@JillianMichaels 5/ ... Protein intake does NOT cause an increase risk of cancers, heart disease and diabetes
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Oct 2019 – Sep 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter135 posts
-
News42 articles
-
Facebook14 posts
-
Blogs12 articles
-
YouTube7 videos
-
Reddit3 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Several posts highlight the study's findings, such as the mention that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on health outcomes, referencing phrases like 'very-low-certainty evidence.' The discussions employ a mix of supportive and critical tones, indicating an active engagement with existing literature, often referring to previous studies that contradict mainstream dietary guidance, which enhances the sentiment of scrutiny around health claims associated with red meat.
Most discussions express support for the idea that red meat intake does not significantly impact health outcomes, suggesting a moderate level of agreement with the publication's findings.
Participants show high interest through diverse discussions, referencing various studies and meta-analyses related to red meat consumption and health outcomes.
While some posts critique the study's methodologies, overall engagement levels indicate a mix of analytical and anecdotal commentary, suggesting moderate engagement depth.
Many discuss the implications of the findings, indicating a belief that the publication could influence dietary guidelines and perceptions about red meat consumption.
Abstract in brief
- The review examines the effects of lower versus higher red meat intake on health outcomes related to cardiometabolic diseases and cancer in adults through a systematic analysis of randomized trials.
- There were only 12 eligible trials identified, with one large study indicating minimal impact of reduced red meat consumption on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular risks, though the certainty of this evidence was low.
- Overall, the findings suggest that decreasing red meat intake might not significantly influence major health outcomes, but the number of high-quality trials is limited and results vary widely.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyEffect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes https://t.co/4QVSJbUA5n Full link to paper: https://t.co/bNIzPlEoi9 https://t.co/dP5QKTAGUm
@whitfieldlewis6 @thevegdoc You put the wrong reference for the meta-analysis (https://t.co/vkyo9jSek8). Most of the weight comes from the WHI. I’ve explained before how the WHI was underpowered for CVD as an endpoint. As for meat & cancer, the difference between groups in red meat consumption was not all
https://t.co/CXaFmRrAVe Turns out there are advantages to eating red meat and disadvantages to publishing data about these advantages.
Systematic Review of Randomized Trials: "Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence." https://t.co/9srHw93UA5
@JamieRohu @GrassBased @fleroy1974 @PeteGDunne @NickCotterSr @McConalogue @ClaireBrockTV @TonightVMTV @virginmedia @AnimalRebelIRE @ExtinctRebelsIE @ireland_farming @PastureForLife There is only poor to very poor quality evidence available on red meat & atherosclerosis. Based on poor-quality evidence, limiting red meat in the diet “…may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence.” https://t.co/hINeILmc6t
All mentions
200 Days on the Carnivore Diet: Results and Setbacks Explained
I just completed 200 days on the carnivore diet, focusing on the second half of this period where I encountered setbacks. This video reviews my weight measurements, CGM data, DEXA scans, and bloodwork, providing…
The Importance of Vegetables in a Carnivore Diet
In this video, I share insights from Dr. Stephan van Vliet on diet quality and meat consumption, alongside Dr. Nicola Guess on weight loss strategies for type 2 diabetes prevention. Lower household income can lead to…
Analyzing the Link Between Red Meat and Cancer Risk
In this scientific analysis, we question the premise that red meat causes cancer. The study reviews cohort studies and indicates that while reducing unprocessed meat intake minimally lowers cancer mortality, conclusions…
Impact of Red Meat Consumption on Heart Health Risks
In this video, we explore the impact of red meat consumption on cardiovascular health. We clarify the mechanisms and risk factors associated with heart attacks and strokes, focusing on recent studies linking diet to…
Impact of Red Meat Reduction on Health Outcomes
This video debates common beliefs about diets, specifically examining the effects of lower versus higher red meat intake. It explores findings from a systematic review indicating minimal impact on health outcomes…
Diet Series Matchup #2: Vegetarian vs Flexible Dieting!
The Truth About Fake Meat vs Real Meat: Health Implications
In recent years, meat replacements have gained popularity due to their purported health and environmental benefits. This video delves into the science behind these substitutes, comparing nutritional profiles and…
@whitfieldlewis6 @thevegdoc You put the wrong reference for the meta-analysis (https://t.co/vkyo9jSek8). Most of the weight comes from the WHI. I’ve explained before how the WHI was underpowered for CVD as an endpoint. As for meat & cancer, the difference between groups in red meat consumption was not all
@chiefbacher "Our results from the evaluation of randomized trials do not support the recommendations in the United Kingdom, United States, or World Cancer Research Fund guidelines on red meat intake." https://t.co/rR1s2sxuxq
@RSekuloski @BioLayne Thanks for confirming these are simply anecdotes. We have tons of literature showing positive effects of eating meat that doesn’t benefit the pharma industry. You just have to look: https://t.co/0YsWNDbMhu
@ArkhamFantasy @Mangan150 I see 1 reference to RCTs in your source, which concludes: "Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence." https://t.co/2zPKRzR7Gn
@The1m2o @hikingsaltlake @_OliverVenture @DrGaryMcGowan Meat doesn’t cause cancer. They’ve been meta analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating meat’s association (from Whole Foods) with cancer and CVD and no association was found. Hong Kong eats the most meat per capita and live the longest. https://t.co/IlNcDVMP52
@GiantOldMonster @_OliverVenture @DrGaryMcGowan https://t.co/IlNcDVMP52
@hikingsaltlake @MasalaFry69 @_OliverVenture @DrGaryMcGowan He still hasn’t provided a single randomized controlled trial. Here is a meta analysis of RCT for you. https://t.co/IlNcDVMP52
@RogerSeheult https://t.co/mNl98pflJL No RCT evidence that changes in LDLc via diet affect CVD or mortality https://t.co/rDol9781Sr https://t.co/vReWVdvjLr https://t.co/KlkVCONLLL MA of RCTs show no effects from meat https://t.co/zwv4VireUg High meat low carb diets improve metabolic health
@CaloriesProper https://t.co/rl5LDgz035 stuff like this https://t.co/vgri85NKuk… also fun stuff like this where the author makes the literal opposite conclusion as all the other papers https://t.co/3GPV9Tzkvg or stuff like this where the papers they use aren't viable for what they're studying
@PsiloCrypto Metanalysis from 2019, "Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence." https://t.co/doZB2CmNnq
@Maroxad @JohnnyPenso Metas of randomised trials at the top for you?https://t.co/q5zscXRfJY
https://t.co/4FuZpRBJ1f
@TarbuckSam https://t.co/TBTntTeIbj
@TarbuckSam @bigfatsurprise I guess I’m inconsistent because I think don’t think Smoking/CHD has the religious/ideological bias that RM/CHD has Is everyone who disagrees with you inconsistent, or in "in Nina’s group" https://t.co/8pGYSNwUBd
@awsomeboy360 @DaveEDanna https://t.co/JcZD2MresU
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Random… https://t.co/vrQbtH5lBq
_Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials_ https://t.co/cJVV3ktlm3 https://t.co/I1PPV3fKaf
RT @MinorityView: https://t.co/CXaFmRrAVe Turns out there are advantages to eating red meat and disadvantages to publishing data about thes…
RT @MinorityView: https://t.co/CXaFmRrAVe Turns out there are advantages to eating red meat and disadvantages to publishing data about thes…
https://t.co/CXaFmRrAVe Turns out there are advantages to eating red meat and disadvantages to publishing data about these advantages.
Next time someone tells you eating meat is bad for you… https://t.co/qvD0F2w5mH https://t.co/P7S282ZNit
Red Meat Eaters Rejoice While Bug eaters Whine! Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials - PubMed https://t.co/eyoxeDHjEk
And here's the real study that had all the anti-meat nut jobs up in arms https://t.co/3yVYxZlAY0
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Random… https://t.co/zkLjj5nay8
@AleksiReito @IsoHenkka Kuudesta päätetapatumasta yksi oli ”positiivinen”. Sääli, että lihansyönnin vähentämisen terveyshyödyistä on niukasti satunnaistettua näyttöä varsinkin sairastavuuden ja kuolleisuuden osalta. https://t.co/9KC8VlkZYA
@mansplaining10 @SBakerMD @AviBittMD https://t.co/IlNcDVMP52
If you want to know if someone’s credible ask them if they think red meat causes cancer
@MaritKolby The recent SR ((Zeraatkar et al. 2019a) the NNR chapter refer to several times says the evidence is very low/low and causality is uncertain - how can NNR claim the evidence is convincing and recommend an even lower intake? https://t.co/fBd300J25j https://t.co/5WApbVLhaP
NNR2023 claims a solid evidence for reducing red meat on health outcomes, but the SR used by NNR disagree: "Our results highlight the uncertainty regarding causal relationships between red meat consumption and major cardiometabolic and cancer outcomes" https://t.co/fBd300J25j https://t.co/wymRUjaPFM
@spflanzer Quando a metanálise é apenas de ensaios clínicos randomizados, fica ainda mais claro: o efeito da carne vermelha sobre câncer é: "muito baixa certeza" de "efeito nenhum" https://t.co/HNBvTcb5Rd https://t.co/znEnY0HpbS
@Hoellenaufsicht @AndreasSchm1 Welcher Konsens denn? Es gibt eine sehr große Metastudie, die randomisierte Kontrollstudien auswertete. Insgesamt 54.000 Teilnehmern, deren Ernährung zwischen 6 Monate bis zu 12 Jahre hinweg protokolliert und medizinisch begleitet wurde: https://t.co/cVFdTaoN1P
@HueReddish @BigwetRealism @iluminatibot @UndisputedGods https://t.co/l3Qtn8EDHj
@drmatthewnagra @Drlipid https://t.co/IlNcDVMP52
@kurasaki81 @RTLnieuws Vraag t eens aan je moeder. https://t.co/EWkKVRZQ0w
@le1measkyouthis @theproof @PlantChompers https://t.co/nf60yYFOuP "Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence."
@le1measkyouthis @theproof https://t.co/nf60yYFOuP "Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence."
@OxfordMedic @EugeneB94234328 https://t.co/td93ASKOc2
@PlantBasedNews @elonmusk https://t.co/Gfu93XovhX
@BenjaMillanMx URL: https://t.co/ALZkYgJ0oT Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine Publication Date: 10/2019 Summary: Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence.
@franalicee @Pablolouis9 @herbivore_club https://t.co/M8nwknIWbG
@NBCConnecticut There are literal studies with real information available. https://t.co/9hYe3VSBiY
@Schall_abweiser @ZigaMalek Potem konzorcij pod vodstvom očeta "evidence based medicine" https://t.co/o5x5nA3RBB https://t.co/46x7Csea3i https://t.co/rVgfFcuQep https://t.co/AMFmxwiZL2 https://t.co/19eNcXHYHX https://t.co/7nlresqrvg https://t.co/oFsualP5FK https://t.co/iMPUUWzkgz
@normalishvegan @MeJustMe75 There is only poor quality evidence available on red meat & atherosclerosis. Based on poor-quality evidence, limiting red meat in the diet “…may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence.”https://t.co/hINeILDf8t
RT @StevenMBelknap: @JamieRohu @GrassBased @fleroy1974 @PeteGDunne @NickCotterSr @McConalogue @ClaireBrockTV @TonightVMTV @virginmedia @Ani…
@JamieRohu @GrassBased @fleroy1974 @PeteGDunne @NickCotterSr @McConalogue @ClaireBrockTV @TonightVMTV @virginmedia @AnimalRebelIRE @ExtinctRebelsIE @ireland_farming @PastureForLife There is only poor to very poor quality evidence available on red meat & atherosclerosis. Based on poor-quality evidence, limiting red meat in the diet “…may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence.” https://t.co/hINeILmc6t
RT @LilyNicholsRDN: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials: "Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat…
@itsdavidramms So cook steak in grass fed butter :) https://t.co/d1U5fuhxWa https://t.co/aa9IE217Tz Many plant-based foods are lower in iodine and zinc compared to animal foods, which are already challenging to be absorbed due to antinutrients.
RT @LilyNicholsRDN: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials: "Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat…
Systematic Review of Randomized Trials: "Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence." https://t.co/9srHw93UA5
@jaimeraulmolina https://t.co/7YCulJN516
https://t.co/Zr5UCT4bBn /2
@LeytonVegly @stevenhacking @RTE_PrimeTime @GeorgeMonbiot @MiriamOCal https://t.co/Zr5UCT4bBn Alternative views if you’re ever interested.
@mondai_puppet @vitorborin_ https://t.co/tGPBSvYKXK
@r4v5t4r @JonScoff @StevieBaby1988 So that's why nutrition research produces contradictory outcomes then? See https://t.co/xlB7JeQiPD meat not actually bad for you. Helps to know how shit research really is.
@vegansince96 @VinnieTortorich Here's an actual study (not a survey) https://t.co/PjEhRJ7l3s
Red meat effect on cancer mortality… “very-low-certainty evidence that a diet lower in red meat may have little or no effect on cancer mortality (HR, 0.95 [CI, 0.89 to 1.01])” https://t.co/ubPI286MRp
@Yona_NSB @OGLaurels @united_bureau @Drew69460167 @veganfuture The studies that originally suggested that specifically red meat could lead to health complications (specifically cardiovascular complications) have been pretty thoroughly upended at this point. https://t.co/e0dsponKIm
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes https://t.co/4QVSJbUA5n Full link to paper: https://t.co/bNIzPlEoi9 https://t.co/dP5QKTAGUm
@itsmecalcifer1 @Plant_proof @FusionProgGuy https://t.co/PmZrP2aUbv https://t.co/VfbdIBq0BA
@CocoaCutest https://t.co/XyXpzZSyAc https://t.co/QJvmxFnvN3 https://t.co/1YM4kr9ZhQ Have your propaganda and nutrient deficiencies.
@Anre_Dan @__tsb @BerwinEnzemann @TaktiAusDo @PyroKlose Mh. Ich fürchte, du hast von den Limitationen ernährungswissenschaftlicher Epidemiologie einfach keine Ahnung. https://t.co/QSw6Vzm7VB https://t.co/Nib1fTxZuc Sehr kleine Effekte, unklare Kausalität, starke Confounder, Low Level of evidence.
@Anre_Dan @__tsb @BerwinEnzemann @TaktiAusDo @PyroKlose Nein. Man findet die Kausalität eben nicht. Das sind Beobachtungsstudien. Die können keine Kausalität zeigen. Nur eine statistische Assoziation. https://t.co/QSw6VzDIN9 https://t.co/Nib1fTPAlK
@CMonteiro_USP Any considerations about the role of red meat and health should consider the reviews published in 2019 by @methodsnerd https://t.co/oaNoJFf0pH https://t.co/6zBeffUfYb
RT @rafabravo: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Tria…
RT @rafabravo: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Tria…
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials: Annals of Internal Medicine: 2019 Vol 171, No 10 https://t.co/3BMRUclGRn
Efecto de diferentes consumo de carne roja en los resultados cardiometabólicos y del cáncer: resultados de una revisión sistemática de ensayos aleatorizados https://t.co/LiUeWVY66N #ActualizateconFINUT
Systemaattinen katsaus RCT tutkimuksista ”Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence” https://t.co/RQ8PdnKuhz
@kevinnbass I thought reducing red meat didn’t reduce risk of long term health consequences?
@MarcNohr @tednaiman Huge analysis of all available data shows little to no correlation. https://t.co/UOCYHiv50Z
@skyy4all @GovGianforte https://t.co/EPmzCSVBof
@mr_blockchain @davidrknowles @novogratz So you have posted the former (observational studies), but what do randomly controlled trials say? https://t.co/zeMkf36LO2 No relationship between red meat and cardiometabolic or cancer mortality https://t.co/PZ7NfRJ3t2 No relationship between saturated fat and heart disease
"Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence." #MeatyMarch https://t.co/iecR4xlICg
@tbr90 @GSkrovina Example: Some observational studies suggest an increase in heart disease and cancer risk from eating red meat. I have spent a lot of time looking, and this is all I could find w.r.t randomized controlled trials on the matter, which shows no link. https://t.co/zeMkf36LO2
@gialuhr @Genlearnman @SthlmMayor @CityofSthlm @GHGGuru Umm, no! ”Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials” https://t.co/XrgnAFhDjm
@JillianMichaels 5/ ... Protein intake does NOT cause an increase risk of cancers, heart disease and diabetes
@BobFollow99 @MS_Berlin @Frau_Katzenblum @DonLupus Diese Beweise sind extrem schwach und beruhen auf beobachtenden Studien (https://t.co/KrZWFeOXnC). Es gibt auch Studien die zeigen, dass Fleischverzehr vor Krebs schützt.
RT @Travis_Statham: I just posted "Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Revie…
I just posted "Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 171, No 10" on Reddit https://t.co/P2K0kUXqCm
@patrick_yerby @meattherapy @Cynwel73 @vegansince96 @Dravidica @LauraHillsLamb @BarryCPearson @clover_mark @Veganella_ @djbonesmccoy @Dave06031956 @sundstrom_lars @seasylvia2005 @4nk4n @GrahamCD62 @ed_flava @TheAnachronist1 @jadeo09 @Drakgun66 @ProfTimNoakes @ceresisaplanet @xeyedmess @healthypour @Af_donnerwetter @InjusticeN0More @tweetprix @InternalMentalC @Leigh252425 @BraideLochLion @MrAmazinglyAce @1AVintageAffair @bazhsw8183 @Caerage @RossWenk @SGT_Stampede @HERBIHORSE @Steve08859630 @drunkvegans @starlitnites @ByronMurphy8 @RoninSohei @DaveTheHerbi @meatymcsorley @sansbuIIcrap @itsokdadsgotit @Charlotte_0499 @Wildrosebeef Largest meta-analysis ever conducted: https://t.co/Vm3QOTJPrk Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence.
@sustainnyc @ImpossibleFoods https://t.co/ErW0mWA9oO https://t.co/XrgnAF02rO https://t.co/1EAavQY50r
@ratala11 @the_wildfire001 @UNFCCC @ImpossibleFoods @nikolajcw There is no evidence. Only hypotheses and epidemiological studies. Randomized controlled trials tell a different story. https://t.co/ICKjBxBl5B
@The_Nutrivore @FoodLiesOrg I guess you have seen this recent paper? I would assume your objection would be that they did not use mortality as a function of LDL change which would be determined by the quantity of animal SFA consumed relative to baseline LDL? https://t.co/h4HxPBrUEP. https://t.co/GV6DcTDOP9
@CaroliinaaSM @heyimchillin @ktxwct Aqui tens o link para um estudo de 2020, deixo a conclusão em imagem para poupar trabalho. Chegou a mim através de um médico dos US. Assim que tiver fontes, para além do "que se diz por aí", manda e eu dou feedback honesto.
@DrewTheWolf5 Ok ...I know what I have read and the sources I trust example https://t.co/v17aNVGTVy the science is not settled and my personal experience and many experts suggest that optimal nutrition is highly varied between individuals. Yes eating large amounts of meat and shit foods is bad
Widersprüchliche Studien: Kaum gesicherte Erkenntnisse, ob Konsum von rotem Fleisch sich negativ auf wichtigsten kardiometabolischen Erkrankungen sowie die Krebsmortalität und -inzidenz auswirkt. Die CO² Bilanz von rotem Fleisch bleibt aber sehr schlecht. https://t.co/bLEx4RmC10
@dshephard That is based on weak, epidemiological evidence. Most rigorous eval. of red/processed meats is here: https://t.co/XukJ0RAqu4 https://t.co/0M0r9x3kMF and a few other papers by same group
@mlknutsen Risk of meat causing cancer is very low, and based on v. low-quality evidence. This is the most rigorous paper on this subject to date. https://t.co/XukJ0RAqu4
#赤肉減#介入で#循環器疾患#がん死亡リスクほぼ低減しない。#メタ分析#文献Zeraatkar D, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2019. Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials. - PubMed https://t.co/mXrFhdR8Og
RT @GrassBased: @tedeytan @ESodicoffMD @ahhite @KenDBerryMD @TuitNutrition @KetoCarnivore @SBakerMD @RadkeAmanda @tednaiman @eatmostlyfatal…
@tedeytan @ESodicoffMD @ahhite @KenDBerryMD @TuitNutrition @KetoCarnivore @SBakerMD @RadkeAmanda @tednaiman @eatmostlyfatali "Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials" https://t.co/uKa23VBniF
赤身の肉の摂取を減らしても心血管疾患やがんの発症は減少しないというシステマティックレビュー。みんな昨日(11/29)はイイ肉食った? Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Random… https://t.co/89XBEtqRXE
RT @efarisx2: EvidenceAlerts | Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of…
EvidenceAlerts | Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials. https://t.co/52odjj8611
RT @ArkansasACP: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Tr…
RT @IllinoisACP: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Tr…
RT @AcpIndiana: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Tri…
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials https://t.co/WtABJbCSEa
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials https://t.co/FZUiAKuR0k
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials https://t.co/P2v5zZzFjD
RT @AnnalsofIM: ICYMI #free Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes https://t.co/D5n4TFrMuQ #r…
RT @the_paper_link: Trend up+1: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and…
Trend up+1: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.__ https://t.co/ZAxsKK7xGu
RT @the_paper_link: Trend up+1: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and…
Trend up+1: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.__ https://t.co/ZAxsKK7xGu
RT @PubTrend: Trending on PubMed: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review…
RT @AnnalsofIM: ICYMI #free Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes https://t.co/D5n4TFrMuQ #r…
ICYMI #free Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes https://t.co/D5n4TFrMuQ #redmeat https://t.co/TphD676cOA
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials PMID- 31569236 . . The above Study is an RCT analysis of 13,000+ article (in every… https://t.co/MEB9JxsdWX
RT @researchphilia:
RT @researchphilia:
RT @researchphilia:
RT @PubTrend: Trending on PubMed: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review…
RT @the_paper_link: Trend up+1: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and…
Trend up+1: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.__ https://t.co/ZAxsKK7xGu
RT @PubTrend: Trending on PubMed: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review…
RT @PubTrend: Trending on PubMed: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review…
Trending on PubMed: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials. https://t.co/3IslnUcyjx
RT @researchphilia:
RT @the_paper_link: Trend up+12: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic an…
Trend up+12: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.__ https://t.co/ZAxsKK7xGu
RT @the_paper_link: Trend up+3: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and…
Trend up+3: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.__ https://t.co/ZAxsKK7xGu
RT @the_paper_link: Trend new: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and…
Trend new: *Zeraatkar D* et al (Ann Intern Med) __Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.__ https://t.co/ZAxsKK7xGu
@Draven974 @eddyfougier Les publications sont ici : https://t.co/LRHBVswwTm https://t.co/ijTPQi7lN8 https://t.co/Eafj0LARqF https://t.co/FeXtVSSCen Dites nous ce qui est faux et contradictoire. Merci.
RT @ECEF: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials -…
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials - https://t.co/Bta1i0Bl88
RT @CancerEpibot: Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized T…
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials. Ann Intern Med #cancer #epidemiology https://t.co/pRQtjTi7gJ
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials (open access) https://t.co/Mwq7CtfXDo #nutrition #diet