Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions center on how the Nobel Prize in Chemistry has expanded to include life sciences, with comments highlighting concerns about transparency and the distinction between traditional chemistry and biochemistry. The tone varies from supportive acknowledgment to critical commentary, with some posts referencing analyses and suggesting the need for more nuanced awards. Words like 'mutated,' 'opaque,' and 'disheartened' reflect mixed feelings about the changes, indicating a moderate level of engagement and interest among the participants.
Most discussions acknowledge the article's points about the evolution of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, but some express disagreement with specific conclusions or emphasize the need for further nuance.
The discussions demonstrate moderate curiosity about the topic, especially regarding the implications of including life sciences, but many just acknowledge the subject without deep engagement.
Participants reference related articles, analyze the shifts in the Nobel Prize, and suggest corrections, showing active involvement but not deep debate.
While the topic draws attention and raises awareness about scientific recognition, the overall influence on policy or broad scientific community perceptions remains limited.
The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Transparent and Opaque Evidence of Change within the Nobel Prize Program (Restrepo) https://t.co/kFt3hvguVf https://t.co/xU5a75rKJ7
A new paper argues that the #ChemNobel has mutated into a prize for chemistry or life sciences. Jeffrey Seeman and Guillermo Restrepo propose adding 2 new Nobel Memorial prizes to correct that shift: https://t.co/XrSqpkFISm
Evolution of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry https://t.co/RaPYVEWr1l Jeff Seeman and Guillermo Restrepo have analyzed this in detail. How related are chemistry and biochemistry today? @NobelPrize @GDCh_aktuell
We congratulate Guillermo Restrepo @restrepog @mpiMathSci on being awarded the Gmelin-Beilstein Memorial Medal in 2020 @GDCh_aktuell Check out his Essay w/us on the Nobel Prize: https://t.co/m0Mre9i6d1 His @ChemEurJ Essay on the periodic table: https://t.co/iRUYaDNp6W https://t.co/2v2qVvK92z
An interesting piece on: The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades of Transparent and Opaque Evidence of Change within the Nobel Prize Program https://t.co/fT8IBFDHFS
The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades of Transparent and Opaque Evidence of Change within the Nobel Prize Program https://t.co/q4moucuBHQ
In the 1960s NASAs engineers were building the Apollo spacecraft but they ran into a major problem that almost prevented them from getting to the moon. To solve it, they brought in some unexpected help: expert weavers…
In the 1960s, NASA engineers faced a major problem that nearly prevented the Apollo Moon landing. They sought help from unexpected specialists, including those working with central memory rope technology used in the…
https://t.co/dt73omh5Qj
Descubra como eles desenrolaram esse problemão no nosso novo vídeo! #MinutodaTerra https://t.co/Tw67vT9wWV
RT @WilliamLim18202: https://t.co/WxrPfzKhom
https://t.co/WxrPfzKhom
youtu.be/prYQlxH6ypA?...
RT @MinuteEarth: Weaving = Coding !?! For the Apollo Guidance computer that took America to the moon, those two are pretty much the same.…
How 2000 Weavers Got Us To The Moon https://t.co/prVkhaOkW8 via @YouTube
Weaving = Coding !?! For the Apollo Guidance computer that took America to the moon, those two are pretty much the same. Watch our video to see how unusual collaborations led to breakthrough discoveries: https://t.co/mbgBIYroTk https://t.co/EjH2NYJ9Cp
Weaving = Coding !?! For the Apollo Guidance computer that took America to the moon, those two are pretty much the same. Watch our video to see how unusual collaborations led to breakthrough discoveries: youtu.be/prYQlxH6ypA?...
@giudicialex https://t.co/uwTnxyTNdU
@TomLevenson I believe some of this analysis for chemistry is in my friend Jeff Seeman’s excellent article https://t.co/wjHlRpWc37
RT @thfwong: My only complaint is they are not able to acknowledge fundamental chemistry in the Nobel prize in Chemistry (again). For more…
My only complaint is they are not able to acknowledge fundamental chemistry in the Nobel prize in Chemistry (again). For more in-depth reading: https://t.co/IbZwt3ZCy5
بل ان مجلة @angew_chem نشرت مقالا تدعو فيه صراحة الى تعديل عنوان الجائزة من"جائزة نوبل في الكيمياء" إلى "جائزة نوبل في الكيمياء أو علوم الحياة" لتكون الجائزة على المستوى الذي يناسبها من الشفافية https://t.co/GzeTtDakbc
RT @angew_chem: We congratulate Guillermo Restrepo @restrepog @mpiMathSci on being awarded the Gmelin-Beilstein Memorial Medal in 2020 @GDC…
We congratulate Guillermo Restrepo @restrepog @mpiMathSci on being awarded the Gmelin-Beilstein Memorial Medal in 2020 @GDCh_aktuell Check out his Essay w/us on the Nobel Prize: https://t.co/m0Mre9i6d1 His @ChemEurJ Essay on the periodic table: https://t.co/iRUYaDNp6W https://t.co/2v2qVvK92z
RT @Dr_Berionni: The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades of Tr…
RT @Dr_Berionni: The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades of Tr…
The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades of Transparent and Opaque Evidence of Change within the Nobel Prize Program https://t.co/9xJ8W5L2Eh https://t.co/7IqFq12sig
RT @angew_chem: The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Tra…
RT @angew_chem: The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Tra…
RT @angew_chem: The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Tra…
RT @angew_chem: The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Tra…
RT @angew_chem: The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Tra…
RT @angew_chem: The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Tra…
RT @angew_chem: The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Tra…
RT @angew_chem: The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Tra…
RT @angew_chem: The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Tra…
RT @angew_chem: The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Tra…
The Mutation of the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry" into the "Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences": Several Decades of Transparent and Opaque Evidence of Change within the Nobel Prize Program (Restrepo) https://t.co/kFt3hvguVf https://t.co/xU5a75rKJ7
The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades of Transparent and Opaque Evidence of Change within the Nobel Prize Program https://t.co/6raJjmiGPb
The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades of Transparent and Opaque Evidence of Change within the Nobel Prize Program https://t.co/TDKeqCIj0r
RT @Vougioukalakis: The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades o…
The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades of Transparent and Opaque Evidence of Change within the Nobel Prize Program https://t.co/q4moucuBHQ
The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades of Transparent and Opaque Evidence of Change within the Nobel Prize Program https://t.co/nOq1kQutnv not completely agreed though !!
RT @SamLemonick: @angew_chem @cenmag @BiochemistryACS @webofscience @stuartcantrill @NobelPrize @sirfrasersays The paper is here with more…
@angew_chem @cenmag @BiochemistryACS @webofscience @stuartcantrill @NobelPrize @sirfrasersays The paper is here with more nuance than I could reflect in this thread or my article. You should read it: https://t.co/XrSqpkFISm (11/11)
An interesting piece on: The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry or Life Sciences”: Several Decades of Transparent and Opaque Evidence of Change within the Nobel Prize Program https://t.co/fT8IBFDHFS
Interesting read. I’m always a little disheartened when the prize goes to a Life Science advance. Advances in the central science can be too easily overlooked. https://t.co/MdOep6zYua
RT @angew_chem: Evolution of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry https://t.co/RaPYVEWr1l Jeff Seeman and Guillermo Restrepo have analyzed this in…
RT @angew_chem: Evolution of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry https://t.co/RaPYVEWr1l Jeff Seeman and Guillermo Restrepo have analyzed this in…
Evolution of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry https://t.co/RaPYVEWr1l Jeff Seeman and Guillermo Restrepo have analyzed this in detail. How related are chemistry and biochemistry today? @NobelPrize @GDCh_aktuell
No caption neded. https://t.co/UFm4IfNSx8
RT @SamLemonick: A new paper argues that the #ChemNobel has mutated into a prize for chemistry or life sciences. Jeffrey Seeman and Guiller…
RT @SamLemonick: A new paper argues that the #ChemNobel has mutated into a prize for chemistry or life sciences. Jeffrey Seeman and Guiller…
A recent paper, where we quantify the Bio bias in the Nobel Prize in chemistry, published in Angewadte Chemie. (Un artículo reciente en Angewandte Chemie en el que cuantificamos el sesgo biológico en el premio Nobel de química) https://t.co/JSsVxEyesH
A new paper argues that the #ChemNobel has mutated into a prize for chemistry or life sciences. Jeffrey Seeman and Guillermo Restrepo propose adding 2 new Nobel Memorial prizes to correct that shift: https://t.co/XrSqpkFISm
... 10.1002/anie.201906266). استخدم جيفري سيمان من جامعة ريتشموند و غيليرمو ريستريبو من معهد ماكس بلانك للرياضيات في العلوم في الدراسة الجديدة التي أجروها تحليل ...
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201906266 · Crossref. Jeffrey I. Seeman,; Guillermo Restrepo,. The Mutation of the “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” into the “Nobel Prize ...
, 2019, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201906266 · Philip BallPhilip Ball is a freelance science writer based in London, UKView full profile ...
2019, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201906266）。 在这项新研究中，里士满大学的Jeffrey I. Seeman和马克斯·普朗克数学科学学院的Guillermo Restrepo利用文献 ...
2019, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201906266). En este nuevo estudio, Jeffrey I. Seeman de la Universidad de Richmond y Guillermo Restrepo del ...
2019, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201906266). استخدم جيفري سيمان من جامعة ريتشموند و غيليرمو ريستريبو من معهد ماكس بلانك للرياضيات في العلوم في الدراسة ...
2019, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201906266). In the new study, Jeffrey I. Seeman of the University of Richmond and Guillermo Restrepo of the Max ...
AC
SL
IF
GV
CM
AJ
GR
TW
ك
MS
MS
LM
T
GN
AG
AS
G
MD
JG
SV
JB
DP
CL
SM
AM
ΌΕ
SM
FS
DB
WL
EA
AB
MH
FA