@Lhizper @marwim123 O'Brien DT, Farrell C, Welsh BC. Broken (windows) theory: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the pathways from neighborhood disorder to resident health outcomes and behaviors. Soc Sci Med. 2019 May;228:272-292. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.015.Epub 2018Nov 23.PMID: 30885673.
Broken (windows) theory: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the pathways from neighborhood disorder to resident health outcomes and behaviors.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Apr 2019 – Aug 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter4 posts
-
News4 articles
-
Facebook2 posts
-
Reddit2 posts
-
Blogs2 articles
-
YouTube1 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Participants discuss the consistency of the evidence linking perceived neighborhood disorder to mental health and substance use, noting that the meta-analysis challenges the strength of the broken windows theory. Their tone varies from cautious support to critical, with phrases like 'overstated support' and 'questioning the biases,' reflecting a nuanced engagement driven by methodological concerns and implications for social policy.
Most discussions acknowledge the findings, especially questioning or supporting the validity of the broken windows theory based on the provided evidence.
Postings demonstrate moderate interest, with some referencing the methodology and implications rather than just expressing opinions.
Many users engage deeply by analyzing the study's conclusions, discussing its methodology, limitations, and potential influence on policy or community perceptions.
The discussions suggest that this research could influence opinions about neighborhood disorder and police strategies, although some remain skeptical about its overall impact.
Abstract in brief
- The meta-analysis examined how neighborhood disorder affects residents' health through three proposed pathways and found consistent links between perceived disorder and mental health issues, substance abuse, and overall health.
- There was little evidence to support that neighborhood disorder directly impacts physical health or risky behaviors, with findings affected by methodological issues like data censoring and missing important factors such as socioeconomic status.
- The study suggests that support for the broken windows theory may be overstated because much of the evidence relies on subjective perceptions of disorder, which could be biased by individual mental health or outlook on the neighborhood.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyRT @TwoAcademPapers: Broken (windows) theory: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the split feasibility and fixed point problems
Broken (windows) theory: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the split feasibility and fixed point problems
@NoraMcArdle @vertigonex @mattyglesias https://t.co/PK4P4eLHjh
All mentions
Scientific Insights into team cohesion and the APES Protocol
The video discusses the scientifically backed APES protocol—Align, Problemsolve, Experiment, Share—used to enhance team collaboration, illustrating its effectiveness through historical examples and recent research in…
@NoraMcArdle @vertigonex @mattyglesias https://t.co/PK4P4eLHjh
@Lhizper @marwim123 O'Brien DT, Farrell C, Welsh BC. Broken (windows) theory: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the pathways from neighborhood disorder to resident health outcomes and behaviors. Soc Sci Med. 2019 May;228:272-292. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.015.Epub 2018Nov 23.PMID: 30885673.
RT @TwoAcademPapers: Broken (windows) theory: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the split feasibility and fixed point problems
Broken (windows) theory: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the split feasibility and fixed point problems