Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Various discussions highlight the ongoing transformation in children's perceptions of scientists, noting that in the 1960s, less than 1% of children drew female scientists, while by recent years, that figure has increased to 50% for younger girls. Phrases like 'fascinating data' and 'we need to change the story' emphasize both a recognition of progress and a call to action, demonstrating a compelling tone that suggests urgency and importance in addressing these stereotypes.
Most discussions reflect a supportive stance toward the findings of the publication.
Participants show a high level of curiosity and relevance, frequently referencing the meta-analysis.
Many discussions delve into specific data points and implications mentioned in the study.
Users perceive the research as having a significant impact on understanding gender stereotypes in science.
In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%, according to a study (2018). Most scientists are still men, but as time goes on that’s changing- even in the imaginations of children. https://t.co/tjC7xOhl7T https://t.co/m0SHK2g5Et
To learn more about the fantastic work by @GirlsInScience & the "Draw a Scientist" study on how the media shapes children's perspectives on science & gender, here are some great reads! https://t.co/FZlOs8o9uM https://t.co/hMt1Q8erWm
Tem estudos sobre como crianças desenham cientistas.Há um viés na atribuição:as crianças atribuem ciência + ao gênero masculino.Q Luana, @TaschnerNatalia, @gabilotta, @sobotelha e tantas outras ajudem a mudar esse viés. Elas tem feito diferença na pandemia https://t.co/2SFNQNdfoB
Our 5th most popular article comes from @SRCDtweets titled; The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies https://t.co/dmrBpv1gA4 https://t.co/dl94UJxgv5
The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies - Miller - 2018 - Child Development - Wiley Online Library HT: @S_Smith_1st @Edu_EResearch @USD_JI #cvwow https://t.co/fxCiiL2bwQ
ICYMI, highlights from our recent newsletter. READ: Lessons from the Lobster, from @MarderLab LISTEN: @Ologies FOLLOW: @christineliuart LEARN: The Development of Children’s Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies (link below)
This video examines the findings of a meta-analysis on children's drawings of scientists from the past five decades. Despite an increase in female representation in science, stereotypes linking the field to men persist…
This video discusses a meta-analysis of 5 decades of Draw-A-Scientist studies, revealing that children increasingly draw female scientists but still associate science with men. It highlights how environmental…
For 50 years, studies have asked children to draw scientists, primarily analyzing the gender of the depicted individuals. This video discusses a meta-analysis revealing that while female scientist representations are…
Hace unos meses tuve que preparar una charla sobre la escasez de mujeres en tecnología. Revisé muchos estudios y publicaciones al respecto, y este fue uno de los más interesantes que encontré. 50 años de dibujos para analizar estereotipos de género: https://t.co/AKR0tovQYq https://t.co/JQvNfBP3Zo
In the 1960s, almost no kids drew women when asked to sketch a scientist. Today? Over half of girls do. A new study shows how far we’ve come—and why representation on paper can shape futures in science.
The study itself: The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies - Miller - 2018 - Child Development - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/toMk0Y10Ya
RT @davidimiller: My latest research out today in Child Development: A meta-analysis on the development of children's gender-science ster…
The Development of Children's Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies coeduelda.blogspot.com/2024/11/the-...
Representation actually seems to work!
Representation actually seems to work!
RT @LindseyVanHaute: When children are asked to draw a scientist, only about 50% of the girls draw a female scientist and this decreases wi…
When children are asked to draw a scientist, only about 50% of the girls draw a female scientist and this decreases with age. 70% of the 6 year old girl draw a women, but only 25% of the 16 year old girls! https://t.co/hix105dBfT
L'étude est consultable ici :
In the 1960s-70s girls drew a scientist as female ~1% of the time. Now it's ~50%. And both boys and girls are more likely to draw male scientists as they grow older. Fascinating data showing both progress and work still to do. https://t.co/AMC2At1I6f
"Children's depictions of scientists therefore have become more gender diverse over time, but children still associate science with men as they grow older" https://t.co/OyWDAK2k1Y
@Marinebecca @nsimmiz @BD_Stew @InneWithouck @ConstanceSCHERE @hannahsrudd @bucketscientist I'm also not familiar with this paper on photos/ reactions - but agree sounds worth reading! There is of course the classic on drawings/stereotypes: https://t.co/tx7mak5Ww3
@BFE_bigfeminist @Svendroid70 @GendernAendern @IKEA_Presse Die einzige Stelle auf die Ihre Beschreibung zutrifft, bezieht sich auf die "Draw-A-Scientist"-Studien: https://t.co/YdbMOjaHgm Daraus auf "Sprache determiniert Denken" zu schließen ist sehr weit hergeholt. Auch die verlinkte Meta-Analyse gibt einen anderen, plausibleren Grund.
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
@CaAl Yes indeed. Glasses are a proxy for excellence. As convincingly shown in the draw-a-scientist meta-analysis https://t.co/4JcEcGwSrT
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
For the 2018 meta-analysis on "Draw-a-Scientist" studies: https://t.co/PowNOsMax0
RT @PauloBoggio: Tem estudos sobre como crianças desenham cientistas.Há um viés na atribuição:as crianças atribuem ciência + ao gênero masc…
RT @PauloBoggio: Tem estudos sobre como crianças desenham cientistas.Há um viés na atribuição:as crianças atribuem ciência + ao gênero masc…
Tem estudos sobre como crianças desenham cientistas.Há um viés na atribuição:as crianças atribuem ciência + ao gênero masculino.Q Luana, @TaschnerNatalia, @gabilotta, @sobotelha e tantas outras ajudem a mudar esse viés. Elas tem feito diferença na pandemia https://t.co/2SFNQNdfoB
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
RT @ajitjohnson_n: In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%…
In the 1970s, kids who were asked to "draw a scientist" drew a woman less than 1% of the time. By 2016, it was up to 34%, according to a study (2018). Most scientists are still men, but as time goes on that’s changing- even in the imaginations of children. https://t.co/tjC7xOhl7T https://t.co/m0SHK2g5Et
RT @mulhereciencia:
Entenda como o viés implícito pode afetar a sua vida assistindo este vídeo: https://t.co/CgEsClaQpQ https://t.co/63UaQGy7jQ
@PepPhelan Here’s the link to the study the article talks about: https://t.co/FWcq9jdpWy
RT @Emily_S_Choy: To learn more about the fantastic work by @GirlsInScience & the "Draw a Scientist" study on how the media shapes children…
RT @Emily_S_Choy: To learn more about the fantastic work by @GirlsInScience & the "Draw a Scientist" study on how the media shapes children…
✅(4/4) Children did not draw significantly more male than female scientists until ages 7–8. Link to meta-analysis
RT @Emily_S_Choy: To learn more about the fantastic work by @GirlsInScience & the "Draw a Scientist" study on how the media shapes children…
RT @Emily_S_Choy: To learn more about the fantastic work by @GirlsInScience & the "Draw a Scientist" study on how the media shapes children…
To learn more about the fantastic work by @GirlsInScience & the "Draw a Scientist" study on how the media shapes children's perspectives on science & gender, here are some great reads! https://t.co/FZlOs8o9uM https://t.co/hMt1Q8erWm
Two other conclusions from this meta-analysis: - Change has been slower for boys than for girls, with roughly 100% of boys drawing a man up until around 2000 - Very disappointingly, children's bias increases as they grow older https://t.co/isbHfOIa9P https://t.co/wI1A9xXwOe
RT @IntWomxnBiomech: This is a great point by our co-founder @ana_ebrahimi (and @Trevornoah). Did you know: - Children equate men with sc…
RT @IntWomxnBiomech: This is a great point by our co-founder @ana_ebrahimi (and @Trevornoah). Did you know: - Children equate men with sc…
RT @IntWomxnBiomech: This is a great point by our co-founder @ana_ebrahimi (and @Trevornoah). Did you know: - Children equate men with sc…
This is a great point by our co-founder @ana_ebrahimi (and @Trevornoah). Did you know: - Children equate men with scientists as early as 7-8 years old. - By 14 y.o. (highschool), children draw more male scientists then female scientists at a rate of 4:1. https://t.co/oCxkNu3FS7 https://t.co/e8XRpruGBb
This info is based on a Northwestern University study by Miller, Nolla, Eagly, & Uttal: "The Development of Children’s Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies." Go check it out!
Did you know, when asked to draw a scientist 5-6 year olds draw equal amounts of women and men, but from about 7 onwards children predominantly draw men? We need to change the story so that children keep seeing female scientists as they get older. https://t.co/JRSWXb3dHn https://t.co/vWjbVnumkj
@lychee_ssbm At the start of grad school, I worked on a meta-analysis looking at 78 studies across time, and found that gender stereotyping changes as gender representation changes. https://t.co/nuy59a27Gc
RT @TNE: 20 March 2018 The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Stud…
20 March 2018 The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies https://t.co/DnxSDDeVu1. #isij_jim_gender
RT @CVWorldofWork: The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies…
RT @CVWorldofWork: The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies…
RT @CVWorldofWork: The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies…
RT @CVWorldofWork: The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies…
RT @CVWorldofWork: The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies…
RT @CVWorldofWork: The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies…
The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies - Miller - 2018 - Child Development - Wiley Online Library HT: @S_Smith_1st @Edu_EResearch @USD_JI #cvwow https://t.co/fxCiiL2bwQ
RT @LaurieRubel: Here's the paper. The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Sc…
Here's the paper. The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies - Miller - 2018 - Child Development - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/eLP8hNyrOH
Full study: 'The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies' by David I. Miller et al. in Child Development, 20 March 2018 https://t.co/9OU6G8VhRU
RT @b_brilliant_: The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies -…
Research shows that children's depictions of scientists have become more gender #diverse over time but stereotypes still persist. On this #InternationalWomensDay ♀️, listen to why it is crucial to increase girl power in the sciences: https://t.co/lHFWUjMK3D https://t.co/82AIdunqO5
The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies - Miller - 2018 - Child Development - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/kREJfjg6bj Worth the read! Sex ≠ occupation #WomenInSTEM
RT @WomxnInNeuro: ICYMI, highlights from our recent newsletter. READ: Lessons from the Lobster, from @MarderLab LISTEN: @Ologies FOLLOW:…
RT @WomxnInNeuro: ICYMI, highlights from our recent newsletter. READ: Lessons from the Lobster, from @MarderLab LISTEN: @Ologies FOLLOW:…
RT @WomxnInNeuro: ICYMI, highlights from our recent newsletter. READ: Lessons from the Lobster, from @MarderLab LISTEN: @Ologies FOLLOW:…
RT @WomxnInNeuro: ICYMI, highlights from our recent newsletter. READ: Lessons from the Lobster, from @MarderLab LISTEN: @Ologies FOLLOW:…
ICYMI, highlights from our recent newsletter. READ: Lessons from the Lobster, from @MarderLab LISTEN: @Ologies FOLLOW: @christineliuart LEARN: The Development of Children’s Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies (link below)
RT @SociologyLens: Our 5th most popular article comes from @SRCDtweets titled; The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A…
RT @SociologyLens: Our 5th most popular article comes from @SRCDtweets titled; The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A…
RT @SociologyLens: Our 5th most popular article comes from @SRCDtweets titled; The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A…
RT @SociologyLens: Our 5th most popular article comes from @SRCDtweets titled; The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A…
RT @SociologyLens: Our 5th most popular article comes from @SRCDtweets titled; The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A…
Our 5th most popular article comes from @SRCDtweets titled; The Development of Children's Gender‐Science Stereotypes: A Meta‐analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw‐A‐Scientist Studies https://t.co/dmrBpv1gA4 https://t.co/dl94UJxgv5
Meta-analysis: childrens' gender-science stereotypes became more gender diverse over 5 decades but “children still associate science with men as they grow older” N > 20,000, k = 78: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cdev.13039 Via @davidimiller, @KyleNolla, Alice...