DATA: https://t.co/hmw8pWfrOp https://t.co/LwsOhUZYcz https://t.co/078q40OC9G https://t.co/b3mFinoSWF https://t.co/y5kGSIrS8W
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Sep 2019 – Oct 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter172 posts
-
News66 articles
-
YouTube14 videos
-
Facebook14 posts
-
Blogs11 articles
-
Reddit2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The group shows a nuanced attitude, with several examples criticizing the study’s low-quality evidence and funding biases, such as mentions of meta-analyses with mixed results and debates about how study quality affects conclusions. The tone varies from skeptical to supportive, using phrases like 'weak evidence,' 'cherry-picking,' and 'no strong research,' illustrating both engagement and concern about scientific validity.
Most discussions acknowledge the study’s findings that the evidence linking meat consumption to health risks is weak or of low certainty, showing cautious agreement.
Participants demonstrate some interest but focus more on debates about study quality and interpretations rather than genuine curiosity.
Many discussions reference multiple studies, meta-analyses, and methodological concerns, indicating deep engagement and critical analysis.
While there is recognition of the evidence's limitations, the conversations could influence opinions on meat consumption and public health recommendations.
Abstract in brief
- The systematic review analyzed data from over 4 million participants across 61 cohort studies to examine the relationship between red and processed meat consumption and various health outcomes, including mortality and cardiometabolic diseases, but found limited high-quality evidence linking meat intake to these outcomes.
- The findings suggest that reducing unprocessed red meat or processed meat intake by about 3 servings per week may lead to only very small reductions in risks such as cardiovascular mortality, stroke, MI, and type 2 diabetes, with the overall certainty of this evidence being low.
- The study highlights that many existing studies did not sufficiently control for confounding factors and did not assess aspects like quality of life or satisfaction with diet, which limits the strength of the conclusions regarding the health impacts of red and processed meat consumption.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky2年前に「red meatは健康に悪いというエビデンスがない(かなり弱い)」とした論文がAnnals of Internal Medicineに発表されましたが、学会で、 なんと著者は「RCT行われていない喫煙や飲酒の影響もエビデンスが強いと言えない」 と答えたとのことです・・・
Meta análisis en "Annals of Internal Medicine", 2019.
@tapiomaatta Uskon sijasta kannattaa katsoa, mitä tutkimukset sanovat. "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty." https://t.co/Df1o06bhlG
Hva med hjerte- og karsykdom? "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty." https://t.co/bnZysVBEjk
There is no high-quality research on the health effects of red meat in humans. None. DOI 10.7326/M19-0655 Beef is rich in the essential nutrients that humans require for health. DOI 10.1016/j.nutres.2022.06.009 Our human ancestors ate animal fat & meat. DOI 10.1002/ajpa.24247 https://t.co/aTh6oJ8sSI https://t.co/Xe2V1AMIUi
All mentions
200 Days on the Carnivore Diet: Results and Setbacks Explained
I just completed 200 days on the carnivore diet, focusing on the second half of this period where I encountered setbacks. This video reviews my weight measurements, CGM data, DEXA scans, and bloodwork, providing…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Health Risks Analysis
This systematic review analyzed data from over 4 million participants across 61 cohort studies to examine the relationship between red and processed meat consumption and various health outcomes, including mortality and…
The Truth About Meat's Impact on Health and Environment
This video examines the facts about meat consumption, including its role in human evolution, health effects, and environmental impact. It questions common beliefs and presents research insights to promote informed…
Analyzing the Link Between Red Meat and Cancer Risk
In this scientific analysis, we question the premise that red meat causes cancer. The study reviews cohort studies and indicates that while reducing unprocessed meat intake minimally lowers cancer mortality, conclusions…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Health Risks: A Systematic Review
This review analyzed data from over 4 million participants across 61 studies on meat consumption and health outcomes, finding limited evidence linking intake to mortality and cardiometabolic diseases, with small risk…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Health Risks Analysis
This video examines the relationship between red and processed meat intake and health outcomes, based on a systematic review of over 4 million participants. It highlights that reducing meat intake by about 3 servings…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Health Outcomes Review
This systematic review analyzed data from over 4 million participants across 61 cohort studies to examine the relationship between red and processed meat consumption and various health outcomes, including mortality and…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Health Risks Review
This systematic review analyzed data from over 4 million participants across 61 cohort studies examining the relationship between red and processed meat consumption and health outcomes, including mortality and…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Health Risks Overview
This video reviews a systematic analysis of over 4 million participants from 61 studies on red and processed meat consumption and health outcomes. It highlights the limited evidence linking meat intake to mortality and…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Health Risks Review
This systematic review analyzed data from over 4 million participants across 61 cohort studies, examining the relationship between red and processed meat intake and health outcomes like mortality and cardiometabolic…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Health Risks: A Review
This review analyzed data from over 4 million participants to examine the relationship between red and processed meat intake and health outcomes. The evidence suggests that reducing meat intake results in only small…
Impact of Red Meat Consumption on Heart Health Risks
In this video, we explore the impact of red meat consumption on cardiovascular health. We clarify the mechanisms and risk factors associated with heart attacks and strokes, focusing on recent studies linking diet to…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Health Risks Analysis
Impact of Red Meat Reduction on Health Outcomes
This video debates common beliefs about diets, specifically examining the effects of lower versus higher red meat intake. It explores findings from a systematic review indicating minimal impact on health outcomes…
@matsxekberg @folkmunnen @LtTorstenson Visst, första jag hittade: https://t.co/WdCHzTkgkz
@WallStreetApes Nothing like that is true. There is no decent science showing processed meat is harmful. See: Zeraatkar et al. Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies. Ann Intern
@brettboettcher1 Horseshit. A 2019 systematic review of 55 large cohort studies concluded that higher consumption of red and processed meat was associated with increased all-cause mortality, alongside risks for stroke, myocardial infarction, and other outcomes. https://t.co/W2aKwQh1Sf
RT @dr_ericberg: DATA: https://t.co/hmw8pWfrOp https://t.co/LwsOhUZYcz https://t.co/078q40OC9G https://t.co/b3mFinoSWF https://t.co/y5kGSIr…
RT @dr_ericberg: DATA: https://t.co/hmw8pWfrOp https://t.co/LwsOhUZYcz https://t.co/078q40OC9G https://t.co/b3mFinoSWF https://t.co/y5kGSIr…
دادهها https://t.co/E1meNy3VGC https://t.co/CmFltMHup5 https://t.co/bECeJOEDdh https://t.co/1VTotPGbx6
RT @dr_ericberg: DATA: https://t.co/hmw8pWfrOp https://t.co/LwsOhUZYcz https://t.co/078q40OC9G https://t.co/b3mFinoSWF https://t.co/y5kGSIr…
RT @dr_ericberg: DATA: https://t.co/hmw8pWfrOp https://t.co/LwsOhUZYcz https://t.co/078q40OC9G https://t.co/b3mFinoSWF https://t.co/y5kGSIr…
RT @dr_ericberg: DATA: https://t.co/hmw8pWfrOp https://t.co/LwsOhUZYcz https://t.co/078q40OC9G https://t.co/b3mFinoSWF https://t.co/y5kGSIr…
RT @dr_ericberg: DATA: https://t.co/hmw8pWfrOp https://t.co/LwsOhUZYcz https://t.co/078q40OC9G https://t.co/b3mFinoSWF https://t.co/y5kGSIr…
DATA: https://t.co/hmw8pWfrOp https://t.co/LwsOhUZYcz https://t.co/078q40OC9G https://t.co/b3mFinoSWF https://t.co/y5kGSIrS8W
@levelsio Here's another: https://t.co/XVsbs4mqft
@Vegansup @flower_1991m @PlantBasedNews How about this science? Or do you just readily accept the WHO classifications, without even reading the science they are based on?
RT @StevenMBelknap: There is no strong research result showing processed meat will kill you. DOI 10.7326/M19-0655 You might want to ditch…
There is no strong research result showing processed meat will kill you. DOI 10.7326/M19-0655 You might want to ditch the bread, though. That stuff will spike your insulin. The real danger to your health here is the stream of wrong diet info from @AndreaPetersen of the @WSJ. https://t.co/IPVS2Mgczy https://t.co/VVUzddoB50
There is no strong research result showing processed meat will kill you. DOI 10.7326/M19-0655 You might want to ditch the bread, though. That stuff will spike your insulin. The real danger to your health here is the stream of wrong diet info from @AndreaPetersen of the @WSJ. https://t.co/VVUzddo3fs
There is no strong research result showing processed meat will kill you. DOI 10.7326/M19-0655 You might want to ditch the bread, though. That stuff will spike your insulin. The real danger to your health here is the stream of wrong diet info from @AndreaPetersonn of the @WSJ. https://t.co/VVUzddoB50
RT @Faktantarkast10: @tapiomaatta Uskon sijasta kannattaa katsoa, mitä tutkimukset sanovat. "The magnitude of association between red and…
RT @Faktantarkast10: @tapiomaatta Uskon sijasta kannattaa katsoa, mitä tutkimukset sanovat. "The magnitude of association between red and…
@tapiomaatta Uskon sijasta kannattaa katsoa, mitä tutkimukset sanovat. "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty." https://t.co/Df1o06bhlG
“The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty.” https://t.co/FdUyxd5KUc https://t.co/FfOW61vBO2
@Estabao_Brasil @VCasapino Hahahahajja que piada. Que bom que o preço da carne está cara. Carne é o alimento mais nutritivo e necessário ao humano. Existem revisões sistemáticas e metanalises demonstrado que o consumo de carne não é prejudicial. https://t.co/w6YlhuEoBw
@HealthChmp That’s cute cardiology professional I suggest you connect with research interpretation professionals https://t.co/9mZgy3NuqK https://t.co/NdVmBlVMXx
Meat
A SRMA found no strong research showing that processed meat is harmful: "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty." DOI 10.7326/M19-0655 https://t.co/3ANa3yGvE8 https://t.co/oeSJcUDsn3
A SRMA found no strong research showing that processed meat is harmful: "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty."DOI 10.7326/M19-0655 https://t.co/YRxEEiFOh9 https://t.co/oeSJcUDsn3
@BohemianAtmosp1 Urged by whom referencing a study paid for by whom? Here’s a meta-study of 55 cohorts and 4 million people that says meat and cheese is fine. https://t.co/vRmp6CTT2q Here’s another with 12 and 54,000 people https://t.co/t2h6p74Sz6
@AukeHoekstra https://t.co/krekdeyAKc
@aaaaax99999 https://t.co/a6c2WKURbu you have to look at who funded the study. there is no increased risk of cvd with red or processed meats.
@hblwebb "Tvärtom borde folk äta mindre kött. Det finns gott om bevis för att stor konsumtion av kött ökar risken för tjocktarmscancer" @AMPajari
RT @Genlearnman: @JTayScience @ryanattar @helsinkiuni @svenska_yle @CSundstrm He dismissed PURE and Ramsden et al 2016: https://t.co/ziD21X…
@JTayScience @ryanattar @helsinkiuni @svenska_yle @CSundstrm He dismissed PURE and Ramsden et al 2016: https://t.co/ziD21X3S4Y and went ballistic over these #NutriRecs papers: Han et al 2019: https://t.co/dS7SJyYpU9 @methodsnerd et al 2019: https://t.co/CZms77ogYS Zeraatkar et al 2019: https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ
@Expressen .@AgnesWold med #GRADE, t ex. Han et al. 2019 https://t.co/yj2rAePuKC, Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/CZms77ogYS och Zeraatkar et al. 2019, https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ blir risken nära 0. Vid @helsinkiuni tror dock en del på idén om kött - tjocktarmscancer https://t.co/QclfCrxx83
RT @StevenMBelknap: There is no high-quality research on the health effects of red meat in humans. None. DOI 10.7326/M19-0655 Beef is rich…
@sjhancocknz @bigfatsurprise @4dietaryreform @TheLancet Nutrition people at @helsinkiuni treat Willet's food questionnaire approach as the most valid method. They also suppresses Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ in favor of the veggie-dogma, claiming that read meat causes colon cancer. My take: https://t.co/US2FwKGvCb
RT @StevenMBelknap: There is no high-quality research on the health effects of red meat in humans. None. DOI 10.7326/M19-0655 Beef is rich…
There is no high-quality research on the health effects of red meat in humans. None. DOI 10.7326/M19-0655 Beef is rich in the essential nutrients that humans require for health. DOI 10.1016/j.nutres.2022.06.009 Our human ancestors ate animal fat & meat. DOI 10.1002/ajpa.24247 https://t.co/aTh6oJ8sSI https://t.co/Xe2V1AMIUi
@Tellit007 @nileshpatelm @BioLayne Actually found a couple! Only after sifting through the algorithm claiming the opposite though https://t.co/kX87p2HkoS https://t.co/wd7L5RdBQS
@andyswarbs I haven’t made a claim. I’m so sorry your info sources misled you. “The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty.” doi: 10.7326/M19-0655
@AleksiReito @KingManninen @PiritaReito ”The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty.” https://t.co/2pp1zjFeC6
The declarations that cutting red meat consumption is good for your health rest on very, very weak evidence. Any such health effects are, at best, very small. https://t.co/D2DEtieHka
RT @StevenMBelknap: @trshmanx @leehazlewoodism @vegan_logic False. “The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumptio…
@trshmanx @leehazlewoodism @vegan_logic False. “The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty.” https://t.co/Wpi0CPFO4v
Writing in New Scientist, @grace_wade_ claims eating red meat is associated with heart disease. The best available meta-analysis found only very low quality observational studies showing a trivial effect of red meat on mortality and heart disease. https://t.co/Wpi0CPFO4v https://t.co/3qCIwbDLwM https://t.co/VVO70G1Q85
Veganistas claim meat has been proven to be bad for your health. This claim is a delusion/error/lie/other. Whatever the reason for this claim, it is a claim that is false. The ancestral human diet consisted of animal fat and meat most of the time. See: https://t.co/Wpi0CPFO4v https://t.co/JA8fTEnE6n
Hmm, da gibt es doch in der Tat #Wissenschaftler, die Opa @M_Hundhausen|s These zum schädlichen #Fleischkonsum widerlegen. Und nun? https://t.co/MGtnK9S0yp https://t.co/PHw4KWmf38
@AMPajari Zeeratkar et al 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ
@teamTandB2017 @JamieWoodhouse Neither of these two claims holds water. There is no strong research result showing carnivory increases human mortality or morbidity. https://t.co/oGenmuTzXa Most vegetarians/vegans abandon their diet within a short time, often due to health concerns. https://t.co/NOrQvS3Ha2
@EcoNews2021 @forktown385 @JEverettLearned "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty." https://t.co/Pjb83lBQ4e
@doyleysar @CityFarmSystems @JoeWStanley https://t.co/kN4tW8WCkK https://t.co/FbWTDMKYvo
@Provokatoren Det finns inga vettiga studier som visar att "rött kött" är ohälsosamt. Däremot finns det en studie från 2019 som visar att det inte är det. https://t.co/7Ze9PU7qom Om man däremot menar kött som färgats rött med natriumnitrit så ja. Det är eventuellt inte nyttigt i stora mängder.
@DrFrankLipman You claim that red meat is unhealthy. Here’s where the science is: "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty.” https://t.co/J8CnfVrDWX
report to media that they recommend people to limit their consumption of read meat to 350 grams. Is that consistent with science? like @methodsnerd et al 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u, Han et al. 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW, Zeeratkar et al 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ
Didn't @Maikkie1 read: @methodsnerd et al 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u, Han et al. 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW, Zeeratkar et al 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Dehghan et al 2018 https://t.co/GEopeZBtqe @bigfatsurprise https://t.co/JpPVm9urnp @HennaVepsalaine et al 2017:
@ScepticalDoctor There is no strong research result that fatty meat is good or bad. “The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty.” https://t.co/J8CnfVrDWX
@Unpop_Science Let’s stick to the facts about bacon & other processed meats. “The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty.” https://t.co/J8CnfVrDWX
@ahimsaluna @AESAN_gob_es @agarzon @aedninforma @TheLancet Usted es quien está equivocado. Le dejo por aquí datos de verdad por si le interesa informarse. Que le vaya bien con su ideología. https://t.co/AftUqNM83D https://t.co/0CDrwjCKbX https://t.co/QideQ9zvHo https://t.co/RCzSWwR8Qi
@ChadxMichael @SuzanneDalangin @nutrition_facts The recommendation of the experts is that adults continue to eat red meat. The quality of the research results on red meat is poor & harmful effects are negligible, possibly zero. https://t.co/0NzH9YbM9t https://t.co/edkJWDSPc3 https://t.co/oGenmuTzXa https://t.co/kmTvFDv8u2
@Sninkelletti @CarneAdventist "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty." So not even showing causality, even just the association is poor. https://t.co/WMTEeo13E3
@PlantBasedNews Fake science. Fake journalism. "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty.” https://t.co/J8CnfVrDWX
Hva med hjerte- og karsykdom? "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty." https://t.co/bnZysVBEjk
@TaaviHorila @yleuutiset According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/mHO9lSkzp6
@yleuutiset According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@YleOulu According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@Alena_iWl According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@nnewspdates According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@HeikkiOjala According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@minnaminski1 @TaaviHorila @yleuutiset According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@PetraNyqvist According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@PasiJJunnila According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
https://t.co/j3V9TQHdRR
erregend ein. https://t.co/HaIU7FKGxd Mir geht es hier übrigens nicht um Ideologie, sondern um eine gesunde Ernährung im Sinne der Inneren Medizin. /2
@NHCorg @PlantChompers I think using the term cow flesh shows some likely bias? Science is based on the strength of the evidence (not the strength of conviction) and the evidence seems very weak: https://t.co/1txvxTRBPj
@DankReject @KetoCarnivore @thecarnivorebar @NutritionwJudy @SBakerMD @chriskresser @kevinstock12 @BrianLenzkes @robbwolf Esquire? LOL. There is only poor quality, confounded clinical data on meat & health. If there is an adverse effect of meat, the magnitude of the health effect is nil. I expect good RCTs would show a substantial health benefit of carnivory over veganism. https://t.co/J8CnfVsbMv
@Schall_abweiser @ZigaMalek Potem konzorcij pod vodstvom očeta "evidence based medicine" https://t.co/o5x5nA3RBB https://t.co/46x7Csea3i https://t.co/rVgfFcuQep https://t.co/AMFmxwiZL2 https://t.co/19eNcXHYHX https://t.co/7nlresqrvg https://t.co/oFsualP5FK https://t.co/iMPUUWzkgz
RT @Genlearnman: Here are some interesting references för @aftonbladet to report about: Begley (2017) https://t.co/g4cCN8rWsP Johnson et a…
RT @Genlearnman: Here are some interesting references för @aftonbladet to report about: Begley (2017) https://t.co/g4cCN8rWsP Johnson et a…
Here are some interesting references för @aftonbladet to report about: Begley (2017) https://t.co/g4cCN8rWsP Johnson et al 2019 https://t.co/CZms776FAi Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENthg5x White and Hall (2017) https://t.co/gNt24dXZkn
@Nacho1man @mushroomfem @division_belle @veganfitnessric Metanalyses are cherry picking? https://t.co/Pjb83lST6e
@Nacho1man @mushroomfem @division_belle @veganfitnessric That's "literally" a compilation of the who position paper that determines red meat causes cancer. But you mean studies like this metanalysis in the topic? https://t.co/Pjb83lBieG
@Nacho1man @mushroomfem @division_belle @veganfitnessric Same as this metanalysis. Which shows the evidence of red meat and any poor outcomes is too weak for health authorities to make recommendations. https://t.co/Pjb83lBieG
@GZzyzyx @LeomantVictoria @benandjerrys Don’t “follow”—whatever that means—instead, *evaluate.* Compelling evidence shows food frequency questionnaires are unreliable. https://t.co/MtNYNO7sng There is no compelling research result indicating that red meat consumption increases mortality. https://t.co/J8CnfVsbMv
@bigfatsurprise @nntaleb @LuisCLCorreia @DrDamluji @cochranecollab @nationallipid The quality of evidence on red meat consumptions is also poor: “The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty.” https://t.co/J8CnfVsbMv
@HenryFailsafe 2/ B. Extremely weak and hardly conclusive. Metanalyses showing strength of evidence conclude this. C, D. Bwahahaha. You know you're wrong.. https://t.co/Pjb83lBQ4e
@archeocosa @jburnmurdoch Is there such a thing as "healthy food" and "unhealthy food"? https://t.co/tWiU2WtQKZ "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty."
Esse mês mais uma paciente minha entrou em remissão do câncer sem reduzir consumo de carne vermelha e gordura! E nós vimos a Censura voltando ao Brasil! A carne vemelha NÃO CAUSA câncer ou infarto e pode te ajudar a chegar mais rápido na remissão do câncer https://t.co/fglR6k1KaH
@ilona_mclean @kenwoo0952 @markoftheD @CR_UK Here, do some actual medical research that doesn't come from the WHO or directly from the UK government (because they're so trustworthy
@JJM93_ @AtteHarjanne https://t.co/Df1o06bhlG https://t.co/yHrwQC0V9Y
RT @SaulNutri: Meta análisis en "Annals of Internal Medicine", 2019.
Meta análisis en "Annals of Internal Medicine", 2019.
RT @ProfScoles: Annals of Internal Medicine - Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outco…
Annals of Internal Medicine - Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies. https://t.co/R2xK1joSGt
RT @cacophonyYYC: Red & Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies…
Red & Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies magnitude of assoc’n Bren meat consumption & all-cause mortality & adverse outcomes is very small, the evidence is of low certainty. https://t.co/SCxLcSQWbZ
@ceddygrock @forktown385 @DietHeartNews Most are poor quality, the better the quality the less studies show any detrimental effects in heart disease or all cause mortality. https://t.co/OQGiy6Tr9d
@EEddyEdwards1 @DMDent @GodSal1 @RossWenk @Rdavis67 @AriaWillows @danceforthesky @SteakAndIron @iraq_mawtini @yvonne_clem @sallepierrelamy @Philodices @drop_robert @NKernowVegan @MiaJame55497405 @Leebeeskee @TPoet1973 Metanalyses don't show that. But it's fun to combine "red and processed" meat. Would be like studying "baked potatoes and french fries" and concluding baked potatoes were bad for you because french fry intake is correlated w/ bad health. https://t.co/OQGiy6Tr9d
@EEddyEdwards1 @DMDent @GodSal1 @RossWenk @Rdavis67 @AriaWillows @danceforthesky @SteakAndIron @iraq_mawtini @yvonne_clem @sallepierrelamy @Philodices @drop_robert @NKernowVegan @MiaJame55497405 @Leebeeskee @TPoet1973 Right. So avoid processed meat. Red meat isn't a problem. And other meats and dairy don't have any correlations to poor health, and often are related to positive health. Grasping at straws. https://t.co/OQGiy6TYYL
@EEddyEdwards1 @SteakAndIron @iraq_mawtini @AriaWillows @danceforthesky @GodSal1 @sallepierrelamy @Rdavis67 @Philodices @drop_robert @NKernowVegan @MiaJame55497405 @Leebeeskee @TPoet1973 Nope. Low quality study that associates other confounders and doesn't control for them. Higher quality studies show mi such problems. https://t.co/OQGiy7b20L
2年前に「red meatは健康に悪いというエビデンスがない(かなり弱い)」とした論文がAnnals of Internal Medicineに発表されましたが、学会で、 なんと著者は「RCT行われていない喫煙や飲酒の影響もエビデンスが強いと言えない」 と答えたとのことです・・・
RT @CarnivoreIs: @Alexander_LBRY @TheCarnivoreLaw @_Roquette I'll take your opinion piece and raise you an actual metanalysis from last yea…
@Alexander_LBRY @TheCarnivoreLaw @_Roquette I'll take your opinion piece and raise you an actual metanalysis from last year on the topic. Plus "red and processed meat" are not the same thing. Try finding a study on "red meat" instead of two different categories of meat. https://t.co/OQGiy7b20L
@fedefedeson @OscarGenomics @MasDeUno No hay base científica sólida que relacione consumo de carne (roja) con mayor incidencia de ECV. Uno de los estudios más rigurosos publicados en los últimos años: https://t.co/NpXWdydOQZ
@PeterMcCormack And finally regarding red meat consumption; a review article: https://t.co/t7LgJ6ExqS
To ja to tylko tu zostawię: https://t.co/DqhmHM90zC a i jeszcze to - nie ma praktycznie żadnych dowodów na to, że czerwone mięso powoduje raka, żądam sprostowania fejknewsów: https://t.co/fQIVgUFzZ6 i to: https://t.co/Des0H7Udfy https://t.co/CWXeVxIuuN
@SylwiaSpurek To ja to tylko tu zostawię: Tak...że...no...teges...https://t.co/DqhmHM90zC a i jeszcze to: https://t.co/fQIVgUFzZ6 i to: https://t.co/Des0H7Udfy
@TyRBeal @vanvlietphd If misinformation, perhaps justified? Published comment by Dr Fleming:"This paper does a disservice to the journal, as well as medicine, the media & the general public (...) We are all now dumber for having read & listened to what the authors published" https://t.co/fUKldIg6xs
@MartinR158 The studies that are in existence are the weakest evidence and, in fact, the stronger the evidence the less it shows any problem. So ..this is using grade criteria. https://t.co/OQGiy7b20L
@RealisticView33 https://t.co/apbWkjTTFp Metabolically healthy diets can include (or not include) meat Nutritional dogmatism does not benefit anyone. Focus on optimizing metabolic health and find a nutritional strategy that works for you Eat Whole Real Food
@CMonteiro_USP Any considerations about the role of red meat and health should consider the reviews published in 2019 by @methodsnerd https://t.co/oaNoJFf0pH https://t.co/6zBeffUfYb
@The_Nutrivore @anoceanian Depends which epidemiological study you look at PURE and EPIC studies have different findings on red meat. I don’t think any RCTs have found issues. Also this 2019 meta says there’s no good evidence for red meat causing harm. Are you cherry picking? https://t.co/MaIZSCzCNO
@rachela_hall You might wish to review the excellent meta analysis on the topic here: https://t.co/PNAgvzuJzA
@doctorbataev @egor_berish Про красное мясо опровергли! https://t.co/Acxwp6qogW
RT @fleroy1974: @nntaleb And this very recent and very comprehensive look at the data: https://t.co/nv00CWafzt https://t.co/raIDr6YU8c
@nntaleb And this very recent and very comprehensive look at the data: https://t.co/nv00CWafzt https://t.co/raIDr6YU8c
Recently held another journal club among med students about @DenaZera and others' SR on red & processed meat and mortality
@jeanette_samsom Is dat zo? Volgens mij is er in 'nutrition science' vrij weinig onomstotelijk bewezen. Hier een meta-analyse over dit onderwerp. https://t.co/mwW9HNDzGh
@TrejbalChris @ZacharyWenger @jonnettlefold @ScepticalDoctor @AmandaZZ100 @SBakerMD @cambridge_pt Besides which, we have several metastudies showing that these correlations are not robust, such as https://t.co/p6z1Vcj6mr
RT @MattMadore576: @TheBhupiThakur @Nutradvance @MyNutritionSci @The_Nutrivore @dylanarmbruste3 @NutritionMadeS3 @nick_krontiris Nutri:http…
@TheBhupiThakur @Nutradvance @MyNutritionSci @The_Nutrivore @dylanarmbruste3 @NutritionMadeS3 @nick_krontiris Nutri:https://t.co/TvXcsKmeAn Zhong: https://t.co/xQBSlEOPA1 Zheng: https://t.co/YwgjTjuK9P
@RuprechtMtl @jannarden Study. https://t.co/HmNPvnqVUU
@bubnovbog @vyakunin Вот про смертность от всех причин https://t.co/UxivrfRUTi
@bubnovbog @vyakunin 2003 й год это очень старая статья https://t.co/UxivrfRUTi
@The_Nutrivore @ZacharyWenger Hi Zachary, would this be your impression of the literature: "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty." https://t.co/xkNgNPkVEv
RT @Alan_Watson_: @janetwillicott @ProfTimNoakes @fleroy1974 @fatisourfriend @JoannaBlythman It is available (FOC) at: https://t.co/E5JDYRj…
@RitaLobo Eu montei uma disciplina sobre Tendências na Produção e Consumo de Alimentos. Dá uma espiada na aula sobre Saudabilidade e Bem Estar https://t.co/HDtcEGj3Uy
"The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty." https://t.co/W4xMWRjkxO
@TariroAnton @gominolasdpetro Solamente en carnes rojas hay una relación bajísima, insuficiente para sentar evidencia sólida. Además es susceptible a otros factores como el método de cocción (frituras y brasas). Te falta decirme que los huevos aumentan el colesterol https://t.co/0TLq2uNVlv
RT @Alan_Watson_: @janetwillicott @ProfTimNoakes @fleroy1974 @fatisourfriend @JoannaBlythman It is available (FOC) at: https://t.co/E5JDYRj…
RT @saludatm: The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic o…
The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes is very small, and the evidence is of low certainty. https://t.co/bJaHBL7KWc
RT @Travis_Statham: I just posted "Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Syst…
I just posted "Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 171, No 10" on Reddit https://t.co/pofCrGjWSM
I just posted "Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes" on Reddit https://t.co/yfu9gYNir6
@Eki_glasto @GwenSampe @guardian Completely incorrect. High sugar intake in any form is responsible for that. All recent studies have concluded that meat is not at all harmful. https://t.co/bfGdwfINwT
RT @EBCPMcMaster: Sadly – or happily – there is only low quality evidence of very small adverse effects of red and processed meats on all-c…
Sadly – or happily – there is only low quality evidence of very small adverse effects of red and processed meats on all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic outcomes. https://t.co/8OISa1KtBo https://t.co/O8N3NWtJUH
RT @IsahMW: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 171, No 10 https://t.co/Q6uloa4CjW
@FrasierHarry @Jimbobbatron @Claydencows https://t.co/CUmEiTYQdp
@tedeytan @ESodicoffMD @ahhite @KenDBerryMD @TuitNutrition @KetoCarnivore @SBakerMD @RadkeAmanda @tednaiman @eatmostlyfatali "Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies" https://t.co/k9wiBXFxtd
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes - [Source: CrossFit] https://t.co/dU46gwPRX9 #article #athlete #blog #crossfit #crossfitarticle #crossfitblog #crossfitnews #essentials #fitness #fitnessarticle #fitnessblog #func... https://t.co/uJWGaQUY5w
RT @AcpIndiana: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and M…
RT @IllinoisACP: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and…
RT @ArkansasACP: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies https://t.co/YIUapemWHV
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies https://t.co/6HneMRl7ar
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies https://t.co/htJIlbmkyk
RT @docramiro: Queda entonces aún la deliciosa duda, mientras tanto, consumamos todo con moderación. Fuentes: -Ann Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1…
Queda entonces aún la deliciosa duda, mientras tanto, consumamos todo con moderación. Fuentes: -Ann Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1. doi: 10.7326/M19-0655. (https://t.co/B1X91t6D3j) -https://t.co/2yMbWjspaA -https://t.co/h4vyHu1OEN
RT @AnnalsofIM: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes https://t.co/da38WitjqK @D…
RT @the_paper_link: Trend up+2: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality…
Trend up+2: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.__ https://t.co/ro369Xk2Uk
RT @the_paper_link: Trend up+2: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality…
Trend up+2: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.__ https://t.co/ro369Xk2Uk
RT @AnnalsofIM: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes https://t.co/da38WitjqK @D…
RT @AnnalsofIM: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes https://t.co/da38WitjqK @D…
RT @AnnalsofIM: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes https://t.co/da38WitjqK @D…
RT @Kenn_QBE: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Met…
RT @Kenn_QBE: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Met…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies https://t.co/LXdeRJ4WJs @fleroy1974 @GHGGuru @DrAseemMalhotra @FructoseNo @BelindaFettke @SBakerMD @AnnChildersMD
RT @the_paper_link: Trend up+1: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality…
Trend up+1: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.__ https://t.co/ro369Xk2Uk
RT @the_paper_link: Trend new: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality a…
Trend new: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.__ https://t.co/ro369Xk2Uk
RT @TamarHaspel: #3: "Red and processed meat consumption and risk for all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic outcomes." https://t.co/3SSpu…
RT @GacetaCienForen: Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies---https://t.co/xLEvZvxWR9
@Draven974 @eddyfougier Les publications sont ici : https://t.co/LRHBVswwTm https://t.co/ijTPQi7lN8 https://t.co/Eafj0LARqF https://t.co/FeXtVSSCen Dites nous ce qui est faux et contradictoire. Merci.
@denisjelec @Bluebirdlouise @GilesYeo But all the evidence we do have, inc these studies, which may well be the best evidence we will get any time soon, points to both red & processed meat being a problem with increased RR for mortality & T2D Doi:10.7326/M19-0655 Sup for RR mortality table & 10.7326/M19-0655 for T2D: https://t.co/YMl6XzcjsV
RT @Alan_Watson_: @piersmorgan Piers relies on rabid headlines rather than the actual science (I know, real science is hard work Piers) the…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies (open access) https://t.co/CKClzEriwq #nutrition #diet
#3: "Red and processed meat consumption and risk for all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic outcomes." https://t.co/3SSpu2Sseg
OT
SP