Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
This collection of discussions references a specific preference assessment procedure used with autistic individuals, mentioning that children had to sit ignored without access for several minutes, which shows a focus on the methodological details rather than broader implications. The tone is neutral and descriptive, reflecting mild curiosity without strong agreement or interest in the research outcomes.
The discussion provides only a brief mention of the methods used in preference assessments, indicating a neutral stance regarding the study's findings.
The tone suggests a neutral or minimal interest, noting the procedural aspects rather than engaging deeply with the implications.
Comments are superficial, referencing specific procedures without elaborating on broader significance or critique.
There is no indication that the discussion considers the study to have a meaningful impact on the field or practice.
Requiring autistics (N=3, age 9-21) who choose a food reinforcer to sit ignored & with no access to anything for up to 5 minutes https://t.co/JfvHIW6S7I ABA preference assessment, in 2019
RT @autismcrisis: Requiring autistics (N=3, age 9-21) who choose a food reinforcer to sit ignored & with no access to anything for up to 5…
This episode examines the reliance on edible reinforcers in behavior acquisition, exploring research on whether increasing access to leisure items reduces displacement caused by edibles and suggests alternative…
RT @autismcrisis: Requiring autistics (N=3, age 9-21) who choose a food reinforcer to sit ignored & with no access to anything for up to 5…
RT @autismcrisis: Requiring autistics (N=3, age 9-21) who choose a food reinforcer to sit ignored & with no access to anything for up to 5…
Requiring autistics (N=3, age 9-21) who choose a food reinforcer to sit ignored & with no access to anything for up to 5 minutes https://t.co/JfvHIW6S7I ABA preference assessment, in 2019
MD
EG
GK