September 2018 PMID 29683919

High-Intensity Interval Training in the Real World: Outcomes from a 12-Month Intervention in Overweight Adults.

Melyssa Roy, Sheila M Williams, Rachel C Brown, Kim A Meredith-Jones, Hamish Osborne, Michelle Jospe, Rachael W Taylor

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 1 in Jan 2020

across 5 sources since Jan 2020

Extended reach

81,856

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

4,043

Mentions per month

Jan 2020 – Oct 2022

Where it's discussed

News15 articles
Facebook5 posts
YouTube3 videos
Blogs2 articles
X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions broadly agree that HIIT is appealing yet difficult to sustain over time, as evidenced by comments on declining adherence and the minimal health improvements observed after a year. The tone balances curiosity and critical reflection, emphasizing practical implications such as motivation and long-term commitment, using phrases like 'enjoyed more but didn't lead to significant changes' and 'long-term adherence remains a challenge.'

AgreementModerate agreement

Many comments acknowledge the study's findings, noting that while HIIT is enjoyable, its long-term health benefits are limited, reflecting moderate agreement.

InterestModerate interest

Discussions show a moderate level of curiosity, with commenters engaging with the practical aspects of HIIT and its real-world application.

EngagementModerate engagement

Posters demonstrate some depth by discussing adherence challenges and comparing HIIT to moderate exercise, indicating thoughtful participation.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions suggest the study influences perceptions about exercise routines, highlighting issues like motivation and sustainability but not drastic changes in health practices.

Abstract in brief

This study looked at whether doing high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on your own could improve health for overweight adults over a year. It found that people who chose HIIT enjoyed it more, but after 12 months, there were no significant differences in weight, body fat, or blood pressure compared to those doing standard moderate exercise.
Although some participants stuck with HIIT, adherence declined over time, with only about 23% regularly doing the workouts as recommended. Men and those who stayed consistent with HIIT experienced greater weight and visceral fat loss.
Overall, HIIT was liked by participants and could be a good alternative to traditional exercise, but maintaining long-term commitment is challenging, and it didn't show substantial health benefits over the standard approach in this real-world setting.

Read the full abstract