Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Several discussions reference the study's main findings, particularly that individuals over 65 are significantly more likely to share fake news, with phrases like 'seven times more than younger users' underscoring the finding. The tone is often analytical; for instance, a participant mentions the research's backing of a common assumption that older adults are 'more likely to share fake news,' implying a recognition of the issue's seriousness. Additionally, users express a mix of surprise and validation, noting that these insights are critical for addressing misinformation.
Most discussions generally support the findings of the publication, particularly regarding the prevalence of fake news sharing among older adults and conservatives.
There is a high level of curiosity, as posts frequently reference the study's findings and question their implications.
While some posts show deep engagement by analyzing specific demographics and their behaviors, a few appear dismissive of the results.
The publication is perceived to have significant importance in understanding the dynamics of misinformation, especially among older populations.
But what about misinformation? Sure, social media may be good for the scientists but the public are led astray, right? No. First, "fake news" constitutes a tiny fraction of the info on social media (https://t.co/0EZqYVeUtU). (5/8)
またフェイクニュースを信じるのは65歳以上のユーザーで、最年少の年齢層の7倍...というデータがありました。 noteで「陰謀論と精神医学」というネタを書こうかな？ https://t.co/qGSQF1ykye https://t.co/QTuY75wo7i
Fact checks were also not effective overall (d = .11)--especially with Republicans who had a fused identity with Donald Trump (d = .01) This is especially problematic since prior research finds that this group is more likely to spread misinformation: https://t.co/Ht6T1TtLof https://t.co/e0NSy5Pf8l
Ironisk nok er dette desinformasjon, ifølge de fleste studier. "Women are slightly more likely to share fake news articles on social media, particularly those related to health and lifestyle." Guess et al. (2019), "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news https://t.co/w4OXFLGgO4
הפצת חדשות-כזב בפייסבוק היא כנראה תופעה פחות נפוצה ממה שנהוג לחשוב. למעשה, זו תופעה די נדירה -- לפחות, עם כל ההסתייגויות, כשמתמקדים בבחירות בארה״ב ב-2016, בהן הדיון על פייק-ניוז קיבל הרבה בולטות תקשורתית. ומה לגבי תיבות תהודה? https://t.co/JMrjmrgGgw https://t.co/joHH62tfqc
@UKDefJournal Someone should write something on the psychology of this
This video discusses how individuals can spot fake online accounts that spread misinformation, particularly around health topics like vaccines. Learn effective strategies to avoid falling for misleading content and…
This video delves into the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, explaining concepts such as superposition, entanglement, and wave-particle duality. Viewers will gain insights into how these theories shape our…
Andrea JonesRooy explores data sets illustrating how misinformation is consumed and shared, focusing on the demographic factors influencing these behaviors. The discussion includes insights from an OpenAI study on…
RT @EuroDale: Ironisk nok er dette desinformasjon, ifølge de fleste studier. "Women are slightly more likely to share fake news articles o…
RT @EuroDale: Ironisk nok er dette desinformasjon, ifølge de fleste studier. "Women are slightly more likely to share fake news articles o…
Ironisk nok er dette desinformasjon, ifølge de fleste studier. "Women are slightly more likely to share fake news articles on social media, particularly those related to health and lifestyle." Guess et al. (2019), "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news https://t.co/w4OXFLGgO4
RT @jayvanbavel: Fact checks were also not effective overall (d = .11)--especially with Republicans who had a fused identity with Donald Tr…
@souperfan2012 @YourAnonCentral Study: "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook" Date: 2019 Publication: Science Advances Findings: Conservatives were more likely to share fake news articles than liberals, even after controlling for demographics and digital literacy
@pbeyssac Ne pas oublier la tarte à la crème des jeunes inconsistants qui croient et qui qui font circuler les fake news... ce type est une caricature https://t.co/qAWbtvKvZv
@MarekWilinski1 @_KinChm_ @Nocny_Pingwin 1. https://t.co/WnIJUjwWXc 2. https://t.co/12iok3Yevx 3. https://t.co/Cnl40Rjlug 4. https://t.co/xwV0GETXQi 5. https://t.co/0Gx56qaHnb Na podstawie kuzyna i kolegi (oboje niski poziom edu), chciałam stwierdzić, że to 40+, a okazuje się, że to jednak "complicated". https://t.co/opH4dHONCM
J'ai finalement retrouvé une étude
RT @biblioconnards: On a parlé rapidement de cette étude "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Face…
On a parlé rapidement de cette étude "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook" qui conclut que les personnes qui partagent le plus de fake news sont les plus de 65 ans et les gens de droite. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
On a parlé rapidement de cette étude "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook" qui conclut que les personnes qui partagent le plus de fake news sont les plus de 65 ans et les gens de droite. https://t.co/LdQXhwmuUn
@ramonacus @undivaga No encuentro el que decía pero hay otros similares. No sé muy bien qué tal se exporta a otros países/escenarios pero lo que he visto estaba bien diseñado dentro de las limitaciones https://t.co/76xizvxMj1
@ThinkingHerring @phl43 "On average, users over 65 shared nearly seven times as many articles from fake news domains as the youngest age group." https://t.co/308Uv9NAE8
@UKDefJournal Someone should write something on the psychology of this
@JackS_1919 Thank you I found another one elsewhere about how conservatives are way more likely to believe misinformation This isn't the same one but it's close https://t.co/G9lweTmBjq
@charbonnie41003 @barriere_dr @DrMGpom @Avokayon https://t.co/0FO4Xo331b Research indicates misinfo I s heavily concentrated among small minority of Americans. Study of FB in 2016 found 90% of respondents didn't share a single link from a fake news website during the election period. https://t.co/0FO4Xo331b
For the misinfo that does exist, research indicates it's heavily concentrated among small minority of Americans. Our study of FB in 2016 found 90% of respondents didn't share a single link from a fake news website during the election period. 5/ https://t.co/U1d24hdB8a https://t.co/FSga1VWtG1
Sources Andrew Guess et al. ,Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook.Sci. Adv.5,eaau4586(2019).DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
@Exon_Fx @azazelowa Jak uda mi się znaleźć, to z pewnością podrzucę - mimo wszystko dość dawno mi to gdzieś mignęło, z pewnością w kontekście również fake newsów w internecie https://t.co/ttory1GN6N https://t.co/476DIvi2ZE https://t.co/3AnXmZIAcm
@notcapnamerica Then why are older generation more likely to share fake news than the younger generation? https://t.co/jMfUXb7afG
RT @kayahosuke: またフェイクニュースを信じるのは65歳以上のユーザーで、最年少の年齢層の7倍...というデータがありました。 noteで「陰謀論と精神医学」というネタを書こうかな？ https://t.co/qGSQF1ykye https://t.co/QTu…
またフェイクニュースを信じるのは65歳以上のユーザーで、最年少の年齢層の7倍...というデータがありました。 noteで「陰謀論と精神医学」というネタを書こうかな？ https://t.co/qGSQF1ykye https://t.co/QTuY75wo7i
@LioraSion @Weiss_Lilach לא המצאתי את הגלגל וגם לא את המחקר. יש מספר מחקרים שמראים קורלציה בין גיל ושיתוף פייק ניוז, לדוגמא: https://t.co/C2jWfoVR7R
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook | Science Advances https://t.co/A0M8a35R2w
RT @BlkoJa: Další studie na datech z facebooku ukazuje, že sdílení "fake-news" je vzácné. https://t.co/bbq9UPup11
RT @jayvanbavel: Fact checks were also not effective overall (d = .11)--especially with Republicans who had a fused identity with Donald Tr…
RT @jayvanbavel: Fact checks were also not effective overall (d = .11)--especially with Republicans who had a fused identity with Donald Tr…
Fact checks were also not effective overall (d = .11)--especially with Republicans who had a fused identity with Donald Trump (d = .01) This is especially problematic since prior research finds that this group is more likely to spread misinformation: https://t.co/Ht6T1TtLof https://t.co/e0NSy5Pf8l
RT @watergate1974: @cwebbonline @shannonrwatts Not just the reach, studies have shown that people over 65 are much more likely to fall-for…
@cwebbonline @shannonrwatts Not just the reach, studies have shown that people over 65 are much more likely to fall-for and peddle 'Fake News' narratives. "On average, users over 65 shared nearly seven times as many articles from fake news domains as the youngest age group." https://t.co/RdZR2o15iV
@Jonathan_Nagler for your "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook" paper: Can you tell me # of user posts or # of hyperlinks you guys looked at? I can't find this info in the paper or supplementary materials. Thank you!
@andyguess for your "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook" paper: Can you tell me # of user posts or # of hyperlinks you guys looked at? I can't find this info in the paper or supplementary materials. Only about the 3500 users. TY!
@koenfucius @jayvanbavel i think this paper estimated fake news to be even less numerous https://t.co/9AM9SIe3qr
Další studie na datech z facebooku ukazuje, že sdílení "fake-news" je vzácné. https://t.co/bbq9UPup11
@AlanTuc2112 @TheRabbitHole84 @carsonkrow "Conservatives were more likely to share articles from fake news domains" "users over 65 shared nearly seven times as many articles from fake news domains as the youngest age group" lmao https://t.co/5WK1ve3qgT
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
“Conservatives were more likely to share articles from fake news domains, which in 2016 were largely pro-Trump in orientation, than liberals or moderates.” – Science https://t.co/7vPRxJwKWt 5/9
@Silimund Here is a '19 Science paper by my colleagues @j_a_tucker et al. at the NYU Social Media and Political Participation (SMaPP) Lab: https://t.co/qpgJ5sclz7 Quote: "On average, users over 65 shared nearly seven times as many articles from fake news domains as the youngest age group"
@tweets3rdeye @Mon4Kooyong How do you know that older adults have been genuinely exposed to the political system? Older people are far more likely to share political misinformation than the young people (maybe up to 7x more likely) https://t.co/7CEKcjlPuW
"OK BOOMER": "On average, users over 65 shared nearly seven times as many articles from fake news domains as the youngest age group" https://t.co/VtOoWXdYJw
@Burner87966475 @NewstalkZB A reminder that it is the 50+ demographic who are the most likely to share fake news so your argument about making rational political decisions is shakey at best. https://t.co/g0XXPwIRAW
@kohunz @TameeOliveFern Bold of you to assume that adults are intelligent given boomers + are the most likely to share fake news online https://t.co/g0XXPwIRAW.
@michaelswanny @anni3ru0k @Wheelman_666 @NewstalkZB Given that the most likely people to share fake news on Facebook by age demographic are them, this a bit rich. https://t.co/g0XXPwrOyW
@Cozz4ever @vudian86 @zucksegg @SimplyABucket @JAX2866 @MattWallace888 What does this have to do with gullibility? Never said young people didn't have dumb ideas. Also, one dudes opinion is not a source. Here's a real source: "users over 65 shared nearly seven times as many articles from fake news domains" https://t.co/AhtwWmuwnv
@pling619 @BrandenMLane @oneunderscore__ @NBCNews The majority of the issue is boomers: “We also find a strong age effect, which persists after controlling for partisanship and ideology: On average, users over 65 shared nearly seven times as many articles from fake news domains as the youngest age group.” https://t.co/fGD4gAtPio
@Vannt41 @RaqeulCarbalall No sé a qué te refieres con "falsa". Te estoy poniendo el enlace a la noticia que es del diario El País y si entras puedes ver las fuentes con los estudios: https://t.co/cRNsl1X01A Pero igual tu comentario de Twitter es más real que la noticia y los estudios al respecto.
Pero, ojo, la desinformación afecta, y mucho, a la gente mayor, que tiene más dificultades para reconocer las “noticias falsas” y es más propensa a compartirla, como sugieren distintos estudios: https://t.co/kwisKAQvoM https://t.co/nRCHO1BHK5
@denisparra No lo encontrarás: Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science advances, 5(1), eaau4586.
@nmayer31 @StepClement @dexsilicium https://t.co/a1FhIrXzwd
הפצת חדשות-כזב בפייסבוק היא כנראה תופעה פחות נפוצה ממה שנהוג לחשוב. למעשה, זו תופעה די נדירה -- לפחות, עם כל ההסתייגויות, כשמתמקדים בבחירות בארה״ב ב-2016, בהן הדיון על פייק-ניוז קיבל הרבה בולטות תקשורתית. ומה לגבי תיבות תהודה? https://t.co/JMrjmrgGgw https://t.co/joHH62tfqc
3/ https://t.co/TlsZcvuIQF https://t.co/DHnhB0TttL
@Bubilus @dalpha423 @ProfCampagna Trovato! Come vedi un ragionamento demografico come fattore amplificate delle fake news andrebbe fatto. https://t.co/zbsUgXfie4 https://t.co/wC4duNDt51
@aarosenberg Yo no veo que @gabrielboric diga en su post que las fake news estén diseñadas para dañar a la izquierda. Sin embargo, si se revisa la literatura sobre el tema, hay datos que muestran que la propagación de noticias falsas se asocia a personas conservadoras https://t.co/pB7XS3DBzE
Amerikaanse 65+-ers deelden tijdens de presidentsverkiezingen in 2016 vijf keer zoveel nepnieuwsberichten op Facebook als jongeren. https://t.co/rD8JvOMifF
@wener_michael @_Kittypunk Hier zum Beispiel zum Thema Medienkompetenz: https://t.co/UPzgAh9W1l https://t.co/E2J4PjV1EK
On fake news, we found sharing this content is relatively rare: Less than 9% of our survey respondent shared links to fake news on FB in 2016, but this behavior was disproportionately common among >65s co-authored w/ @andyguess @Jonathan_Nagler https://t.co/21UBv5avhU 4/
RT @CSMaP_NYU: On fake news, we found sharing this content is relatively rare: Less than 9 percent of Americans shared links to fake news o…
On fake news, we found sharing this content is relatively rare: Less than 9 percent of Americans shared links to fake news on FB in 2016, but this behavior was disproportionately common among people over 65. 3/ @andyguess @Jonathan_Nagler @j_a_tucker https://t.co/U1d24hdB8a https://t.co/yWhrURFmaS
@TerriNightPT @Columbia https://t.co/y1mxOnX6Zd https://t.co/I42LMKOUnO https://t.co/UI0s4yvj0l It’s pretty well known
Une étude intéressante à ce sujet : https://t.co/jZxmt25yVH. Pour résumer, elle dit que les personnes âgées publient 70% de fakes news de plus que les ado. Oui oui, même vos ados en face de vous à la bib qui regardent des vidéos de Squeezie en plein délire sur les pyramides. 7/16
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
@GreenPeaches2 @kalcraig38 @IcelandVanessa @DavMicRot This isn't trivial. The first reference (10) in the Yang study is to another similar study. That study talks lists built by "fact checkers and academics". I won't assume that list is biased. But how to be sure? https://t.co/0IrvupSxVb
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
@JesterWootton https://t.co/8xGmxctLcQ
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
@TimJGraham @CNN Look at the reseach and it means next to nothing. Suggesting otherwise on CNN should qualify as misinformation. It won't because the game is (usually) rigged but the problems overlooked thanks to confirmation bias. https://t.co/bEExkhcTgj
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
RT @BrianMGuay: The problem of fake news sharing appears to be largely concentrated among the political right. Republicans share *a lot* (u…
RT @DG_Rand: The root of the challenge when inferring political bias is that Republicans/conservatives are substantially more likely to sha…
前にこんなんあったの思い出した
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/Sg9IeUNvSu
RT @M_B_Petersen: But what about misinformation? Sure, social media may be good for the scientists but the public are led astray, right? N…
RT @M_B_Petersen: But what about misinformation? Sure, social media may be good for the scientists but the public are led astray, right? N…
But what about misinformation? Sure, social media may be good for the scientists but the public are led astray, right? No. First, "fake news" constitutes a tiny fraction of the info on social media (https://t.co/0EZqYVeUtU). (5/8)
"Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook " https://t.co/9YJpNi7k36
@drGregBowman @MarkusDeserno At least you might have answered the original question https://t.co/fCa9n1HEsf
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/Us2o0IvcWh
Another reminder of how important it is that we all become media literate. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/WU3WoCFd72
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/a3Il6LvGQ5
Hmm. More like racism is baked in: Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook | Science Advances https://t.co/PNCcRbhWH4
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/GhqKzQJK9S
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/YehssXNfkI
« Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook » https://t.co/etjBo9fxcx Fake News Shared by Very Few, But Those Over 65 More Likely to Pass on Such Stories, New Study Finds https://t.co/CNgWzc18p9
Some readings ahead of CSMaP co-director @j_a_tucker’s @CamdenConf talk: 1) “From Liberation to Turmoil: Social Media and Democracy”: https://t.co/wTOYN1EYwZ 2) “Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook”: https://t.co/nGLUXCP0XI https://t.co/ThHpmcbqT8
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/2XhOicGM3W
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/2XhOicGM3W
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/bZsPXRE2Qy
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/eeO7qBlHwY
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook | Science https://t.co/ASDjN2d3Qv
RT @Elyrya_Ylnae: Interesting. While I can't vouch for the accuracy of all findings here, the results aren't surprising and are probably wo…
Interesting. While I can't vouch for the accuracy of all findings here, the results aren't surprising and are probably worth consideration by all. Via: .@LFredenhall Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/2Zaikh2Zin
@TheCyberPsyche @BPSCyberPsych this is the source of that 10% figure: Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), eaau4586. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau4586 #CyberSectionChat #PolPsychChat
And this one claims at least in US elderly people share fake news far more often than youngsters. Tucker et al (2019). "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook". Science Advances. 5 (1): doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/SEiUu5YYUF
PapersOfTheDay "Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election" https://t.co/Hu8JWqCiUU https://t.co/9gLNadSzY5 "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook" https://t.co/sQrwXiP3V6 https://t.co/Kt5WOXHrXa
Given #deepfakes & baby boomers who share a lot of #fakenews we’re in for wild ride in 2020, ref “Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook,” A. Guess, J. Nagler and J. Tucker, Science Advances 5:1, 2009, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586 https://t.co/N2JfLjei33
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook | Science Advances https://t.co/eN3hhQloHu
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/uQt5ujndR1
WOW! Those who are over 65 years disseminate Fake news seven times more than youngest group? Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/Bmh0uxQ7ui
Compartir #FakeNews (EEUU): cuanto más conservadores (republicano pro-Trump) y mayor (+65), más probable. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook, vía @sciencemagazine https://t.co/YV7FLcuWA2 #ComPol https://t.co/IS5dMFIMu4
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/2sn1NOl7F7
Over 65’s more likely to spread fake news ... More to be Brexiteers More likely to be prejudiced Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook | Science Advances https://t.co/csnctNr1x4
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/Z4mqXxlHlm
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/GqGCcHFAT0
We all assumed this was true, now we have scientific research to back it up. Conservative Seniors love their “FAKE NEWS” Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/pE1SjzT0aB
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/VwvPeH4jld
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook - Science Advances https://t.co/t6iE6T0rVr
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/CEfkTOZBXJ
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/pcWa64auET
RT @rnavi_official: フェイクニュースに騙されるのは若者か老人か…？最新の調査結果（現代ビジネス） - Yahoo!ニュース https://t.co/rCyEKhYwgf 元論文：A Guess, J Nagler, J Tucker. Less th…
RT @rnavi_official: フェイクニュースに騙されるのは若者か老人か…？最新の調査結果（現代ビジネス） - Yahoo!ニュース https://t.co/rCyEKhYwgf 元論文：A Guess, J Nagler, J Tucker. Less th…
RT @rnavi_official: フェイクニュースに騙されるのは若者か老人か…？最新の調査結果（現代ビジネス） - Yahoo!ニュース https://t.co/rCyEKhYwgf 元論文：A Guess, J Nagler, J Tucker. Less th…
RT @rnavi_official: フェイクニュースに騙されるのは若者か老人か…？最新の調査結果（現代ビジネス） - Yahoo!ニュース https://t.co/rCyEKhYwgf 元論文：A Guess, J Nagler, J Tucker. Less th…
RT @rnavi_official: フェイクニュースに騙されるのは若者か老人か…？最新の調査結果（現代ビジネス） - Yahoo!ニュース https://t.co/rCyEKhYwgf 元論文：A Guess, J Nagler, J Tucker. Less th…
フェイクニュースに騙されるのは若者か老人か…？最新の調査結果（現代ビジネス） - Yahoo!ニュース https://t.co/rCyEKhYwgf 元論文：A Guess, J Nagler, J Tucker. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances (2019) 5:eaau4586
on the #reading list: Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook, link: https://t.co/C6hzj1bvWX (via Instapaper) https://t.co/4MfHjPZHOo
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/Z6RszMDBJn
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/XixtEfyZlE
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook (https://t.co/CKn5Vbf8iJ
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/EmT0qkR3QD
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/7rVPNu3ZhF
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/TRq2IVGqIc
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook | Science Advances https://t.co/qywn2WBU6R
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/B1fenFo7uI
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook via @ScienceAdvances https://t.co/9VqQdIM0ep Wow! #FakerFact's #AI nailed this one! https://t.co/EEvtYDKdwq https://t.co/Od3yuOgJ6F
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/RYIVUzVRTF
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/Hc6DTUm0AI
Precisamos ajudar nossos idosos: Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/EMTV3TPkxY
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/8ULtujifO6
Lien vers la recherche de mon dernier tweet - Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook - https://t.co/Wm5pXGTDSi
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook - Science Advances https://t.co/zYFjeePZbv https://t.co/f0gr4cxz5u
@noUpside Really enjoyed your interview! Any feedback on this research article? "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook" Conservatives and an older population were significantly more susceptible to fake news? https://t.co/oA8OjvYaVN
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/zyKJCbGNSb
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/y6IClTr4Xr
RT @soramame0518: 2016米大統領選において、リベラル系よりは保守系が、若者よりは65歳以上の年配層の方が、フェイクニュースをFBで共有したとの報告。Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake…
RT @_atanas_: Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/rcpFdqKGZy
RT @TomHoltzPaleo: Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/d8HLluyxgv
RT @TomHoltzPaleo: Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/d8HLluyxgv
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/d8HLluyxgv
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/0JJVFgNRDC
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/vC32Qjn8qx
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook, study says. https://t.co/FhkoSvpLZV However, it has a few issues. 1) Doesn't capture how many fake stories were liked (which drives visibility in social),
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/A1t342knXU
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/vipC2lAok3 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/EVv9SuDLvJ
RT @evt_shaazgai: 65 аас дээш насныхан Нүүр номонд бусдаас илүү худал мэдээ (Fake news)түгээдэг гэсэн судалгаа бна. Less than you think: Pr…
RT @_atanas_: Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/rcpFdqKGZy
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/OOZ1GOAiL1
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook https://t.co/rcpFdqKGZy
RT @coldcrashpics: As validating as this headline sounds to a bitter Millennial like me, the name of the study is "Less than you think: Pre…
RT @APDillon_: The actual study is called "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook" https://t…
The actual study is called "Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook" https://t.co/0HVUlHgmjv NY Times does not question how this journal got their data from Facebook for this study, btw.
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook However extremely dangerous ! https://t.co/3xYpD0KKCx
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook | Science Advances https://t.co/KYIt0b3u05
RT @h_okumura: 朝日新聞の記事には「米プリンストン大などのチーム」としか書かれていないが，どうやらこれっぽい→ https://t.co/AzCSmfiO0p #フェイクニュース https://t.co/rSdSShtx9d
朝日新聞の記事には「米プリンストン大などのチーム」としか書かれていないが，どうやらこれっぽい→ https://t.co/AzCSmfiO0p #フェイクニュース https://t.co/rSdSShtx9d