Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reflect strong interest and moderate engagement, with examples like sharing of search strategies and adherence evaluations, as well as references to data sharing and external studies. The tone is informative and collaborative, emphasizing the importance of improving reporting quality, which supports an overall positive view of the publication's relevance and impact.
Most discussions acknowledge the study's findings about suboptimal adherence to PRISMA, indicating general agreement with the publication's conclusions.
Posts demonstrate high interest by referencing detailed aspects like data sharing, search strategies, and adherence evaluations.
Participants are engaging with the topic through sharing data, quoting guidelines, and referencing related studies, showing moderate depth.
The conversations highlight that the research addresses important issues in systematic review transparency, suggesting a notable but not transformative impact.
More importantly, you can see our data, included studies, excluded studies, search strategies, etc here: https://t.co/kix8brfDbk (w/HUGE thanks to @mjpages @dmoher for sharing their data from https://t.co/NSX6rWXmjW which saved us so. much. time.)
#239 evaluating adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to PRISMA Guidlines ‘Many studies have evaluated how well SRs adhere to the PRISMA Statement, and the pooled result suggests reporting of many items is suboptimal. @mjpages @dmoher https://t.co/DXEtrgifQS https://t.co/QLIcY3v5CW
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review - PubMed https://t.co/WJLQpEGtQT
RT @mlrethlefsen: More importantly, you can see our data, included studies, excluded studies, search strategies, etc here: https://t.co/kix…
RT @westwoodsam1: #239 evaluating adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to PRISMA Guidlines ‘Many studies have evaluated how w…
RT @mlrethlefsen: More importantly, you can see our data, included studies, excluded studies, search strategies, etc here: https://t.co/kix…
The PRISMA Statement aims to improve transparency in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A scoping review of 100 studies found that adherence remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for strategies to enhance…
The PRISMA Statement aims to enhance transparency in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A scoping review of 100 studies revealed limited adherence to key guidelines, highlighting the need for improved strategies to…
The PRISMA Statement aims to improve transparency in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A scoping review examined 100 studies to evaluate adherence and the impact of PRISMA guidelines, revealing limited compliance…
The PRISMA Statement aims to improve transparency in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A scoping review of 100 studies found that adherence to key guidelines remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for strategies…
The PRISMA Statement aims to improve transparency in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A scoping review of 100 studies highlights suboptimal adherence and limited research on extensions, emphasizing the need for…
The PRISMA Statement is designed to improve transparency in systematic reviews. A scoping review analyzed 100 studies, revealing suboptimal adherence to key reporting items and limited research on extensions…
RT @mlrethlefsen: More importantly, you can see our data, included studies, excluded studies, search strategies, etc here: https://t.co/kix…
RT @mlrethlefsen: More importantly, you can see our data, included studies, excluded studies, search strategies, etc here: https://t.co/kix…
RT @mlrethlefsen: More importantly, you can see our data, included studies, excluded studies, search strategies, etc here: https://t.co/kix…
More importantly, you can see our data, included studies, excluded studies, search strategies, etc here: https://t.co/kix8brfDbk (w/HUGE thanks to @mjpages @dmoher for sharing their data from https://t.co/NSX6rWXmjW which saved us so. much. time.)
RT @consiliumsci: Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) S…
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review - PubMed https://t.co/WJLQpEGtQT
RT @westwoodsam1: #239 evaluating adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to PRISMA Guidlines ‘Many studies have evaluated how w…
#239 evaluating adherence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to PRISMA Guidlines ‘Many studies have evaluated how well SRs adhere to the PRISMA Statement, and the pooled result suggests reporting of many items is suboptimal. @mjpages @dmoher https://t.co/DXEtrgifQS https://t.co/QLIcY3v5CW