Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The social discussions reflect a strong interest in the detailed scientific analysis presented in the article, with many citing specific figures and pages such as page 4's diagram and the discussion of residues like Gln493 and Asn501. The tone varies from supportive to skeptical, with some posts questioning whether important features like the furin cleavage site were intentionally omitted, highlighting active engagement with the research’s implications and limitations, which collectively indicate the publication's considerable influence in ongoing debates about virus origins and mechanisms.
Most discussions emphasize the significance of the publication, with many expressing support for its findings or highlighting its implications, such as the importance of receptor studies and questions around virus origins.
The discussions show a high level of interest, especially in topics like furin cleavage sites, the role of specific residues, and the potential origins of the virus, indicating deep curiosity about the research details and significance.
Participants cite specific aspects like the paper's focus on receptor recognition, omission of certain features like the furin cleavage site, and connections to broader virus origins, demonstrating active engagement with the scientific content.
The discussions suggest that the publication has substantial influence, prompting debates and questions about virus engineering, lab research, and the accuracy of initial claims, though some skepticism reduces the perceived definitive impact.
Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS CoV-2? #redesULPGC @IUSAeu Más información https://t.co/RzPn7Au635 https://t.co/dJ947QzyEP
Advice from a January 2020 paper (https://t.co/QfzTkREGoo): Well, that did not work out. https://t.co/OWv4hJBABl
@tony_vandongen @JackDempsey2_2 @BiophysicsFL @pathogenetics Hard to believe Baric wasn't consulted. Very first argument made in PO is how some key residues in the RBD are "not predicted to be optimal for receptor binding", referencing Baric'c paper https://t.co/vwLEybTk4J But that paper was only published on March 17th, same day as PO.
The reference that disappeared showed that virus probably binds Ace-2: "Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus" Was this reference important? Who knows! Bye, bye! https://t.co/EMGrfBHXMR
@RobertWager1 @sense_strand @Debunk_the_Funk @pathogenetics @Florin_Uncovers @jaredpretender @BiophysicsFL @thackerpd @R_H_Ebright @Greg21143362 @TomahawkVPhD @NIH @PeterDaszak -Baric proposes to put cleavage sites in novel unpublished SARS -a novel SARS virus with a cleavage site breaks out *right next to his partner's lab* & he doesn't think to look for a cleavage site in his paper? https://t.co/MfsXiJlUGf https://t.co/joUm5LvGV8
Their argument that the RBM of SARS-CoV-2 was not predicted to be ideal for binding human ACE2 came from Baric, with his paper being published on the same day as Proximal Origin: https://t.co/BkxRtGqzxq https://t.co/4klN1K5uAl
This video delves into recent advancements in quantum mechanics, highlighting key findings and their implications for our understanding of the universe. Join us as we explore how these discoveries challenge existing…
This video covers critical insights from a study analyzing 1,099 confirmed COVID-19 patients in China. Key symptoms included high rates of fever and cough, with an overall composite endpoint rate of 6.1% for ICU…
This video explores how specific bat coronaviruses can infect humans, highlighting research on trypsin treatment to overcome infection barriers. Key findings suggest that both receptor binding and spike protein cleavage…
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @TheMillennialVC: @CoWIVd I wonder if they're referring to this diagram on page 4 of this paper: https://t.co/HM1EX9HAy2 https://t.co/t…
@jhas5 @Muller_Lab @aya_velazquez @R_H_Ebright @hsu_steve @ProGof39474 @JamieMetzl @stevehsu Sins of omission then. https://t.co/zwZeex8S2v
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
@gumby4christ @emilyakopp Baric wrote about creating spike proteins in this paper, but studiously avoids mentioning GoF research on TG mice at the WIV. https://t.co/zTaTHVxsR5
RT @RicketRobin: @BillyBostickson Baric knew this in early 2020. https://t.co/uHINpNth2A https://t.co/cVVwqkolIU
@BillyBostickson Baric knew this in early 2020. https://t.co/uHINpNth2A https://t.co/cVVwqkolIU
RT @dapstats: @nataliegwinters Dr. Baric didn't "give China the mice". In 2020 he worked with a team of researchers to help understand how…
@nataliegwinters Dr. Baric didn't "give China the mice". In 2020 he worked with a team of researchers to help understand how mice could be genetically engineered to express ACE2 receptors, allowing them to be used to study these viruses. https://t.co/mSjzEf1vqC
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @harishseshadri2: 5/ Less odd is Baric's own early paper on SARS2. Unsurprisingly, it was all about receptor binding with not a word abo…
RT @harishseshadri2: 5/ Less odd is Baric's own early paper on SARS2. Unsurprisingly, it was all about receptor binding with not a word abo…
5/ Less odd is Baric's own early paper on SARS2. Unsurprisingly, it was all about receptor binding with not a word about the FCS
RT @harishseshadri2: Yet Baric's earliest paper on SARS2 (when it was still called 2019-nCoV) was all about the RBD, with not a word about…
Yet Baric's earliest paper on SARS2 (when it was still called 2019-nCoV) was all about the RBD, with not a word about the FCS! One can only speculate about his reasons for the omission - better, one can hope that he testifies soon! https://t.co/AyI6A0znBP
RT @antonioregalado: The reference that disappeared showed that virus probably binds Ace-2: "Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus…
RT @antonioregalado: The reference that disappeared showed that virus probably binds Ace-2: "Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus…
RT @antonioregalado: The reference that disappeared showed that virus probably binds Ace-2: "Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus…
The reference that disappeared showed that virus probably binds Ace-2: "Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus" Was this reference important? Who knows! Bye, bye! https://t.co/EMGrfBHXMR
@AGHuff @TheSeeker268 @Baric_Lab contributed a bullshit paper to support Proximal Origins. The RBD sequence is different to what their models predict to be optimal for receptor binding so this is "strong evidence that SARS COV E is not the product or purposeful manipulation" https://t.co/27GqQtozJa
@hellodonavon @BokononsProphet https://t.co/EoXLRsOiQB
https://t.co/EoXLRsOiQB
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
https://t.co/xFeD77QKha
@CoWIVd I wonder if they're referring to this diagram on page 4 of this paper: https://t.co/HM1EX9HAy2 https://t.co/tvyH9OXQko
Su argumento de que no se predijo que el RBM del SARS-CoV-2 fuera ideal para unirse a la ACE2 humana provino de Baric, y su artículo se publicó el mismo día que Proximal Origin: https://t.co/pkWxRb1Obp https://t.co/XY5PtO3CYw
RT @CD57227: Their argument that the RBM of SARS-CoV-2 was not predicted to be ideal for binding human ACE2 came from Baric, with his paper…
RT @CD57227: Their argument that the RBM of SARS-CoV-2 was not predicted to be ideal for binding human ACE2 came from Baric, with his paper…
Their argument that the RBM of SARS-CoV-2 was not predicted to be ideal for binding human ACE2 came from Baric, with his paper being published on the same day as Proximal Origin: https://t.co/BkxRtGqzxq https://t.co/4klN1K5uAl
RT @CD57227: @tony_vandongen @JackDempsey2_2 @BiophysicsFL @pathogenetics Hard to believe Baric wasn't consulted. Very first argument made…
RT @jhas5: @ydeigin @BiophysicsFL @MJnanostretch @virologyanon @harishseshadri2 @Stephengm99 @mbalter @R_H_Ebright @Rebecca21951651 @Cadhla…
@ydeigin @BiophysicsFL @MJnanostretch @virologyanon @harishseshadri2 @Stephengm99 @mbalter @R_H_Ebright @Rebecca21951651 @CadhlaFirth @Ayjchan @alisonannyoung @fayeflam @natashaloder @Biol4Ever @FilippaLentzos @emilyakopp @EmaNymton90 @theintercept @USRightToKnow @washingtonpost @sciencecohen That paper is even more telling. Sars1 had a cleavage site at S1/S2. They don’t understand SC2 has a furin cleavage site Guess who also missed it in paper published at exact same time? https://t.co/xIPQq9xJMc
RT @mentju4: @Baric_Lab @ScienceTM @KDinnon @SarahRLeist @aschaefe29 @LisaGralinski How could Baric fail to mention the furin cleavage site…
@Noldoggs11 @BillyBostickson @WashburneAlex @user3425664 @innominata_ https://t.co/xIPQq9xJMc
@iconoblast @dolphdippin6399 @TheOmniLiberal The following scientific consensus. 1/2 https://t.co/IWtjlexL0G https://t.co/zVMx5MUVt2 https://t.co/ar7iYoagRx https://t.co/OZAnQhfdoP https://t.co/EcHgsPz9Ju https://t.co/OZdEPsZoY3 https://t.co/pRnym3BSpm https://t.co/5in2JZxvQT
@MattTweetsIt @brandondarby @cenkuygur - https://t.co/FSCZi2AokL Here's the thing: we know there was at least one intermediate species to which CoV2 jumped b4 transmitting to humans. We're there more than one? IDK & IDK if anyone has determined that. I would think that learning would tell us the origin's relevance.
@wanderer_jasnah hold on. they didn't think to tell anyone about this experiment & that isn't weird to you? & if interested in FCS's in sarbecovs, *why didn't they mention the FCS in a novel sarbecovirus that emerged next to their partner's lab*? https://t.co/MfsXiJE3Un https://t.co/DZpDjZxoqV
@breakfast_dogs 'Guiqing Peng' of HZAU was certainly involved in GOF on SARS at the University of Minnesota in 2012. Fang Li, too. Here's Ralph Baric referring to the Peng/Li Paper of 2012
@HansMahncke @RepJamesComer He's conspicuously cited by the fake Origins paper. https://t.co/ISrAxDTZyK
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @Dover63A: @loridan_eric Délètère : "SARS-CoV infections and the Spike protein of the SARS-CoV reduce ACE2 expression" (2005) https://t.…
RT @Dover63A: @loridan_eric Délètère : "SARS-CoV infections and the Spike protein of the SARS-CoV reduce ACE2 expression" (2005) https://t.…
@loridan_eric Délètère : "SARS-CoV infections and the Spike protein of the SARS-CoV reduce ACE2 expression" (2005) https://t.co/NJMD1TH2Kx 2008 (texte jaune fluo) https://t.co/xhavP0L4zG similarities between 2019-nCoV spike and SARS-CoV spike : 76% to 78% (mars 2020) https://t.co/dqG7sGSQg5 https://t.co/DBLf9rjjsP
@harishseshadri2 * Ref 1 in the Proximal Origin pre-print from Feb 17th https://t.co/vwLEybSMfb
RT @jhas5: In Baric’s 1st SARS2 paper Submitted Jan 29 2020 0 mention of the FCS https://t.co/P0g9UsdiCO
RT @jhas5: In Baric’s 1st SARS2 paper Submitted Jan 29 2020 0 mention of the FCS https://t.co/P0g9UsdiCO
In Baric’s 1st SARS2 paper Submitted Jan 29 2020 0 mention of the FCS https://t.co/P0g9UsdiCO
also, how do baric & fang li *fail to mention the furin cleavage site* in their jan 2020 SC2 paper: https://t.co/MfsXiJE3Un when fang highlighted, at length, the role of cleavage sites in cell entry in his 2016 paper: https://t.co/Hs4aHdVqJx ?! https://t.co/e85ei9O9FR
@quay_dr Epic comments Doc! He’s focused on those 2 residues (493 & 501) for a reason. U picked up on this nearly 2 years ago https://t.co/xIPQq9xJMc https://t.co/zJ0j8Wglrh
RT @mentju4: @andrewtanyongyi so baric, part of a secret project sticking cleavage sites onto novel SARS to enhance pathogenicity, fails to…
“2019-nCoV RBM (particularly Asn501) are compatible with, but not ideal for, binding human ACE2, suggesting that 2019-nCoV has acquired some capacity for human-to-human transmission.” After gaining the FCS…
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @CD57227: @tony_vandongen @JackDempsey2_2 @BiophysicsFL @pathogenetics Hard to believe Baric wasn't consulted. Very first argument made…
@WashburneAlex @BlijfAUBThuis @Graybea71861266 @K_G_Andersen Ralph's emails from march 2019 to jan 2020 are straight-up missing: https://t.co/R5FzSwMEuL Encl 1 page 394 he doesn't mention the FCS in his paper on SC2: https://t.co/MfsXiJE3Un or in his talk to govt. officials/staff: https://t.co/nqwiu7Hlyv subpoena @Baric_Lab
RT @CD57227: @tony_vandongen @JackDempsey2_2 @BiophysicsFL @pathogenetics Hard to believe Baric wasn't consulted. Very first argument made…
RT @CD57227: @tony_vandongen @JackDempsey2_2 @BiophysicsFL @pathogenetics Hard to believe Baric wasn't consulted. Very first argument made…
RT @CD57227: @tony_vandongen @JackDempsey2_2 @BiophysicsFL @pathogenetics Hard to believe Baric wasn't consulted. Very first argument made…
@tony_vandongen @JackDempsey2_2 @BiophysicsFL @pathogenetics Hard to believe Baric wasn't consulted. Very first argument made in PO is how some key residues in the RBD are "not predicted to be optimal for receptor binding", referencing Baric'c paper https://t.co/vwLEybTk4J But that paper was only published on March 17th, same day as PO.
@HL3133 Baric had T501 in his optimized RBD
@Biol4Ever @emmecola Answers to ur illiterate questions 1 USAID paid miners, eg Banal collected by US military 2 USAID $$$ ended Sept 3 renamed to distance herself from Baric & 4991 4 why did Baric miss FCS? https://t.co/xIPQq9xJMc 5 proof WIV can’t engineer SARS2 6-7 ask Danielle? 8 off ur rocker
@jhas5 I believed this one denying the possibility. But this paper was wrong. https://t.co/uoTpUat83l
RT @mentju4: @RobertWager1 @sense_strand @Debunk_the_Funk @pathogenetics @Florin_Uncovers @jaredpretender @BiophysicsFL @thackerpd @R_H_Ebr…
RT @mentju4: @RobertWager1 @sense_strand @Debunk_the_Funk @pathogenetics @Florin_Uncovers @jaredpretender @BiophysicsFL @thackerpd @R_H_Ebr…
RT @mentju4: @RobertWager1 @sense_strand @Debunk_the_Funk @pathogenetics @Florin_Uncovers @jaredpretender @BiophysicsFL @thackerpd @R_H_Ebr…
@RobertWager1 @sense_strand @Debunk_the_Funk @pathogenetics @Florin_Uncovers @jaredpretender @BiophysicsFL @thackerpd @R_H_Ebright @Greg21143362 @TomahawkVPhD @NIH @PeterDaszak -Baric proposes to put cleavage sites in novel unpublished SARS -a novel SARS virus with a cleavage site breaks out *right next to his partner's lab* & he doesn't think to look for a cleavage site in his paper? https://t.co/MfsXiJlUGf https://t.co/joUm5LvGV8
@andrewtanyongyi so baric, part of a secret project sticking cleavage sites onto novel SARS to enhance pathogenicity, fails to look for a cleavage site in a highly pathogenic novel SARS that just happened to break out next to his partner's lab involved in the same project. https://t.co/a06brniFsC
@_everythingism @PeaseRoland @K_G_Andersen @TheLancet @EcoHealthNYC @Baric_Lab @edwardcholmes @Sydney_Uni @RemindMe_OfThis @amymaxmen @PeterDaszak @sciencecohen @arambaut @NIH even stranger is that he fails to look for a cleavage site of a novel SARS virus that just happened to break out next to his partner's lab while he has an undisclosed project with her to insert cleavage sites into novel SARS viruses. https://t.co/MfsXiJlUGf https://t.co/BHdMAzGG7Y
@_everythingism @K_G_Andersen @PeaseRoland @TheLancet -@baric_lab was solicited to insert cleavage sites into novel SARS:https://t.co/1FCvTSaIdW -a novel SARS w/ a furin cleavage site emerges next to his partner's lab, yet he fails to look at the site in his paper or his presentation? https://t.co/MfsXiJlUGf https://t.co/atA41Jg7De
RT @jhas5: 4. Ralph Baric at UNC didn’t mention infamous furin cleavage site on his paper submitted at same time Ralph also started myth t…
RT @MonaRahalkar: @BillyBostickson @Daoyu15 @ydeigin @R_H_Ebright Also Fang Li published with Ralph Baric, Rachel Graham. https://t.co/Yv9f…
@BillyBostickson @Daoyu15 @ydeigin @R_H_Ebright Also Fang Li published with Ralph Baric, Rachel Graham. https://t.co/Yv9fjl5Qds
RT @jhas5: @FoolsMultiply These were the 2 safety kill switches Baric tried to use but obviously failed It’s why he’s so focused on hot s…
@FoolsMultiply These were the 2 safety kill switches Baric tried to use but obviously failed It’s why he’s so focused on hot spot 31 & 353 (while ignoring his FCS lol) https://t.co/BWTFrThbQM
Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F (2020) Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J Virol 94(7):e00127 @larryellison @OracleHealthSci #EdgeComputing
@InWuchang Whereas in the 2020 paper... https://t.co/BkxRtGqzxq https://t.co/YelhsSNqW5
RT @jhas5: @BiophysicsFL Baric was ref in Proximal Origins: RBD ‘not ideal’ https://t.co/xIPQq9xJMc And ref PO: “KGA cites strong evidence…
@capitolsheila @sciencecohen Ahhh. Yes this line in Proximal Origins is Baric’s words from Baric’s RBD paper #7 https://t.co/xIPQq9xJMc & when talking about the ‘new’ backbone they keenly reference #20 RGS system (ie NOT Baric’s) https://t.co/A3i6798wVt https://t.co/1CKbUfs8Id
@Pablo67838624 @miloperuthiagom @MJsusRz @pueblas_valeria @JulioRazona Te paso más vínculos para estudiar https://t.co/46FeOAkQMH
@corailX0 @afis_science https://t.co/mpbWZg44eF https://t.co/kkeqClFSDY https://t.co/zSPj4FQ2wH https://t.co/umdvO9dEJs https://t.co/JtGVOPlavY
@Elsolylaluna17 @LEYANTISECTAS https://t.co/OZ5Gi1wrfV
https://t.co/kVOzeL14Uk
https://t.co/jdOEBDduNZ
References Wan, Y., Shang, J., Graham, R., Baric, R. & Li, F. Receptor recognition by the novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J. Virol. 94, e00127–20 (2020). https://t.co/y8iUtM1OID
@EpochTimes Andersen cites Wan Mar 2020 article, https://t.co/1WmmF7ei5l, as evidence that #covid did not originate in a #WuhanLab. But Wan described 2012 GoF research in which a #COVID19 spike protein was CREATED that binds to human ACE2 with super affinity.
RT @SamSimeonSays: @DawsonSField Here is a good example. Two papers (one referencing the other, even tho published the same day) from two…
@DawsonSField Here is a good example. Two papers (one referencing the other, even tho published the same day) from two of his team. Andersen and Baric. https://t.co/jUcCntwVMa https://t.co/IPCWQIes61 https://t.co/z3JpWCX3Xk
@MartinaSisters @threadreaderapp "mientras que el análisis filogenético indica un origen de murciélago de 2019-nCoV, 2019-nCoV también reconoce potencialmente ACE2 de una diversidad de especies animales (excepto ratones y ratas)"... https://t.co/JIFwNDloAj
RT @Hlu28849973: @LawrenceSellin @jsdfposjpqyuee1 Ralph S Baric and Fang Li(李放) Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan:…
@LawrenceSellin @jsdfposjpqyuee1 Ralph S Baric and Fang Li(李放) Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus。
RT @ThornLab: Advice from a January 2020 paper (https://t.co/QfzTkREGoo): Well, that did not work out. https://t.co/OWv4hJBABl
Advice from a January 2020 paper (https://t.co/QfzTkREGoo): Well, that did not work out. https://t.co/OWv4hJBABl
Paper: “Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis based on Decade-long structural studies of SARA coronavirus” by Yushun Wan, Joan Shang, Rachel Graham, Ralph Bari , and Fang Li.
Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus - PubMed https://t.co/4QBocQ3lDg
Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus From Wuhan: An Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SA… https://t.co/4Nq7SYMcpB
Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus https://t.co/q67jPCu3f9
RT @jlmbarrasa: Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS C…
RT @jlmbarrasa: Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS C…
RT @jlmbarrasa: Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS C…
RT @jlmbarrasa: Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS C…
RT @jlmbarrasa: Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS C…
RT @jlmbarrasa: Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS C…
RT @jlmbarrasa: Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS C…
RT @jlmbarrasa: Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS C…
RT @jlmbarrasa: Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS C…
Un modelo al lado de los humanos. ¿Sabías que especies nos están ayudando a conocer la puerta de entrada celular del SARS CoV-2? #redesULPGC @IUSAeu Más información https://t.co/RzPn7Au635 https://t.co/dJ947QzyEP
Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus | Journal of Virology https://t.co/dXxYQNBJ3A
Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, LiF. 2020. Receptor recognition by the novelcoronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based ondecade-long structural studies of SARScoronavirus. J Virol 94:e00127-20. https://t.co/xBgzYfRCFx. https://t.co/9Jo66RbhcD
Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus https://t.co/3j4NM7Ervj https://t.co/d1LH3wLlXO
We already know it could likely do this: '... SARS-CoV-2 seems to have an RBD that binds with high affinity to ACE2 from humans, FERRETS, CATS
#SARSCoV2 binds with high affinity to ACE2 from humans, ferrets, cats and other species with high receptor homology https://t.co/BEC9wRC9Gy
This report suggests that many animals, including cats could serve as intermediate hosts for SARS-CoV-2. Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus | Journal of Virology https://t.co/39zphXLjoo
Core Pubmed: Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus.: Related Articles Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan:… https://t.co/vwFnqEaVxq #coronavirus #SARS_CoV_2 #covid19
Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus. https://t.co/EOxSkdo66R
Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus https://t.co/yJeXbUncYG It looks like 2019-nCoV can use also other hosts like cats, social distancing from the nature itself?
EW
J
R