Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many discussions highlight critical insights from the article, emphasizing that the randomized controlled trial was halted due to severe safety concerns, with phrases like 'had to be stopped for safety reasons' and '3 out of 10 patients experienced severe hemorrhage' underscoring the risks involved. The tone is often critical of the concept of abortion pill reversal, labeling it as 'junk science' and calling for evidence-based practices, which contributes to a strong collective sentiment of caution and advocacy for patient safety.
The majority of discussions reflect a strong consensus that the publication raises critical concerns about the safety and efficacy of abortion pill reversal, with many expressing agreement with its conclusions.
Posts indicate a high level of curiosity about the study and its implications for public health and medical practice.
Participants demonstrate deep engagement by discussing the methods, outcomes, and ethical implications of the study, often referencing specific findings and critiques.
There is a widespread belief that the publication will have significant repercussions on how medical abortion practices are understood and legislated.
Here's the study: https://t.co/iTLlUcTUTV 10 patients. 5 had current treatment (expectant management, not taking misoprostol); 5 had abortion pill reversal (taking progesterone instead of misoprostol). They cancelled it after 10 patients because 3 patients had haemorrhages.
Ende Feb. hatte @ZDF #DieSpur schwere Vorwürfe gegen Abtreibungsgegner erhoben, auf die @BVLebensrecht bereits mit einem 1. Faktencheck geantwortet hat. Hier nun der 2. Teil über das Medikament & die ärztliche Beratung. #Abtreibung https://t.co/27bbyx1d9Z
@AliceKing69 @strictlyRhythm_ @MaryTracy1101 @annavrmac @dangerpronedap3 @Janemarch888 @EHgreenthumb @vollebergh @to_discussion @veaton @PaulDeRego @Prolife4babies @wicked_wiccan76 In addition, Creinin et al: https://t.co/7sudTqEIG6
@shutup_m3g @KristanHawkins The only person who TESTED IT. Delgado never did clinical trials. Clearly you do not understand how this works. https://t.co/iitIn3qxR5 Randomized clinical trials by Dr Mitchell Creinin had to be stopped because it was too dangerous. https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk https://t.co/O5dRzFiY6S
Abortion Reversal is JUNK SCIENCE, it is not real. It is NOT FDA approved. One study does not effectiveness make as Dr Mitchell Creinin attempted randomized controlled clinical trials and had to stop them. No other trials have been done. https://t.co/knG0oOkH0S https://t.co/HLevMgddGZ https://t.co/ckkAPZp1fy
@StudentsforLife Abortion reversal IS NOT A THING. Dr Mitchell Creinin, the only person to actually study this, had to stop the trials because of dangerous affects. https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk https://t.co/5EpVeC0dhg
The video uncovers the controversy surrounding the clandestine handover of a dangerous medication to a supposed pregnant woman. We clarify the facts about abortion reversal and explore its implications based on recent…
Colorado's legislature is advancing three pro-abortion bills, notably SB23190, which could penalize pregnancy centers for advertising services to support women in crisis. This video features testimony regarding these…
Society member Melissa Chen, MD, MPH testified before a MT Senate Committee on the disinformation behind so-called medication abortion "reversal." Dr. Chen has co-authored the only credible study on this practice. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31809439/
https://t.co/eh5DXX4XI2
@Clairetassie @IsabelVSpruce https://t.co/b4sYiDyyfR
RT @RTB_FRana: Can the effects of abortion pills be reversed? I discussed this question on a past episdoe of Stars, Cells, and God with Chr…
Can the effects of abortion pills be reversed? I discussed this question on a past episdoe of Stars, Cells, and God with Chris. https://t.co/Ff2IHgOpfm
@c81443108 @TDarkDandelion @March_for_Life Facts do make me feel better, unlike you, I only deal with facts. Not only is abortion pill reversal a lie, it’s dangerous. https://t.co/iWpVa45r8X
@jimbojimbo @DrCalumMiller https://t.co/SPRuWe5Szu
RT @FlorianHettig: @CiaraTadic @ulrich_srh Und hier ist der Faktencheck
@CiaraTadic @ulrich_srh Und hier ist der Faktencheck
RT @FlorianHettig: @ReulaStine @EKD @ekir_de @ekhn_de @ekbo_de @elkwue @ekvw_online @EvInLippe @SabineHatscher @ekiba @kirchehannovers @EKM…
Dann seid ihr beide doch bestimmt bereit, euch das GANZE Bild anzusehen - nicht nur die #Abtreibung's-Propaganda. Hier ist der Faktencheck über die #ZDF-Doku + Journalistinnen: https://t.co/vQN9Gchtcx Und hier Teil 2 über das Medikament + die Ärzte: https://t.co/27bbyx1d9Z https://t.co/Aze5zraL4Z
@ReulaStine @EKD @ekir_de @ekhn_de @ekbo_de @elkwue @ekvw_online @EvInLippe @SabineHatscher @ekiba @kirchehannovers @EKM_online @elkb @VELKD_Presse @chrismon_de @epd_news @sonntagsblatt @zeitzeichenNET @ethikrat Dann seid ihr beide doch bestimmt bereit, euch das GANZE Bild anzusehen - nicht nur die #Abtreibung's-Propaganda. Hier ist der Faktencheck über die #ZDF-Doku + Journalistinnen: https://t.co/vQN9Gchtcx Und hier Teil 2 über das Medikament + die Ärzte: https://t.co/27bbyx1d9Z
RT @BVLebensrecht: Und hier der zweite Teil der Entlarvung einer öffentlich-rechtlichen #Propaganda gegen unsere Arbeit/unsere Mitarbeiteri…
RT @FlorianHettig: Ende Feb. hatte @ZDF #DieSpur schwere Vorwürfe gegen Abtreibungsgegner erhoben, auf die @BVLebensrecht bereits mit einem…
RT @FlorianHettig: Ende Feb. hatte @ZDF #DieSpur schwere Vorwürfe gegen Abtreibungsgegner erhoben, auf die @BVLebensrecht bereits mit einem…
RT @FlorianHettig: Ende Feb. hatte @ZDF #DieSpur schwere Vorwürfe gegen Abtreibungsgegner erhoben, auf die @BVLebensrecht bereits mit einem…
Ende Feb. hatte @ZDF #DieSpur schwere Vorwürfe gegen Abtreibungsgegner erhoben, auf die @BVLebensrecht bereits mit einem 1. Faktencheck geantwortet hat. Hier nun der 2. Teil über das Medikament & die ärztliche Beratung. #Abtreibung https://t.co/27bbyx1d9Z
Und hier der zweite Teil der Entlarvung einer öffentlich-rechtlichen #Propaganda gegen unsere Arbeit/unsere Mitarbeiterinnen. @ulrich_srh und @ZDF blamieren sich erneut durch mangelnde Recherche, Falschaussagen, eigene Widersprüche in der Sendung selbst. https://t.co/xK4CmkGCmQ.
The Dr Creinin was LITERALLY STOPPED for SAFETY REASONS https://t.co/knG0oOkH0S Right there. And Calum just said I can't read. You all can read this conclusion right? "Due to safety concerns..." This is called gaslighting by a doctor. @ProTruth4Life https://t.co/n86aVB8rOm https://t.co/1ADSzv6FfJ
https://t.co/knG0oOkH0S And trying to say see, see, it's safe, while gaslighting you all. Amazing isn't it.
@secularprolife @DrCalumMiller Lmao you are talking about the study that was STOPPED for SAFETY REASONS AND ISSUES. https://t.co/knG0oOkH0S Please do explain the current APR treatment of a study that specifically stated it was STOPPED for SAFETY REASONS. Go ahead. The clinical trial is incomplete. https://t.co/rVpiwn8urK
I found this study -how they decided if there was life in the womb in order to be in the study and the reason they stopped the study very interesting + horrible of course since the drs clearly knew that they were terminating a life- https://t.co/b1V13UL9LW
See the Financial Disclosure on the 1st page: @mcreinin "Mitchell D. Creinin is a consultant for Danco Laboratories, providing medical consultation for clinicians that contact Danco with questions regarding mifepristone." https://t.co/g6eBmxw2DE
@secularprolife What's tripping you up You mean this study. The fact that "abortion reversal" was not proven and that was the point of the study and would you like to see the over 100 studies showing the safety of abortion medication. Enough with the BS. https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk
RT @LyssAnthrope: @DrCalumMiller RCT is the gold standard for proving safety. The abortion reversal RCT I know of ended early due to safet…
To this day, that I know of, there have been 2 published studies, based on actual testing research that has not been successful, &/or not done in humans. 1) Dr Mitchell Creinin's randomized clinical trials. https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk 2) a study done in rats. https://t.co/fWW1wUhB4P https://t.co/PjmIYV7vx2
@DrCalumMiller RCT is the gold standard for proving safety. The abortion reversal RCT I know of ended early due to safety concerns associated with not completing the medication abortion protocol. That was 4 years ago. https://t.co/szJxmvOKjI If AR is safe, why not conduct an RCT and prove it?
Abortion Reversal is JUNK SCIENCE, it is not real. It is NOT FDA approved. One study does not effectiveness make as Dr Mitchell Creinin attempted randomized controlled clinical trials and had to stop them. No other trials have been done. https://t.co/knG0oOkH0S https://t.co/HLevMgddGZ https://t.co/ckkAPZp1fy
@theladykatie @DrJenGunter https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk The study. It could not be completed.
@asgari_anne @Deeneeday @mandalynns23 @LeahNTorres Research have found it presenting no added risk and 68% effective. Viz. https://t.co/4qQ8MhyZDp The pro-abortionists currently have their court battles to block it. Proof that "pro-choice" is a fake cover.
@sbaprolife @RepAndyHarrisMD Now, can some1 provide the randomized controlled clinical trials for "ABORTION PILL REVERSAL". Oh look here we go, wait what it failed? https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk That's odd b/c according to Heartbeat Int/Abortion Pill Rescue it's been approved by the FDA. https://t.co/eMEAyA92kW https://t.co/r57YyhVJ3W
RT @9_tellthetruth: @KristanHawkins Dr Mitchell Creinin attempted to perform randomized clinical trials on abortion reversal, as it had nev…
RT @9_tellthetruth: @KristanHawkins Dr Mitchell Creinin attempted to perform randomized clinical trials on abortion reversal, as it had nev…
@KristanHawkins Dr Mitchell Creinin attempted to perform randomized clinical trials on abortion reversal, as it had never been done before. It failed. https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk Backstory:https://t.co/iitIn3qxR5 Aftermath:https://t.co/ygoM2iAMO3 THIS IS SCIENCE. BUT there's more. https://t.co/AFZ1tusryA
@shanoawarrior @virtuosamujer31 Again you're wrong. 2500 babies and moms have been saved. The abortion pill causes hemmorage and an increase of er visits by 500%. APReversal saves women from complications https://t.co/IZDSa20ydc https://t.co/BSppd6Bb2d https://t.co/msaCjRp8Lq https://t.co/nm8l7cfNWO https://t.co/NG2Ss1pbQx
RT @DrCalumMiller: Here's the study: https://t.co/iTLlUcTUTV 10 patients. 5 had current treatment (expectant management, not taking misopr…
Here's the study: https://t.co/iTLlUcTUTV 10 patients. 5 had current treatment (expectant management, not taking misoprostol); 5 had abortion pill reversal (taking progesterone instead of misoprostol). They cancelled it after 10 patients because 3 patients had haemorrhages.
@StudentsforLife At NO TIME in the history of the FDA has abortion reversal pill EVER been approved by the FDA. NONE, ZIP, ZERO, ZILCH. Abortion reversal FAILED during actual randomized controlled clinical trials. https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk https://t.co/6i8w2pgLyG
@KristanHawkins https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk The only randomized controlled clinical trial attempted on this BS "abortion reversal" garbage. IT FAILED, but Kristan Hawkins don't want you to know that, and of course that kind of severe bleeding is all right. https://t.co/7mPyQtkVr3
RT @RTB_FRana: A lot of discussion about mifepristone... Regardless of your view on abortion you need to watch these 2 episodes of Stars, C…
Abortion Pill Reversal https://t.co/dBkOttTa0U
A lot of discussion about mifepristone... Regardless of your view on abortion you need to watch these 2 episodes of Stars, Cells, & God with Chris Cirucci, an OB/GYN Are Chemical Abortions Safe? https://t.co/JBONqPeoCq Abortion Pill Reversal https://t.co/dBkOttTa0U
RT @RTB_official: Discover the wonders of God's creation with our latest episode of Stars, Cells, and God!
Discover the wonders of God's creation with our latest episode of Stars, Cells, and God!
@DermotKearney3 @secularprolife The lie is the fact this was tested in a randomized controlled clinical trial, THE ONLY TIME it was ever done, as Dr Delgado DID NOT ever do this, and it should have been done. The clinical trials had to be stopped due to safety reasons. https://t.co/knG0oOkH0S https://t.co/ona0mvnJxW
@KristanHawkins THIS LIE which causes severe medical harm towards women/people. https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk The ONLY time this idea was put to a randomized controlled clinical trial, it had to be stopped due to safety issues. Yet you all are going after abortion medication that HAS BEEN TESTED. https://t.co/kgxCCsq2IY
@Beffernusse @Maestra_Momma @julianne_wiley @QuiddityJones @cbrentboles1 @emily_frank @MurderCityPodCC @ProLifeMidwife @PainfulGains @TStewPrincess14 @Sassenach_85 @tree__duh It's all there in the paper if you care to read it in full. https://t.co/Dh7tb8lpSv By the way, it wasn't actually a controlled trial as no attempt was made to allow for a wide range of variable factors among participants.
Yes "abortion reversal" was tested by Dr Mitchell Creinin. It failed. He conducted randomized clinical trials, as one should with medication treatments. Delgado never did. https://t.co/iitIn3qxR5 https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk https://t.co/ygoM2iAMO3 https://t.co/tnRCnuW3u7
@shutup_m3g @KristanHawkins The only person who TESTED IT. Delgado never did clinical trials. Clearly you do not understand how this works. https://t.co/iitIn3qxR5 Randomized clinical trials by Dr Mitchell Creinin had to be stopped because it was too dangerous. https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk https://t.co/O5dRzFiY6S
I want to encourage potential Moms out there who may see this that this study does *not* disprove the effectiveness of Abortion Pill Reversal. If anything, it shows an 80% effective rate of APR and that more research *is* needed. https://t.co/ffrmpBJi3r
@melissaarantxa Good question. Ppl have tried giving high doses of progestin to reverse medication abortion, but research, such as this study has shown that it is dangerous and not effective. https://t.co/TcDv3PABhz
RT @DermotKearney3: @AliceKing69 @strictlyRhythm_ @MaryTracy1101 @annavrmac @dangerpronedap3 @Janemarch888 @EHgreenthumb @vollebergh @to_di…
@AliceKing69 @strictlyRhythm_ @MaryTracy1101 @annavrmac @dangerpronedap3 @Janemarch888 @EHgreenthumb @vollebergh @to_discussion @veaton @PaulDeRego @Prolife4babies @wicked_wiccan76 In addition, Creinin et al: https://t.co/7sudTqEIG6
@StudentsforLife You argue abortion reversal IS real and safe, when it absolutely IS NOT, but demand the FDA make abortion medication be marked as unsafe, when it is very much safe. https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk https://t.co/X1HrXt8ZWO https://t.co/KXye5GfDxq
RT @9_tellthetruth: @StudentsforLife Abortion reversal IS NOT A THING. Dr Mitchell Creinin, the only person to actually study this, had to…
@StudentsforLife True science? You all call for true science when you peddle the abortion reversal process. Really? https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk The same process that FAILED. Yeah that's b/c we KNOW this is you calling all forms of medical birth control "abortifacients" so you can get it banned. https://t.co/xXz0OKdUfq
@StudentsforLife First off, you outright LIE about abortion reversal when Dr Mitchell Creinin actually being the only person to put this whole BS idea to the test. It failed. https://t.co/knG0oOkH0S You claim abortion Rx is harmful, despite trials showing otherwise, while you support this. https://t.co/abjnB86dwN
@StudentsforLife Abortion reversal IS NOT A THING. Dr Mitchell Creinin, the only person to actually study this, had to stop the trials because of dangerous affects. https://t.co/knG0oOk9bk https://t.co/5EpVeC0dhg
@DermotKearney3 @stillin_beta @korauth314 In randomized clinical trials (intended to see if this could be introduced as medicine), 3 out of 10 patients experienced severe hemorrhage, requiring study to be stopped prematurely for safety reasons. You'd know this paper if you were a (ethical) doctor. https://t.co/H7yjtLzsL5
The only randomised trial attempting to test whether high dose progesterone can interfere with the actions of mifepristone had to be stopped early because of a higher than expected rate of haemorrhage in participants... https://t.co/qWu9D8QjRc
@Megan20920725 @Pro_life_NRCHY @AlisonHowardC @LiveAction My question to you is, have you read the journal article that all these news sources are talking about? It's this: Creinin M, et. al, Mifepristone Antagonization With Progesterone to Prevent Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obs. Gyn. (2020) 135 (1): 158- 165
RT @greenjrnl: Mifepristone Antagonization With Progesterone to Prevent Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Mifepristone inges…
RT @greenjrnl: Mifepristone Antagonization With Progesterone to Prevent Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Mifepristone inges…
Mifepristone Antagonization With Progesterone to Prevent Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Mifepristone ingestion without subsequent misoprostol administration in first-trimester gestations can result in hemorrhage and poses safety concerns. https://t.co/90mgEfR49h https://t.co/7YgKIKRf7u