Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The group generally agrees with the publication, citing examples like Dr. Bowleg's critique of the use of 'health disparities' and her emphasis on dismantling structural inequalities. Words such as 'dismantle', 'crucial', and phrases like 'approaches that dismantle structural inequities' reflect a positive reception and recognition of the article's emphasis on epistemology and methodology as fundamental to meaningful health equity research.
Most discussions support the idea that epistemology is crucial to health equity research, emphasizing the importance of addressing social structures.
Posts indicate high interest, especially with references to influential figures like Dr. Lisa Bowleg and the critique of common terminology like 'health disparities'.
The comments demonstrate engagement through critical analysis and appreciation of the methodology and theoretical underpinnings discussed in the publication.
While the discussions highlight significant conceptual shifts, they suggest moderate perceived impact on current practices, emphasizing the transformative potential of a critical epistemological stance.
3/ One of my fave pieces was commentary by Dr. Lisa Bowleg -- 'Towards a Critical Health Equity Research Stance: Why Epistemology and Methodology Matter More Than Qualitative Methods'- she discusses approaches that dismantle structural inequities as foundational to #healthequity https://t.co/vK2AfBcKHp
#LisaBowleg criticizes "the ubiquitous use of the term health disparities in U.S. public health and argue[s] that the uncritical use of this term reflects epistemologies of ignorance that function to bolster #Whiteprivilege." https://t.co/o2GCZ2rCDg https://t.co/mGvDlSfswc
In this segment, experts discuss authentic engagement in academic roles, identifying mentors, and finding a supportive career environment, emphasizing strategies to promote diversity and inclusion in higher education.
In this video, experts discuss epistemic exclusion, injustice, and oppression, highlighting how biases against marginalized scholars affect recognition, promotion, and diversity in academia. Addressing these barriers is…
This video discusses epistemic exclusion as a barrier to diversity in academia, highlighting biases in research evaluation and suggesting strategies for more inclusive faculty assessment to foster equity and…
This video emphasizes the importance of naming and externalizing external oppression, focusing on epistemic exclusion as a barrier to diversity in academia. It explores biases that devalue marginalized scholars and…
3/ One of my fave pieces was commentary by Dr. Lisa Bowleg -- 'Towards a Critical Health Equity Research Stance: Why Epistemology and Methodology Matter More Than Qualitative Methods'- she discusses approaches that dismantle structural inequities as foundational to #healthequity https://t.co/vK2AfBcKHp
#LisaBowleg criticizes "the ubiquitous use of the term health disparities in U.S. public health and argue[s] that the uncritical use of this term reflects epistemologies of ignorance that function to bolster #Whiteprivilege." https://t.co/o2GCZ2rCDg https://t.co/mGvDlSfswc
odology matter more than qualitative methods. Health Education & Behavior, 44(5), 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198117728760. Bowleg, L., ...
doi: 10.1177/1090198117728760. Carter, S. M., & Little, M. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies ...
DS
JB