Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical grounding is currently unsettled...nevertheless...a milestone in cognitive neuroscience" https://t.co/cWWQsSOb06
Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Mar 2020 – Oct 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter90 posts
-
Facebook4 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Blogs2 articles
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Numerous discussions highlighted specific aspects of the article, such as noting that predictive processing challenges traditional perception models and can influence future research. Phrases like 'timely and very useful paper' and 'proper review of evidence' indicate enthusiasm and solid recognition of the article’s significance, illustrating a collective appreciation for its contribution to the field.
The majority of discussions show confident support for the article's insights about predictive processing.
Users express high curiosity about the neurophysiological aspects and implications of the research.
While many posts echo similar sentiments, a few delve deeper into the specifics, such as discussing traditional models versus predictive processing.
There is a strong belief that this publication will influence future research and discussions in cognitive neuroscience.
Abstract in brief
- The traditional view of perception focuses on hierarchical feedforward models, where sensory inputs are processed through layers of feature detectors.
- Recently, this has been challenged by predictive processing (PP) theories, which suggest perception is based on predictions and discrepancies between expected and actual sensory information.
- Despite the growing interest in PP, it has faced criticism for insufficient empirical evidence, but new neurophysiological research is emerging that aims to provide support for its key claims.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyInteresting paper evaluating the evidence for
明日のジャーナルクラブに向けて、予測処理周りの神経生理研究のレビュー読んでた。これはすげえ勉強になった。 https://t.co/NQU4N6hs96
Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and @RedmondOConnell is out today. You can check out the paper here (https://t.co/c4J7vlueLh)
Check out the new review on predictive processing by @DP_McGovern and colleagues, just released as part of The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience in @NYASciences. https://t.co/7ZDvdrVbZK Well done David! @DCUFSH @DCU
ANNAS of the New York Academy of Sciences Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception https://t.co/3zsPkV6nA7
All mentions
Understanding Brain Function: Free Energy Principle Explained
Discover how the brain works through the Free Energy Principle and Predictive Processing. This video explores the brain as a prediction machine, emphasizing how it builds models to minimize surprise. Learn how this…
Biases in perceptual decision making
Day 22: How the Brain Works - The Free Energy Principle & Predictive Pro... https://t.co/7vJcGIcMXq via @YouTube
Valoración de la evidencia neurofisiológica del procesamiento predictivo como modelo de percepción. https://t.co/dV6cF7IS2I
RT @mjquinteroperez: Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive proc…
RT @mjquinteroperez: Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive proc…
RT @mjquinteroperez: Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive proc…
RT @mjquinteroperez: Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive proc…
RT @mjquinteroperez: Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive proc…
Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception https://t.co/M6b23fQAIF #AISSEconCIENCIA22 #clinicocontigo @fundaisse @clinicogranada
RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for
RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for
RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for
RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for
RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for
RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for
RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for
Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for
@AsafKlaf @TravoliRavioli @adamdobson123 I guess time wil tell if the more traditional models of perceptual experience will make way for new and better theories...(https://t.co/Fqzh1NZ6s9)...thanks for engaging in this discussion Asaf!
明日のジャーナルクラブに向けて、予測処理周りの神経生理研究のレビュー読んでた。これはすげえ勉強になった。 https://t.co/NQU4N6hs96
@BethHardie @Alberto_Chr Also, bottm-up procssing plays a relatively limted role in how we experience our environmnt. Top-down models based on our previous experiences more sig. influence what we perceive (see predictive processing models of perception). https://t.co/6jYIMOQng3
RT @DCUPsychology: Check out the new review on predictive processing by @DP_McGovern and colleagues, just released as part of The Year in C…
RT @DCUPsychology: Check out the new review on predictive processing by @DP_McGovern and colleagues, just released as part of The Year in C…
RT @DCUPsychology: Check out the new review on predictive processing by @DP_McGovern and colleagues, just released as part of The Year in C…
Check out the new review on predictive processing by @DP_McGovern and colleagues, just released as part of The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience in @NYASciences. https://t.co/7ZDvdrVbZK Well done David! @DCUFSH @DCU
Here a great review about #PredictiveProcesses (e.g. #PredictiveCoding and other flavors). https://t.co/NPjwMB36zd
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @PaulPcf22: Timely and very useful paper by @fluffycyborg and colleagues on the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing in…
RT @Raymundo_Pardal: Great work summarizing many of the evidence for and against predictive coding. It should spur future modeling and expe…
RT @Raymundo_Pardal: Great work summarizing many of the evidence for and against predictive coding. It should spur future modeling and expe…
Great work summarizing many of the evidence for and against predictive coding. It should spur future modeling and experimental work. ”Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception” https://t.co/dEZmME9kke
RT @PaulPcf22: Timely and very useful paper by @fluffycyborg and colleagues on the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing in…
RT @PaulPcf22: Timely and very useful paper by @fluffycyborg and colleagues on the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing in…
RT @leafs_s: ANNAS of the New York Academy of Sciences Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @PaulPcf22: Timely and very useful paper by @fluffycyborg and colleagues on the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing in…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
Timely and very useful paper by @fluffycyborg and colleagues on the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing in perception: https://t.co/tkYkOgjK0H
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @leafs_s: ANNAS of the New York Academy of Sciences Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
Major claims of predictive coding have been put under investigation! Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception https://t.co/TxNH9Rdlz3
RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and @RedmondOConnell is out today. You can check out the paper here (https://t.co/c4J7vlueLh)
ANNAS of the New York Academy of Sciences Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception https://t.co/3zsPkV6nA7
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…
Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical grounding is currently unsettled...nevertheless...a milestone in cognitive neuroscience" https://t.co/cWWQsSOb06
JH
LP
HM
KW
DP
C
ÁG
FC
JO
YC
PI
FA
MJ
SO
DS
A
PA
BL
NG
JB
ED
RN
N
DS
DM
YV
KF
DG
MG
ON
JD
RN
CH
BK
H
LS
QE
AB
PF
DS
AB
CL
JH
HH
DJ
T
SK
AC
PT
PM
C
ES
TS
TC
DH
RA
W
TE
E
AF
TD
JK
MW
BÜ
J
AS
KM
CS
GN
DV
DW
KF
EC
AS
FS
MS
GD
CJ
AF
PN
JD