Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
This collection of discussions predominantly dismisses scientific studies like Radonovich 2019, with words such as 'lies', 'fraud', and phrases like 'masks don't work' which demonstrate a tone of outright rejection. Many posts mock the studies' methodology or dismiss them as politicized or flawed, showing a deep-seated skepticism that diminishes the potential influence of scientific evidence on their perspectives.
Most discussions strongly reject the idea that masks, including N95s, are effective against respiratory viruses, citing multiple studies and studies' flaws.
Participants show low interest in the scientific evidence, often dismissing or ignoring relevant research, and rely on preexisting beliefs rather than new data.
The conversations are highly dismissive, with many posters mocking or attacking the authority of scientific studies, rather than engaging with the evidence critically.
The overall tone suggests these discussions have little to no impact on changing views; they perpetuate skepticism and appear to reinforce existing distrust or misconceptions.
MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Radonovich 2019: https://t.co/8DPzEsWoEj Alfelali 2020: https://t.co/6gm2bRJGpB Bundgaard 2021: https://t.co/Djkser7zpH Abaluck, 2022: https://t.co/xQbN0vicWc
STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial Lewis J Radonovich Jr et al. JAMA. 2019”
These are supposed to be THE NATION'S BEST. The study is here https://t.co/KDncY2mkFT does say that you need to see the protocols, so that's not the lie. The lie is in the study itself. You see, on the lower left, it is discussing the study DESIGN. What should be. https://t.co/2pa4NvRxpC
Study 6: “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833. https://t.co/kuQMwCmndN
@maiti_86 @MrNonwoven 3MすらN９５に
MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg3Ogg Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYecMaG MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSjulA Radonovich 2019: https://t.co/8DPzEsVQOL Alfelali 2020: https://t.co/6gm2bRJ8A3 Bundgaard 2021: https://t.co/LhQFPCysxD Abaluck, 2022: https://t.co/MzkTf0nCZS
This video explains what coronavirus COVID-19 is and why it is a hot topic. It describes effects, mode of transmission, protection methods, and treatment options, with interviews and animations providing in-depth…
This study investigates the amount of SARS-CoV-2 virus present in upper respiratory specimens to understand contagiousness. It emphasizes the importance of early testing and isolation to prevent COVID-19 spread.
This video explores the impacts of climate change on marine biodiversity. It discusses key findings on species adaptation, habitat loss, and conservation strategies in the face of rising temperatures and ocean…
The study reports on four COVID-19 patients treated with a combination of Chinese and Western medicines, including antivirals and traditional Chinese medicine, showing varied clinical improvements and suggesting…
The study investigates the amount of SARS-CoV-2 virus present in the upper respiratory specimens of infected patients to understand how contagious they might be. Viral load varies during infection and peaks around…
This case involves a 54-year-old South Korean male, the third confirmed COVID-19 patient, causing secondary and tertiary transmissions, highlighting rapid spread. Treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir showed a significant…
This video discusses a study on four COVID-19 patients treated with combined Chinese and Western medicines, showing potential benefits and clinical improvements, highlighting the need for further research to confirm…
This rapid advice guideline assists healthcare professionals in managing 2019-nCoV pneumonia, covering virus spread, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, infection control, and patient care, drawing from initial hospital…
This study investigates SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in upper respiratory specimens to assess contagiousness. Viral load varies during infection and peaks around symptom onset, emphasizing early testing and isolation to…
This video examines a 54-year-old male COVID-19 case in South Korea, highlighting rapid virus spread and the potential effectiveness of lopinavir-ritonavir therapy in reducing viral loads and managing pneumonia.
This video discusses a study of four COVID-19 pneumonia patients treated with a combination of Chinese and Western medicines, including antivirals and traditional Chinese medicine, showing different levels of…
RT @Placeb0Mad: También se hicieron estudios para evaluar si eran mejor las FFP2 a las quirúrgicas. Spoiler: NO. https://t.co/ULojPXEDy7
También se hicieron estudios para evaluar si eran mejor las FFP2 a las quirúrgicas. Spoiler: NO. https://t.co/ULojPXEDy7
@buta_noir @MasukuShac87060 あ、そうですね、間違えてました。 以前ブックマークしていたリンクが切れてたので、探して貼ったら違うものでした、確認不足です。 自分が参照していた論文が見当たらないので、替わりにこれを。 https://t.co/xUa8YZjy8Z N95 マスクと医療用マスクに有意差は見られない。 こういった複数のRCTあり。
RT @MsDicekey: @maiti_86 @MrNonwoven 3MすらN９５に
@deo_mister @MichelleLA1981 10. https://t.co/pJAuSsjPuA 11. https://t.co/ryHrQCtqpX 12. https://t.co/CoGmwCKZDT 13. https://t.co/OBYdSIVDLV 14. https://t.co/aUw8UDpGod 15. https://t.co/DrEJNTbEOZ 16. https://t.co/dMGouUFYXZ 17. https://t.co/3YNjoqFk8l 18. https://t.co/iN31pzRYw2
@deo_mister @MichelleLA1981 1. https://t.co/d0zzTcZ9KD 2. https://t.co/0MWRR2MMl5 3. https://t.co/8hsjY1u6vE 4. https://t.co/cd6lncji4R 5. https://t.co/TPpFN02Xim 6. https://t.co/lOfOfgjrln 7. https://t.co/fZbGqCm7e8 8. https://t.co/DrEJNTbEOZ 9. https://t.co/jcy9GXVaNH
RT @MsDicekey: @maiti_86 @MrNonwoven 3MすらN９５に
RT @MsDicekey: @maiti_86 @MrNonwoven 3MすらN９５に
RT @MsDicekey: @maiti_86 @MrNonwoven 3MすらN９５に
RT @MsDicekey: @maiti_86 @MrNonwoven 3MすらN９５に
RT @MsDicekey: @maiti_86 @MrNonwoven 3MすらN９５に
RT @MsDicekey: @maiti_86 @MrNonwoven 3MすらN９５に
RT @MsDicekey: @maiti_86 @MrNonwoven 3MすらN９５に
@maiti_86 @MrNonwoven 3MすらN９５に
N９５製造メーカーの３Mが
N９５製造メーカーの３Mが
@LeFossile55 @onesimus_day @drseanmullen The fool is you,brainwashed my media BS that was only pushed to keep the fear of Covid going so governments could have a trial run at authoritarianism so they could find their weaknesses... have read a 100 studies like this one now.. https://t.co/PEatdPQuka
@blackwidow_94 @CheriDiNovo https://t.co/RUd80wZ932
@Lucy_The_Brain @DaveHcontrarian "Bot accounts" Weak. I accept your concession. Here some mask science links I picked up along the way. Enjoy! https://t.co/yZNYXws6nC https://t.co/mo7vPMP3gb https://t.co/uWk9JBQlgu https://t.co/7DdyBvPleu
@drombit @yogastephy The Lancet said, "they should be worn by healthcare workers to protect their vulnerable patients, as well as themselves, when community rates of respiratory infections are high" They did, and found: https://t.co/E2TAN7Dgpu https://t.co/H8KPb7BUZr
@rmbateman @scsaint62 @TogetherWeMask YouTube isn't science, science says N95 masks are just as poor a choice as surgical masks https://t.co/E2TAN7Dgpu
@AnciraBecky "scientists" lol Shame they didn't study N95 masks. https://t.co/E2TAN7CIzW
@RobertAWiseman @bridges2002227 @BuckSexton https://t.co/Gpq3kh5aj1
@Drfahadalnajjar @RandPaul It's 2025 and you still tell the same lies over and over... It doesn't work anymore buddy, so stop your nonsense and go have a read https://t.co/Wtky5yLhHn https://t.co/Gpq3kh5aj1
@MT_urawatomiki @yas_kawamura @tabinidetain 医療現場での研究でも有意差なしはいくらでもありますけど。 https://t.co/XtCDMubbND 義務化や推奨してみて効果なかったから、どこの国もマスクやめちゃったんですよ。 いい加減、現実を見つめてね。
@HeideWeltonRN @kevinnbass It clearly doesn't https://t.co/Gpq3kh5aj1
RT @AltenbergLee: This 2019 study of "N95 respirators vs medical masks" found "no significant difference" in flu rates. BUT—HCWs masked onl…
RT @AltenbergLee: This 2019 study of "N95 respirators vs medical masks" found "no significant difference" in flu rates. BUT—HCWs masked onl…
This 2019 study of "N95 respirators vs medical masks" found "no significant difference" in flu rates. BUT—HCWs masked only "within 6 feet of patients"—droplet theory. We now can infer that N95 subjects caught flu from aerosol when unmasked >6ft away. https://t.co/wicyUygYWq
@JackieSeidel1
@JILLSLASTWORD https://t.co/RUd80wYBdu
@DrKateTO https://t.co/RUd80wYBdu
@Yaminashi69 @KaiMADAOZen @AskPerplexity @TheChefsGardens @Kidsdoc1Rick albeit, they are thickest the closer you get to the source of them. Anyway, this is why Radonovitch and the two Loeb studies are irreparably confounded. Loeb is worse - donning within 3 feet. Oopsie. Turns out N95s don't work, like masks, if you /2 https://t.co/KDncY2mkFT
@BierVicki @tryna_do_rite Because it does nothing but virtue signal. https://t.co/E2TAN7Dgpu
@LoneWolfMasker Lol https://t.co/RUd80wZ932
@alyssaschwartz https://t.co/RUd80wZ932
@covidbagofdicks
@broadwaybabyto
@TRyanGregory Lol quite the ridiculous comparisons.. it's as if you have zero understanding of the subject you're attempting to speak on. https://t.co/RUd80wYBdu
@beansprouts_mom https://t.co/RUd80wZ932
@DrKateTO
@Kidsdoc1Rick N95'S are virtually no different than a medical mask, which does nothing to mitigate airborne viruses.. https://t.co/RUd80wYBdu
@KashPrime Why? N95's have shown to be just as ineffective as medical masks. https://t.co/RUd80wYBdu
@IHateCilantro @covidbagofdicks @PeterHotez False https://t.co/E2TAN7CIzW
@BarryHunt008 N95s show no benefit over flimsy surgical masks, in HCW settings where masking etiquette is high. https://t.co/E2TAN7CIzW
@portna Infectious respiratory viruses don't care if it's surgical or N95 either, they do nothing to prevent infection. https://t.co/E2TAN7CIzW
@danitasteinberg Why would any critical thinker wear a medical or N95 mask to prevent respiratory virus transmission when the best science and real world evidence shows they do no such thing? https://t.co/E2TAN7CIzW https://t.co/XCS2LSzl8r
@beansprouts_mom You do realise this study has multiple issues and would be extremely surprised if it passes the review process. For a better understanding of masking in health care settings I'd suggest a strong, reviewed RCT https://t.co/RUd80wZ932
@BarryHunt008 Already been done, numerous times. Doesn't work https://t.co/yMdtC5kzP6 https://t.co/RUd80wYBdu
RT @Kenvinottawa: Masks are not effective https://t.co/dZ3qRZ3DTd https://t.co/DiNNFGSWbg https://t.co/PCsezhrVG1 https://t.co/UE6UWtd4Gc…
Masks are not effective https://t.co/dZ3qRZ3DTd https://t.co/DiNNFGSWbg https://t.co/PCsezhrVG1 https://t.co/UE6UWtd4Gc https://t.co/m7XdCwxXJr https://t.co/IocoNBwsvt https://t.co/uMUX2baEhS
@IsoHenkka https://t.co/6RyrMiQXuz?
@VicVijayakumar @gbrl_dick There really is not good evidence that either loose-fitting masks or even N95 Respirators reduce viral infections RCT in trained medical workers Fit-tested N95 Respirators vs loose-fitting masks. Worn ~ 80% of time around patients Sept 2019 https://t.co/GRJSkhzX2M
@ann_mcnitt https://t.co/IjsOswsKbN https://t.co/fAknv3jwnE https://t.co/xQwAcK5ErE https://t.co/oJkGxVowBh https://t.co/dC2FFxb6vD https://t.co/O6dZgQiG18
@kenrank24 @broadwaybabyto Example: RCT of N95 Respirator vs loose-fitting surgical mask in medical workers for Influenza Worn about 80% of time when around patients, when most exposed Similar portion of each group got infected No stat sig difference Published Sept 2019 https://t.co/GRJSkhAuSk
@smurfsj @kinsellawarren Science disagrees. 4 studies say otherwise. https://t.co/PCsezhrnQt https://t.co/m7XdCwxpTT https://t.co/IocoNBvUFV https://t.co/uMUX2ba6sk
@DALupton https://t.co/4vU3wSEcTb
@StevesRawMind @Variety Yup: https://t.co/HcmgXxwJYU.
@angelssanctum https://t.co/yZNYXwryy4 'kay https://t.co/mo7vPMOvqD https://t.co/uWk9JBPNqW https://t.co/7DdyBvONoW https://t.co/za07T5hvZc https://t.co/JrIc6Ey6Y7 https://t.co/GqpxlCAXrB https://t.co/67RxjCqMgE https://t.co/Td16xg9kPU https://t.co/tjtTD4A7IA
@Becca_Roth Randomized Controlled Trials: N95 Respriator vs Surgical Mask in Medical Workers No statistically significant difference One study for Influenza, another for Covid Influenza RCT: Published Sept 2019 https://t.co/GRJSkhzX2M
@sarahs_not_sick @JamesThrot Not a problem.
@KaeliVanfossen @KiwiOnTheSticks Sit down midwit. https://t.co/yZNYXwryy4 https://t.co/mo7vPMOvqD https://t.co/uWk9JBPNqW https://t.co/7DdyBvONoW https://t.co/za07T5hvZc https://t.co/JrIc6Ey6Y7 https://t.co/GqpxlCAXrB https://t.co/67RxjCqMgE https://t.co/Td16xg9kPU https://t.co/tjtTD4A7IA
Ambas igual de inútiles frente a virus respiratorios según la evidencia científica de las últimas décadas y la actualizada con Covid. Meta-análisis de RCTs. Incluso hay un estudio que muestra + casos con FFP2 que con quirúrgicas. https://t.co/ULojPXE5Iz https://t.co/Qi2QYy1aim
@internetuserf12 https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk
@MCASHistamine @DailyJLee https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk
@spyrach21 @germfreegangsta Here’s the real science on the effectiveness of the masks for viruses.., https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk
@Kiss_Toms_Ass @GBNT1952 Radonovich et al. (2019) - JAMA Radonovich, L. J., Simberkoff, M. S., Bessesen, M. T., Brown, A. C., Cummings, D. A., Gaydos, C. A., & Perl, T. M. (2019). N95 respirators vs medical masks for preventing influenza among health care personnel: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA,
@mryoung151 You’re so full of shit lol Let’s see some pre Covid studies, that aren’t compromised… https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk
@SunService44 Neither N-95’s nor Surgeons masks stop virus’s… https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk
@broadwaybabyto @MASk90098257 https://t.co/7uZJ6E0zHs Read up my precious…
@MASk90098257 @broadwaybabyto I’ve already proven you wrong with this… Bit you just keep yapping lol…. You look desperate lol… https://t.co/7uZJ6E0zHs https://t.co/uiOiOZq4Mk
@MASk90098257 @broadwaybabyto And I provided you with proof MULTIPLE TIMES NOW, that the N-95’s are no better than a surgical mask.. https://t.co/Ee997RD4HM
@MASk90098257 @broadwaybabyto I already showed you the study proving the N-95’s are as useful as a surgical mask.. I’ll post it again for you..
@MASk90098257 @broadwaybabyto I obviously know more than you do… And your profile is 100% about Fkn masks… You’re fkn funny…
@leasch15 @broadwaybabyto Here you go schnookums Conclusions: N95 vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed flu. I always go to pre-covid mask trials, because covid was so politicized. https://t.co/G6TwO6BTPI
@motoula2 Κλινική μελέτη του 2019: «Καμία διαφορά στο ποσοστό των λοιμώξεων από γρίπη μεταξύ αυτών που φορούσαν N95 και χειρουργικές μάσκες.» Κανένας τύπος μάσκας δεν προλαμβάνει τις ιογενείς λοιμώξεις του αναπνευστικού.... https://t.co/Tl1s3hoYuJ https://t.co/QuKrg1Ewde
@GasolineBreath @baldypidge https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk https://t.co/2GWZbGA5Y0
@GasolineBreath @baldypidge Lol what a weak attempt…
@bubblekittea @WHOWPRO No is don’t … NEITHER WORK, at stopping viruses. Do you think you “gotcha” Leo? https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk
@luckytran They don’t stop “airborne viruses” though.. Find any study pre Covid… https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk https://t.co/RFk9jxxPT6
@muzikguy1 @Annalisa840917 @SalvMattera I never ran or cried dumbfk lol Find the “science” pre Covid.. https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk https://t.co/ZIa8GegPNH
@Andr_Ergo @AaronCornielle From the other post I was censored in.. NOT FALSE, as you said.. https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk https://t.co/1Bb2s41bYQ
@Andr_Ergo @muzikguy1 @SalvMattera Try finding evidence to support your argument pre Covid lol… Below is a 2019 article. https://t.co/Ee997RD4HM https://t.co/xwzb5OmiCt
@hello_aubs @__nosferatupac @kirbykrackle @babs_zone @CleanAirLA https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk https://t.co/HAh7lFZGG6
@punkybrewsters1 @askwhymoreoften More on the N95 stopping viruses.. They changed all the “science” post Covid policies.. You may also be interested in this : https://t.co/Ee997RD4HM https://t.co/8vV9H893h5
@CupcakeDoes https://t.co/Ee997RDCxk
@Greyhoundbob75 @kirbykrackle @babs_zone @CleanAirLA N-95 have never been any better than normal partial masks.. They changed their “science”, when they pushed all the masking for Covid.. This study was done pre Covid measures (2019). I challenge you to find anything backing you pre Covid
@Blanche80832391 @vrtnws @Eva_DK_ Really!? You sure? https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@hazardscampaign @JasonS1269 @AmandaPritchard https://t.co/h02ABobW6f
@dbongino The science is clear. Mask do not work. https://t.co/dZ3qRZ3DTd https://t.co/UE6UWtd4Gc https://t.co/m7XdCwxXJr https://t.co/IocoNBwsvt https://t.co/uMUX2baEhS
@ScottAtlas_IT They’ve actually known that surgical masks don’t work since the 1950’s. N95’s don’t work either. https://t.co/gNtYKiFTDJ
@GDCAOLHvMe8ZvhC ●Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial https://t.co/JTHTk0Nfio ●N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel https://t.co/zXXYcdRoxC
@kitazatosatuki ●N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel https://t.co/zXXYcdRoxC ●Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis https://t.co/VwAHtzl8Gb
RT @christianperez: Más ciencia: https://t.co/RzOZh30zSI https://t.co/z4orwcgfrL https://t.co/3Dmqd9oqzj https://t.co/cZKFZWmwIA
@fromoutersp4ce @covidbagofdicks It is? https://t.co/F8nKiZEQq7
@covidbagofdicks Sure thing. https://t.co/F8nKiZEQq7
@BorjAlexandre @wallstwolverine Mascarillas quirurgicas = mascarillas N95 https://t.co/ULojPXE5Iz
@COVID19_disease They should improve their air quality through better filtration. It's been long known that masks are not effective in reducing flu spread (and any improvement was statistically insignifiant for Covid). https://t.co/j3lNPPzIYl https://t.co/TsqBhMTdRk https://t.co/FELGro6vcU
Study #4 - N95 vs Medical Masks https://t.co/nFTmUyuHo2 - Key Points 1) Wide randomized study of over 5,000 personnel at 137 Outpatient sites from 2011-2015 2) 207 lab confirmed Influenza infections for the N95 group and 193 lab confirmed Influenza infections for the medical
@cjdeas10 @donna_dishman @MuncyRhodes @ScottJenningsKY @CNN There’s no difference: https://t.co/K8U29K2KFx
@ghhughes @zhouliang_mask And here is some real world data and not a reddit post. Also don't forget if sick there are 200.000 viral particles in 1 cough or sneeze, and n95 filters 95%(it's actually 81% but let's say 95%) then 10.000 particles still go through. https://t.co/Gpq3kh5aj1
RT @LazarusLong13: These are supposed to be THE NATION'S BEST. The study is here https://t.co/KDncY2mkFT does say that you need to see t…
RT @LazarusLong13: These are supposed to be THE NATION'S BEST. The study is here https://t.co/KDncY2mkFT does say that you need to see t…
RT @LazarusLong13: These are supposed to be THE NATION'S BEST. The study is here https://t.co/KDncY2mkFT does say that you need to see t…
RT @LazarusLong13: These are supposed to be THE NATION'S BEST. The study is here https://t.co/KDncY2mkFT does say that you need to see t…
These are supposed to be THE NATION'S BEST. The study is here https://t.co/KDncY2mkFT does say that you need to see the protocols, so that's not the lie. The lie is in the study itself. You see, on the lower left, it is discussing the study DESIGN. What should be. https://t.co/2pa4NvRxpC
@Nicole_Lee_Sch Looks like you don't understand anything https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@luckytran @jvipondmd https://t.co/jcBfDqvgYt
@Overlordmainst1 @davidkurten 2862 randomized participants 2371 completed the study accounting for 5180 HCW-seasons Among outpatient HCW's N95 respirators vs medical masks worn by participants resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”https://t.co/jcBfDquJ8V
@always_c0nfused @TrishtheSkeptic @nycHealthy Funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
@n_e_rd @nycHealthy JAMA link: https://t.co/K8U29K2KFx
@chaitrovert @TheManeCharactr 2.) While this is one about N95 that compares it to those same blue surgical masks. It makes no difference at all and in this study the N95 group even has 1% more infected in it https://t.co/Gpq3kh4Ctt
@milanaldebaran Take of your mask so your tiny brain has some oxygen to process all these studies that proofs you wrong! It's almost 2025 dude, 90% of the world already knows they don't work! Snap out of your denial! https://t.co/Wtky5yLhHn https://t.co/DP8k1CW9zv https://t.co/Gpq3kh5aj1
@luckytran @jvipondmd Still going on about masks that doesn't work!? Here you have 170! studies that proof you wrong again! How many times are you gonna make a fool of yourself? https://t.co/hkrO4XCk1R https://t.co/jqpUsaN47e
@luckytran Who paid for these studies? Because THESE studies say otherwise. https://t.co/Lzi9rL5yZ9 https://t.co/2lq7eeFjaa https://t.co/uQbUtr6Cvy https://t.co/x3H3bqfxwZ And more links can be found here: https://t.co/IO19U3iABd
@_InThisTogether Statistically insignificant. https://t.co/XFZEfSLoca
@PolHumanity @Backwater83 @liz_churchill10 https://t.co/XX5mz4wKUA https://t.co/hhZn3sXiLf
@PolHumanity @liz_churchill10 https://t.co/hhZn3sXiLf
@Mamacov @broadwaybabyto Thank you for the explanation. I am not aware of significant effects on airborne viral infections from surgical masks or N95s in actual use. Any benefit would have to be weighed against downsides such as impeded communication. Sept 2019: RCT N95 vs mask https://t.co/GRJSkhzX2M
@heySekaye @ArieWindmill @JipperCones @SantosSuperFan @jeremymstamper @TRHLofficial N95 masks do not protect or slow the spread of airbourne viruses. There are hundreds of studies proving this. Go back and do the research. https://t.co/qiueV42Zca
@ConceptualJames Also n95s were a lie too https://t.co/trVr8ph13Z
@ConceptualJames https://t.co/gNtYKiFlOb
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg3Ogg Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYecMaG MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSjulA Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg3Ogg Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYecMaG MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSjulA Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg3Ogg Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYecMaG MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSjulA Ra…
MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg3Ogg Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYecMaG MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSjulA Radonovich 2019: https://t.co/8DPzEsVQOL Alfelali 2020: https://t.co/6gm2bRJ8A3 Bundgaard 2021: https://t.co/LhQFPCysxD Abaluck, 2022: https://t.co/MzkTf0nCZS
JAMA is not a fringe source :) https://t.co/fyqtFVRWoG https://t.co/bEG1M8NKuT
RT @MiyuMotohashi: みんな大好きJAMA。 N95マスク群では8.2%、医療用マスク群では7.2%。 ここでは逆転してしまっている。 医療従事者のインフルエンザ予防のためのN95マスクと医療用マスクの比較：ランダム化比較試験 https://t.co/6N…
@PillCounterKel https://t.co/8xmCqcyrjE https://t.co/qiueV42Zca https://t.co/bfc7wz3hBK
@Jensen_McRae The science says masks dont work: https://t.co/8xmCqcyrjE https://t.co/qiueV42Zca https://t.co/bfc7wz3hBK
@broadwaybabyto No It’s not. The science says the opposite: https://t.co/8xmCqcyZ9c https://t.co/qiueV43x1I https://t.co/bfc7wz3Pri
@peamilkstan Masks do not protect against the spread of airborne viruses. Most studies have this conclusion. I have over 100 saved here are a few: https://t.co/8xmCqcyrjE https://t.co/qiueV42Zca https://t.co/bfc7wz3hBK
@LygiaNavarro @babs_zone Research shows masks do not protect against airborne viruses https://t.co/8xmCqcyZ9c https://t.co/qiueV43x1I https://t.co/bfc7wz3Pri
@kananaskinyeti The studies are there. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11645 I have more studies as well. The majority of studies on masks show that they are ineffective against airborne viruses. N95 masks do not protect against particles around 0.001 - 0.01 microns
@justadrifter31 @TogetherWeMask @BaileyDevine20 @MsJulieSLam @DrJudyStone @michael_hoerger @TheWHN @CovidActionGSO @Pan_End_It 11. https://t.co/v1fFo7gn8L 12. https://t.co/0OgaT7dbCa 13. https://t.co/y36yhUTAPh 14. https://t.co/VMQxTI20FF 15. https://t.co/lYCrIfgghi 16. https://t.co/m4xef36Tq7 17. https://t.co/NLxkSiFRmx 18. https://t.co/yb1kwyy3fY 19. https://t.co/MXsjbVbc6B
@justadrifter31 @TogetherWeMask @BaileyDevine20 @MsJulieSLam @DrJudyStone @michael_hoerger @TheWHN @CovidActionGSO @Pan_End_It 1. https://t.co/CSayd4fdlg 2. https://t.co/nUfKpafbcg 3. https://t.co/uHJVaT8uQw 4. https://t.co/yEnwwWX5cE 5. https://t.co/4KvVFqaf7Q 6. https://t.co/Md5btXTDsZ 7. https://t.co/6lvSz5NTEf 8. https://t.co/lYCrIfgghi 9. https://t.co/dg1d2EyXEd 10. https://t.co/N8bKd78Hzx
RT @LazarusLong13: @NIOSH @NIOSH_TWH @OSHAReporter Niosh's Lewis Radonovich's study, "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks" https://t.co/IVo…
@NIOSH @NIOSH_TWH @OSHAReporter Niosh's Lewis Radonovich's study, "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks" https://t.co/IVoEJFQ1I9 Is directly responsible for her LongCovid. Please retract that fatally flawed study - having donning/doffing at 6 feet. https://t.co/rHMfBhCNTz https://t.co/QMi1EMU0FG
RT @avslojar: @PeteUK7 @covidinquiryuk @mdc_martinus I'm certain she's influenced by bad studies like the often quoted "N95 Respirators vs…
@PeteUK7 @covidinquiryuk @mdc_martinus I'm certain she's influenced by bad studies like the often quoted "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel", doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11645, where the method assumed droplet. Masks worn <2m from patients, proved airborne inadvertently. https://t.co/SChE1nVSGa
@LongCovidSOS @UKHSA @covidinquiryuk Some of them indirectly proved airborne even before Covid but failed to understand their error. "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial". JAMA. 2019;322(9):824-833. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@LongCovidSOS @UKHSA @covidinquiryuk Often referenced is "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial". JAMA. 2019;322(9):824-833. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11645
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
@KreelanWarrior That N95 mask? Yeah, it doesn’t prevent covid transmission. Sorry to burst your bubble. https://t.co/Q9349mqWq8
@wildcat_of @kristians414 @CDCgov Yeah it couldn’t be about science could it? https://t.co/Q9349mqWq8
@kristians414 @CDCgov Why would they push ineffective measures? https://t.co/Q9349mqWq8
@baddestmamajama We know that they do nothing for transmission of respiratory viruses like flu and Covid, so why mention them? Only loons want to keep on about masks. https://t.co/Q9349mqWq8
@fillthewhole It’s difficult to understand why you do something that has zero effect on infection and transmission rates https://t.co/Q9349mqWq8
@JeromeAdamsMD @StewMama71 *so many pictures of me virtue signaling Fixed it for you. https://t.co/Q9349mqWq8
@tocquevilleboy @EricArchambaul7 8. https://t.co/DrEJNTb6Zr 9. https://t.co/jcy9GXUCY9 10. https://t.co/pJAuSsjhF2 11. https://t.co/ryHrQCsSAp 12. https://t.co/CoGmwCKrOl 13. https://t.co/OBYdSIV5Wn 14. https://t.co/aUw8UDp8yF 15. https://t.co/DrEJNTb6Zr 16. https://t.co/dMGouUFr8r A SUIVRE
@gdholtby @katrosenfield These are three of the RCTs I was able to find from their citations. https://t.co/F1mQtRtqqw https://t.co/z9sWrJDhPI https://t.co/PSlGEhYdXs https://t.co/PXpTUN6WEv
@DontInhaleVirus @bizness_u @TinaLeungPoetry @TammySei10 @kron4news “Third, respirators are significantly more effective than medical or cloth masks.” Nope! https://t.co/Q9349mrufG
@mmpadellan No it was because masks literally do nothing for covid transmission…but keep crying!
@BHudsonWrites @JoshWalkos @BillDoesStuff2 @Spartan1Tim @LatheGrain 17) https://t.co/GqBMRmUt7I
@LibertyNow11 @xxBB69xx @GuntherEagleman @MarioNawfal Radonovich LJ, et al. (2019). "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial." found that the incidence of influenza was similar among healthcare workers wearing N95 respirators and those wearing surgical masks.
@AJDelgado13 By science you dung beetle https://t.co/Q9349mqWq8
@BalkemaLynne @MJJ_1989 @MrRisun Run a poll. Find out how many people changed their mask routinely during the day. I’ll just leave this little nugget showing n95 did not prevent influenza infection. Lol But you be you. https://t.co/Hb9llBqaBM
@denpamonkey39ra ●N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel https://t.co/zXXYcdRoxC ●Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis https://t.co/VwAHtzl8Gb
@FlaGirlInThePNW @BradSCPat @KING5Seattle 9. https://t.co/LVCHpNn3Ej 10. https://t.co/yRBKMQXhPC 11. https://t.co/LtrNLlPj5o 12. https://t.co/NW8OABNNOE 13. https://t.co/Rbeo10pSEw 14. https://t.co/5oTbuA6TBU 15. https://t.co/w37aN7mYaO 16. https://t.co/sYSpLGbRtg 17. https://t.co/einGIoszuX
@FlaGirlInThePNW @BradSCPat @KING5Seattle risks from masks and that they offer NO protection 1. https://t.co/9roM1uWpZg 2. https://t.co/XjURh2sz5o 3. https://t.co/Exb29J9Isx 4. https://t.co/86JvtlKJjg 5. https://t.co/sAWC4sly8C 6. https://t.co/YW38wf5k3N 7. https://t.co/CqgEkk1mjy 8. https://t.co/w37aN7mYaO
@BarryHunt008 @IPACCanada https://t.co/eWuTkGdJGt https://t.co/1mTKJ36wn7
@Marco_Esp_Ita @ituerahipster @albertoortegana @scipio91 @LMBooster Tienes este estudio experimental https://t.co/DSUNaoVXsR y ensayo clínico en personal sanitario de mascarillas de tela vs. quirúrgicas https://t.co/1PrNoHRZST y mascarillas quirúrgicas vs. FFP2 https://t.co/bsIES8t3tW y https://t.co/9oPgi2AswU
@CoffeeShoesDogs @doctuhjay See "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel" (2019, NIOSH, NYU, Cornell, Hopkins): "As worn by health care personnel in this trial, use of N95 respirators, compared with medical masks, in the outpatient setting resulted in no
RT @LazarusLong13: 2️⃣Radonovich (2019). https://t.co/IVoEJFQzxH Confounded via honest errors unlike Loeb's study above. https://t.co/i…
RT @LazarusLong13: 2️⃣Radonovich (2019). https://t.co/IVoEJFQzxH Confounded via honest errors unlike Loeb's study above. https://t.co/i…
2️⃣Radonovich (2019). https://t.co/IVoEJFQzxH Confounded via honest errors unlike Loeb's study above. https://t.co/iC9hl7f7DL
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
@QuickToshi @kutsunasatoshi 73) N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel, Radonovich, 2019 Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks againstinfluenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis74) Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19
@yfuruse @kutsunasatoshi 73) N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel, Radonovich, 2019 Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks againstinfluenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis74) Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19
@arifvuralarif https://t.co/YZaJEwdBlI
RT @EatMySunshine1: N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Oc…
@ElaineJ63353164 @AMJ93616465 Thank you. I'll return the favor by introducing you to randomized clinical trials. Its a fascinating approach. They randomly select people for assignment to one intervention vs another, and a blinded observer counts the outcomes. https://t.co/MQ1L5iPG9q
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Occupational Health | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/R7ieFizR1z
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel A Randomized Clinical Trial.. Among outpatient HCP, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of
@drseanmullen Yes, let's do!! https://t.co/RC4Jjb7b6R
@Real___Gabriel @DrHachi3 @AudaciousPundit LOL Wrong https://t.co/RC4Jjb7b6R
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel A Randomized Clinical Trial SCIENCE & DATA As worn by health care personnel in this trial, use of N95 respirators, compared with medical masks, in the outpatient setting resulted in no
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel A Randomized Clinical Trial SCIENCE & DATA https://t.co/8nERJIm1fD As worn by health care personnel in this trial, use of N95 respirators, compared with medical masks, in the outpatient setting
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Occupational Health | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/Udee8e7qsO
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Occupational Health | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/CuJMQ3cxVq
Masks don’t work, but that doesn’t stop mandates and increasing control by the health complex. N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Occupational Health | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/Mj2JHIFCkj
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Occupational Health | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/yEAAiMjt2r
#NoMaskMandates #DoNotComply N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Occupational Health | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/5u9YNOsEgT
@fivehundredpou1 If you still aren't convinced after all this data, I'd say it's a phobia versus not having enough data. https://t.co/KIWMPQYVD0 https://t.co/gZkMZpkAOf https://t.co/1Jy0NQCk6L https://t.co/KUVXcU9Adq https://t.co/Dq1PZRUpN7 https://t.co/enIFKnhLFn https://t.co/9CybmuPpXM
@DrZoeHyde Good grief. Wake up. It's a flu: survivable and treatable https://t.co/VBWuTQLmvo #theyliedabouteverything https://t.co/9NmtOi10HX… https://t.co/BWcXzswhLl… Current study n95 https://t.co/md6Fgf1dks… Pre COVID https://t.co/b8ABxFprZz https://t.co/qOT1AlqhwB
@PeteUK7 Good grief. Wake up. #theyliedabouteverything https://t.co/421nvkYhph https://t.co/WjA84qN5Ly Current study n95 https://t.co/MEWVwv3HGx Pre COVID https://t.co/yAp867worI
@denise_dewald Why? https://t.co/VGTd91ADP8 https://t.co/WjA84qN5Ly Current study n95 https://t.co/MEWVwv3HGx Pre COVID https://t.co/yAp867worI
@2022onward @mercurial_moons @ohbutwhatashame #4 "2019 study of 2862 participants showed that both N95 respirators and surgical masks “resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory confirmed influenza.” https://t.co/mTXOFtfDPi
@beornnmccarthy @thereal_truther Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833. https://t.co/CUZG45sLFt
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
@DeVerdadera1 @mtosterholm @CIDRAP 2) https://t.co/kIi303oZXN https://t.co/kIi303oZXN https://t.co/z8ABO8PKsE https://t.co/kfGX8ZOJcI https://t.co/qDgyRdm3pJ https://t.co/dPMg0w6Q3M
@2di2d @1goodtern 26) N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel, Radonovich, 2019 “Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of
@SardoHorn @slikrik2003 @RadCentrism Nope https://t.co/TKrYxcZVTB
@GrantAcosta5 @danielkotzin verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant” (6) Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial”, Journal of the American Medical Association, 2019; 322
@jo_woods11 @RealAlexLucio @maosbot https://t.co/TKrYxcZVTB
@joaquinlife Prove it. Because it is not true. https://t.co/Yv3wuZj2dH 47 studies https://t.co/q8Yos1Au5R N95 sucks also. https://t.co/Mo6IbHE09p Big Mac daddy of all mask studies. The NAIL. Here is the mask study. https://t.co/71rcl6j1Ht https://t.co/VWFOnCB5DW
@tbender1028 @SharonRuthstrom @TomiLahren https://t.co/48n5LiE87Y
@joaquinlife @goddeketal @KPSCALnews @3M There's no statistically significant difference in respirator or surgical mask effectiveness. https://t.co/HjVKi5D8lO https://t.co/SHEjuWOFlb https://t.co/7Quxxe7gnW Neither work anyway. https://t.co/UHtHkKsglR https://t.co/oH5Rvg3bWo
Going back to 2006, 09-12,16,19,20 all come to the same conclusions. Masks NEVER worked. Anyone could have looked this up. 2020 https://t.co/NitSvcv3Q9 2019 https://t.co/qNWa9ld0wT 2016 https://t.co/bMH3Em47n7 2010 https://t.co/dsxuY2r9Yg 2006 https://t.co/MpyENdS0rc https://t.co/hVHZIDoH9u
@LestaatL @gammagoblin22 @ProfessorF @elonmusk @Robber_Baron_ References: https://t.co/MSw9tUTB0X https://t.co/MSw9tUTB0X https://t.co/vMDqKWD0Q0 https://t.co/o2vVaE1oRx https://t.co/ulpysEZ8CB
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg4m5O Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Radonovich 2019: https://t.co/8DPzEsWoEj Alfelali 2020: https://t.co/6gm2bRJGpB Bundgaard 2021: https://t.co/LhQFPCz0nb Abaluck, 2022: https://t.co/MzkTf0oaPq
How odd. Studies in 2009-12,16,19,20 all come to the same conclusions. Masks don't work. 2020 https://t.co/NitSvcvBFH 2019 https://t.co/qNWa9ldymr 2016 https://t.co/bMH3Em4FcF 2010 https://t.co/dsxuY2rHNO 2006 https://t.co/MpyENdSygK https://t.co/wnNdu6I8Gp
@Nucleics_Inc @auntiewillow @politicalmath Here you go, from 2019. In a health care setting. "Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza." https://t.co/EVyji7P3lO
@DJJonnyTravieso @PlH14482853 @DaveyMavey90 @trishgreenhalgh #7 https://t.co/VsshUsk4pR was the most interesting imho: "cluster...conducted at 137 outpatient study sites at 7 US medical centers between [9/11-5/15]...Each year for 4 years, during the 12-week period of peak viral respiratory illness, pairs of outpatient sites (clusters) 5/
@sjbirdwatcher @michaelmina_lab @nytimes https://t.co/TKrYxcZVTB
@FmrConservative @KristinRaworth https://t.co/y8uvlJjDvL
@ann85163206_ann @FoxNews It wouldn't have made a difference https://t.co/RC4Jjb7b6R
@alohasolace @HM64444420 @FoxNews It wouldn't have made a difference https://t.co/RC4Jjb7b6R
@JJJJenniferrrr2 @LizHighleyman What about this one? https://t.co/RC4Jjb7b6R
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/zLLQChi5DW Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/Jjc3jMQFed MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/Lp4X8nj5ct Radonovich 2019: https://t.co/SUQZIvvLKU Alfelali 2020: https://t.co/GoJtUMOCxf Bundgaard 2021: https://t.co/XgbMa5GZYp Abaluck, 2022: https://t.co/tGpFXy3Jcq
Ah, so you are familiar with the big 3, @strauss_matt? Loeb 2022. https://t.co/F8uLW58A9O Radonovich 2019. https://t.co/IVoEJFQzxH Loeb 2009. https://t.co/OuRLOdO5S0 All 3 fatally flawed for the most basic reason. What is it? https://t.co/w8lHJlqMlR
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Ra…
MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/m6SoLOFaLV Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYedk0e MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSk2b8 Radonovich 2019: https://t.co/8DPzEsWoEj Alfelali 2020: https://t.co/6gm2bRJGpB Bundgaard 2021: https://t.co/Djkser7zpH Abaluck, 2022: https://t.co/xQbN0vicWc
RT @justin_hart: @IanCopeland5 3) Radonovich 2019. https://t.co/8DPzEsWoEj
RT @justin_hart: @IanCopeland5 3) Radonovich 2019. https://t.co/8DPzEsWoEj
@IanCopeland5 3) Radonovich 2019. https://t.co/8DPzEsWoEj
@Skyl3lazer @SeannWritesStuf @carterforva "N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza" N95s are no better than medical masks (which don't work).
@Steve_Schwenk @Zackaroni1868 @redheadlass1402 @PeterSweden7 2. Just checkout all the papers about masks their efficacy at viral transmission prior covid era. https://t.co/jvSNpBkoyk No need to re-invent the wheel.
@Isolveissues @connolly_s @justin_hart @mamasaurusMeg N95's have never been shown to be more effective than surgical masks at preventing the spread of a respiratory virus in any RCT, much less cloth. Here is the best study I know of, from before science/medicine became so political. https://t.co/MoOY40kYg5
@healthbyjames No. Studies in 2009-12,16,19,20 all come to the same conclusions. 2020 https://t.co/2HyGjbqDFP 2019 https://t.co/TQiqBxLaNS 2016 https://t.co/GXyEK8q0Kv 2010 https://t.co/VNHdx1vybT 2006 https://t.co/OWqM6YzYrv
@healthbyjames not really new. https://t.co/wsL4TaUpBm
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
@KeithMichael08 @tupelohoneyyyyy @hicksnco @bootsndiamonds @morethanmySLE You keep posting the same thing. I think you have a mental issue. In this case, you are the ignoramus. https://t.co/aFE4YM6fZy
RT @JoshWalkos: Study 6: “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Tr…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: Study 6: “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Tr…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: Study 6: “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Tr…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: Study 6: “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Tr…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: Study 6: “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Tr…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial https://t.co/i4kiOSP9M5
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
N95 & surgical masks for INFLUENZA (extrapolate to COVID): Radonovich et al.: "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial"; 207 https://t.co/muFLrBu8Rs
RT @JoshWalkos: STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel:…
RT @paularitchie3: N95 & surgical masks for INFLUENZA (extrapolate to COVID): Radonovich et al.: "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Prev…
N95 & surgical masks for INFLUENZA (extrapolate to COVID): Radonovich et al.: "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial"; 207 https://t.co/YoL7AL2hER
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
N95 & surgical masks for INFLUENZA (extrapolate to COVID): Radonovich et al.: "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial"; 207 https://t.co/SGqGKMK119
N95 & surgical masks for INFLUENZA (extrapolate to COVID): Radonovich et al.: "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial"; 207 https://t.co/7D1De1FqLK
Study 6: “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833. https://t.co/kuQMwCmndN
STUDY 1: https://t.co/yJxpAv3OBu “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial Lewis J Radonovich Jr et al. JAMA. 2019”
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial - PubMed. Masks don’t work. https://t.co/vfvxcn9w6v
N95 & surgical masks for INFLUENZA (extrapolate to COVID): Radonovich et al.: "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial"; 207 https://t.co/ye339v0eSb
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Infectious Diseases | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/xi0g7KuScJ
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
RT @richardursomd: RCT for N95. Masks don’t work, they divide!! N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Car…
@tppw1999 @louise_marwick This is the list of SCIENTIFIC papers describing the results of scientific tests, reviewed in good journals. I am waiting for scientific discussion now: https://t.co/PENJ5agZBD https://t.co/Ch7gSQNgfd https://t.co/ZGOnQc2tj7 https://t.co/OYp8G3IM7I https://t.co/dhnM8rtRe5
@MartinKulldorff Again !!!!! this is the 5th study that shows that masks dont work for respiratory virus, check the others: https://t.co/NWmFfX51ki https://t.co/CnLiGemVyF https://t.co/zM7uHaMGRn https://t.co/a4vj9D118s
@CNN @smerconish This is non scientific. By the away the RCT exist and they do not support masks for respiratory virus, check the DOI for the papers: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@Batman4America @SebGorka @Moms4Liberty This is not study with fluid dynamics. There are particules you can not see: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@PDfh7gk @SebGorka @EdChainsaw No is not: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@Mota__one @JoaoLuisAguiar Achas que as mascaras fazem algo ?? Ensaios Clinicos RAndomizados dizem o contrário: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645 Sim exactamente o contrario que passa nos MEDIA !!!
@MonicaGandhi9 Also 4 RCT have proven that masks don t prevent infection or transmission of respiratory virus: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645 Reducing viral load......maybe....... i trust Monica Gandhi :)
@AlanBixter @FatEmperor No they don t work to stop the spread or transmission of respiratory virus, several Randomize Clinical Trials say so: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645 @FatEmperor
@FozzyBearPDX @MonicaGandhi9 @voxdotcom So why the death per milion in California, New York, New Jersey is so closed to Texas or Florida ?? RCT prove masks don t prevent infection. How do we now if they reduce inoculation ?? 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@vicki_martinez @MonicaGandhi9 @voxdotcom So why the death per milion in California, New York, New Jersey is so closed to Texas or Florida ?? RCT prove masks don t prevent infection. How do we now if they reduce inoculation ?? 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@NickiLynnDNP @MonicaGandhi9 @voxdotcom So why the death per milion in California, New York, New Jersey is so closed to Texas or Florida ?? RCT prove masks don t prevent infection. How do we now if they reduce inoculation ?? 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@sonarhack @MonicaGandhi9 @voxdotcom No such study exists, the contrary that prove masks don t work with RCT is better: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@MonicaGandhi9 @voxdotcom So why the death per milion in California, New York, New Jersey is so closed to Texas or Florida ?? RCT prove masks don t prevent infection. How do we now if they reduce inoculation ?? 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@tdizzzzzzle @ecocentrism1 @SouthJerzMando @drdavidsamadi Radonovich, L.J. et al., N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11645, 2019.
@Sassha05269330 @DocDeRome Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial", JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824-833. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11645
Radonovich, L.J. dkk. (2019) "Respirator N95 vs Masker Medis untuk Mencegah Influenza di antara Petugas Kesehatan: Uji Klinis Acak", JAMA. 2019; 322 (9): 824-833. doi: 10.1001 / jama.2019.11645 https://t.co/H9Lmx0C9Cg
@dmxtechno @Liberte_101 @mbockcote Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial", JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824-833. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@elmat90 @Alexis_Cossette @inademrut @levsyl @YanBourgeois1 @HollywoodPQ @LucieLaurier @complotissss @PolygrapheL @cherielle100 Les masques ne protège pas contre des infections respiratoires virale. Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) "N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial", JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824-833. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@duukeen @BrilliantRose_ @Qo3ZLBUa1tJyAQI @syutoken_sanka Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial”, JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11645
Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial”, JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11645 https://t.co/5iGvcEvtAv
RCT showing comparable effectiveness of N95 and surgical masks. Clearly surgical masks could be helpful not only for people who are Covid-19 test positive but for asymptomatic possible transmitters. https://t.co/wYOkyY891O
N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza in Health Care Personnel https://ja.ma/2vXjpvJ
@drsanjaygupta PubMed search does not support this claim nor claim that N95s are conclusively better. If there's shortage, isn't it better to state this fact as opposed to making claims with very little data? DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.11645 & DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x
@adobedoc_QAQ @MegumiBSB 补充：买不到 N95，正确佩戴普通外科口罩也有效。 https://t.co/iX2jk2gDtN
RT @quinonezmd: #ResPECT Trial. El uso del cubrebocas N95 no resulto mejor que el convencional para reducir la incidencia de #Influenza en…
#ResPECT Trial. El uso del cubrebocas N95 no resulto mejor que el convencional para reducir la incidencia de #Influenza en el personal de salud en unidades de consulta externa. https://t.co/uRTZkYfa2o https://t.co/KYGKoBdtD9
司教
HR
P
MM
D
M
全
K
U
ま
コ贋
み
MN
J
J
MA
RC
B
JC
K