Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reflect a high level of engagement and concern, with examples such as references to a 3% seropositivity rate in rural villages and debates over the role of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, emphasizing their tone of seriousness and speculative reasoning about origins. Words like 'evidence,' 'risk,' and 'control group' contribute to a sense of urgency and importance, illustrating the widespread interest in the study's implications for future pandemic prevention.
Most discussions support the significance of the study and its implications, with several referencing the evidence of zoonotic transmission and lab research.
Participants show high curiosity, citing multiple studies, discussing seropositivity rates, and debates about lab origins, which demonstrate active engagement and concern.
Many contributors analyze methodology, reference multiple papers, and debate the validity of lab leak versus natural spillover scenarios, indicating deep involvement.
The discussions highlight the importance of understanding zoonotic risks and lab safety, emphasizing potential impacts on public health policies and research transparency.
4/ Subtask 6.4 - Test previously collected human sera from Yunnan Province to assess SARSr-CoV spillover. https://t.co/mJod6qoPfZ https://t.co/FuSaTSOMvv https://t.co/8OPZaC7Avf
@mbalter @natashaloder @MarionKoopmans @PeterDaszak @PNASNews A bizarre argument that omits in most cases of zoonotic spillover there wasn't a lab nearby experimenting with the same type of virus! Wuhan was seen as such an unlikely place for bat coronavirus infection it was used as a control for serological studies. https://t.co/5VslGWCIwL https://t.co/sOXiGm7GLd
33/ Curiously, before the Covid outbreak, Peter Daszak and Zhengli Shi were claiming the risk of SARS-like spillover was quite low. In their 2018 paper titled “Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China” they reported that only 6 of the 218 https://t.co/XCZeGFpycC
@Ayjchan Wuhan was even used as a control for a serological study on bat coronaviruses because residents were unlikely to come into contact with bats due to its location. https://t.co/5VslGWCIwL https://t.co/zD6d2sMZNh
@CD57227 Interesting, the 2 papers are: https://t.co/WXrwCCk1WX https://t.co/lDUNZ7yee1 The 1st references the Mojiang mine, the 2nd serological evidence of spillover close to caves in Yunnan. To me, this implies she was initially proposing a bat - human spillover in Yunnan
3/4 The extrapolation from 6 to 1-7M notwithstanding, the study itself was weak. First, antibody levels were pretty low. Here’s the antibody graph from their study: compare the farmers’ levels (panel B, leftmost) with those of 2 SARS patients (rightmost): https://t.co/qcHdTXxgrP https://t.co/DwhWAPObui
This video discusses different COVID-19 diagnostic methods, including rapid antibody tests and RT-PCR. It highlights the importance of proper testing to identify infection accurately and compare their roles in…
Richard Lund discusses the FDA's original research in Yunnan, China, and the search for patient Zero in the COVID-19 outbreak, highlighting traditional Chinese medicine usage and evidence of bat coronavirus infection in…
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles... Virol Sin. 2018 Feb; 33(1): 104–107.
RT @tommy_cleary: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China (2018) Animal and Human Rights: This stud…
RT @tommy_cleary: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China Zheng-Li Shi zlshi@wh.iov.cn (https://t.c…
@Roper_Lab @gadboit @mbw61567742 @Ticklicker56 @3GHtweets @herzogfa @Dissenting2020 @BillyBostickson @Kevin_McKernan @_John_Reed @DonnaGay8989 @ryanbeed @A1responder @DrBMcDH @JohnBeaudoinSr @TammyRenee2567 @chrismartenson @CogburnMrs @shimjelly @TnAlistair @AskDrDrew @drdrew @ECUBrodySOM @ban_epp_gofroc @quay_dr @R_H_Ebright @nizzaneela @MJnanostretch "The 2.7% seropositivity for the high risk group of residents living in close proximity to bat colonies suggests that spillover is a relatively rare event." But not as rare as the outbreaks of SARS and MERS... https://t.co/LvjJKDLVOy
Re: "Virtually all of those viruses will never make it anywhere near humans unless we help them along." It's worth noting evidence of infection: by avian influenza in wildlife professionals pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16965717/ by SARSr-CoV in villages in China pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29500691/ 2/2
@MMTLabour All evidence points to Covid originating in the wet market. It's happened before. https://t.co/hOlQoAWq5l https://t.co/TNnfFVxAel
RT @tommy_cleary: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China Zheng-Li Shi zlshi@wh.iov.cn (https://t.c…
RT @tommy_cleary: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China (2018) Animal and Human Rights: This stud…
@gadboit @BillyBostickson @ban_epp_gofroc Sure not in Wuhan, but again that was Shi Zhengli and Peter Daszak's life's work. They were looking, see paper below. It turned out to be surprisingly easy to find pre-pandemic antibodies in tiny population samples where zoonoses were actually occurring. https://t.co/faNED6BnD4
@jhas5 @WashburneAlex @quay_dr I'm still contemplating on the two papers Shi sent Drosten as "hint" on whats going on in Wuhan sent Jan 6th 2020. Its an eco-health paper. None of the sera reacted to SARS & Chimera RBD? https://t.co/4GLMEtas6d https://t.co/nTcNWGrJsm
RT @roadjull: @butlerofdogs @sanewman1 @Rebecca21951651 @Baric_Lab If you're gonna just jump into a 4 year battle, you should first catch u…
RT @roadjull: @butlerofdogs @sanewman1 @Rebecca21951651 @Baric_Lab If you're gonna just jump into a 4 year battle, you should first catch u…
@butlerofdogs @sanewman1 @Rebecca21951651 @Baric_Lab If you're gonna just jump into a 4 year battle, you should first catch up on the basics. Wuhan was famously used as negative control for SARS serology by Shi Zeng-Li herself. That's how non-endemic SARS-like viruses are to Hubei province. https://t.co/kHogLDWxte
@sanewman1 It's basically the same. Start with a bat sarbecovirus. It acquires an FCS naturally (either in the bats or in a person it has infected) and hey presto it goes pandemic. People do pick up SARS related viruses from bats somewhat often. https://t.co/Qxs2Bx4EP9
RT @ydeigin: 33/ Curiously, before the Covid outbreak, Peter Daszak and Zhengli Shi were claiming the risk of SARS-like spillover was quit…
RT @ydeigin: 33/ Curiously, before the Covid outbreak, Peter Daszak and Zhengli Shi were claiming the risk of SARS-like spillover was quit…
@henjin256 @SitSilver @CharlesRixey @BlackTomThePyr8 @RandPaul @Sabisteb @Doctor_I_am_The Hu? So the Corman-Drosten Primers were shorter, thats it? Would be hard to patent if it was exactly the same as in 2016, right? How many PCR Protocols back then used the RdRP? China allegedly had the genome idendified later! Shi knew and hinted on Jan 6th! https://t.co/4GLMEtas6d
RT @stevenemassey: @CD57227 Interesting, the 2 papers are: https://t.co/WXrwCCk1WX https://t.co/lDUNZ7yee1 The 1st references the Moj…
RT @stevenemassey: @CD57227 Interesting, the 2 papers are: https://t.co/WXrwCCk1WX https://t.co/lDUNZ7yee1 The 1st references the Moj…
RT @stevenemassey: @CD57227 Interesting, the 2 papers are: https://t.co/WXrwCCk1WX https://t.co/lDUNZ7yee1 The 1st references the Moj…
@CD57227 Interesting, the 2 papers are: https://t.co/WXrwCCk1WX https://t.co/lDUNZ7yee1 The 1st references the Mojiang mine, the 2nd serological evidence of spillover close to caves in Yunnan. To me, this implies she was initially proposing a bat - human spillover in Yunnan
@rajeshxsingh @joel_c_miller @nytimes "2.7% seropositivity for the high risk group of residents living in close proximity to bat colonies" https://t.co/PGP727XSGK
RT @ydeigin: 33/ Curiously, before the Covid outbreak, Peter Daszak and Zhengli Shi were claiming the risk of SARS-like spillover was quit…
RT @ydeigin: 33/ Curiously, before the Covid outbreak, Peter Daszak and Zhengli Shi were claiming the risk of SARS-like spillover was quit…
33/ Curiously, before the Covid outbreak, Peter Daszak and Zhengli Shi were claiming the risk of SARS-like spillover was quite low. In their 2018 paper titled “Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China” they reported that only 6 of the 218 https://t.co/XCZeGFpycC
@Nucleocapsoid @breakfast_dogs @DarrenM98230782 @raouljdegroot @SystemsVirology @JarelElgin @vmcorman @a_kruschke @stevenemassey @BiophysicsFL ... come across any good evidence of this), in others perhaps incidental. We certainly do catch viruses directly from bats. There isn't necessarily any need for another species of host to be involved. https://t.co/Qxs2Bx4EP9
@blink64 @ZooNaughty Humans often do get infected with bat viruses directly. We may well have got SARS1 from bats first and then given it to civets rather than the other way around. The same may have happened with pangolins. Wild civets were generally seronegative for... https://t.co/Qxs2Bx4EP9
RT @Panopticonomy: @Byron_Wan Notes: The same publication known as "Virol Sin" in its short form. The same Journal that Peter Daszak publi…
RT @Panopticonomy: @Byron_Wan Notes: The same publication known as "Virol Sin" in its short form. The same Journal that Peter Daszak publi…
@Byron_Wan Notes: The same publication known as "Virol Sin" in its short form. The same Journal that Peter Daszak published in with the bat lady. Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/MEZ5Q60kfT
RT @Engineer2The: 4/ Subtask 6.4 - Test previously collected human sera from Yunnan Province to assess SARSr-CoV spillover. https://t.co/m…
9\ Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/Qr3jU4Xj6c Finds serological evidence of unproductive spillovers in Yunnan, discloses their sampling locations
@harishseshadri2 @PatrickSSte @Dissenting2020 @MJnanostretch @jbkinney @gdemaneuf @Bryce_Nickels DEFUSE study site involving 3 caves is 250 km from Mojiang mine where RaTG13 was discovered. This paper indicates Shitou & Yanzi Caves were implicated by Daszak for SARSr virus Ab in blood of local villagers - see map: https://t.co/RvUKc5UNJz Search Googlemap for Lvxixincun,China
RT @Engineer2The: 4/ Subtask 6.4 - Test previously collected human sera from Yunnan Province to assess SARSr-CoV spillover. https://t.co/m…
RT @Amy31129057: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China (Feb. 2018) Peter Daszak Received 2017 V…
RT @Amy31129057: Dates are important~ To: Ralph Baric From Alison Andre- EcoHealth Alliance March 9, 2018 Attached is a PDF version of t…
RT @Amy31129057: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China (Feb. 2018) Peter Daszak Received 2017 V…
RT @Amy31129057: Dates are important~ To: Ralph Baric From Alison Andre- EcoHealth Alliance March 9, 2018 Attached is a PDF version of t…
RT @Amy31129057: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China (Feb. 2018) Peter Daszak Received 2017 V…
RT @Amy31129057: Dates are important~ To: Ralph Baric From Alison Andre- EcoHealth Alliance March 9, 2018 Attached is a PDF version of t…
RT @Amy31129057: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China (Feb. 2018) Peter Daszak Received 2017 V…
RT @Amy31129057: Dates are important~ To: Ralph Baric From Alison Andre- EcoHealth Alliance March 9, 2018 Attached is a PDF version of t…
RT @Amy31129057: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China (Feb. 2018) Peter Daszak Received 2017 V…
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China (Feb. 2018) Peter Daszak Received 2017 Virol Sin. 2018 Feb;33(1):104-107 This study was approved by the Wuhan Institute of Virology Institutional Review Board (China) and by Hummingbird IRB (USA) https://t.co/vmKxm9qI9e https://t.co/DBIVUvRxQd
RT @Amy31129057: Dates are important~ To: Ralph Baric From Alison Andre- EcoHealth Alliance March 9, 2018 Attached is a PDF version of t…
Dates are important~ To: Ralph Baric From Alison Andre- EcoHealth Alliance March 9, 2018 Attached is a PDF version of the Wang et al paper “Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China." https://t.co/pmlp72nJyN
@AwakenedJoyce @stopthespraybc @IR23944504 @R_H_Ebright @mindymouse324 MERS/MERSr's continues to spill over to humans from camels where it is endemic. Based on seroprevalence, it likely spills over multiple times a year without causing large outbreaks...as do SARSr's. https://t.co/JtdEIu5CcB https://t.co/PGP727XkRc
@mentju4 @schwinn3 I still get a chuckle out of the fact that as recently as 2018 Wuhan was so unlikely it was the control group in Daszak and Shis' own SARS-like CoV serology studies hahaha. doi: 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7 https://t.co/sylHTOX1As
@grizwald87 @mbalter @zeynep @tommy2t45103307 @BiophysicsFL @MarioKoopmans @R_H_Ebright @janeqiuchina @sciencecohen Btw, have you read the Daszak/SZL paper where they did the scary "gain of function" tests (with sequences that *are* available in databases I might add). https://t.co/CXJDciGaZw Cause there's another part to it, where they did serological testing.
@whstancil Link to above paper "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China" Ning Wang, Lin-Fa Wang, Peter Daszak, Zheng-Li Shi et el https://t.co/04g5p6O4yO
RT @Biorealism: @rickwsint @_everythingism @C_Kavanagh @NateSilver538 Wuhan was such an unlikely location for a SARS-like coronavirus outbr…
RT @Biorealism: @davideyoungmd @whstancil Wuhan was such an unlikely place for this type of outbreak it was used as a control for a 2018 se…
@davideyoungmd @whstancil Wuhan was such an unlikely place for this type of outbreak it was used as a control for a 2018 serological study on SARS-like coronaviruses infections. An outbreak in southern China would make a lot more sense. WIV's research is an obvious source. https://t.co/xKquE30OEm
RT @Biorealism: @rickwsint @_everythingism @C_Kavanagh @NateSilver538 Wuhan was such an unlikely location for a SARS-like coronavirus outbr…
@rickwsint @_everythingism @C_Kavanagh @NateSilver538 Wuhan was such an unlikely location for a SARS-like coronavirus outbreak that they used it as a control for serological study on these viruses in 2018. The nearest relatives to SARS-CoV-2 are in Yunnan and Laos. Areas WIV sampled. https://t.co/YEbN1ztX9i
@dumb_41 https://t.co/tYRGJ7Un6L
RT @pepesgrandma: October 2015, 6 people out of 240 randomly tested people in 4 villages in Jinning County, China, tested positive for mult…
@G_Commish @ejustin46 @Nk9992Nk @supertodd1 @amcalber @dgurdasani1 @VirusesImmunity @EricTopol @EU_Commission Best zoonosis evidence! https://t.co/tzZDwNmrLO https://t.co/xk7dHTNqhh
@MikeEsque @R_H_Ebright @du_yuping https://t.co/tzZDwNmrLO
@Rebecca21951651 @angoffinet 2018- Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China
https://t.co/8PBNqyuAgO
@PhilippMarkolin @MarionKoopmans @stgoldst @edwardcholmes @nailbomb3 @flodebarre @janeqiuchina And of course, they had already published "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China" which basically shows them getting their data out, glamour journal or not. https://t.co/TJcEL9lXI6
@xiruxi @mikeydoubled @zeynep Note also that the paper includes preliminary behavioral risk survey data showing that 9.1% of rural community participants from S. China had witnessed bats flying close to houses, although no data from Wuhan. https://t.co/ZfGXhBc7QP
Figure is adapted from this paper by 6 WIV affiliated authors: https://t.co/swrhgjUXbe
RT @Engineer2The: 4/ Subtask 6.4 - Test previously collected human sera from Yunnan Province to assess SARSr-CoV spillover. https://t.co/m…
@Biorealism @PEHJackson @davidzweig @LauraKahn1 This is important: "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China", from our beloved favourites of EchoHealth, in 2018.
https://t.co/zc4I8ZtdJf
RT @Biorealism: @nparoundight @joshtpm @NoahShachtman Wuhan was used as a control for serological studies on bat coronaviruses research bec…
@nparoundight @joshtpm @NoahShachtman Wuhan was used as a control for serological studies on bat coronaviruses research because of its urban location they were unlikely to have contact with bats. https://t.co/5VslGWCIwL https://t.co/O6eBMna66N
@lindacavazos13 Also Here's the other link to the wuhan lab connection look at the project numbers for both they match https://t.co/ogyeiLbujp
@mkeulemans @VermeulenHellen @WashburneAlex @NicolieGelder @Repelsteeltje21 @alinachan @Forbes Note that Wuhan was previously used as a control for serological studies on bat coronaviruses research because of its urban location. Botao and Lei Xiao noted the nearest relatives to SARS-CoV-2 were ~900km away in areas WIV sampled. https://t.co/5VslGWCIwL https://t.co/IzbtYdVRoW
@stevemur @NateSilver538 Serological evidence of SARS-COV or SARSr-cov spillover in rural China (2018) https://t.co/PGP727XkRc
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/Vuws8J3JG6
@mbalter @gdemaneuf @Biol4Ever @philipcball Yes, another is that the Wuhan Institute of Virology located in Wuhan due to its proximity to bat coronaviruses in nature, when it was in fact used as a control for serological studies on bat coronaviruses due to its urban location. https://t.co/5VslGWlFuL https://t.co/yjeAfm0Z1A
RT @Engineer2The: 4/ Subtask 6.4 - Test previously collected human sera from Yunnan Province to assess SARSr-CoV spillover. https://t.co/m…
RT @Engineer2The: 4/ Subtask 6.4 - Test previously collected human sera from Yunnan Province to assess SARSr-CoV spillover. https://t.co/m…
4/ Subtask 6.4 - Test previously collected human sera from Yunnan Province to assess SARSr-CoV spillover. https://t.co/mJod6qoPfZ https://t.co/FuSaTSOMvv https://t.co/8OPZaC7Avf
@Jikkyleaks Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/QKv8KpPr3Q
@Ayjchan Wuhan was even used as a control for serological studies on bat coronaviruses because of its urban setting. https://t.co/5VslGWlFuL https://t.co/2d7bjp12SS
@tabulla_rassa @BallouxFrancois @LizHighleyman @RightsRobins There is a research paper that posits this exact theory when Chinese villagers living near large bat caves were tested for CoV antibodies from the WIV....:"Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China"....
RT @Biorealism: @Jstnorv10 @MacLilja @bennyjohnson Not true. Wuhan was even used as a control for bat coronavirus studies because it's an u…
RT @Biorealism: @Jstnorv10 @MacLilja @bennyjohnson Not true. Wuhan was even used as a control for bat coronavirus studies because it's an u…
RT @Biorealism: @Jstnorv10 @MacLilja @bennyjohnson Not true. Wuhan was even used as a control for bat coronavirus studies because it's an u…
@Jstnorv10 @MacLilja @bennyjohnson Not true. Wuhan was even used as a control for bat coronavirus studies because it's an unlikely place for people to come into contact with bats. https://t.co/5VslGWCIwL https://t.co/PSXp1oGSLM
https://t.co/3EyMlul5Fw Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China
https://t.co/idaNPR9nXr Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China
RT @pepesgrandma: October 2015, 6 people out of 240 randomly tested people in 4 villages in Jinning County, China, tested positive for mult…
RT @pepesgrandma: October 2015, 6 people out of 240 randomly tested people in 4 villages in Jinning County, China, tested positive for mult…
October 2015, 6 people out of 240 randomly tested people in 4 villages in Jinning County, China, tested positive for multiple SARS Corona virus strains. Considering waning antibodies over time, these were recent infections. Add the super bat cave found.. https://t.co/gcoAJKRznF https://t.co/ZwbpYtqc4f
RT @Biorealism: @WashburneAlex @joshlbrooks @JulianRhees @BallouxFrancois Wuhan was also used as a control for a serological study on bat c…
@WashburneAlex @joshlbrooks @JulianRhees @BallouxFrancois Wuhan was also used as a control for a serological study on bat coronaviruses because people are unlikely to be in contact with bats. Let alone for a bat coronavirus outbreak to begin where the nearest relative to the virus is found ~1,000 miles away. https://t.co/5VslGWCIwL https://t.co/Yc5XaOWe67
RT @Biorealism: @Ayjchan Wuhan was even used as a control for a serological study on bat coronaviruses because residents were unlikely to c…
RT @Biorealism: @Ayjchan Wuhan was even used as a control for a serological study on bat coronaviruses because residents were unlikely to c…
@Ayjchan Wuhan was even used as a control for a serological study on bat coronaviruses because residents were unlikely to come into contact with bats due to its location. https://t.co/5VslGWCIwL https://t.co/zD6d2sMZNh
@mbalter @DavidBahry @_ocean @Nature I guess the nearest to that would be Peter Daszak and Zheng-Li Shi "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans" paper using Wuhan as a negative control against areas they expected to see outbreaks https://t.co/gNb3Y1i6W0
RT @Biorealism: @mbalter @natashaloder @MarionKoopmans @PeterDaszak @PNASNews A bizarre argument that omits in most cases of zoonotic spill…
RT @Biorealism: @mbalter @natashaloder @MarionKoopmans @PeterDaszak @PNASNews A bizarre argument that omits in most cases of zoonotic spill…
RT @Biorealism: @mbalter @natashaloder @MarionKoopmans @PeterDaszak @PNASNews A bizarre argument that omits in most cases of zoonotic spill…
@mbalter @natashaloder @MarionKoopmans @PeterDaszak @PNASNews A bizarre argument that omits in most cases of zoonotic spillover there wasn't a lab nearby experimenting with the same type of virus! Wuhan was seen as such an unlikely place for bat coronavirus infection it was used as a control for serological studies. https://t.co/5VslGWCIwL https://t.co/sOXiGm7GLd
@2dedostesta2 @pathogenetics @0bj3ctivity @EduEngineer @WIRED @sergeilkp @kumar_lab @MichaelWorobey @ScienceMagazine @sciencecohen @mnt @WmHaseltine This 2018 paper did find pre-pandemic SARSr-CoV antibodies in the region where SARS-CoV was traced to, which is also the same region that the closest relatives of SARS-CoV-2 were found (and they're able to infect human cells): https://t.co/kX5nMTJkP9
RT @CovidSerology: @msabouri @BallouxFrancois @stuartjdneil @MichaelWorobey @ScienceMagazine Only a limited number of people in Hubei are i…
RT @PatrickSSte: @InWuchang @SebViret @emmecola @R_H_Ebright @jbkinney @WashburneAlex @VaccaRules Last sentence: "It might also be prudent…
@InWuchang @SebViret @emmecola @R_H_Ebright @jbkinney @WashburneAlex @VaccaRules Last sentence: "It might also be prudent to combine serological surveillance with molecular surveillance of bats in future, despite the technological challenges that this represents" And, you might suggest, molecular surveillance of humans https://t.co/Gktu8q5xXD
RT @PatrickSSte: @InWuchang @SebViret @emmecola @R_H_Ebright Thoughts @jbkinney @WashburneAlex? @VaccaRules you won't like this because it…
@InWuchang @SebViret @emmecola @R_H_Ebright Thoughts @jbkinney @WashburneAlex? @VaccaRules you won't like this because it's speculative but it can give us ideas where to look Eg wouldn't it be incredibly interesting to get the sequence of the SARS-like CoV that generated antibodies in Jinning?⬇️ https://t.co/Gktu8q5xXD
@InWuchang @SebViret @emmecola @R_H_Ebright I also don't understand why everyone is repeating the same few points about lab leak and Huanan market while ignoring a much more likely scenario We know that people in South China had antibodies to SARS-like viruses⬇️ cont/ https://t.co/Gktu8q65Nb
@emmecola @R_H_Ebright A tiny serological sample of 200 people is all you need to find SARS-like antibodies where zoonosis actually happens. https://t.co/faNED6BVsC
RT @InWuchang: @daniel_corcos @jaredpretender @HL3133 @PatrickSSte @pathogenetics @VaccaRules @K_G_Andersen @Ayjchan @ScienceMagazine If la…
@daniel_corcos @jaredpretender @HL3133 @PatrickSSte @pathogenetics @VaccaRules @K_G_Andersen @Ayjchan @ScienceMagazine If lab leak, there could have been a few infections before breakout, & those wouldn't be picked up. But if it was a zoonosis-caused pandemic there should be tens of thousands or millions of infected. Even a small sample would pick it up: https://t.co/faNED6BnD4 https://t.co/10zWmAgRCo
https://t.co/t4Mrr8aXrh
Interesting that Chinese researchers often used Wuhan citizens as a control group in coronavirus research precisely because Wuhan was a long way from bat populations. Well, bats in nature anyway. https://t.co/GETqF2D2K0 https://t.co/DYZFsV5dVW
Interesting that Chinese researchers often used Wuhan citizens as a control group in coronavirus research precisely because Wuhan was a long way from bat populations. Well, bats in nature anyway. https://t.co/GETqF2D2K0 https://t.co/hBQlG3NnjX
Interesting that Chinese researchers often used Wuhan citizens as a control group in coronavirus research precisely because Wuhan was a long way from bat populations. Well, bats in nature anyway. https://t.co/GETqF2D2K0 https://t.co/vXVoDReKOF
@TheEthanIverson @CT_Bergstrom > Number 2 by a long shot. Wang et all found 6 people in villages in Yunnan who had antibodies to SARS-related CoVs in 2015 https://t.co/Gktu8q5xXD
@Ayjchan https://t.co/0VC0ggy3ni
@breakfast_dogs @sciencecohen @john_jxw @blJOg @SpyrosLytras yes absolutely amazing nature/evolution is an incredible thing. With these types of events we are seeing the successful outcomes, ie massive survivor bias, there's many many more SARS-related coronaviruses getting into humans that go nowhere: https://t.co/3gguJp5JSx https://t.co/ENVcHjNLAu
@SebViret @_b_meyer @arambaut Also, fires in London weren't uncommon. In contrast, Wuhan was used as a negative control for a study of serological evidence of bat SARS-related coronavirus infection in humans in China. https://t.co/VvaKaAeNJS https://t.co/Yx1nwcMopY
It found that six people, or nearly 3 percent, carried antibodies against SARS-like coronaviruses from bats—even though none of them had handled wildlife or reported SARS-like or other pneumonialike symptoms. 3/2/18 Published https://t.co/mrjUNSJ6B9 https://t.co/Gcm6krFx1E
. . . on the outskirts of Kunming, the capital of Yunnan, where they conducted intense sampling during different seasons over five consecutive years. 3/2/18 Published https://t.co/mrjUNSJ6B9 https://t.co/Gcm6krFx1E
@justme_hoping @mattwridley Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China Ning Wang, Li, Yang,Huang,Zhang, Guo, Chu-Ming Luo, Maureen Miller, Zhu, Aleksei A. Chmura, Emily Hagan, Ji-Hua Zhou, Yun-Zhi Zhang, Wang, Peter Daszak & Zheng-Li Shi https://t.co/XVLroqymzt
RT @robertson_lab: @tony_vandongen @Rossana38510044 @Ayjchan Thanks, we certainly do need to be concerned with direct bat to human transmis…
@tony_vandongen @Rossana38510044 @Ayjchan Thanks, we certainly do need to be concerned with direct bat to human transmission, https://t.co/3gguJp5c2Z, but live animal markets seem the key link for introducing these viruses into cities where sustained transmission is more likely to seed an outbreak.
@tony_vandongen Wouldn't we observe SARS antibodies in people in the Hubei province before the pandemic in this scenario? https://t.co/LvjJKDLVOy
@MarcBrup Wenn die stellvertretende Leiterin des Wuhan Institute of Virology 2018 die Bevölkerung Wuhans als Kontrollgruppe nimmt, weil sie dort keinerlei Kontakt mit SARS-artigen Viren vermutete, ... https://t.co/sUlL3qaHQz
@randysmith1962 Look into a Chinese scientist named - Shi Zhengli, aka “Bat Woman” She worked at, yes, the Wuhan Institute of Virology. She’s the last author on this study, which was funded by NAIAD & NIH. Yes, Anthony Fauci approved this research. https://t.co/SNJJN94km8
@Camilo2010 @pavel23 Interessant: "As a control, we also collected 240 serum samples from random blood donors in 2015 in Wuhan, Hubei Province more than 1000 km away from Jinning and where inhabitants have a much lower likelihood of contact with bats due to its urban setting." https://t.co/sUlL3qaHQz
@BusinessmanLego https://t.co/uOy0MBC2Os https://t.co/Y5kLIm40XD
@msabouri @BallouxFrancois @stuartjdneil @MichaelWorobey @ScienceMagazine Only a limited number of people in Hubei are involved in the wild life trade so no its not a good case for people living near Hubei having strong X-reactive immunity to SARS-Cov2. https://t.co/ZDCFD64Zpq https://t.co/IvNR52KRkL
@spwells A similar study in 2015 in yunan "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China" https://t.co/DS3tSB1mT5
@kderosa @mangosandanimu @echo_chamberz Serological tests are cross-reactive to SARS viruses; and since they detect the exact antibodies that confer immunity, any prior immunity they don't detect also wouldn't work. https://t.co/LDFMoxsUFS
@jonathan_reiss If you had bothered to click through and read the links, you would learn it was 6 people out of 218 in the four villages "in close proximity to caves where bats that carry diverse SARSr-CoVs." https://t.co/TAT7oVdDI4 https://t.co/5tcBZVpBdc
@wanderer_jasnah Well I think they specialize in organizing funding and support for scientific research, and advocating for the idea that zoonoses are about way more than the virus. Cuz public policy matters. https://t.co/sSkNauO1hm https://t.co/mheaMaDo4M https://t.co/wvLZgXoD2y
@_everythingism @harishseshadri2 @nicolascgrey @MJnanostretch @stuartjdneil @SebViret @AngloScot2 @Stephengm99 Some of this risk posed by SARS-related bat viruses has been quantified eg -- "2.7% seropositivity for the high risk group of residents living in close proximity to bat colonies" https://t.co/sYrxBEr6g7
@XinWei57337546 @R_H_Ebright @stuartjdneil @Hookshown @mrandersoninneo @RobertJUsher @PhilippMarkolin Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China Received: 21 November 2017 / Accepted: 8 January 2018 Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018 https://t.co/2t5YbDLwkH
@kakape @PeterDaszak @nycbat We’re talking about two studies here, which you forgot to mention both have P. Daszak as a co-author. In the first study, six seropositive people are found in a sample of 218, and in the second it’s nine out of 1500. https://t.co/wzHY2R3Vjd 1/
@R_H_Ebright @TheSeeker268 Importantly, in both studies, none of the seropositive subjects cite relevant respiratory symptoms in the 12 months preceding the sampling. In the "3%" (6/218 = 2.7%) study, authors conclude that this a sign of subclinical infection https://t.co/pdm9OpsuKK https://t.co/TSzwfaUVml
RT @tommy_cleary: @Tantalite Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans https://t.co/IYqxZmwlES Tells the tal…
2018 Study: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection In Humans, China #coronavirus #virus #science https://t.co/MjH7BrfP1T
RT @tommy_cleary: @AnagalisArvensi @mrandersoninneo @MonaRahalkar @Ayjchan @pathogenetics "Subsequent serological surveys found ∼3% positiv…
@AnagalisArvensi @mrandersoninneo @MonaRahalkar @Ayjchan @pathogenetics "Subsequent serological surveys found ∼3% positivity rates to SARS-related coronaviruses (SARSr-CoV) in residents of Yunnan province living close to bat caves" https://t.co/wbVY04TwFP
@charlie_cherpor @RozasL1 Aquí tiene evidencias de que los coronavirus pueden saltar directamente a humanos desde murciélagos. Lo que usted crea es irrelevante aquí
@babarlelephant @ChuckPaulen @franciscodeasis @TheSeeker268 @Engineer2The @sanqia @Daoyu15 @AntGDuarte @Ayjchan Great geotag. I've never worked out the view over rooftops. Sero study map overlays precisely on roads/villages and Shitou is just across the dam above a concrete road https://t.co/0x56pkWNwr https://t.co/uz8mIik1sK
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China | SpringerLink https://t.co/WlwcJFWyPC
RT @chernayavdova1: https://t.co/tuldcA8Qa0 https://t.co/lIHhCY8GX9
RT @chernayavdova1: https://t.co/tuldcA8Qa0 https://t.co/lIHhCY8GX9
https://t.co/tuldcA8Qa0 https://t.co/lIHhCY8GX9
https://t.co/bv3qChKbgY https://t.co/tuldcA8Qa0
https://t.co/lIHhCY8GX9 https://t.co/tuldcA8Qa0
RT @revoltes: En 2018, des spécialistes de #Wuhan cosignent "Preuves sérologiques de l'infection d'humains par des #coronavirus de chauve-…
RT @robertson_lab: @stuartjdneil @InWuchang @evolving_string @krylormaximus @_everythingism @Daoyu15 @Rossana38510044 @AtomsksSanakan @past…
@stuartjdneil @InWuchang @evolving_string @krylormaximus @_everythingism @Daoyu15 @Rossana38510044 @AtomsksSanakan @past_is_future @franciscodeasis @FrancescoEsp33 @zhihuachen @ydeigin @lab_leak Plenty of evidence from serology studies for dead end SARS-like infections in rural China - https://t.co/3gguJp5c2Z & https://t.co/el7fPXHLBS
@hedwig_sam @FLMIRONES Esta pandemia es una consecuencia conocida y anunciada por años, causada por acciones humanas. Pero nadie hizo caso. No es ninguna casualidad, es necedad en todo caso. Este fue de los últimos en advertirnos (2018): https://t.co/8aO1hXTctg
RT @RealYeyoZa: Fact is in 2015 Wuhan was considered such an unlikely place for a natural spillover from bats to occur that it was used as…
RT @RealYeyoZa: Fact is in 2015 Wuhan was considered such an unlikely place for a natural spillover from bats to occur that it was used as…
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/Tn5CG8gzuu
@p_lindenfors Den här studien exempelvis använde Wuhan som negativ kontrollgrupp just för att det finns så få fladdermöss där. https://t.co/dux3spJCDh https://t.co/UrkFYbG9Tt
China: Zhengli/Daszak/Ecohealth – “Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related #Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China” 2018 https://t.co/sym1vkJEUq
@natashaloder Well found. Bat coronaviruses pass sporadically into humans - as Shi ZhengLi, @peterdaszak et al documented here. https://t.co/jmEuHEoYqK But intermediate species (in my understanding) would make infection more effective.
@lymanstoneky Your tweet is about Yunnan.. The outbreak most likely emerged in Wuhan.. This study on seroprevalence took Wuhan as a negative control.. https://t.co/7WJefsKK0G
RT @pepesgrandma: October 2015, 6 people out of 240 randomly tested people in 4 villages in Jinning County, China, tested positive for mult…
RT @pepesgrandma: October 2015, 6 people out of 240 randomly tested people in 4 villages in Jinning County, China, tested positive for mult…
@rohrer_bruno @MarcBrup Published: 02 March 2018 https://t.co/rNUgEjCDWY
@WeiyuanOttawa @tengbiao 18年3月发表的一篇文章显示，对云南矿场周边村民的调查发现，只有2.7%的村民具有针对蝙蝠冠状病毒的抗体，而在对武汉居民的测试没有发现任何证据证明他们接触过冠状病毒。 参考： https://t.co/e28fr9HiSO 6/n
@BeijingPalmer How likely are such zoonotic spillovers in Wuhan? There was in fact a study in which Wuhan was taken as a control for assessing spillovers.. https://t.co/7WJefsKK0G
@AstorAaron @zeynep @ScottGottliebMD @florian_krammer @NateSilver538 It’s from a WIV authored paper. https://t.co/G9oN2sV6ML
@thedenature @gomijacogeo @NateSilver538 That is often repeated, and it is false. https://t.co/soWG9LQbzw
@EthicalSkeptic seems this would create a fissure some between natural vs lab. nonetheless for the sake of considering all possibilities, perhaps sarsr-cov provide the memory for crossreactivity. https://t.co/t4Mrr8aXrh
@Fang__z @trizzlor @JohnFSilver “As a control, we also collected 240 serum samples from random blood donors in 2015 in Wuhan, Hubei Province more than 1000 km away from Jinning (Fig. 1A) and where inhabitants have a much lower likelihood of contact with bats due to its urban setting.” https://t.co/soWG9LyAHY
"this study further supports the notion that some bat SARSr-CoVs are able to directly infect humans without intermediate hosts, as suggested by receptor entry and animal infection studies" https://t.co/t4Mrr8aXrh
https://t.co/VHiXjx7ta9 https://t.co/dsTiPJz9Fw
Ironically Z.-L. Shi has chosen #Wuhan "where inhabitants have a much lower likelihood of contact with bats[...]" as comparison in this - for certain reasons - very interesting article from 2018. "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China" https://t.co/5ZZQXqSO3O
@LawrenceSellin In the paper of "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China Ning Wang, Shi-Yue Li, [...], and Zheng-Li Shi " It show Shi ZL worked with other 6 institutions including China, Singapore and New York (EcoHealth Alliance)
@Tantalite Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans https://t.co/IYqxZmwlES Tells the tale of Shi taking antibody samples of people in Yunnan in 2017, & thinking/warning about the prospect of SARS-CoV-2, though it had not yet occurred it was a overt risk. https://t.co/rQ3TtiZ7zc
RT @tommy_cleary: @jhouse678 @McWLuke @PeterDaszak @WHO @SciDiplomacyUSA @sciencecohen @MarionKoopmans @wcgIRB @BangXiao_ @MarisePayne @Sci…
@jhouse678 @McWLuke @PeterDaszak @WHO @SciDiplomacyUSA @sciencecohen @MarionKoopmans @wcgIRB @BangXiao_ @MarisePayne @Scinquisitor Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, PRC https://t.co/0gefZhL50w tells the tale of Shi taking antibody samples of people in Yunnan, & thinking/warning about the prospect of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/HOIqv0vj93 https://t.co/kb0RPEcyWG
RT @tommy_cleary: @0707TangDIUDIU @zlj517 above map from Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China, W…
@0707TangDIUDIU @zlj517 above map from Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China, Wang Et al..2018
@ewancampy @DrewPavlou @globaltimesnews @ChinaConSydney @Sophiemcneill @ABCChinese @MFA_China @USNavy @USNINews Perhaps there is some association beyond temporal with the pandemic but in 2017 Prof Shi already found the Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans https://t.co/0gefZhL50w and the only link to US is the ethics approval. https://t.co/WVR18pWTGN https://t.co/noPYH5zmCJ
RT @tommy_cleary: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China (2018) Animal and Human Rights: This stud…
RT @tommy_cleary: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China Zheng-Li Shi zlshi@wh.iov.cn (https://t.c…
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China (2018) Animal and Human Rights: This study was approved by the Wuhan Institute of Virology Institutional Review Board (China) and by Hummingbird IRB (USA).
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China Zheng-Li Shi zlshi@wh.iov.cn (https://t.co/j1YaBGYKIm) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. https://t.co/0gefZhL50w
@TKB_Wade Like, it could be #2 but we've known even before this year that zoonotic spillover affects some percentage of rural chinese populations eg in 2018 the same lab found seropositivity from bat viruses in a bunch of villages https://t.co/uOy0MBC2Os
RT @AggelosMichael3: @Chris_F_Carson @5Agenda21 @annika1021 @Arkadios_Voskos @v_apostolos @Sofrup @SheenaParish @Trader00101EU01 Grants htt…
RT @AggelosMichael3: @Chris_F_Carson @5Agenda21 @annika1021 @Arkadios_Voskos @v_apostolos @Sofrup @SheenaParish @Trader00101EU01 Grants htt…
RT @AggelosMichael3: @Chris_F_Carson @5Agenda21 @annika1021 @Arkadios_Voskos @v_apostolos @Sofrup @SheenaParish @Trader00101EU01 Grants htt…
RT @AggelosMichael3: @Chris_F_Carson @5Agenda21 @annika1021 @Arkadios_Voskos @v_apostolos @Sofrup @SheenaParish @Trader00101EU01 Grants htt…
@Chris_F_Carson @5Agenda21 @annika1021 @Arkadios_Voskos @v_apostolos @Sofrup @SheenaParish @Trader00101EU01 Grants https://t.co/AnW3IfFG53 https://t.co/MVyGl7SkSo https://t.co/yKpmUM7WSQ And why the absolute F did this go on? https://t.co/6NycfP6dbl
RT @Smackenziekerr: Serological Evidence of Bat #SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/om127ffznT https://t.co/d…
RT @Smackenziekerr: Serological Evidence of Bat #SARS-Related #Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/om127ffznT https://t.co/…
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/RPd6wJ8zhq
RT @Smackenziekerr: Serological Evidence of Bat #SARS-Related #Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/om127ffznT https://t.co/…
RT @Smackenziekerr: Serological Evidence of Bat #SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/om127ffznT https://t.co/d…
Serological Evidence of Bat #SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/om127ffznT https://t.co/d68FM6ulHO
Serological Evidence of Bat #SARS-Related #Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/om127ffznT https://t.co/h26pgIdwAD
@BillyBostickson @BidoliNicola @caruan_eyes Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/RSl7c56Bkj
@peacepirate1 @paulkrugman Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/RSl7c56Bkj
RT @suzuki_takaya: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China. https://t.co/hZrBmamORE
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China. https://t.co/hZrBmamORE
@BillyBostickson @BahulikarRahul @TheSeeker268 @DrAntoniSerraT1 @Nomdeplumi1 @KevinMcH3 @luigi_warren @TrueOriginCOVID @_coltseavers @AntGDuarte @ydeigin @babarlelephant @PaulGodolphin @BioObject @Daoyu15 @JJ2000426 @scottburke777 @still_a_nerd @jjcouey @Harvard2H @uacjess @CarltheChippy @ico_dna @Real_Adam_B @nerdhaspower @RolandBakerIII @babarelephant @EcoHealthNYC @NIHDirector @NIH @NSF That is all about Jinning caves. JN is the acronym. Talking about conclussions of Wang et al. (2018) "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China" https://t.co/dKSg9EKS2Z
RT @RitaSiebrecht: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/eakyUnTbQt Serologischer Na…
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China https://t.co/eakyUnTbQt Serologischer Nachweis einer Fledermaus-SARS bedingten Coronavirus - Infektion 2002-2003 bei Menschen in China, die auf "feuchten Märkten" arbeiten!
3/4 The extrapolation from 6 to 1-7M notwithstanding, the study itself was weak. First, antibody levels were pretty low. Here’s the antibody graph from their study: compare the farmers’ levels (panel B, leftmost) with those of 2 SARS patients (rightmost): https://t.co/qcHdTXxgrP https://t.co/DwhWAPObui
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, Wuhan Virology Lab China 2018. https://t.co/uW64JjKVjb
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China | SpringerLink @rmbascope #coronavirus https://t.co/1zktaIrsqW
The second major mutation most likely happened during a period of unrecognized transmission in humans . A study has shown such a low-level exposure in some parts of China in 2015 . https://t.co/yULcfYzCWW
Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China Zheng-Li Shi corresponding author https://t.co/Peb33IGANQ possible location is the Yanzi cave in Yunnan https://t.co/SnrOD5WuRO
RT @batpapers: Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China. https://t.co/igOjTqoGfC https://t.co/EpZXrT…
RT @IdiUcv: Evidencia serológica de infección por coronavirus de murciélago relacionada con el SARS en humanos, China. https://t.co/36qsF…
RT @IdiUcv: Evidencia serológica de infección por coronavirus de murciélago relacionada con el SARS en humanos, China. https://t.co/36qsF…
RT @IdiUcv: Evidencia serológica de infección por coronavirus de murciélago relacionada con el SARS en humanos, China. https://t.co/36qsF…
Evidencia serológica de infección por coronavirus de murciélago relacionada con el SARS en humanos, China. https://t.co/36qsFrm2u4 https://t.co/fF9TPgdZSF
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
RT @tragedyandhope: 2018 "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China" https://t.co/992vblKcyr
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
RT @VasquezBazan: Estudio aprobado por el Instituto de Virologia de Wuhan, China publicado en febrero-marzo 2018. Uno de los autores partic…
https://t.co/9Ilw0yeBTZ
7. Wang, N. et al. Serological evidence of bat SARS-related coronavirus infection in humans, China. Virol. Sin. 33, 104–107 (2018). https://t.co/1tRmcoYCPw
@tomselliott @MeghanMcCain Since you like reading studies... https://t.co/MiemY76Bqz
@robbystarbuck @NYGovCuomo see study... https://t.co/MiemY76Bqz
@hua_zhong @robbystarbuck @NYGovCuomo This study negates your comment... https://t.co/MiemY76Bqz
@Rafael74597581 @robbystarbuck @NYGovCuomo according to this study, they've known about it for years... https://t.co/MiemY76Bqz
@robbystarbuck @NYGovCuomo according to this study, they've known about it for years... https://t.co/MiemY76Bqz
Not "maybe", the answer is "yes"! But I totally agree with the second part. "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China" https://t.co/NENI4YcLqg https://t.co/Nq1nQzLWaS
doi.org/10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. 13. It is highly… signs: Yi Fan, et al., “Bat coronaviruses in China,” Viruses 11, no. 3 (March 2019): 210, doi.org ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF ... 10.1007/s13149-015-0448-z. Ge XY, Li JL, Yang XL, Chmura AA, Zhu G ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
doi: 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. 1814 148.Gao ZC. 2020. Efficient management of novel coronavirus pneumonia by efficient 1815 prevention and control in ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Serological evidence of bat Sars-related coronavirus infection in humans, China.
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF ... 10.1007/s13149-015-0448-z. Ge XY, Li JL, Yang XL, Chmura AA, Zhu G ...
... 10.1007/s00134-020-05991-x. Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F, Gong ... s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
... 10.1007/s00134-020-06057-8. Dondorp AM, Hayat M, Aryal D, Beane A, Schultz MJ ... s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF ...
Virol Sin. 2018;33(1): 104–107. doi:10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7 16. Che X, Qiu L, Liao Z, Wang Y, et al. Antigenic cross-reactivity between severe acute ...
doi:10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7 434. Daszak and scientists stand by Lancet letter condemning Wuhan lab “conspiracy theories.” MSN. Accessed September 28, 2021 ...
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7 133. Li et al. “Human-animal interactions and bat coronavirus spillover potential among rural residents in. Southern ...
doi: 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. • HuB, Zeng L-P, Yang X-L, et al.; Discovery of a rich gene pool ofbat SARS-related coronaviruses provides new insights into ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation in Bats. Cell ...
TikTok video from เรามาล้างพิษวัคซีนกันเถอะ (@meelap1999x): “ตอนที่ 2/2 อเมริกาได้ทำการตัดต่อพันธุกรรม และจดสิทธิบัตรไวรัสโคโรน่าหลายหลากสายพันธุ์มานานหลายสิบปีแล้ว ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0009-2 109 See “Wuhan Institute of Virology ... 018-0012-7. 263. Marshall.Senate.Gov THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19 827
Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China. Virologica Sinica, 33(1), 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Wang ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7). Ein Team um Pamela Björkman vom California Institute of Technology in Pasadena hat einen Impfstoff entwickelt ...
Sin. 2018, DOI: 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7).
10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. [18] H. Li, E. Mendelsohn, C. Zong, W. Zhang, E. Hagan, N. Wang, S. Li, H. Yan, H. Huang and G. Zhu, Human-animal ...
doi:10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7 · Medline. 42. P. Liu, J. -Z. Jiang , X. -F. Wan, Y. Hua, L. Li, J. Zhou, X. Wang, F. Hou, J. Chen, J. Zou, J ...
doi:10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7 16. Che X, Qiu L, Liao Z, Wang Y, et al. Antigenic cross-reactivity between severe acute respiratory syndrome ...
doi: 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. 148.Gao ZC. 2020. Efficient management of novel coronavirus pneumonia by efficient prevention and control in ...
com/article/10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. link.springer.com. Serological Evidence of Bat SARS- Related Coronavirus Infection in. 5 yrs. Other posts.
org/en/article/doi/10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. [3]https://www.scau.edu.cn/2020/0208/c1302a219376/page.htm. [4]https://www.biorxiv.org/content ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Serological evidence of bat Sars-related coronavirus infection in ...
... 10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7. Xie J, Li Y, Shen X, Goh G, Zhu Y, Cui J, Wang LF, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Dampened STING-Dependent Interferon Activation ...
doi:10.1007/s12250-018-0012-7 16. Che X, Qiu L, Liao Z, Wang Y, et al. Antigenic cross-reactivity between severe acute respiratory syndrome ...
T
H
YD
SM
TC
PB
AC
W
VN
TS
R
J
GG
I
CL
D
JC
J
JG
LM
LL
T
DS
RF
BS
Y
RF
Q
K
TN
TM
JN
KC
AJ
AT
PD
AJ
TC
DG
MX
SP
G
MG
GB
N
UY
JO
XM
CM
RM
P
BU
DM
LF
MC
EN
F
G
PS
HE
FB
S
LS
R
RC
B
C
I
RT
CI
EC
?
JG
DT
TA
F
T
JJ
M
S
MG
NR
M
NU
I
JS
DD
IS
Y
C
RP
LL
T
LP
NG
WU
TR
KJ
S
EJ
L
MM
AM
M
A
R
内
TP
FA
AA
RS
P
D
KP
GE
GD
IU
J
AP
PP
AJ
PR
HR
KL
CR
DC
MB
CS
N
FT
AK
VC