Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall tone reflects a balanced view, highlighting that both dietary strategies lead to similar weight and health outcomes, exemplified by comments noting 'no difference' in results and mechanistic considerations involving mice. Discussions include mentions of hunger variations and dropout rates, demonstrating engagement with practical implications and underlying mechanisms, shaping a measured perception of the study's significance.
Most discussions acknowledge that both intermittent and continuous energy restrictions produce similar clinical results, indicating moderate agreement.
Participants seem somewhat interested, as they reference methodological details and mechanistic factors, though enthusiasm is not very high.
Comments engage with the study's findings by discussing specific outcomes like hunger, drop-out rates, and mechanistic factors, showing moderate depth.
The shared insights suggest the discussion sees this research as relevant but not groundbreaking, with some noting the utility of findings in clinical practice.
@YoniFreedhoff Only 4 (7 %) dropouts in the IF group at 12 months in Sundfør et al's trial, btw
Effect of intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on weight loss, maintenance and cardiometabolic risk: A randomized 1-year trial https://t.co/gWywgIDAYd
4) many mechanistic factors involved in mice (e.g. autophagy). Role in humans unclear, esp. since overall benefit seems to differ from rodents 5) Effect on appetite/hunger varies. Some studies report MORE hunger on IF, others less / no diff https://t.co/SaFGOaFrZ4
Al final, ambas estrategias mejoraron resultados clínicos, como la circunferencia de cintura, presión arterial o grasas en sangre. Es decir, el ayuno intermitente no fue superior a la dieta habitual de las personas. https://t.co/LJnhnGufjk
@KhalidalKanadee @Losing200Pounds Full year study. no difference between IF and linear restriction. https://t.co/tZmj7YuDi6
@johnsveitch @drjasonfung @thebeetofficial Evidence to the contrary. Those who fast display feelings of increased hunger compared to continuous caloric restriction. But enjoy your books. https://t.co/kB9AXPNCAn
Women and individuals with eating disorders should be cautious with intermittent fasting as it may cause hormonal imbalances if not done properly. This video discusses who should and shouldn't practice IF for safe…
Explore the effects of intermittent fasting compared to continuous energy restriction on weight loss, maintenance, and cardiometabolic health, based on a one-year randomized trial.
Al final, ambas estrategias mejoraron resultados clínicos, como la circunferencia de cintura, presión arterial o grasas en sangre. Es decir, el ayuno intermitente no fue superior a la dieta habitual de las personas. https://t.co/LJnhnGufjk
@KhalidalKanadee @Losing200Pounds Full year study. no difference between IF and linear restriction. https://t.co/tZmj7YuDi6
4) many mechanistic factors involved in mice (e.g. autophagy). Role in humans unclear, esp. since overall benefit seems to differ from rodents 5) Effect on appetite/hunger varies. Some studies report MORE hunger on IF, others less / no diff https://t.co/SaFGOaFrZ4
@johnsveitch @drjasonfung @thebeetofficial Evidence to the contrary. Those who fast display feelings of increased hunger compared to continuous caloric restriction. But enjoy your books. https://t.co/kB9AXPNCAn
@YoniFreedhoff Only 4 (7 %) dropouts in the IF group at 12 months in Sundfør et al's trial, btw
Effect of intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on weight loss, maintenance and cardiometabolic risk: A randomized 1-year trial https://t.co/gWywgIDAYd
2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 14. PMID: 29704911. May ... Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 23(4), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.
SUGAR FREE, mas doce. 328 likes. Porque ser saudável não é sinónimo de não comer doces! É possível comer snacks/bolos/barras/waffles saudáveis, doces e...
Exercise and Nutrition. 2567 likes. Do you need help with designing a workout program? Do you need help in reaching your fitness goals ? Drop us a...
j'étais parti faire du repérage jsuis ressorti avec de la déco Voilà les références ... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.009. sonido original ...
10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.009 [doi] Headland M.L. et al., Int J Obes (Lond) (2019). PMID: 30470804 / DOI: 10.1038/s41366-018-0247-2. Pinto A.M. et al., Clin ...
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108747. Epub 2021 May 21. PMID: 34052685; PMCID ... 2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 23. PMID: 29596854; PMCID: PMC6173667. 803 ...
doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2018.03.009 plant. 2011;30(2):188-193. doi:10.1016/j ... j.numecd.2020.07.044 2019;43(3):161-162. doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.11.005 118 ...
Saudi J Biol Sci 25:1102–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.03.009 ... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2006. 03.005. Di Meo MC, De Cristofaro GA ...
doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.009. 9. Harvie M, Wright C, Pegington M, et al. The effect of intermittent energy and car- bohydrate restriction v . daily ...
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.03.009 scores. Am Heart J 2023;261:55 ... numecd. tal heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2012;154:270–4. https://doi.org ...
... en la salud por encima que otros protocolos. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004199 doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.009".
... 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.009”.sonido original - nutriologoeliseomorales.
... 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.009. Log in ·
Published Aug.14, 2018. Sundfør TM, et al. Nutr Metab Cardiosasc Dis. 2018;doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.009 ...
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.009 DOI: 10.3390/jfmk5010019 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0936 #nutricion #salud #fitness #vidasana ...
Repost @bradschoenfeldphd with @get_repost ・・・ Despite the endless number of fad diets claiming otherwise, weight management ultimately ...
EA
BH
GP
EP
MH
GA