Endoscopy January 2020 PMID 31614373

Endocuff vision-assisted vs. standard polyp resection in the colorectum (the EVASTA study): a prospective randomized study.

Guido von Figura, Moritz Hasenöhrl, Bernhard Haller, Alexander Poszler, Jörg Ulrich, Hayley Brown, Mohamed Abdelhafez, Roland M Schmid, Stefan von Delius, Peter Klare

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 10 in Jan 2020

across 3 sources since Dec 2019

Extended reach

69,297

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

185

Mentions per month

Dec 2019 – May 2020

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter14 posts
Facebook2 posts
YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions reflect a keen focus on the practical benefits of the device, such as faster polypectomies, highlighted by phrases like 'reduces the duration' and questions about ease of use. The tone fluctuates between curiosity and skepticism, especially when questioning whether it improves detection rates, illustrating a nuanced engagement with the study’s implications.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the study's findings that Endocuff speeds up procedures, with some skepticism about improvements in clinical outcomes like adenoma detection rate.

InterestHigh interest

Posts show high interest in the practical aspects of colonoscopy, especially regarding procedure duration and device use.

EngagementHigh engagement

Many participants actively discuss personal experiences with Endocuff, question its benefits, and consider procedural details, indicating deep engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions suggest that the findings could influence endoscopic practices and encourage some to adopt or reconsider Endocuff usage, but the overall impact appears moderate.

Abstract in brief

The study found that using the Endocuff Vision device during colonoscopy significantly reduces the time needed to remove colorectal polyps, especially those 6mm or larger, compared to standard colonoscopy without the device.
Endocuff assistance also shortens the time taken to reach the cecum and overall length of the colonoscopy, but does not affect the time spent during withdrawal or the rates of detecting adenomas.
The main benefit of the Endocuff Vision appears to be providing a more stable scope position, which helps make polyp removal faster, though further research is needed to see if it can also improve other procedures like clipping or biopsies.]

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Endocuff Vision Versus Standard Polyp Resection in Colorectal Colonoscopies

This study compares Endocuff Vision-assisted colonoscopy with standard procedures, showing that using Endocuff reduces polyp removal time and improves scope stability, especially for larger polyps, without affecting…

endoscopythieme · Dec 18, 2019 185 views

Gastroenterology Updates

@GastroLatest · X

EVASTA study : Endocuff Vision-Assisted vs. Standard Polyp Resection in Colorectum: A Prospective Randomized Study @endoscopyjrnl Jan, 2020 #Gitwitter https://t.co/hFrlAeTIVL

May 19, 2020 · 1 like · 362 followers View post →

David Arciniegas, MD

@ArciniegasMd · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: “Endocuff vision-assisted vs. standard polyp resection in the colorectum (the EVASTA study): a prospective randomized st…

Jan 20, 2020 · 1 share · 636 followers View post →

Endoscopy Journal

@endoscopyjrnl · X

Jan 20, 2020 · 8 likes · 1 share · 11,570 followers View post →