Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many contributors highlight the low certainty of evidence regarding meat consumption's impact on cancer risk, with phrases like 'the certainty of evidence is low to very low' and 'possible absolute effects are very small,' which indicate concern about the reliability of the conclusions. The varied tone reflects a mix of skepticism and curiosity about the implications of this research, emphasizing the need for clearer evidence in dietary recommendations.
The discussions reflect a range of opinions, with some participants firmly disagreeing with the conclusions, while others acknowledge the findings, leading to a neutral score overall.
There is a strong interest as many contributors engage with the research, sharing perspectives and engaging in discussions about evidence and implications.
While some posts reflect deep engagement with the article's content, many responses are more about countering opinions rather than a thorough exploration of the research methods or results.
The perceived impact is moderate, as some participants contest the findings but do not dismiss the potential influence of diet on health.
Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red meat to date, finding "low or very low certainty of evidence" on effects that were "v. small." https://t.co/zq4IG1WbOm And see thread below https://t.co/vQ7QozIzop
Meta-Analyse zu rotem und verarbeitetem Fleisch bezüglich Krebsrisiko: https://t.co/HoW0HSbQel Fazit: bei o.g. Konsum ist das Risiko an Krebs zu erkranken sehr gering.
A JEDNAK! MIĘSA NIE POWODUJE RAKA.Uczeni z kilkudziesięciu uczelni na całym świecie zbadali związek przycz. między spożyciem czerw. i przetworz. mięsa a ŚMIERTELNOŚCIĄ i zachorowaln. na raka. Synteza danych po zbadaniu 6 milionów os. mówi: ZWIĄZKU BRAK https://t.co/kpFNSQMpOj https://t.co/6wai6MlF37
Og så den skumle kreftfaren! The possible absolute effects of red and processed meat consumption on cancer mortality and incidence are very small, and the certainty of evidence is low to very low. https://t.co/RxSdFzFTGX
@edxe47 @TheNutrivore @IARCWHO You can’t establish causality. That’s the whole point. So what you ask is the mechanism? We don’t have one... But the evidence of ‘association’ when you apply any rigorous form of analysis is also terrible https://t.co/PMaAC5QO6o
Aun así, este metaanálisis de 2019 no encuentra una relación significativa entre la ingesta de carnes rojas frescas o procesadas y una mayor incidencia del cáncer. Afirman que la evidencia es baja. https://t.co/U45zvqW3z7
I just completed 200 days on the carnivore diet, focusing on the second half of this period where I encountered setbacks. This video reviews my weight measurements, CGM data, DEXA scans, and bloodwork, providing…
This video examines the nutritional advantages of meat, highlighting its role as a dense source of essential proteins and bioactive compounds vital for health. It also addresses recent studies that challenge the…
This video examines the relationship between meat consumption and intestinal cancer based on various meta-analyses. It highlights evidence suggesting that reducing red and processed meat intake may lower cancer…
This video explores the associations between red and processed meat intake and colorectal cancer risk. It discusses dietary patterns linked to health outcomes, emphasizing that reducing meat consumption may lower some…
In this scientific analysis, we question the premise that red meat causes cancer. The study reviews cohort studies and indicates that while reducing unprocessed meat intake minimally lowers cancer mortality, conclusions…
"Los posibles efectos absolutos del consumo de carne roja y procesada en la mortalidad e incidencia del cáncer son muy pequeños, y la certeza de la evidencia es baja a muy baja". https://t.co/IPVyxlpMDV
The cancer studies are observational. This is an RCT. And we can have battling citations all day! I'm sure you're familiar with the literature. Meat consumption is associated with everything bad, including death by accidents. But the cancer evidence is thin. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31569214/
@1PTDan @Et_smartere_liv @NicNorthVegan https://t.co/Pw96NiazVR
@PekkaKJKoivisto @BenjaminPitkane Tässä katsauksessa prosessoidun lihan ja paksu- ja peräsuolisyövän välisen yhteyden arvioitiin olevan suuruusluokassa 1 tapaus vähemmän per 1000 henkilöä 3 annoksen (1 annos 50 g) per viikko vähennyksellä. Näytön varmuus oli matala. https://t.co/2MoVIOepBJ
@hblwebb "Tvärtom borde folk äta mindre kött. Det finns gott om bevis för att stor konsumtion av kött ökar risken för tjocktarmscancer" @AMPajari
@olivier930816 @LaurieDez17 - https://t.co/ucKarXDjQ5 - https://t.co/vZfiHxEHN0 - https://t.co/QoQroH4tL9
@andyswarbs @RationalStoic @gebloke @ImKhan70 @eli_outsider @Bron1954 Not so much. "The possible absolute effects of red and processed meat consumption on cancer mortality and incidence are very small, and the certainty of evidence is low to very low." doi: 10.7326/M19-0699 "The magnitude of association between red and processed meat consumption
@Wolfy_999 @MaxCRoser @OurWorldInData I’m sorry that your info sources have done this to you. Meat doesn’t cause cancer. “The possible absolute effects of red and processed meat consumption on cancer mortality and incidence are very small, and the certainty of evidence is low to very low.” https://t.co/s90pHFz8oJ
@atulshukla757 I’m so sorry your sources have done this to you. We have only poor-quality research on meat & cancer. The harm is nil. Ignore the cults, communists, vegans & corporations that want you to eat Famine Chow®. Imagine what other lies you’ve been told! See: https://t.co/s90pHFz8oJ
@AMPajari Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW
RT @mackinprof: @edxe47 @TheNutrivore @IARCWHO You can’t establish causality. That’s the whole point. So what you ask is the mechanism? We…
RT @mackinprof: @edxe47 @TheNutrivore @IARCWHO You can’t establish causality. That’s the whole point. So what you ask is the mechanism? We…
@edxe47 @TheNutrivore @IARCWHO You can’t establish causality. That’s the whole point. So what you ask is the mechanism? We don’t have one... But the evidence of ‘association’ when you apply any rigorous form of analysis is also terrible https://t.co/PMaAC5QO6o
report to media that they recommend people to limit their consumption of read meat to 350 grams. Is that consistent with science? like @methodsnerd et al 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u, Han et al. 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW, Zeeratkar et al 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ
Didn't @Maikkie1 read: @methodsnerd et al 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u, Han et al. 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW, Zeeratkar et al 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Dehghan et al 2018 https://t.co/GEopeZBtqe @bigfatsurprise https://t.co/JpPVm9urnp @HennaVepsalaine et al 2017:
@GranierBenoit2 @LaMineDeSel1 Il y a eu pas mal de méta-analyses de grande envergure qui montrent que les preuves sont inexistantes. Il est faux de déclarer que la viande est responsable de l'obésité ou du cancer.
@ChadxMichael @SuzanneDalangin @nutrition_facts The recommendation of the experts is that adults continue to eat red meat. The quality of the research results on red meat is poor & harmful effects are negligible, possibly zero. https://t.co/0NzH9YbM9t https://t.co/edkJWDSPc3 https://t.co/oGenmuTzXa https://t.co/kmTvFDv8u2
@drmatthewnagra “The possible absolute effects of red and processed meat consumption on cancer mortality and incidence are very small, and the certainty of evidence is low to very low.”https://t.co/7S4mN3J7rd
@RuudBodem @KeesBloklandPhD Ahem, de onderzoekers hebben ook gekeken naar 'total mortality'. Overigens zijn er nog wel meer overzichtsartikelen verschenen waarin de associatie tussen rood vleesconsumptie en kanker als 'low to very low' wordt beoordeeld. Zie bijv.: https://t.co/JzhlaGvlCo
Og så den skumle kreftfaren! The possible absolute effects of red and processed meat consumption on cancer mortality and incidence are very small, and the certainty of evidence is low to very low. https://t.co/RxSdFzFTGX
@Benaim15 @Sante_Gouv @Assur_Maladie @Institut_cancer pourquoi ? https://t.co/CD1jhRobia https://t.co/ie4mCEkBKi https://t.co/PIuVa6eH5v https://t.co/cNRdZG47rl https://t.co/PjCs4HAXCf https://t.co/BgyeVJXWw0 https://t.co/i5XxnircIh https://t.co/4Pab1Rr1A0 https://t.co/CXPJZnRgfN
@leonieantoine23 @Boutdebabouche @rogersalengro8 @Melanie_Vogel_ Non, justement, le contraire est montré ici (je cite directement des méta-analyses avec un niveau de fiabilité bien + élevé que votre document, et très récentes) : https://t.co/CD1jhRobia https://t.co/ie4mCEkBKi https://t.co/PIuVa6eH5v https://t.co/cNRdZG47rl 1/n
@deaddildo @GBNEWS @Carys_vegan @PETAUK @Jacob_Rees_Mogg Most thorough meta-analysis on the matter, using GRADE: https://t.co/dqG57Y8v8N https://t.co/ZF60GORDNV
@TaaviHorila @yleuutiset According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/mHO9lSkzp6
@yleuutiset According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@YleOulu According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@Alena_iWl According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@nnewspdates According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@HeikkiOjala According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@minnaminski1 @TaaviHorila @yleuutiset According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@PetraNyqvist According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
@PasiJJunnila According to science she's correct: Johnston et al. 2019 https://t.co/I4uEtJtR2u Han et al 2019 https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW Zeeratkar et al. 2019 https://t.co/x7xENsZFdZ Aiello and Wheeler (1995) https://t.co/BHntmEtOOL
Conclusión: "Los posibles efectos absolutos del consumo de #carne roja y procesada sobre la mortalidad y la incidencia del #cancer, son muy pequeños, y la certeza de la evidencia es baja a muy baja"
@Schall_abweiser @ZigaMalek Potem konzorcij pod vodstvom očeta "evidence based medicine" https://t.co/o5x5nA3RBB https://t.co/46x7Csea3i https://t.co/rVgfFcuQep https://t.co/AMFmxwiZL2 https://t.co/19eNcXHYHX https://t.co/7nlresqrvg https://t.co/oFsualP5FK https://t.co/iMPUUWzkgz
Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 171, No 10 https://t.co/iTPxip4Rxc
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
@CocoaCutest https://t.co/XyXpzZSyAc https://t.co/QJvmxFnvN3 https://t.co/1YM4kr9ZhQ Have your propaganda and nutrient deficiencies.
@Anre_Dan @__tsb @BerwinEnzemann @TaktiAusDo @PyroKlose Mh. Ich fürchte, du hast von den Limitationen ernährungswissenschaftlicher Epidemiologie einfach keine Ahnung. https://t.co/QSw6Vzm7VB https://t.co/Nib1fTxZuc Sehr kleine Effekte, unklare Kausalität, starke Confounder, Low Level of evidence.
Aun así, este metaanálisis de 2019 no encuentra una relación significativa entre la ingesta de carnes rojas frescas o procesadas y una mayor incidencia del cáncer. Afirman que la evidencia es baja. https://t.co/U45zvqW3z7
@Anre_Dan @__tsb @BerwinEnzemann @TaktiAusDo @PyroKlose Nein. Man findet die Kausalität eben nicht. Das sind Beobachtungsstudien. Die können keine Kausalität zeigen. Nur eine statistische Assoziation. https://t.co/QSw6VzDIN9 https://t.co/Nib1fTPAlK
RT @rafabravo: Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Coho…
RT @rafabravo: Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Coho…
Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies: Annals of Internal Medicine: 2019, Vol 171, No 10 https://t.co/Bdhtw0lhiR
RT @byVNTY: Meta-Analyse zu rotem und verarbeitetem Fleisch bezüglich Krebsrisiko: https://t.co/HoW0HSbQel Fazit: bei o.g. Konsum ist da…
Meta-Analyse zu rotem und verarbeitetem Fleisch bezüglich Krebsrisiko: https://t.co/HoW0HSbQel Fazit: bei o.g. Konsum ist das Risiko an Krebs zu erkranken sehr gering.
@seadleo @MontanaBlack https://t.co/HoW0HSbQel Gibt noch ein paar die beweisen dass übermäßiger konsum (was auch verständlich ist) Krebs erregen kann. Moderate Mengen und hochwertiges Fleisch = Krebsrisiko minimal bis gegen null
RT @redakcja_TM_PM: A JEDNAK! MIĘSA NIE POWODUJE RAKA.Uczeni z kilkudziesięciu uczelni na całym świecie zbadali związek przycz. między spo…
RT @redakcja_TM_PM: A JEDNAK! MIĘSA NIE POWODUJE RAKA.Uczeni z kilkudziesięciu uczelni na całym świecie zbadali związek przycz. między spo…
RT @redakcja_TM_PM: A JEDNAK! MIĘSA NIE POWODUJE RAKA.Uczeni z kilkudziesięciu uczelni na całym świecie zbadali związek przycz. między spo…
A JEDNAK! MIĘSA NIE POWODUJE RAKA.Uczeni z kilkudziesięciu uczelni na całym świecie zbadali związek przycz. między spożyciem czerw. i przetworz. mięsa a ŚMIERTELNOŚCIĄ i zachorowaln. na raka. Synteza danych po zbadaniu 6 milionów os. mówi: ZWIĄZKU BRAK https://t.co/kpFNSQMpOj https://t.co/6wai6MlF37
@svenska_yle Har @svenska_yle verkligen gjort faktakoll? ”The possible absolute effects of red and processed #meat consumption on #cancer mortality and incidence are very small, and the certainty of evidence is low to very low” (Han et al., 2019). https://t.co/7xUQk4rvCW #GRADE #NutriRecs
@Fckedupusername @MadsenAb @DenDyriskeTime Absurd sammenligning. Myterne om kød og kræft er skabt på observationsstudier, som ikke kan dokumentere årssagssammenhæng. Nu hvor disse studier bliver undersøgt med robust videnskabelige metode falder det hele til jorden. @cancer_dk bør opdatere sig. https://t.co/xC1UY8rAnJ
"The possible absolute effects of red and processed meat consumption on cancer mortality and incidence are very small, and the certainty of evidence is low to very low." #plantbased #foodfraud #healthfraud https://t.co/pMRxTHHxGR
@EspinosaRomain J'ai l'impression que même les meta-analyses n'arrivent pas aux mêmes conclusions sur ce sujet
https://t.co/R89uCJrCmx
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @monstercroom: A great read with valid questions on real impacts of red meat consumption and assumptions. Also this: https://t.co/P7JMCN…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @monstercroom: A great read with valid questions on real impacts of red meat consumption and assumptions. Also this: https://t.co/P7JMCN…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @monstercroom: A great read with valid questions on real impacts of red meat consumption and assumptions. Also this: https://t.co/P7JMCN…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @monstercroom: A great read with valid questions on real impacts of red meat consumption and assumptions. Also this: https://t.co/P7JMCN…
A great read with valid questions on real impacts of red meat consumption and assumptions. Also this: https://t.co/P7JMCNW6tm https://t.co/T7fW4GXWAp
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
RT @bigfatsurprise: Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red…
Red meat does not cause cancer. See my short video on this: https://t.co/eA2XYXZ81q Or the most rigorous review of red meat to date, finding "low or very low certainty of evidence" on effects that were "v. small." https://t.co/zq4IG1WbOm And see thread below https://t.co/vQ7QozIzop
RT @Travis_Statham: I just posted "Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and M…
I just posted "Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 171, No 10" on Reddit https://t.co/LniNN3rWlU
@FrasierHarry @RoninInstitute @LouiseStephen9 @ahhite Try this instead: - https://t.co/UXiJqbW468 - https://t.co/TdEeUIeskT - https://t.co/dqG57Y8v8N - https://t.co/XlmR28eua3
@tedeytan @ESodicoffMD @ahhite @KenDBerryMD @TuitNutrition @KetoCarnivore @SBakerMD @RadkeAmanda @tednaiman @eatmostlyfatali "Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies" https://t.co/1v8SqdY9Td
RT @AcpIndiana: Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Coh…
RT @IllinoisACP: Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Co…
RT @ArkansasACP: Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Co…
Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies https://t.co/m35k6tgMh9
Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies https://t.co/1crE4xq23t
Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies https://t.co/nbiy14kRVh
RT @the_paper_link: Trend up+1: *Han MA* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incid…
Trend up+1: *Han MA* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.__ https://t.co/aFKXwTIzLt
@Harpalos @GreenMan_Off @SU_Samuel @fabricepelosi @JJBourdin_RMC @RoyalSegolene @Institut_cancer Je faisais référence à cette étude, pardon de ne pas avoir cité la source. https://t.co/imh4l5k5k1
RT @the_paper_link: Trend up+1: *Han MA* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incid…
Trend up+1: *Han MA* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.__ https://t.co/aFKXwTIzLt
RT @SalgiFoundation: Reduction of red and processed meat intake and cancer mortality and incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis o…
Reduction of red and processed meat intake and cancer mortality and incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies @MDLinx https://t.co/E9sr2RLfNB #cancer #health #esophagealcancer #esophagealcancerawareness #AllPeriwinkleEverything™
RT @dr_teid: تأثير اللحوم الحمراء على تكون معظم أنواع السرطان قليل جدا بناء على الدراسات السابقة بعنوان Reduction of red and processed mea…
تأثير اللحوم الحمراء على تكون معظم أنواع السرطان قليل جدا بناء على الدراسات السابقة بعنوان Reduction of red and processed meat intake and cancer mortality and incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
RT @the_paper_link: Trend new: *Han MA* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incide…
Trend new: *Han MA* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.__ https://t.co/aFKXwTIzLt
@Draven974 @eddyfougier Les publications sont ici : https://t.co/LRHBVswwTm https://t.co/ijTPQi7lN8 https://t.co/Eafj0LARqF https://t.co/FeXtVSSCen Dites nous ce qui est faux et contradictoire. Merci.
Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies (open access) https://t.co/1up7KOR1Fc #nutrition #diet