PubHawk
June 2020 PMID 31797140

3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices.

Joshua L Burnard, William C H Parr, Wen Jie Choy, William R Walsh, Ralph J Mobbs

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

9
Peak: 4 in Jul 2020
across 2 sources since Dec 2019

Extended reach

82,786
potential audience

Total likes

976

Video views

62,870

Mentions per month

Dec 2019 – Feb 2022

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter7 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone suggests cautious optimism, with phrases like 'potential benefits' and 'further research needed' showing balanced reactions. Comments highlight the promising safety profile but also the limitations of current evidence, with some posts referencing correction notices or methodological notes to underscore ongoing research concerns.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the potential benefits of 3D-printed spinal implants, supporting the article's positive outlook on safety and efficacy.

InterestModerate interest

Participants show moderate curiosity, often mentioning the technology's innovative aspects but not deeply exploring detailed implications.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments include brief references to the methodology and critical notes like the need for further research, indicating some level of thoughtful engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

While recognizing that 3D printing could influence surgical practices, discussions remain general, reflecting awareness rather than profound influence.

Abstract in brief

  • Three-dimensional printing (3DP) is a new technology used to create complex surgical devices, particularly in spine surgery, by transforming digital models into physical implants—both patient-specific (PS) and off-the-shelf (OTS).
  • A systematic review of literature found that 22 peer-reviewed articles mainly detailed case reports, highlighting the use of PS titanium implants in complex spinal conditions due to various factors.
  • Although the initial results suggest that 3DP spinal implants are effective and safe, further research is needed due to short follow-up periods and a lack of large-scale studies, emphasizing the need for more standardized patient outcome reporting.
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @EurekaMag: 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and o…

Jul 17, 2020 · 3 shares · 6,712 followers View post →
EurekaMag
@EurekaMag · X

3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices https://t.co/aQAqY6OxFr

Jul 17, 2020 · 3 shares · 6,518 followers View post →
POPLINE
@POPLINE_org · X

RT @EurekaMag: 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and o…

Jul 17, 2020 · 3 shares · 5,257 followers View post →
Science Alerts
@Science_Alerts · X

RT @EurekaMag: 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and o…

Jul 17, 2020 · 3 shares · 1,241 followers View post →
monchiropracteur.com
@chiropracteur1 · X

https://t.co/zaPn5rAcYI 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices: Abstract Purpose Three-dimensional printing (3DP), or additive manufacturing, is an… https://t.co/JwjMRGnoqk

Jun 3, 2020 · 55 followers View post →
monchiropracteur.com
@chiropracteur1 · X

https://t.co/zaPn5rAcYI 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices: Abstract Purpose Three-dimensional printing (3DP), or additive manufacturing, is an… https://t.co/KsgFFDV4Hx

Dec 4, 2019 · 55 followers View post →

All mentions

SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @EurekaMag: 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and o…

Jul 17, 2020 · 3 shares · 6,712 followers View post →
Science Alerts
@Science_Alerts · X

RT @EurekaMag: 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and o…

Jul 17, 2020 · 3 shares · 1,241 followers View post →
POPLINE
@POPLINE_org · X

RT @EurekaMag: 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and o…

Jul 17, 2020 · 3 shares · 5,257 followers View post →
EurekaMag
@EurekaMag · X

3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices https://t.co/aQAqY6OxFr

Jul 17, 2020 · 3 shares · 6,518 followers View post →
monchiropracteur.com
@chiropracteur1 · X

https://t.co/zaPn5rAcYI 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices: Abstract Purpose Three-dimensional printing (3DP), or additive manufacturing, is an… https://t.co/JwjMRGnoqk

Jun 3, 2020 · 55 followers View post →
monchiropracteur.com
@chiropracteur1 · X

https://t.co/zaPn5rAcYI Correction to: 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices: Unfortunately, 3rd author’s first name was incorrectly published in… https://t.co/AnlkOokkVZ

May 26, 2020 · 55 followers View post →
monchiropracteur.com
@chiropracteur1 · X

https://t.co/zaPn5rAcYI 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices: Abstract Purpose Three-dimensional printing (3DP), or additive manufacturing, is an… https://t.co/KsgFFDV4Hx

Dec 4, 2019 · 55 followers View post →