Hum Brain Mapp April 2020 PMID 31860160

Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.

Asif Jamil, Giorgi Batsikadze, Hsiao-I Kuo, Raf L J Meesen, Peter Dechent, Walter Paulus, Michael A Nitsche

Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 2 in May 2020

across 3 sources since May 2020

Extended reach

146,195

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

602

Mentions per month

May 2020 – Nov 2022

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter3 posts
YouTube2 videos
Facebook2 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall discussions mainly focus on announcing the publication and its open access status, such as referencing the article being published and available through Human Brain Mapping and #projektDEAL. The tone remains neutral and informative, reflecting cursory acknowledgment rather than detailed engagement or critique of the research findings.

AgreementNeither agree nor disagree

All discussions acknowledge the publication as an open access article, but there is no expressed disagreement or critique of its findings.

InterestNeutral interest

Since the posts primarily mention the article's availability and publication details without diving into the content, interest remains neutral.

EngagementModerate engagement

Although minimal, the mentions of the article being available and its inclusion in a project suggest some recognition and surface-level engagement, but not deep analysis.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions signal some recognition of the article’s relevance within the scientific community, especially with references to open access and publication platforms, but no indication of its influence beyond awareness.

Abstract in brief

The study examined how different intensities and polarities of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affect brain activity, specifically looking at how blood flow in the brain (measured with MRI) changes and how this relates to brain excitability measured with TMS.
Results showed that anodal tDCS increased blood flow in the targeted motor area, especially at higher intensities (like 20mA), while cathodal tDCS decreased blood flow, with effects lasting up to 120 minutes after stimulation.
The changes in blood flow and brain excitability were related and depended on the dose and polarity of the stimulation, indicating that tDCS can cause lasting, intensity-dependent changes in brain activity that are measurable with imaging techniques.]

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Dose-Response Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Brain Activity

This webinar discusses how different intensities and polarities of tDCS influence brain blood flow and excitability, with effects lasting up to 120 minutes. It highlights the dose-dependent changes measurable with fMRI…

International Network of Neuroimaging Neuromod · Nov 22, 2022 404 views

Dose-Response Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Human Brain Function

This webinar discusses how different intensities and polarities of tDCS influence brain activity, blood flow, and neurophysiological outcomes, highlighting the importance of individual factors and stimulation parameters.

International Network of Neuroimaging Neuromod · Nov 22, 2022 198 views

SilverLine Research

@Silverline_R · X

Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study https://t.co/JqLVEQXfwr

Jan 21, 2022 · 46 followers View post →

Sistemas Sociales

@sozialesysteme · X

RT @wileyneurosci: The #openaccess article: Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current…

May 21, 2020 · 1 share · 4,612 followers View post →

Wiley Neuro

@WileyNeuro · X

May 21, 2020 · 3 likes · 1 share · 140,932 followers View post →