October 2019 PMID 31256086

Effectiveness of somatosensory interventions on somatosensory, motor and functional outcomes in the upper limb post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cigdem Yilmazer, Leonardo Boccuni, Liselot Thijs, Geert Verheyden

Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 2 in Jul 2019

across 3 sources since Jul 2019

Extended reach

7,225

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

306

Mentions per month

Jul 2019 – Jul 2025

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter2 posts
YouTube2 videos
Instagram1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone reflects cautious acknowledgment of the study’s findings, with comments noting that active interventions are beneficial for motor recovery yet limited for sensory improvements, exemplified by phrases like 'significant motor improvements' and noting the 'low quality of evidence,' which underscores both interest and recognition of research gaps.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the mixed findings and emphasize that active interventions improve motor outcomes but are limited in sensory improvements, aligning with the article’s conclusions.

InterestModerate interest

Posts demonstrate moderate curiosity, often highlighting the significance of the systematic review and its implications for stroke rehabilitation practices.

EngagementNeutral engagement

The discussions show a surface-level engagement with some referencing specific interventions and uncertainties about sensory outcomes, but few delve deeply into methodological critiques.

ImpactModerate impact

Participants seem to recognize the study's importance in guiding future research and clinical approaches, indicating a moderate perceived impact.

Abstract in brief

This study reviews the effectiveness of different somatosensory interventions on improving sensory, motor, and functional recovery in the upper limbs after a stroke, highlighting that most research has focused on motor recovery rather than sensory outcomes.
Active somatosensory interventions were found to significantly improve motor impairment but did not significantly enhance sensory perception or functional activities, while passive interventions improved light touch sensation but had limited effects on proprioception and higher cortical functions.
Overall, the evidence quality is low to very low, indicating a need for better-designed studies to conclusively determine the benefits of somatosensory interventions in upper limb stroke rehabilitation.

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Neurorehabilitation and Prehabilitation in Brain Tumor Treatment

This interview features Italian physiotherapist Leonardo Boccuni discussing his doctoral thesis on prehabilitation for brain tumors using non-invasive brain neuromodulation and intensive therapy. He shares insights on…

Hemispherics · Nov 22, 2024 171 views

Somatosensory Rehabilitation in Stroke Recovery: Techniques & Outcomes

This episode explores the often overlooked sensory aspect of neurological recovery post-stroke, detailing the neurophysiology of sensory systems, types of sensitivity deficits, and clinical assessments. It discusses…

Hemispherics · Jul 26, 2025 135 views

SystematicReviewBot

@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @TC_papers: Effectiveness of somatosensory interventions on somatosensory, motor and functional outcomes in the upper limb post-stroke:…

Jul 1, 2019 · 1 share · 6,693 followers View post →

TC_papers

@TC_papers · X

Effectiveness of somatosensory interventions on somatosensory, motor and functional outcomes in the upper limb post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. https://t.co/I9ZJW1zbse

Jul 1, 2019 · 1 like · 1 share · 212 followers View post →

Quase 70% dos pacientes com AVC apresentam deficiências ...

Instagram

... stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(4):459-477. doi:10.3233/NRE-192687".

Oct 18, 2023 View →