Endoscopy July 2019 PMID 31071757

Virtual reality simulation training in endoscopy: a Cochrane review and meta-analysis.

Rishad Khan, Joanne Plahouras, Bradley C Johnston, Michael A Scaffidi, Samir C Grover, Catharine M Walsh

Mentions

6
Peak: 2 in Jun 2019
across 3 sources since Jun 2019

Extended reach

18,517
potential audience

Total likes

0

Video views

260

Mentions per month

Jun 2019 – Jul 2019

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter2 posts
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Facebook2 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions highlight key findings from the review, such as VR's advantage over no training but lack of clear superiority, using neutral language like 'quantitative analysis' and referencing figures. The tone is analytical rather than emotional, reflecting a balanced view of VR's role in endoscopy training and emphasizing the need for further research.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the review's findings that VR training has some benefits but isn't drastically superior overall, showing moderate support.

InterestModerate interest

Participants display moderate curiosity about the research, referencing figures and analyses, but do not delve deeply into implications.

EngagementNeutral engagement

The responses tend to be brief and fact-focused, with some referencing specific figures like Fig. 3, indicating limited in-depth discussion.

ImpactModerate impact

The shared content suggests that the publication could influence future training approaches, though the tone remains cautious with acknowledgement of its mixed evidence.

Abstract in brief

  • Virtual reality (VR) simulation training in endoscopy is being studied to see if it can replace or supplement traditional hands-on training for trainees with little to no experience.
  • The review of 18 trials found that VR training generally did not improve overall competency compared to no training or conventional methods, but it was better than no training in some areas like independent procedure completion.
  • Overall, VR simulation is useful, especially when integrated with educational principles, but it doesn't show clear superiority over other training methods based on current evidence.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

“Virtual reality simulation training in endoscopy: a Cochrane review and meta-analysis” by Rishad Khan et al. Fig. 3 Quantitative analysis for trials evaluating virtual reality (VR) simulation training versus no training. https://t.co/SB7kLjaxsZ

Jul 13, 2019 · 1 share · 11,548 followers View post →
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: “Virtual reality simulation training in endoscopy: a Cochrane review and meta-analysis” by Rishad Khan et al. Fig. 3…

Jul 13, 2019 · 1 share · 6,706 followers View post →

All mentions

SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: “Virtual reality simulation training in endoscopy: a Cochrane review and meta-analysis” by Rishad Khan et al. Fig. 3…

Jul 13, 2019 · 1 share · 6,706 followers View post →
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

“Virtual reality simulation training in endoscopy: a Cochrane review and meta-analysis” by Rishad Khan et al. Fig. 3 Quantitative analysis for trials evaluating virtual reality (VR) simulation training versus no training. https://t.co/SB7kLjaxsZ

Jul 13, 2019 · 1 share · 11,548 followers View post →