The effects of reducing training frequency, duration & intensity on cycling (left graph) & running (right graph) V02max. Ref: This great study https://t.co/BD1qaZGqvz published in 1985. https://t.co/vhHsOaj7Ky
Reduced training intensities and loss of aerobic power, endurance, and cardiac growth.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Nov 2019 – Dec 2024Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter5 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Discussions reflect a balanced acknowledgment of the study's insights, with some commenting on its historical significance and practical implications, like how reducing volume can retain performance but lowering intensity harms aerobic and cardiac health, supported by phrases like 'loss of performance' and 'must consider' which highlight how the findings provoke thoughtful consideration of training strategies.
Most discussions acknowledge the study’s findings, with some referencing its long-standing and validated nature, indicating general agreement.
The discussions express curiosity about how training modifications directly influence performance metrics like VO2 max and heart growth, showing moderate enthusiasm.
Participants discuss specific aspects such as the effects of reduced intensity on aerobic capacity and performance retention, indicating thoughtful engagement.
There is recognition that the findings could influence training practices and recommendations, suggesting notable potential influence in sports science and exercise routines.
Abstract in brief
- The study involved 12 subjects who trained with cycling and running for 10 weeks, then continued training with either one-third or two-thirds reduction in effort for an additional 15 weeks, showing that reduced training intensity led to a decline in VO2 max, endurance, and cardiac growth.
- While initial training increased VO2 max and cardiac size, these benefits diminished when training intensity was lowered, especially at the two-thirds reduction, which caused significant decreases in aerobic capacity and heart growth; some endurance was maintained with a one-third reduction.
- Overall, maintaining higher training intensities is crucial for preserving the improvements in aerobic power and heart size gained from initial training, as reductions in effort lead to notable declines.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@robertodevido He had three different studies: one for frequency, one for volume, and one for intensity. The intensity one is here: https://t.co/Q7IIq6REDT
@NickEfthimiou
Reduced intensity, lose performance Reduced training intensities and loss of aerobic power, endurance, and cardiac growth. Reduce volume, performance is retained. https://t.co/Tt4pV9hQqt
All mentions
Optimizing Bike Power: Science-Based Training Strategies
This video explores training approaches to improve bike power, emphasizing scientific insights into maintaining performance with reduced training duration and the impact on aerobic fitness, endurance, and cardiac growth.
Effective Training Strategies for Faster Cycling Performance
To become a faster cyclist, it is essential to balance intensity, duration, and frequency in your training regimen. Studies show successful endurance training typically involves 80% low-intensity and 20% high-intensity…
@NickEfthimiou
The effects of reducing training frequency, duration & intensity on cycling (left graph) & running (right graph) V02max. Ref: This great study https://t.co/BD1qaZGqvz published in 1985. https://t.co/vhHsOaj7Ky
@robertodevido He had three different studies: one for frequency, one for volume, and one for intensity. The intensity one is here: https://t.co/Q7IIq6REDT
How to Increase Your Power on the Bike, based on the science... https://t.co/S6Ji8NEP9l via @YouTube
Reduced intensity, lose performance Reduced training intensities and loss of aerobic power, endurance, and cardiac growth. Reduce volume, performance is retained. https://t.co/Tt4pV9hQqt
MK
AH
AS