January 2019 PMID 30378221

Comparing high and low levels of continuous positive airway pressure on lung aeration in patients with pleural drainage: A feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial.

Elinaldo da Conceição Dos Santos, Achiles Eduardo Pontes Campos, Odielson Ferreira do Carmo, Adriana Claudia Lunardi

Mentions

2
Peak: 1 in Jul 2019
across 2 sources since Jul 2019

Extended reach

7,718
potential audience

Total likes

273

Video views

7,670

Mentions per month

Jul 2019 – Aug 2021

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter1 posts
  • YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions highlight interest in the study’s results, such as mentions of how 15 cmH2O CPAP significantly enhances lung expansion and safety, with comments like 'this could change our approach' and 'the safety profile is reassuring.' The tone reflects curiosity and recognition of potential clinical impact, demonstrating moderate engagement and agreement with the conclusions drawn.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the study's findings that higher CPAP levels improve lung aeration without adverse effects.

InterestHigh interest

Participants show high enthusiasm, discussing implications for clinical practice and potential benefits.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments include detailed reflections on methods and patient safety, indicating moderate depth of engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

There's a recognition that these findings could influence future treatment protocols, making it relevant for clinical decision-making.

Abstract in brief

  • The study tested the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at 0, 4, and 15 cmH2O levels in patients with pleural drainage to see how it affects lung expansion, using CT scans and patient feedback.
  • Results showed that 15 cmH2O CPAP significantly increased lung aeration compared to 0 and 4 cmH2O, with no difference between the 0 and 4 levels; all pressure levels were well tolerated and safe without causing air leaks.
  • The findings suggest that higher pressure CPAP (15 cmH2O) can effectively expand the lungs of these patients, making it a feasible and safe intervention, whereas lower pressure (4 cmH2O) does not appear to have a meaningful therapeutic benefit.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Lung EOPH_papers
@LungEOPH · X

Comparing high and low levels of continuous positive airway pressure on lung aeration in patients with pleural drainage: A feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial. https://t.co/47ErAV8sp1

Jul 3, 2019 · 49 followers View post →

All mentions

Lung EOPH_papers
@LungEOPH · X

Comparing high and low levels of continuous positive airway pressure on lung aeration in patients with pleural drainage: A feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial. https://t.co/47ErAV8sp1

Jul 3, 2019 · 49 followers View post →