PubHawk
March 2019 PMID 30101734

Treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Stuart B Murray, Daniel S Quintana, Katharine L Loeb, Scott Griffiths, Daniel Le Grange

Download social card

Mentions

40
Peak: 8 in Jul 2019
across 4 sources since Jul 2019

Extended reach

166,618
potential audience

Total likes

10

Video views

89

Mentions per month

Jul 2019 – Aug 2023

Where it's discussed

  • News18 articles
  • X / Twitter15 posts
  • Facebook5 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone indicates a strong interest in the research, with discussions emphasizing the need for improved psychological treatments, as seen in discussions about the plateau in helping patients with their psychological symptoms. Words like 'thought-provoking' and 'incisive' convey respect and curiosity, while references to conference mentions suggest engagement without extensive critique or advocacy for immediate application.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions recognize the findings, especially the limitations in psychological treatment, indicating general agreement with the article's conclusions.

InterestHigh interest

Posts show high interest, evident through references to multiple conferences and analyses, with phrases like 'thought-provoking' and 'incisive.'

EngagementModerate engagement

Some posts engage deeply by analyzing the methodology and implications, while others passively acknowledge the research.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions suggest the article prompts reflection on current treatment approaches, but no evidence of widespread calls for immediate changes.

Abstract in brief

  • The meta-analysis of 35 randomized controlled trials found that specialized treatments are more effective than other treatments at improving weight outcomes at the end of treatment, but this effect does not last at follow-up.
  • There was no significant difference between specialized and comparator treatments in improving psychological symptoms of anorexia nervosa both immediately after treatment and at follow-up.
  • The study concludes that while current specialized treatments help with weight gain, they do not improve psychological symptoms, indicating a need for more focused approaches on psychological aspects of anorexia nervosa.]
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Emma Louise Pudge
@takeonEDs · X

Thought-provoking, incisive paper: "When meta-analyses get it wrong: response to ‘treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials’ (2018)" https://t.co/2EWWWZL4KN

Jul 23, 2019 · 5 likes · 4 shares · 1,355 followers View post →
Academy for Eating Disorders
@aedweb · X

#ICED2020: Are we at a plateau in terms of how we can help patients with their psychological symptoms using our current evidence based treatments @DrStuartBMurray https://t.co/BAWbdBvzy2

Jun 16, 2020 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 12,788 followers View post →
ANZAED
@ANZAED1 · X

#ICED2020 meta-analysis reviewed 35 RCTs https://t.co/8eyzEYFKwp

Jun 16, 2020 · 1 like · 1 share · 1,442 followers View post →
Mattias Strand
@MattiasStrand · X

Fredagsläsning: “Treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials” https://t.co/Yu8Dd4cj2S via @wordpressdotcom

Jul 5, 2019 · 1 like · 2 shares · 165 followers View post →
Agnes Wold
@AgnesWold · X

@R_undrar Treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychological MedicineVolume 49, Issue 4, Pages 535 - 5441, March 2019

Aug 27, 2023 · 112,914 followers View post →
Agnes Ayton
@AgnesAyton · X

RT @takeonEDs: Thought-provoking, incisive paper: "When meta-analyses get it wrong: response to ‘treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a…

Jul 23, 2019 · 4 shares · 7,381 followers View post →

All mentions

Agnes Wold
@AgnesWold · X

@R_undrar Treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychological MedicineVolume 49, Issue 4, Pages 535 - 5441, March 2019

Aug 27, 2023 · 112,914 followers View post →
@PersonalidadLimite
@PersonalidadLi1 · X

Del metaanálisis concluyeron que el enfoque hacia los problemas psicológicos debería mejorar en el tratamiento de la #anorexia y otros #ed #tca #edtwt ; Alimentarles bien, sí, pero algo más, también. https://t.co/u6bDq80T8S

Nov 17, 2021 · 31 followers View post →
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @ANZAED1: #ICED2020 meta-analysis reviewed 35 RCTs https://t.co/8eyzEYFKwp

Jun 16, 2020 · 1 share · 6,714 followers View post →
ANZAED
@ANZAED1 · X

RT @aedweb: #ICED2020: Are we at a plateau in terms of how we can help patients with their psychological symptoms using our current evidenc…

Jun 16, 2020 · 2 shares · 1,442 followers View post →
Kel O'Neill
@Kel_MHB · X

RT @aedweb: #ICED2020: Are we at a plateau in terms of how we can help patients with their psychological symptoms using our current evidenc…

Jun 16, 2020 · 2 shares · 1,352 followers View post →
Academy for Eating Disorders
@aedweb · X

#ICED2020: Are we at a plateau in terms of how we can help patients with their psychological symptoms using our current evidence based treatments @DrStuartBMurray https://t.co/BAWbdBvzy2

Jun 16, 2020 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 12,788 followers View post →
ANZAED
@ANZAED1 · X

#ICED2020 meta-analysis reviewed 35 RCTs https://t.co/8eyzEYFKwp

Jun 16, 2020 · 1 like · 1 share · 1,442 followers View post →
SilvyJa
@JaSilvy · X

RT @takeonEDs: Thought-provoking, incisive paper: "When meta-analyses get it wrong: response to ‘treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a…

Jul 25, 2019 · 4 shares · 80 followers View post →
Bodywhys
@bodywhys · X

RT @takeonEDs: Thought-provoking, incisive paper: "When meta-analyses get it wrong: response to ‘treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a…

Jul 24, 2019 · 4 shares · 7,312 followers View post →
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @takeonEDs: Thought-provoking, incisive paper: "When meta-analyses get it wrong: response to ‘treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a…

Jul 23, 2019 · 4 shares · 6,714 followers View post →
Agnes Ayton
@AgnesAyton · X

RT @takeonEDs: Thought-provoking, incisive paper: "When meta-analyses get it wrong: response to ‘treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a…

Jul 23, 2019 · 4 shares · 7,381 followers View post →
Emma Louise Pudge
@takeonEDs · X

Thought-provoking, incisive paper: "When meta-analyses get it wrong: response to ‘treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials’ (2018)" https://t.co/2EWWWZL4KN

Jul 23, 2019 · 5 likes · 4 shares · 1,355 followers View post →
David Lewis
@SRS_DavidL · X

RT @MattiasStrand: Fredagsläsning: “Treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled…

Jul 5, 2019 · 2 shares · 58 followers View post →
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @MattiasStrand: Fredagsläsning: “Treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled…

Jul 5, 2019 · 2 shares · 6,714 followers View post →
Mattias Strand
@MattiasStrand · X

Fredagsläsning: “Treatment outcomes for anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials” https://t.co/Yu8Dd4cj2S via @wordpressdotcom

Jul 5, 2019 · 1 like · 2 shares · 165 followers View post →