@markpoulter5 @AdamMeakins Systematic reviews show that MDT is not superior for acute pain: https://t.co/X9ZaoffCDA we have known that doing MDT for acute pain doesn’t change anything. See 2010 adding to first line care: https://t.co/g2Emzhgal4 1998 no better than booklet or SMT: https://t.co/SavVBSiTsM
Effectiveness of the McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy for Treating Low Back Pain: Literature Review With Meta-analysis.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Feb 2019 – Jan 2025Where it's discussed
-
Facebook26 posts
-
X / Twitter17 posts
-
YouTube4 videos
-
Blogs2 articles
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Overall, the discussions reflect a nuanced understanding of the article, with participants referencing systematic review results, such as noting MDT's lack of superiority in acute pain but potential benefits in chronic cases, and examining factors like 'centralization' that influence prognosis. The tone varies from analytical to curious, demonstrating both interest and engagement, though some comments remain speculative, highlighting moderate impact.
Most discussions acknowledge that systematic reviews show MDT is not superior for acute low back pain but may be more effective for chronic cases.
Posts demonstrate high interest, referencing meta-analyses, concepts like 'centralization,' and debates on MDT’s effectiveness, indicating active engagement.
The conversations include references to specific studies, methodological critiques, and clinical implications, showing moderate to deep engagement.
The discussions highlight ongoing debates and evidence reviews that influence clinical decision-making, indicating a moderate impact on practice and perceptions.
Abstract in brief
- The study reviews the effectiveness of the McKenzie Method (MDT) for treating low back pain, analyzing data from 17 randomized controlled trials to compare MDT with other treatment options.
- For patients with acute low back pain (less than 12 weeks), MDT was not significantly better than other therapies in reducing pain or disability, but for chronic cases (more than 12 weeks), MDT showed a notable improvement, especially in reducing disability.
- Overall, evidence suggests MDT is not superior for acute LBP, but it may be more effective than other treatments for chronic LBP, though this depends on the specific comparison.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@PiR2_BA @Leya_MK @KineMeuh @KineOmne @kinefact @joshlavalleeMK A ma connaissance la dernière review/MA sur le sujet : https://t.co/URJjlKJfAn Sans oublier le concept de " centralisation " de MDT qui est un très bon facteur pronostique : https://t.co/8O1qkwZMHQ
@Retlouping @Farmer_MindBody @BobVermeeren @marklaslett_NZ @stoneb26 @Tdekkersphysio @nakedphysio @JosephGerman16 @GregLehman @CGMMaher @adiemusfree @DerekGriffin86 @PhysioNetwork @KWernliPhysio @BJSM_BMJ @kieranosull @kjartanfersum @BrendanMouatt @MaryOKeeffe007 Why do you think that we don’t see superior outcomes then? https://t.co/GX2lnet3ui
@EricBouthier @marcatteau Méthode n'ayant pas montré de supériorité par rapport à une autre approche de kiné active -> lombalgie https://t.co/U7QU9mlsgd Et c'est pareil pour les radiculopathies lombaires pour l'instant. Ça fait 2 fois que vous parlez de cette méthode enseignée par un organisme privé
@GeekNfit @__PatK__ En sachant que les revues systématiques semblent indiquer une certaine équivalence de résultats, par exemple celle-ci une fois qu'on corrige, il me semble, une erreur dans la méta-analyse (Miller 2005 trouve une supériorité du gainage pas l'inverse) : https://t.co/U7QU9mlsgd
@kinesi_theo Pour faire genre j ai un gros cerveau, je te partage ça : (en vrai j'ai lu que l'abstract, je suis un imposteur) https://t.co/czCJkrohPp
All mentions
Effectiveness of McKenzie Method for Chronic Low Back Pain Therapy
This video examines whether extension exercises help disc herniation. It reviews the effectiveness of the McKenzie Method for low back pain, showing it is more beneficial for chronic cases than acute, especially in…
Evidence-Based Approaches to Managing Low Back Pain with Dr. Johnson McEvoy
Johnson McEvoy, a physiotherapy expert with over 30 years of experience, discusses the causes, assessment, and treatment options for low back pain. He emphasizes the importance of evidence-informed therapy and…
Dr. Richard McIlmoyle - Stop searching for the Sasquatch
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the McKenzie Method for Low Back Pain Treatment
This video reviews the effectiveness of the McKenzie Method for treating low back pain, analyzing data from 17 trials to compare it with other therapies. The results suggest MDT is more effective for chronic cases…
@kinesi_theo Pour faire genre j ai un gros cerveau, je te partage ça : (en vrai j'ai lu que l'abstract, je suis un imposteur) https://t.co/czCJkrohPp
@GeekNfit @__PatK__ En sachant que les revues systématiques semblent indiquer une certaine équivalence de résultats, par exemple celle-ci une fois qu'on corrige, il me semble, une erreur dans la méta-analyse (Miller 2005 trouve une supériorité du gainage pas l'inverse) : https://t.co/U7QU9mlsgd
RT @gero5: @markpoulter5 @AdamMeakins Systematic reviews show that MDT is not superior for acute pain: https://t.co/X9ZaoffCDA we have kno…
RT @gero5: @markpoulter5 @AdamMeakins Systematic reviews show that MDT is not superior for acute pain: https://t.co/X9ZaoffCDA we have kno…
RT @gero5: @markpoulter5 @AdamMeakins Systematic reviews show that MDT is not superior for acute pain: https://t.co/X9ZaoffCDA we have kno…
@markpoulter5 @AdamMeakins Systematic reviews show that MDT is not superior for acute pain: https://t.co/X9ZaoffCDA we have known that doing MDT for acute pain doesn’t change anything. See 2010 adding to first line care: https://t.co/g2Emzhgal4 1998 no better than booklet or SMT: https://t.co/SavVBSiTsM
El método #McKenzie no tiene mejores resultados que otras técnicas en el #dolor #lumbar agudo pero sí en el tratamiento del dolor lumbar #crónico. Esto se detalla en un reciente metaanálisis (2018): https://t.co/3VCidzHZ9h https://t.co/GMUrDIXAau
@thinkin_mkdeabh @marklaslett_NZ @Retlouping The JOSPT meta-analysis is this: https://t.co/Lb6iTF9H4h
@EricBouthier @marcatteau Méthode n'ayant pas montré de supériorité par rapport à une autre approche de kiné active -> lombalgie https://t.co/U7QU9mlsgd Et c'est pareil pour les radiculopathies lombaires pour l'instant. Ça fait 2 fois que vous parlez de cette méthode enseignée par un organisme privé
@WorstAtRoutine @AnikaBlub Das finde ich mit am besten: ist eine Literaturübersicht und Meta Analyse aus 2019: https://t.co/3pDhFD0cJT
@floteichert @PaulBliton Effectiveness of the McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy for Treating Low Back Pain: Literature Review With Meta-analysis https://t.co/kbGohF9S0n https://t.co/KJcFseIQfc
@BattleBorn_PT @nikegal7 Effectiveness of the McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy for Treating Low Back Pain: Literature Review With Meta-analysis https://t.co/kbGohF9S0n https://t.co/xCmF3gY1fU
@annescampbell @TimothyGrimes7 @marklaslett_NZ @McK_Institute Enjoy 13-7 currently
@McK_Institute Or https://t.co/JP0klT08hx A system designed for acute therapy and self treatment? Thoughts? Effectiveness of the McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy for Treating Low Back Pain: Literature Review With Meta-analysis https://t.co/xzY9T52FRL
RT @RV_Physio: @PiR2_BA @Leya_MK @KineMeuh @KineOmne @kinefact @joshlavalleeMK A ma connaissance la dernière review/MA sur le sujet : https…
@PiR2_BA @Leya_MK @KineMeuh @KineOmne @kinefact @joshlavalleeMK A ma connaissance la dernière review/MA sur le sujet : https://t.co/URJjlKJfAn Sans oublier le concept de " centralisation " de MDT qui est un très bon facteur pronostique : https://t.co/8O1qkwZMHQ
@Retlouping @Farmer_MindBody @BobVermeeren @marklaslett_NZ @stoneb26 @Tdekkersphysio @nakedphysio @JosephGerman16 @GregLehman @CGMMaher @adiemusfree @DerekGriffin86 @PhysioNetwork @KWernliPhysio @BJSM_BMJ @kieranosull @kjartanfersum @BrendanMouatt @MaryOKeeffe007 Why do you think that we don’t see superior outcomes then? https://t.co/GX2lnet3ui
GB
R
BC
TM
M
AK
ɹP
TP
P
VH
CC
MC