Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspecification | BMC Medical Research Methodology | Full Text https://t.co/mdQBEvdtrY
Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspecification.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Feb 2020 – Aug 2023Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter6 posts
-
News2 articles
-
Blogs2 articles
-
YouTube1 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Discussions often reference the comparison of the two modeling approaches, with phrases like 'robust Poisson remains unbiased,' and mention practical scenarios such as data truncation and model bias, reflecting a moderate level of technical engagement and interest in the article's methodological insights.
Most discussions acknowledge the validity of the study, recognizing the robustness of the Poisson model under misspecification.
Participants show moderate curiosity, often referencing the comparison of regression models and their practical implications.
Comments involve some technical details, such as mentions of bias, truncation, and model assumptions, indicating a moderate level of engagement.
The overall tone suggests awareness of the study's relevance but without strong claims about transformative impact on the field.
Abstract in brief
- The study compares the performance of log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models in estimating risk ratios, especially when the model assumptions are not fully correct (misspecified).
- Results show that when the link function is misspecified or responses are truncated, the log-binomial model produces biased results, especially with more truncated data and lower response rates, while the robust Poisson model remains unbiased.
- Overall, under conditions of model misspecification, the robust Poisson regression model is generally more reliable for estimating risk ratios.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyRR推定時にモデルの誤特定下での修正ポアソン回帰と対数二項回帰の比較。収束の問題もあるし、基本的には修正ポアソンでよいと思っているんだけど、どうなんだろう。 https://t.co/6lZfGjoPBf
RT @kaz_yos: Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspec…
RT @kaz_yos: Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspec…
RT @kaz_yos: Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspec…
RT @kaz_yos: Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspec…
All mentions
Comparison of Log-Binomial and Robust Poisson Regression for Risk Ratio Estimation
This study compares the performance of log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models in estimating risk ratios, especially when model assumptions are misspecified. The robust Poisson model remains unbiased under…
RR推定時にモデルの誤特定下での修正ポアソン回帰と対数二項回帰の比較。収束の問題もあるし、基本的には修正ポアソンでよいと思っているんだけど、どうなんだろう。 https://t.co/6lZfGjoPBf
RT @kaz_yos: Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspec…
RT @kaz_yos: Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspec…
RT @kaz_yos: Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspec…
RT @kaz_yos: Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspec…
Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspecification | BMC Medical Research Methodology | Full Text https://t.co/mdQBEvdtrY
KY
KM
S佐
P
Y
W