March 2020 PMID 32147856

Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception.

Kevin S Walsh, David P McGovern, Andy Clark, Redmond G O'Connell

Mentions

98
Peak: 67 in Mar 2020
across 4 sources since Mar 2020

Extended reach

472,202
potential audience

Total likes

315

Video views

3,260

Mentions per month

Mar 2020 – Oct 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter90 posts
  • Facebook4 posts
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Blogs2 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Numerous discussions highlighted specific aspects of the article, such as noting that predictive processing challenges traditional perception models and can influence future research. Phrases like 'timely and very useful paper' and 'proper review of evidence' indicate enthusiasm and solid recognition of the article’s significance, illustrating a collective appreciation for its contribution to the field.

AgreementModerate agreement

The majority of discussions show confident support for the article's insights about predictive processing.

InterestHigh interest

Users express high curiosity about the neurophysiological aspects and implications of the research.

EngagementModerate engagement

While many posts echo similar sentiments, a few delve deeper into the specifics, such as discussing traditional models versus predictive processing.

ImpactHigh impact

There is a strong belief that this publication will influence future research and discussions in cognitive neuroscience.

Abstract in brief

  • The traditional view of perception focuses on hierarchical feedforward models, where sensory inputs are processed through layers of feature detectors.
  • Recently, this has been challenged by predictive processing (PP) theories, which suggest perception is based on predictions and discrepancies between expected and actual sensory information.
  • Despite the growing interest in PP, it has faced criticism for insufficient empirical evidence, but new neurophysiological research is emerging that aims to provide support for its key claims.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Jakob Hohwy
@hohwy · X

Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical grounding is currently unsettled...nevertheless...a milestone in cognitive neuroscience" https://t.co/cWWQsSOb06

Mar 9, 2020 · 103 likes · 53 shares · 4,675 followers View post →
Luiz Pessoa
@PessoaBrain · X

Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for

Jun 8, 2022 · 51 likes · 7 shares · 45,536 followers View post →
Hiroshi Matsui
@HeathRossie · X

明日のジャーナルクラブに向けて、予測処理周りの神経生理研究のレビュー読んでた。これはすげえ勉強になった。 https://t.co/NQU4N6hs96

May 10, 2021 · 18 likes · 2,499 followers View post →
Kev Walsh
@_KevWalsh · X

Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and @RedmondOConnell is out today. You can check out the paper here (https://t.co/c4J7vlueLh)

Mar 9, 2020 · 13 likes · 6 shares · 108 followers View post →
DCU School of Psychology
@DCUPsychology · X

Check out the new review on predictive processing by @DP_McGovern and colleagues, just released as part of The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience in @NYASciences. https://t.co/7ZDvdrVbZK Well done David! @DCUFSH @DCU

Apr 9, 2020 · 10 likes · 4 shares · 1,031 followers View post →
CLaE
@leafs_s · X

ANNAS of the New York Academy of Sciences Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception https://t.co/3zsPkV6nA7

Mar 9, 2020 · 9 likes · 2 shares · 28,256 followers View post →

All mentions

Anthony Ellis
@skydog811 · X

Day 22: How the Brain Works - The Free Energy Principle & Predictive Pro... https://t.co/7vJcGIcMXq via @YouTube

Oct 3, 2025 · 53,481 followers View post →
Álvaro Guiter
@guiterfisio · X

Valoración de la evidencia neurofisiológica del procesamiento predictivo como modelo de percepción. https://t.co/dV6cF7IS2I

Jan 3, 2024 · 1 like · 1,399 followers View post →
FT. Carlos Carmona
@CarmonaFisio · X

RT @mjquinteroperez: Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive proc…

Sep 24, 2022 · 5 shares · 742 followers View post →
Juan Anaya Ojeda
@Juanayaojeda · X

RT @mjquinteroperez: Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive proc…

Sep 24, 2022 · 5 shares · 3,321 followers View post →
Yolanda Colodro
@YolandaColo · X

RT @mjquinteroperez: Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive proc…

Sep 24, 2022 · 5 shares · 1,264 followers View post →
Paula Iglesias
@Paula_igr · X

RT @mjquinteroperez: Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive proc…

Sep 24, 2022 · 5 shares · 693 followers View post →
Fundación AISSE
@fundaisse · X

RT @mjquinteroperez: Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive proc…

Sep 24, 2022 · 5 shares · 953 followers View post →
Manuel Jesús
@mjquinteroperez · X

Otro artículo recomendado por @Juanayaojeda Walsh' 20 Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception https://t.co/M6b23fQAIF #AISSEconCIENCIA22 #clinicocontigo @fundaisse @clinicogranada

Sep 24, 2022 · 6 likes · 5 shares · 160 followers View post →
Shin Okada
@nshinshi_ · X

RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for

Jul 9, 2022 · 7 shares · 187 followers View post →
Daniel Borek (@dborek@scholar.social)
@danieltomasz · X

RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for

Jun 28, 2022 · 7 shares · 1,319 followers View post →
AT
@a_tomyshev · X

RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for

Jun 10, 2022 · 7 shares · 21 followers View post →
Philosophy & Psychiatry (AAPP)
@aapp_PhilPsych · X

RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for

Jun 9, 2022 · 7 shares · 4,100 followers View post →
Bruce Long
@BruceRLong · X

RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for

Jun 9, 2022 · 7 shares · 830 followers View post →
Nathalie George
@nathgeorgeNG · X

RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for

Jun 8, 2022 · 7 shares · 250 followers View post →
Jesus Ramirez-Bermudez
@JRBneuropsiq · X

RT @PessoaBrain: Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for

Jun 8, 2022 · 7 shares · 31,334 followers View post →
Luiz Pessoa
@PessoaBrain · X

Interesting paper evaluating the evidence for

Jun 8, 2022 · 51 likes · 7 shares · 45,536 followers View post →
Evert Jan Das
@Everdojuan · X

@AsafKlaf @TravoliRavioli @adamdobson123 I guess time wil tell if the more traditional models of perceptual experience will make way for new and better theories...(https://t.co/Fqzh1NZ6s9)...thanks for engaging in this discussion Asaf!

Feb 18, 2022 · 1 like · 149 followers View post →
Hiroshi Matsui
@HeathRossie · X

明日のジャーナルクラブに向けて、予測処理周りの神経生理研究のレビュー読んでた。これはすげえ勉強になった。 https://t.co/NQU4N6hs96

May 10, 2021 · 18 likes · 2,499 followers View post →
Richard E. Niemeyer
@RENiemeyerPhD · X

@BethHardie @Alberto_Chr Also, bottm-up procssing plays a relatively limted role in how we experience our environmnt. Top-down models based on our previous experiences more sig. influence what we perceive (see predictive processing models of perception). https://t.co/6jYIMOQng3

Nov 30, 2020 · 1 like · 1,358 followers View post →
NYAS
@NYASciences · X

RT @DCUPsychology: Check out the new review on predictive processing by @DP_McGovern and colleagues, just released as part of The Year in C…

Apr 9, 2020 · 4 shares · 11,274 followers View post →
DCU Neuroscience Society
@DCUNeuroSoc · X

RT @DCUPsychology: Check out the new review on predictive processing by @DP_McGovern and colleagues, just released as part of The Year in C…

Apr 9, 2020 · 4 shares · 81 followers View post →
David McGovern
@DP_McGovern · X

RT @DCUPsychology: Check out the new review on predictive processing by @DP_McGovern and colleagues, just released as part of The Year in C…

Apr 9, 2020 · 4 shares · 216 followers View post →
DCU School of Psychology
@DCUPsychology · X

Check out the new review on predictive processing by @DP_McGovern and colleagues, just released as part of The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience in @NYASciences. https://t.co/7ZDvdrVbZK Well done David! @DCUFSH @DCU

Apr 9, 2020 · 10 likes · 4 shares · 1,031 followers View post →
Yamil Vidal
@YamilVidal_arg · X

Here a great review about #PredictiveProcesses (e.g. #PredictiveCoding and other flavors). https://t.co/NPjwMB36zd

Mar 16, 2020 · 1 like · 725 followers View post →
Kjartan Vibe Fersum
@kjartanfersum · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 15, 2020 · 53 shares · 4,119 followers View post →
Derek Griffin
@DerekGriffin86 · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 15, 2020 · 53 shares · 38,381 followers View post →
Manesh Girn
@MGirnNeuro · X

RT @PaulPcf22: Timely and very useful paper by @fluffycyborg and colleagues on the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing in…

Mar 15, 2020 · 4 shares · 2,415 followers View post →
OpenCorteX.net
@opencortexnet · X

RT @Raymundo_Pardal: Great work summarizing many of the evidence for and against predictive coding. It should spur future modeling and expe…

Mar 13, 2020 · 2 shares · 26 followers View post →
Jess Dully
@JessicaDully · X

RT @Raymundo_Pardal: Great work summarizing many of the evidence for and against predictive coding. It should spur future modeling and expe…

Mar 13, 2020 · 2 shares · 635 followers View post →
Raymundo Neto
@Raymundo_Pardal · X

Great work summarizing many of the evidence for and against predictive coding. It should spur future modeling and experimental work. ”Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception” https://t.co/dEZmME9kke

Mar 13, 2020 · 5 likes · 2 shares · 340 followers View post →
Kev Walsh
@_KevWalsh · X

RT @PaulPcf22: Timely and very useful paper by @fluffycyborg and colleagues on the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing in…

Mar 12, 2020 · 4 shares · 108 followers View post →
Jess Dully
@JessicaDully · X

RT @PaulPcf22: Timely and very useful paper by @fluffycyborg and colleagues on the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing in…

Mar 12, 2020 · 4 shares · 635 followers View post →
CLaE
@leafs_s · X

RT @leafs_s: ANNAS of the New York Academy of Sciences Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of…

Mar 10, 2020 · 2 shares · 28,256 followers View post →
Cecilia Heyes
@CeliaHeyes · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 10, 2020 · 53 shares · 4,574 followers View post →
Brennan Klein
@jkbren · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 10, 2020 · 53 shares · 3,011 followers View post →
Hello
@intrinsic_motiv · X

RT @PaulPcf22: Timely and very useful paper by @fluffycyborg and colleagues on the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing in…

Mar 10, 2020 · 4 shares · 939 followers View post →
Leonhard Schilbach
@leoschilbach · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 10, 2020 · 53 shares · 6,744 followers View post →
q(Alex Kiefer | everything else)
@exilefaker · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 10, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,267 followers View post →
Action Prediction Lab / Prof Patric Bach
@actpredictlab · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 10, 2020 · 53 shares · 2,863 followers View post →
Paul Fletcher
@PaulPcf22 · X

Timely and very useful paper by @fluffycyborg and colleagues on the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing in perception: https://t.co/tkYkOgjK0H

Mar 10, 2020 · 7 likes · 4 shares · 4,263 followers View post →
Honey
@amy21109 · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 10, 2020 · 53 shares · 5 followers View post →
Daniel Skipper
@DanielSkipper6 · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 10, 2020 · 53 shares · 54 followers View post →
Aishwarya (Ash) Bhonsle
@ashbhonsle · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 10, 2020 · 53 shares · 225 followers View post →
Choice Blindness Lab
@ChoiceBlindness · X

RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…

Mar 10, 2020 · 6 shares · 464 followers View post →
Jeong-Kyu Han
@jayhan97 · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 10, 2020 · 53 shares · 341 followers View post →
Hinze Hogendoorn
@HinzeHogendoorn · X

RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…

Mar 10, 2020 · 6 shares · 786 followers View post →
Diane Jacobs
@dfjpt · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 4,436 followers View post →
tosun
@lethimwhat · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 180 followers View post →
Simon Kelly
@spk3lly · X

RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…

Mar 9, 2020 · 6 shares · 466 followers View post →
Andrew Corcoran
@mr_corcorana · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,069 followers View post →
Prof Mick Thacker
@dibbygibby · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 5,926 followers View post →
Peter Murphy
@neuromurphy · X

RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…

Mar 9, 2020 · 6 shares · 501 followers View post →
CCIG
@ccig_cambridge · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 609 followers View post →
Emmanuel A Stamatakis
@estamatakis · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 810 followers View post →
Tobias Schuwerk
@TobiasSchuwerk · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 485 followers View post →
Tim Cocks
@altThinq · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,516 followers View post →
RindMind
@MindRind · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 9 followers View post →
Dr Caitlin Howlett
@caitlinahowlett · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,244 followers View post →
Reza (Abolfazl) Alipour
@Reza_a_Alipour · X

RT @leafs_s: ANNAS of the New York Academy of Sciences Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of…

Mar 9, 2020 · 2 shares · 99 followers View post →
wolodya
@wolodya · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,071 followers View post →
Tobias Egner
@EgnerLab · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,529 followers View post →
Eric
@ewschaetzle · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 277 followers View post →
Anna Fiveash
@Anna5ash · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,578 followers View post →
Tony Donegan
@tony_donegan78 · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 109 followers View post →
James Kingsland
@JamesAKingsland · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,702 followers View post →
Mateusz Wozniak
@mmwozniak · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 941 followers View post →
Burcu Ayşen Ürgen
@BAUrgen · X

Major claims of predictive coding have been put under investigation! Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception https://t.co/TxNH9Rdlz3

Mar 9, 2020 · 3 likes · 2,634 followers View post →
Jess Dully
@JessicaDully · X

RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…

Mar 9, 2020 · 6 shares · 635 followers View post →
Jeshua
@JeshuaTromp · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 99 followers View post →
Anil Seth
@anilkseth · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 56,331 followers View post →
Kevin Mitchell
@WiringTheBrain · X

RT @_KevWalsh: Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and…

Mar 9, 2020 · 6 shares · 40,316 followers View post →
Clare Press @clarepress.bsky.social
@ClarePress · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,988 followers View post →
Graham Mead (NeuroPleb)
@twillierod · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,446 followers View post →
David Vanegas
@evolanguagemind · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,473 followers View post →
Kev Walsh
@_KevWalsh · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 108 followers View post →
Kev Walsh
@_KevWalsh · X

Delighted that our review of the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing with @DP_McGovern, @fluffycyborg, and @RedmondOConnell is out today. You can check out the paper here (https://t.co/c4J7vlueLh)

Mar 9, 2020 · 13 likes · 6 shares · 108 followers View post →
CLaE
@leafs_s · X

ANNAS of the New York Academy of Sciences Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception https://t.co/3zsPkV6nA7

Mar 9, 2020 · 9 likes · 2 shares · 28,256 followers View post →
Dan Williams
@danwilliamsphil · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 11,070 followers View post →
Kayson Fakhar
@Kaysonfakhar · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,472 followers View post →
Eros Carvalho
@filosofemas · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 3,180 followers View post →
Anna Ciaunica @annaciaunica.bsky.social
@AnnaCiaunica · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 13,878 followers View post →
Fernando Ferreira-Santos
@ffsantos_lab · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 423 followers View post →
Matt Spike
@matspike · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 3,417 followers View post →
George Deane
@georgejwdeane · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,114 followers View post →
Chris Jungerius
@ChrisJungerius · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 161 followers View post →
Anderson Fonseca
@AndydeFonseca · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 316 followers View post →
Paul Nulty
@pgnulty · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 455 followers View post →
Joe Dewhurst
@joe_dewhurst · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 1,974 followers View post →
Evert Jan Das
@Everdojuan · X

RT @hohwy: Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical groun…

Mar 9, 2020 · 53 shares · 149 followers View post →
Jakob Hohwy
@hohwy · X

Finally! A proper review of evidence for predictive processing, from @fluffycyborg et co "the debate about PP’s empirical grounding is currently unsettled...nevertheless...a milestone in cognitive neuroscience" https://t.co/cWWQsSOb06

Mar 9, 2020 · 103 likes · 53 shares · 4,675 followers View post →