@J_sArt06 @wzjbyg See eLetters (2) : https://t.co/4SIxpAdAQh
Growing up : Osteohistology refutes the pygmy "" and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile .
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2020 – Jul 2025Where it's discussed
-
News276 articles
-
Blogs16 articles
-
X / Twitter11 posts
-
Facebook8 posts
-
Reddit3 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions reflect a strong consensus supporting the research's refutation of Nanotyrannus as a separate species, with comments emphasizing its role in understanding growth and ecological niches. The tone conveys excitement and intellectual engagement, often referencing scientific studies and using phrases like 'supports ontogenetic niche partitioning' and 'refutes the pygmy hypothesis,' illustrating both deep interest and perceived significant impact.
Most discussions strongly support the findings, frequently mentioning that the research refutes the idea of a smaller pygmy species and highlights T. rex's growth patterns.
The discussions show high interest, with users engaging in taxonomic debates and highlighting the significance of the research in understanding dinosaur development.
Many comments analyze the implications of the findings, referencing specific studies and debating the presence of Nanotyrannus, showing moderate to deep engagement.
Participants believe the article has a high impact, emphasizing its importance for understanding dinosaur ecology and taxonomy, which could influence future research directions.
Abstract in brief
- Osteohistology studies of juvenile T. rex bones show that these specimens were about 13 to 15 years old, growing at rates similar to modern birds and mammals, with growth influenced by resource availability.
- The findings support the idea that T. rex individuals grow rapidly and undergo a size shift during development, which helps them occupy different ecological niches as they mature, rather than existing as smaller closely related species.
- The study refutes the hypothesis of a smaller, coexisting tyrannosaurid species, emphasizing that T. rex alone exploited a range of mid to large-sized theropod niches toward the end of the Cretaceous period.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky#DINOPALEOch ジェーンを"ナノティランヌス"に分類する研究もありますが(Larson 2013 https://t.co/dYrlWO0c4p, https://t.co/N7FtJcJKJ5)、現在ではT. rexの若い個体(亜成体)とする研究が多いです(e.g. Woodward et al. 2020 https://t.co/MJDtx9rIfj)。 https://t.co/arVugEEx2A
Taxonomic debate on Tyrannosaurus rex. Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus”... Woodward et al 2020. @histo_holly #FossilFriday #dinosaur #dinosaurs #paleontology #palaeontology #Nanotyrannus #Tyrannosaurusrex https://t.co/LoeCkNv0qO
RT @Hiro_DinoPaleo: #DINOPALEOch ジェーンを"ナノティランヌス"に分類する研究もありますが(Larson 2013 https://t.co/dYrlWO0c4p, https://t.co/N7FtJcJKJ5)、現在ではT. rexの若い個体…
RT @geocappiello:
All mentions
Nanotyrannus Controversy: Juvenile T rex or Separate Species?
The debate about Nanotyrannus lancensis is one of the most fascinating discussions in paleontology. Recent osteohistology studies of juvenile T. rex bones reveal rapid growth rates and ecological niche changes…
Understanding Teropod Dinosaurs and Their Evolutionary Significance
This episode explores the evolution and diversity of theropod dinosaurs, including the origins of birds. Paleontologist Rafael Delcourt discusses how these creatures adapted to their environments and their ecological…
@J_sArt06 @wzjbyg See eLetters (2) : https://t.co/4SIxpAdAQh
RT @jgilchrist13: Taxonomic debate on Tyrannosaurus rex. Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus”... W…
Taxonomic debate on Tyrannosaurus rex. Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus”... Woodward et al 2020. @histo_holly #FossilFriday #dinosaur #dinosaurs #paleontology #palaeontology #Nanotyrannus #Tyrannosaurusrex https://t.co/LoeCkNv0qO
一個忘れてた。 こっちの論文だとジェーンは13歳、ピーティーは15歳となってますね。(この論文は同属主張) https://t.co/KPS5gnSghQ
RT @Hiro_DinoPaleo: #DINOPALEOch ジェーンを"ナノティランヌス"に分類する研究もありますが(Larson 2013 https://t.co/dYrlWO0c4p, https://t.co/N7FtJcJKJ5)、現在ではT. rexの若い個体…
RT @Hiro_DinoPaleo: #DINOPALEOch ジェーンを"ナノティランヌス"に分類する研究もありますが(Larson 2013 https://t.co/dYrlWO0c4p, https://t.co/N7FtJcJKJ5)、現在ではT. rexの若い個体…
#DINOPALEOch ジェーンを"ナノティランヌス"に分類する研究もありますが(Larson 2013 https://t.co/dYrlWO0c4p, https://t.co/N7FtJcJKJ5)、現在ではT. rexの若い個体(亜成体)とする研究が多いです(e.g. Woodward et al. 2020 https://t.co/MJDtx9rIfj)。 https://t.co/arVugEEx2A
@mkbendtsen @NatSci_AU It is most likely a #Nanotyrannus, yes. Maybe a sign that it is, in fact, a real species and not just a juvenile #TyrannosaurusRex
RT @geocappiello:
Growing up Tyrannosaurus rex: Osteohistology refutes the pygmy “Nanotyrannus” and supports ontogenetic niche partitioning in juvenile Tyrannosaurus | Science Advances https://t.co/iXpPqBtCbE https://t.co/R9I6n08F2M