Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions include references to the industry's influence on dietary recommendations, such as comments on 'organized efforts by influential plant-based diet advocates' to control narratives (@GeorgiaEdeMD) and critiques of how traditional scientific findings are questioned based on funding biases (@bigfatsurprise). The tone is often confrontational, using terms like 'mafia tactics' and calling out 'shady corporate ties,' which reflects the heightened emotion and urgency surrounding this topic.
Many posts indicate a shared skepticism regarding the objectivity of dietary recommendations, reflecting a moderate level of agreement with the article's premise.
Users express high interest in the ongoing debate about meat consumption and corporate influences on nutritional science.
Multiple users engage deeply with the topic by referencing specific studies and articulate complex arguments about conflicts of interest in nutrition research.
The discussions highlight a belief that the article has significant implications for public understanding and policy regarding dietary guidelines.
JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical tactics to quash meta-studies exonerating red meat. I now question some of the claims in this @JAMA_current article. Thread. https://t.co/XZiv4mYPb9
@FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises questions about corporate ties to nutrition scientists." JAMA 323(5): 401-404. https://t.co/b4jGzP6Lhq) https://t.co/eIovkn7CEl
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists - November publication by Annals of Internal Medicine of a guideline suggesting that adults can continue current unprocessed and processed meat consu… https://t.co/y78aa7yMWx https://t.co/t5wcamP5i9
Guidelines rec'ing adults continue current #redmeat consumption ignited a firestorm as critics claiming harm have financial interests in companies and organizations that stand to profit if people eat more plant-based food, per @ritarubin https://t.co/WWgZIfPPsG #JAMAMedNews
Example of personal agenda and opinion (almost a religion) that opposes scientific data. Don’t recommend meat or you will be attacked. Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/uUahUBKSoS
Much debate last week over the science & strategy re COVID19. How can @nytopinion describe David Katz a "public health expert" & give him so much air time given his dubious history? See @JAMA_current on Katz here. https://t.co/dXeTxBJx0C This is lazy and dangerous from @nytimes. https://t.co/Ljo7hcQc3C
The idea that saturated fat causes heart disease is one of the biggest myths in modern nutrition. Science shows that saturated fat is not associated with increased mortality, while refined carbohydrates and industrial…
In this scientific analysis, we question the premise that red meat causes cancer. The study reviews cohort studies and indicates that while reducing unprocessed meat intake minimally lowers cancer mortality, conclusions…
Eating red meat such as beef and lamb has been linked to cancer stroke type 2 diabetes cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. The NutriRECS Consortium recommends adults continue current red and processed meat…
@rei10830349 ジェンダー方面もヤバいんですがビーガン系wokeも中々でして、似たような欠陥コホートを自作してはそれをメタアナするので手の施しようがないんですよね... https://t.co/xPHaZ9wjFA https://t.co/j2komtTY3i
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists - JAMA Network https://t.co/HrmbJuV4lT
RT @M_Stamatakis: The deep & dark abyss of dietary recommendations. It's so dark that I see no way out other than banning *all* industry f…
RT @GeorgiaEdeMD: Kudos to @JAMA_current for exposing organized efforts by influential plant-based diet advocates to quash publication of @…
RT @TheoDJager: Farmers must demand science based policies on agriculture, food systems and livestock. The article "Backlash Over Meat Diet…
RT @TheoDJager: Farmers must demand science based policies on agriculture, food systems and livestock. The article "Backlash Over Meat Diet…
RT @TheoDJager: Farmers must demand science based policies on agriculture, food systems and livestock. The article "Backlash Over Meat Diet…
Farmers must demand science based policies on agriculture, food systems and livestock. The article "Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists" by Rita Rubin in JAMA, 2020, explains why https://t.co/AFIwwwzDcZ
@LDLSkeptic @CommunistoObama Crappy is what happens when people eat according to the rubbish USDA dietary guidelines which is without any basis of fact ! https://t.co/MIMa6o1C9u ➡️ https://t.co/acRxbUU4W0 ➡️ https://t.co/ilWlqAPyvW ➡️ https://t.co/iBiBReP23u ➡️ https://t.co/fCbjOSyZsi
@whereisjasonnow @FleshFitnessing @Jokermanhere What you found was a vicious campaign by vegans to discredit the NUTRIRECS group via very tenuous funding links. There was even academic misconduct to break the embargo. You've been conned. https://t.co/mPx9jJfZa1
@NutritionMadeS3 @MichaelMindrum @MatthewJDalby Read this: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists Rita Rubin, MA JAMA. 2020;323(5):401-404. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.21441
@cosmos_mother @shanoawarrior @TPoet1973 @Khiva1 @Grahanimal @OliviaL53289925 @Kizwiz6 @TheAltruist10 @Lynnia00721169 @thatwitchyjess7 @me1stVegan2nd @andyswarbs @cerebralsymphoy @OofT74480205 @RoodepoortL @PeachVonT @Son_of_Space @OtherCosmonauta @JoeKerr57254356 @pro13A @bloodflowerburn @hargrump @_Aloominati_ @medicalinguist Here's what a Mafia does: it tried to dominate science and censor any opposing science. They don't concern themselves with a few kids tied to trees in Brazil.
@kevinnbass @MatthewJDalby @TyRBeal Kevin, here is another example: Rubin R. Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists. JAMA. 2020;323(5):401–404. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.21441
@MatthewJDalby @CeriseFlegal seems like a similar tactic that true health initiative took with Annals of Internal Medicine when they published studies about meat and CV risk. THI was more vitriolic than the NRA! doi:10.1001/jama.2019.21441
RT @GrassBased: @FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises…
RT @GrassBased: @FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises…
RT @GrassBased: @FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises…
RT @GrassBased: @FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises…
RT @GrassBased: @FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises…
RT @GrassBased: @FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises…
RT @GrassBased: @FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises…
RT @GrassBased: @FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises…
RT @GrassBased: @FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises…
RT @GrassBased: @FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises…
@FructoseNo @fleroy1974 @nathancofnas Bonus (paper - Rubin, R. (2020). "Backlash over meat dietary recommendations raises questions about corporate ties to nutrition scientists." JAMA 323(5): 401-404. https://t.co/b4jGzP6Lhq) https://t.co/eIovkn7CEl
@ChessiePique @Beef https://t.co/6r73upwR1g
@gunnvald1966 @abovehiseye @Peder34891351 @bigfatsurprise @arendtiana JAMA editor-in-Chief Christine Laine, MD, was attacked/doxed over posting a legit study that showed that there is no connection between meat and cancer. She wrote an editorial about it and the huge money that supports plant based diets from the growers. https://t.co/xcL2ZGnlbo
RT @EBCPMcMaster: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists @methodsnerd htt…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists @methodsnerd https://t.co/9VdRBToGr4 https://t.co/ZBsh27PBbn
I just posted "RedMeatScience! JAMA - A prestigious medical journal's number one non-Covid 2020 article was: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists" on Reddit https://t.co/A3rJbjNyCb
Just when you think #bigpharma is the only the problem you realize it is also #nutrition #diet #NutritionFirst #HealthyFood #healthandwellness #HealthyEating https://t.co/QWo04WllCI
RT @Jaimegimenez_DN: ¿Es la carne roja (no procesada) tan perjudicial para la salud? ¿Es la alimentación basada en plantas tan beneficiosa…
¿Es la carne roja (no procesada) tan perjudicial para la salud? ¿Es la alimentación basada en plantas tan beneficiosa para la salud?. Una publicación de 2020, habla sobre los conflictos de intereses que hay en la investigación en nutrición. https://t.co/XaoNiBT2Ac FELIZ AÑO https://t.co/u7MpRXuF9H
¿Es la carne roja (no procesada) tan perjudicial para la salud? ¿Es la alimentación basada en plantas tan beneficiosa para la salud?. Una publicación de 2020, habla sobre los conflictos de intereses que hay en la investigación en nutrición. https://t.co/Hskbp9oQyR FELIZ AÑO
RT @AviBittMD: If half the effort fighting over conflicts of interest was spent on discussing the actual study people might have a basic id…
In this corner: the plant-based industry. And in this corner: paleo/keto/carnivore industry. Are consumers the real loser when nutrition researchers can’t play nice? https://t.co/4wP2nCyRFw
RT @ColinChampMD: Hey! Let's not forget this crazy thing happened: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corpor…
Hey! Let's not forget this crazy thing happened: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/CrySrDp0fM
RT @S_Alomairah: تضارب المصالح في أبحاث التغذية.. قد يتسائل المختصون وغير المختصون لماذا نتائج دراسات التغذية و التوصيات فيها نوع من التضار…
@Sami_alrohaily @ruhalaa في مجلة سنوية للطب الباطني صارت عليها ضجة بسبب نشر دراسة تبين أن الأدلة التي تربط استهلاك اللحوم الحمراء بأمراض القلب والأوعية الدموية والسرطان ضعيفة للغاية بحيث لا يوصي البالغين بتناول كميات أقل منها. https://t.co/UitQaeiPPV
RT @IFEDD1: "Do consumers lose when nutrition researchers can’t play nice?" https://t.co/d9XNVxe3Qo
@OysteinHeggdal https://t.co/QAu8qacqev
RT @EricaHauver: Much debate last week over the science & strategy re COVID19. How can @nytopinion describe David Katz a "public health ex…
RT @SimmonsBart: Katz - chip & cereal spokesperson or nutrition expert? “Among THI’s for-profit partners are Wholesome Goodness, which se…
Katz - chip & cereal spokesperson or nutrition expert? “Among THI’s for-profit partners are Wholesome Goodness, which sells “better-for-you foods” such as chips, breakfast cereals,...”developed with guidance from renowned nutrition expert Dr David Katz” https://t.co/maruLejdlL
RT @EricaHauver: Much debate last week over the science & strategy re COVID19. How can @nytopinion describe David Katz a "public health ex…
RT @EricaHauver: Much debate last week over the science & strategy re COVID19. How can @nytopinion describe David Katz a "public health ex…
RT @EricaHauver: Much debate last week over the science & strategy re COVID19. How can @nytopinion describe David Katz a "public health ex…
RT @EricaHauver: Much debate last week over the science & strategy re COVID19. How can @nytopinion describe David Katz a "public health ex…
RT @EricaHauver: Much debate last week over the science & strategy re COVID19. How can @nytopinion describe David Katz a "public health ex…
Much debate last week over the science & strategy re COVID19. How can @nytopinion describe David Katz a "public health expert" & give him so much air time given his dubious history? See @JAMA_current on Katz here. https://t.co/dXeTxBJx0C This is lazy and dangerous from @nytimes. https://t.co/Ljo7hcQc3C
RT @whsource: JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical ta…
RT @FatEmperor: Fascinating article on the underhanded tactics being used to vilify #meat - unprecedented interference in true scientific p…
RT @FatEmperor: Fascinating article on the underhanded tactics being used to vilify #meat - unprecedented interference in true scientific p…
RT @whsource: JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical ta…
RT @whsource: JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical ta…
RT @whsource: JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical ta…
RT @whsource: JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical ta…
RT @whsource: JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical ta…
RT @PabloPastos: @jgkodama @Nega_Maiz Y sobre los conflictos de interés que hay detrás de muchas de estas informaciones, en fin... espero q…
RT @PabloPastos: @jgkodama @Nega_Maiz Y sobre los conflictos de interés que hay detrás de muchas de estas informaciones, en fin... espero q…
@jgkodama @Nega_Maiz Y sobre los conflictos de interés que hay detrás de muchas de estas informaciones, en fin... espero que nadie se caiga del guindo a estas alturas: 1.- https://t.co/SbMueawKuT 2.- https://t.co/0zAhQOSyfP 3.- https://t.co/2cI0ynOdAB Y, por supuesto, hay más...
RT @whsource: JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical ta…
RT @whsource: JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical ta…
RT @whsource: JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical ta…
RT @whsource: JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical ta…
JAMA recently published an explosive article by @RitaRubin suggesting that the True Health Initiative engaged in unethical tactics to quash meta-studies exonerating red meat. I now question some of the claims in this @JAMA_current article. Thread. https://t.co/XZiv4mYPb9
https://t.co/c5BX0SwCGW
Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition Research https://t.co/gKSiwUvQKn
RT @skyking171717: @DrEades Have you seen this article? https://t.co/325rnZ5esi
Ever heard of @UniversiteitVL? One of our team members explained if we can still eat meat. Maybe intereseting to read the @JAMA_current paper about the meat discussion https://t.co/8VNrGxbAqP. Communication is key, luckely our team is involed @VLAIO_be funded project #INFLOOD https://t.co/aauc7zNsw8
RT @Dr_Brinley: Very interesting! https://t.co/PWBEdykKlp
@wyadvd @NutritionalThe3 From the article: "I personally do not see any major conflict of interest,” she said. “I see much more convergence of interests.” Bit like Katz' "confluence of interest"?
@4dietaryreform @USDANutrition @RitaRubin Here's a link to @RitaRubin's article https://t.co/B0LFMdLwS2 #JAMAMedNews
@NicholasDCarter I didn’t see Shawn Baker in there, but ok, here is the same message, but in the form of an article. https://t.co/BMMf354Vqu https://t.co/R8VEDWznyF
RT @JAMANetwork: This is was one of our most popular pieces from last month! Read what @RitaRubin has to say about the backlash over meat d…
RT @JAMANetwork: This is was one of our most popular pieces from last month! Read what @RitaRubin has to say about the backlash over meat d…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/Bu4ANrGfSN
RT @JAMANetwork: This is was one of our most popular pieces from last month! Read what @RitaRubin has to say about the backlash over meat d…
RT @JAMANetwork: This is was one of our most popular pieces from last month! Read what @RitaRubin has to say about the backlash over meat d…
RT @JAMANetwork: This is was one of our most popular pieces from last month! Read what @RitaRubin has to say about the backlash over meat d…
This is was one of our most popular pieces from last month! Read what @RitaRubin has to say about the backlash over meat dietary recommendations. #JAMAMedNews https://t.co/NJfGU09Xr6
RT @KenDBerryMD: Shady corporate ties ($$$) among top #PlantBased/#Vegan Nutrition experts?? https://t.co/kdJoKuNSyZ
RT @KenDBerryMD: This may be the most useful thing I've ever read in @JAMA_current. It seems that plant-based critics of meat have many mor…
La industria de la nutrición tiene serios problemas de conflicto de intereses y luchan simplemente por el mercado.El consumidor sufre las consecuencias. No hay evidencia de calidad que un tipo de alimento origine o evite determinada enfermedad. #FelizLunes https://t.co/kVjsslHwjc
RT @GeorgiaEdeMD: Kudos to @JAMA_current for exposing organized efforts by influential plant-based diet advocates to quash publication of @…
RT @S_Alomairah: تضارب المصالح في أبحاث التغذية.. قد يتسائل المختصون وغير المختصون لماذا نتائج دراسات التغذية و التوصيات فيها نوع من التضار…
RT @doctormacias: Annals of Internal Medicine estaba por publicar estudios que mostraban que el consumo moderado de carne roja no se relaci…
RT @4dietaryreform: Turns out the critics who lambasted authors of red-meat paper for conflicts of interest had themselves serious, far gre…
RT @PeterBrukner: Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition Research https://t.co/46bYKRSEFs
You couldn’t make up a story like this if you tried. Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition Research - a story of a few doctors putting personal gain over health. https://t.co/HTNqsyjcUy excellent reporting by @RitaRubin
RT @bigfatsurprise: Riveting piece by @RitaRubin in @JAMA_current about $$corporate conflicts of interest among researchers demanding retr…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/GGHegfa7jn
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
Sad that many prominent researchers primarily do politics, not science. Unfortunately, most seem to do research to validate a truth they already believe in or is comfortable, rather than the truth. The end result? We know next to zero about nutrition. https://t.co/nNucP4VanI
https://t.co/aMSHmYwlZB A shocking illustration of the tactics the anti-meat zealots will use to prop up their flawed premise. #beef #plantbased
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition Research https://t.co/j9A8BKf7by
RT @drjasonfung: Fascinating article about “Information Terrorism”. Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition Research https://t.co/6c5QEFF1rW
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to #Nutrition Researchers: fascinating article in @JAMA_current https://t.co/AeIgeGdjmb
RT @NeilFlochMD: Conflicts of Interest in #Nutrition Research https://t.co/RhvasAAd2L #diet #weight #obesity
RT @NeilFlochMD: Conflicts of Interest in #Nutrition Research https://t.co/RhvasAAd2L #diet #weight #obesity
RT @NeilFlochMD: Conflicts of Interest in #Nutrition Research https://t.co/RhvasAAd2L #diet #weight #obesity
Conflicts of Interest in #Nutrition Research https://t.co/RhvasAAd2L #diet #weight #obesity
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition Research https://t.co/G8Oqcvbj7G
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/yarBiSKHX8
RT @Dr_TomSmith_III: @usmade1001 Americans likely need to reduce their consumption of red meat, but more importantly, consumption of proces…
@usmade1001 Americans likely need to reduce their consumption of red meat, but more importantly, consumption of processed meats like bacon, sausage, hot dogs, salami, pepperoni, etc. I will continue to eat skinless white poultry meat. The study has limitations! https://t.co/ihSBzM43bv
RT @JAMA_current: Guidelines rec'ing adults continue current #redmeat consumption ignited a firestorm as critics claiming harm have financi…
RT @JAMA_current: Guidelines rec'ing adults continue current #redmeat consumption ignited a firestorm as critics claiming harm have financi…
RT @JAMA_current: Guidelines rec'ing adults continue current #redmeat consumption ignited a firestorm as critics claiming harm have financi…
RT @JAMA_current: Guidelines rec'ing adults continue current #redmeat consumption ignited a firestorm as critics claiming harm have financi…
RT @JAMA_current: Guidelines rec'ing adults continue current #redmeat consumption ignited a firestorm as critics claiming harm have financi…
Guidelines rec'ing adults continue current #redmeat consumption ignited a firestorm as critics claiming harm have financial interests in companies and organizations that stand to profit if people eat more plant-based food, per @ritarubin https://t.co/WWgZIfPPsG #JAMAMedNews
@AdrianConway_ @KSLcom there should be more access to the full context (especially when epidemiological studies are in play) for people to review https://t.co/aVJcAurznR
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
RT @ymori117: 原文をお読みいただいた方はわかると思うけど、件の団体、以前から、気に入らない意見を封殺するために、相手の利益相反を針小棒大に言い立てる手法を良く使っていると指摘されている。 https://t.co/g9fr9bj7lN
RT @ymori117: 原文をお読みいただいた方はわかると思うけど、件の団体、以前から、気に入らない意見を封殺するために、相手の利益相反を針小棒大に言い立てる手法を良く使っていると指摘されている。 https://t.co/g9fr9bj7lN
RT @ymori117: 原文をお読みいただいた方はわかると思うけど、件の団体、以前から、気に入らない意見を封殺するために、相手の利益相反を針小棒大に言い立てる手法を良く使っていると指摘されている。 https://t.co/g9fr9bj7lN
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
RT @ymori117: 原文をお読みいただいた方はわかると思うけど、件の団体、以前から、気に入らない意見を封殺するために、相手の利益相反を針小棒大に言い立てる手法を良く使っていると指摘されている。 https://t.co/g9fr9bj7lN
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition Research https://t.co/rvs061TQ5o
RT @4dietaryreform: Turns out the critics who lambasted authors of red-meat paper for conflicts of interest had themselves serious, far gre…
RT @DrvanTilburg: When JAMA publishes you know it’s a big deal. For everyone who hasn’t heard yet: Nutrition science is in a crisis. Old d…
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
RT @ymori117: JAMA「食肉の推奨への反発から栄養科学者と企業の関係に疑惑が沸き起こる https://t.co/gbe16p23bK 「赤身肉が健康に悪いとの研究は根拠は薄い」との論文に、ハーバード大学の栄養科学者を中心とした団体が様々な圧力をかけてきたが、その…
Backlash Over #Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to #Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/MLjXw2h0wz #health #ConflictsOfInterest #Diet #Disease #diet #Lifestyle #Ethics
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/3VT02tMff8
RT @ExphysPhD: Example of personal agenda and opinion (almost a religion) that opposes scientific data. Don’t recommend meat or you will be…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/iDGJjYgoot https://t.co/DnWJV7Rzjn https://t.co/NQcRsepENm #nutrition #conflictsofinterest #statistics #ethics #research https://t.co/Ow5BPmwELn
RT @ExphysPhD: Example of personal agenda and opinion (almost a religion) that opposes scientific data. Don’t recommend meat or you will be…
Example of personal agenda and opinion (almost a religion) that opposes scientific data. Don’t recommend meat or you will be attacked. Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/uUahUBKSoS
Worth the long read from @JAMA “Backlash Over #Meat #Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to #Nutrition Scientists” https://t.co/I4VXyrHagu
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/uj3iMc3vo0 via @CrossFit
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists - [Source: CrossFit] https://t.co/QiumzfqH8y #article #athlete #blog #conflictsofinterest #crossfit #crossfitarticle #crossfitblog #crossfitnews #fitness #fitnessarticle #... https://t.co/xGgWtNGcfQ
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/gOm1AcFfyY
RT @pash22: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/8BQp2IyYF…
RT @pash22: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/8BQp2IyYF…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/8BQp2IyYFO via @RitaRubin
Conflicts of Interest in #Nutrition Research Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | | JAMA Network https://t.co/CCFt9JXQot
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/Uihog10ew0
@scharleb ----»» Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/AzMgXrGNFh
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/GGHegfa7jn
RT @JAMA_current: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists - November publi…
Top story: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/DBdwUodl40, see more https://t.co/blUif09LAx
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/kbddaewCWy, see more https://t.co/VAb9Jwf95E
Top story: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/fw1kODUd0S, see more https://t.co/ZFM5Ty3RCA
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/Y25cLeYG7M https://t.co/SyBDrvrMWG
“Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists”
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/IGgdh4D8Qu
RT @JAMA_current: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists - November publi…
RT @JAMA_current: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists - November publi…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/OkAFlLrtJX
RT @ethical_butcher: What's REALLY going on? Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutritio…
RT @ethical_butcher: What's REALLY going on? Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutritio…
RT @ethical_butcher: What's REALLY going on? Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutritio…
2020: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/ti9uHOAKZQ
What's REALLY going on? Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists: https://t.co/AimbifFQvl #meateater #ethicalbutcher #nutrition https://t.co/chhtkfCA8Z
Wow! Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA | JAMA Network https://t.co/Wl5h5n4VBI
"Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists - Rita Rubin, MA | Medical News & Perspectives | JAMA. Published online January 15, 2020 https://t.co/wsBlh72uJM
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA | https://t.co/a8IRDqedAf
RT @ColinChampMD: More evidence that the diet wars have less to do with health than one would think: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommenda…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines | JAMA https://t.co/nUAaPSxenJ
RT @bermaninstitute: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/XmCO1J4oWO
RT @McGeeMeghan: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to #Nutrition Scientists @RitaRubin @J…
RT @McGeeMeghan: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to #Nutrition Scientists @RitaRubin @J…
RT @McGeeMeghan: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to #Nutrition Scientists @RitaRubin @J…
RT @McGeeMeghan: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to #Nutrition Scientists @RitaRubin @J…
RT @McGeeMeghan: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to #Nutrition Scientists @RitaRubin @J…
RT @McGeeMeghan: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to #Nutrition Scientists @RitaRubin @J…
RT @McGeeMeghan: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to #Nutrition Scientists @RitaRubin @J…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/J4L5fmSbA1
RT @JAMA_current: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists - November publi…
RT @JAMA_current: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists - November publi…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists - November publication by Annals of Internal Medicine of a guideline suggesting that adults can continue current unprocessed and processed meat consu… https://t.co/y78aa7yMWx https://t.co/t5wcamP5i9
RT @Smita_Srinivas: Worth reading in full about research design, disclosure. "Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions A…
RT @SofiaSa00078363: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines…
RT @SofiaSa00078363: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines…
RT @SofiaSa00078363: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists | Guidelines…
Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/NkwFHU8tRK @DrJayRichards
RT @SABOURETCardio: Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists. JAMA | https…
Why trust any of these goons? | Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists https://t.co/LTfUfmgS53
SG
PB
J
JS
EH
M
TM
SS
LD
EM
C
AT
TJ
T
M
KF
CV
MM
HI
SD
KQ
LH
GF
K
O
FL
D
KP
HH
GG
TS
AB
KV
NC
JD
BT
EH
F
CD
دا
SA
RH
B
JS
BS
JF
PV
LH
MA
DW
TG
T
JV
VJ
R
LE
JB
AP
CR
PM
S
YF
AL
SR
MC
M
NK
AG
TO
C
S
DN
DH
DD
JN
KJ
C
DG
JD
SH
O
RM
MA
A
Kこ
SS
BC
TW
森
WB
AP
KR
NM
T
PS
NT
か
F
影
EN
TS
A
MC
KC
S
PM
H
ZR
かC
黒K
地M
パ
ア滴
一
O
BW
A
CL
W残
MS
CP
C
JW
NP
JP
AZ
MM
R
SG
EC
JG
AP
JM
SC
CV
AP
MF
TQ
PU
N
TM
DL
S
MS
A
JE
PO
CF
TB
JD
WV
김K
ES
E
BR
JB
R
JC
VP
C
JA
GR
NB
AB
EE
K
JM
PC
JW
AF
J