Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Several discussions praise the innovative microstructural analysis, exemplified by comments about advanced imaging and light scattering, while some question citation irregularities, indicating curiosity and critical engagement. The tone varies from admiration to skepticism, reflecting the article's technical complexity and broader relevance in biological optics research.
Most posts recognize the scientific significance of the research but express skepticism or curiosity about citation claims and relevance.
Discussions show moderate interest, especially regarding the novelty and implications of feather microstructures influencing optical properties.
Some users delve into methodological details and related work, indicating active engagement with the research content.
The conversation highlights the article's potential importance in bio-optical systems and bird display evolution, though skepticism about citation metrics tempers perceived impact.
Birds of the park, and elsewhere: Structural absorption by barbule microstructures of super black bird of paradise feathers.........https://t.co/RIzt0IKQo6 (Open access) (Images: BHL) https://t.co/QWqHucjzIP
@profjasonpotts @Rainmaker1973 i prefer graphene carbon nanotubes scratching Vantablack® or @WildlifeMcCoy @DiemutStrebe @SurreyNanoSys https://t.co/MJRJExTfhH
@wildrainsbrook @JohnGale8 @asianbirder Rick Prum's done a lot of work on this. Not sure anything on bowerbirds yet, but he has looked at some of the black Paradisaeidae (doi 10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w). Xipholena here: https://t.co/P656mEI9qs https://t.co/JS3woihB5e
4ツイート目: Dakota E. McCoy, et. al. (2018) "Structural absorption by barbule microstructures of super black bird of paradise feathers." Nature Communications volume 9, Article number: 1 (必要な部分のみを切り取り) https://t.co/gBQU4NJrin
Science twitter! Why does google scholar claim McCoy et al 2018 has been cited >500 times? It's a super-cool paper, BUT, many of the alleged citations are irrelevant, & McCoy et al 2018 isn't cited. Who's gaming g-scholar & why??? https://t.co/4G9ghp761f 1/n @WildlifeMcCoy
Structural absorption by barbule microstructures of super black bird of paradise feathers | Nature Communications https://t.co/j4jnmBNNLU
This study explores how microstructures on bird of paradise feathers create a super black appearance by absorbing nearly all incident light, enhancing visual display during courtship.
This study explores how microstructures on bird of paradise feathers create a super black appearance by absorbing nearly all incident light, enhancing their visual impact during courtship.
Science twitter! Why does google scholar claim McCoy et al 2018 has been cited >500 times? It's a super-cool paper, BUT, many of the alleged citations are irrelevant, & McCoy et al 2018 isn't cited. Who's gaming g-scholar & why??? https://t.co/4G9ghp761f 1/n @WildlifeMcCoy
@profjasonpotts @Rainmaker1973 i prefer graphene carbon nanotubes scratching Vantablack® or @WildlifeMcCoy @DiemutStrebe @SurreyNanoSys https://t.co/MJRJExTfhH
Structural absorption by barbule microstructures of super black bird of paradise feathers | Nature Communications https://t.co/j4jnmBNNLU
@wildrainsbrook @JohnGale8 @asianbirder Rick Prum's done a lot of work on this. Not sure anything on bowerbirds yet, but he has looked at some of the black Paradisaeidae (doi 10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w). Xipholena here: https://t.co/P656mEI9qs https://t.co/JS3woihB5e
4ツイート目: Dakota E. McCoy, et. al. (2018) "Structural absorption by barbule microstructures of super black bird of paradise feathers." Nature Communications volume 9, Article number: 1 (必要な部分のみを切り取り) https://t.co/gBQU4NJrin
Birds of the park, and elsewhere: Structural absorption by barbule microstructures of super black bird of paradise feathers.........https://t.co/RIzt0IKQo6 (Open access) (Images: BHL) https://t.co/QWqHucjzIP