA @khurramn1 @MichaelJBlaha @mdmiedema @DavidLBrownMD @boback @rauldsf_santos @almallahmo @MBittencourtMD @MethodistHosp @NadeenFaza @MasriAhmadMD @WilliamZoghbi @pabeda1 @JJheart_doc @pnatarajanmd @thebyrdlab RTC data on statins in primary prevention pts with LDL 190 or above. Short, intermediate, and long term benefits including lower mortality. Benefits dramatically outweigh risks across the board. Why wait till advanced to plaque or an event? Prevent it. https://t.co/qJXb0VznsL
AS
AG
RS
GM
D
JS
T
G
AM
AM
DD
RP
FZ
GP
HF
DN
FP
JL
CD
BZ