PubHawk
J Appl Behav Anal October 2019 PMID 31236942

Evaluation of word recognition following typing produced through facilitated communication.

Henry S Roane, Heather J Kadey, William E Sullivan

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

5
Peak: 3 in Sep 2019
across 2 sources since Sep 2019

Extended reach

54,021
potential audience

Total likes

4

Video views

563

Mentions per month

Sep 2019 – Oct 2022

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter3 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Discussions predominantly express skepticism about facilitated communication, as seen in remarks questioning its validity and citing the study's findings about limited word recognition. Words like 'questionable,' 'controversial,' and references to limitations illustrate the tone and context, highlighting a cautious yet engaged response to the research's implications.

AgreementLow agreement

Most discussions are skeptical or dismissive of the effectiveness of facilitated communication, reflecting disagreement with positive implications of the method.

InterestModerate interest

The posts show moderate curiosity, with some engaging in deeper questions about the research's implications, but many stay on surface-level criticisms.

EngagementNeutral engagement

The interactions are somewhat superficial, mainly mentioning the limitations or controversies without extensive analysis.

ImpactModerate impact

While there is some recognition of the study's relevance, many discussions seem to question its practical significance or influence on current practices.

Abstract in brief

  • The study examined whether a participant could independently recognize words she was facilitated to type during communication sessions, finding that her ability to identify words depended on the number of distracters present.
  • Results indicated that the participant struggled to recognize common words spoken through facilitated communication, suggesting limited independent understanding.
  • The findings are considered in the context of behavioral analysis and raise questions about the effectiveness of facilitated communication as an alternative treatment for autism and related disorders.]
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
afcp
@afcp_01 · X

JABA に facilitated communication に関する論文が出てた。コミュニケーションのセッションで表出された単語は、その後の確認では認識されていなかった、と。まあそうなるよね。 https://t.co/L51Y45UuOR

Sep 4, 2019 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 35,984 followers View post →
Kosuke Sawa
@kosukesa · X

RT @afcp_01: JABA に facilitated communication に関する論文が出てた。コミュニケーションのセッションで表出された単語は、その後の確認では認識されていなかった、と。まあそうなるよね。 https://t.co/L51Y45UuOR

Sep 4, 2019 · 2 shares · 10,237 followers View post →

All mentions

ぱぴお【公式】@難治性うつ治療中(薬剤限界量突破増量中)
@papio_pooh · X

RT @afcp_01: JABA に facilitated communication に関する論文が出てた。コミュニケーションのセッションで表出された単語は、その後の確認では認識されていなかった、と。まあそうなるよね。 https://t.co/L51Y45UuOR

Sep 4, 2019 · 2 shares · 7,226 followers View post →
Kosuke Sawa
@kosukesa · X

RT @afcp_01: JABA に facilitated communication に関する論文が出てた。コミュニケーションのセッションで表出された単語は、その後の確認では認識されていなかった、と。まあそうなるよね。 https://t.co/L51Y45UuOR

Sep 4, 2019 · 2 shares · 10,237 followers View post →
afcp
@afcp_01 · X

JABA に facilitated communication に関する論文が出てた。コミュニケーションのセッションで表出された単語は、その後の確認では認識されていなかった、と。まあそうなるよね。 https://t.co/L51Y45UuOR

Sep 4, 2019 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 35,984 followers View post →