Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
These discussions reflect a cautious acknowledgment of the study's results, with comments like the observation that mortality rates haven't improved despite advances in care. Words such as 'no significant differences' and questions about the lack of prognosis improvement demonstrate critical engagement, but the overall tone remains analytical rather than speculative or urgent.
Most discussions acknowledge the study's findings, especially the stagnant mortality rates despite medical advances, indicating moderate agreement with the publication's implications.
Participants show moderate curiosity, focusing on the timeline and specific trends rather than deeper conceptual debates.
Comments include references to specific analyses and questions about data interpretation, suggesting thoughtful but not deeply emotional engagement.
While the discussions highlight important issues about heart failure prognosis, few posts suggest immediate or transformative consequences, resulting in a neutral impact score.
Why was there no improvement in the prognosis of HF patients from 1990 to 2014 when considerable advances in HF care were introduced in the same period? There were no significant differences in mortality rates across decades within HF subtypes https://t.co/dVrqjJp2p7
@djc795 @drjohnm Framingham/CHS EF phenotype specific mortality trends “There were no significant differences in mortality rates (overall, cardiovascular disease, and noncardiovascular disease) across decades within HF subtypes or between HFrEF and HFpEF within decade” https://t.co/dVrqjJp2p7
@djc795 @ASayedMD @drjohnm Framingham/CHS HF incidence and ☠️ trends reported, don’t cover most recent decade https://t.co/dVrqjJp2p7 Olmsted County trends reported but ending 2010 https://t.co/6UlnnDpB6O Updated analyses would be useful* (* may not be nationally representative)
@David_Ouyang Framingham EF phenotype specific mortality trends There were no significant differences in mortality rates (overall, cardiovascular disease, and noncardiovascular disease) across decades within HF subtypes or between HFrEF and HFpEF within decade https://t.co/dVrqjJouzz
RT @gcfmd: Why was there no improvement in the prognosis of HF patients from 1990 to 2014 when considerable advances in HF care were introd…
RT @gcfmd: Why was there no improvement in the prognosis of HF patients from 1990 to 2014 when considerable advances in HF care were introd…
This video introduces the 2021 ESC Guidelines on Heart Failure, emphasizing its definition, classification methods, incidence, and prognosis, highlighting recent trends in HFrEF and HFpEF incidence and persistent high…
This video discusses the 2021 ESC Guidelines on heart failure, including classification, incidence, prognosis, and recent trends in heart failure types, emphasizing the stable mortality rates despite changing incidence…
@djc795 @ASayedMD @drjohnm Framingham/CHS HF incidence and ☠️ trends reported, don’t cover most recent decade https://t.co/dVrqjJp2p7 Olmsted County trends reported but ending 2010 https://t.co/6UlnnDpB6O Updated analyses would be useful* (* may not be nationally representative)
RT @gcfmd: Why was there no improvement in the prognosis of HF patients from 1990 to 2014 when considerable advances in HF care were introd…
@djc795 @drjohnm Framingham/CHS EF phenotype specific mortality trends “There were no significant differences in mortality rates (overall, cardiovascular disease, and noncardiovascular disease) across decades within HF subtypes or between HFrEF and HFpEF within decade” https://t.co/dVrqjJp2p7
@David_Ouyang Framingham EF phenotype specific mortality trends There were no significant differences in mortality rates (overall, cardiovascular disease, and noncardiovascular disease) across decades within HF subtypes or between HFrEF and HFpEF within decade https://t.co/dVrqjJouzz
RT @gcfmd: Why was there no improvement in the prognosis of HF patients from 1990 to 2014 when considerable advances in HF care were introd…
RT @gcfmd: Why was there no improvement in the prognosis of HF patients from 1990 to 2014 when considerable advances in HF care were introd…
RT @gcfmd: Why was there no improvement in the prognosis of HF patients from 1990 to 2014 when considerable advances in HF care were introd…
Why was there no improvement in the prognosis of HF patients from 1990 to 2014 when considerable advances in HF care were introduced in the same period? There were no significant differences in mortality rates across decades within HF subtypes https://t.co/dVrqjJp2p7