PubHawk
PLoS Med April 2020 PMID 32243458

CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis.

Adriani Nikolakopoulou, Julian P T Higgins, Theodoros Papakonstantinou, Anna Chaimani, Cinzia Del Giovane, Matthias Egger, Georgia Salanti

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

48
Peak: 12 in Apr 2020
across 4 sources since Apr 2020

Extended reach

220,383
potential audience

Total likes

94

Video views

32

Mentions per month

Apr 2020 – Aug 2024

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter40 posts
  • News3 articles
  • Blogs3 articles
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The analysis reveals strong agreement with the usefulness of CINeMA, as reflected in posts that praise its clear methodology and practical examples. Such wording, along with references to specific elements like heterogeneity and bias, indicates active engagement and recognition of its importance in the field of network meta-analysis.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions recognize CINeMA as a valuable framework, supporting its methodology and applications.

InterestHigh interest

Discussions express high curiosity about CINeMA, highlighting its utility and recent developments.

EngagementHigh engagement

Posts include detailed descriptions, methodological examples, and references, showing deep involvement.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions suggest CINeMA influences evidence synthesis practices, encouraging adoption and further research.

Abstract in brief

  • CINeMA is a methodological framework designed to assess the confidence in results from network meta-analyses by examining six key domains: within-study bias, reporting bias, indirectness, imprecision, heterogeneity, and incoherence.
  • The framework uses a contribution matrix to show how much each study influences the overall results, helping evaluate biases and indirectness effectively, with an accessible web tool for calculations.
  • By considering variability and providing clear examples, CINeMA enhances transparency, reduces subjectivity in evidence evaluation, and is adaptable to complex and large network analyses.
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
さくら
@Sakura_Med_DSci · X

ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt46TS3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (ii) reporting bias (iii) indirectness (iv) imprecision (v) heterogeneity (vi) incoherence

Mar 4, 2023 · 46 likes · 7 shares · 17,733 followers View post →
さくら
@Sakura_Med_DSci · X

ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (ii) reporting bias (iii) indirectness (iv) imprecision (v) heterogeneity (vi) incoherence （続く） https://t.co/A22dXYyRc8

Oct 11, 2021 · 38 likes · 13 shares · 17,733 followers View post →
KSR Systematic Reviews
@KSR_SysRev · X

CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis: https://t.co/QnkJPLlfhk via @PLOSMedicine @unibern #OA #openaccess #NMA #MetaAnalysis #SystematicReviews #Methodology #CINeMA Image credit: Nikolakopoulou et al. 2020 https://t.co/pMsDNNlOSz

May 6, 2020 · 3 likes · 4 shares · 356 followers View post →
Cinzia Del Giovane
@CinziaGiovane · X

During the lockdown, what's better than going to the virtual CINeMA and assess confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis? @tpapak114 @Geointheworld @eggersnsf https://t.co/z93qyCeTqN

Apr 8, 2020 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 108 followers View post →
PLOS Medicine
@PLOSMedicine · X

Adriani Nikolakopoulou and co-authors discuss CINeMA, an approach for evaluating the findings of network meta-analyses https://t.co/1ELYOds5Lx @ISPMBern

Apr 14, 2020 · 1 like · 58,026 followers View post →
坂田 昌嗣 Masa Sakata, PhD
@MasatsuguSakata · X

ネットワークメタ解析の信頼性の評価は、間接比較があるためにペアワイズの場合よりややこしい。 CINeMAでは、1．研究内バイアス、2．報告バイアス、3．間接性、4．不正確さ、5．不均一性、6．非一貫性、の領域で比較の質の評価をすることが提起されている。 #PLOSMedicine https://t.co/BvaLinPr68

Oct 6, 2021 · 1 like · 1 share · 3,045 followers View post →

All mentions

Renan Rocha
@rwgrocha · X

#PLOSMedicine: CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis https://t.co/K10OdwjsDT

Feb 16, 2024 · 219 followers View post →
土屋 裕章
@THiroaki1986 · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt46TS3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Mar 5, 2023 · 7 shares · 345 followers View post →
Yu Fujiwara, MD
@waraonc23 · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt46TS3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Mar 4, 2023 · 7 shares · 751 followers View post →
Satoru Mitsuboshi
@3stars67664378 · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt46TS3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Mar 4, 2023 · 7 shares · 1,779 followers View post →
おれんじ色
@orangeiro7 · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt46TS3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Mar 4, 2023 · 7 shares · 1,805 followers View post →
know thyself（子豚のオリバー)
@thyself_know · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt46TS3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Mar 4, 2023 · 7 shares · 1,220 followers View post →
さくら
@Sakura_Med_DSci · X

ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt46TS3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (ii) reporting bias (iii) indirectness (iv) imprecision (v) heterogeneity (vi) incoherence

Mar 4, 2023 · 46 likes · 7 shares · 17,733 followers View post →
Arthur Albuquerque
@arthur_alb1 · X

@rleitepacheco PIs tell us what are the consenquences of heterogeneity. Eg, look how CINeMA addresses it https://t.co/x182TkODw3 “Heterogeneity is important if a prediction interval includes values that lead to a different conclusion than an assessment based on the confidence interval.”

Mar 9, 2022 · 1 like · 861 followers View post →
青島周一
@syuichiao89 · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Oct 15, 2021 · 13 shares · 8,608 followers View post →
こたえもん
@kotaemonn · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Oct 15, 2021 · 13 shares · 968 followers View post →
Suama Lab
@bio_psycho_14 · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Oct 13, 2021 · 13 shares · 163 followers View post →
adeyu/チョコミン党
@th_adieu · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Oct 13, 2021 · 13 shares · 1,887 followers View post →
坂田 昌嗣 Masa Sakata, PhD
@MasatsuguSakata · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Oct 13, 2021 · 13 shares · 3,045 followers View post →
さくら
@Sakura_Med_DSci · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Oct 12, 2021 · 13 shares · 17,733 followers View post →
Hira_Labo
@hirat62363752 · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Oct 11, 2021 · 13 shares · 157 followers View post →
ムック
@mukku_sa6 · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Oct 11, 2021 · 13 shares · 28 followers View post →
Shin@PT
@shintaro4891 · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Oct 11, 2021 · 13 shares · 179 followers View post →
斎藤ひとりファン＠寝る前に毎日聞きましょう
@SaitoHitori_100 · X

RT @Sakura_Med_DSci: ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (i…

Oct 11, 2021 · 13 shares · 2,165 followers View post →
さくら
@Sakura_Med_DSci · X

ネットワークメタ解析（NMA）のエビデンス確信度の評価：CINeMA この論文の説明が一番わかりやすかったです。 https://t.co/2Onrt4nWU3 6つのドメインで評価 (i) within-study bias (ii) reporting bias (iii) indirectness (iv) imprecision (v) heterogeneity (vi) incoherence （続く） https://t.co/A22dXYyRc8

Oct 11, 2021 · 38 likes · 13 shares · 17,733 followers View post →
坂田 昌嗣 Masa Sakata, PhD
@MasatsuguSakata · X

ネットワークメタ解析の信頼性の評価は、間接比較があるためにペアワイズの場合よりややこしい。 CINeMAでは、1．研究内バイアス、2．報告バイアス、3．間接性、4．不正確さ、5．不均一性、6．非一貫性、の領域で比較の質の評価をすることが提起されている。 #PLOSMedicine https://t.co/BvaLinPr68

Oct 6, 2021 · 1 like · 1 share · 3,045 followers View post →
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @HMakrinioti: CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis https://t.co/J6KkX5m4fT

Sep 20, 2021 · 1 share · 6,718 followers View post →
Heidi Makrinioti
@HMakrinioti · X

CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis https://t.co/J6KkX5m4fT

Sep 20, 2021 · 1 share · 416 followers View post →
坂田 昌嗣 Masa Sakata, PhD
@MasatsuguSakata · X

RT @MasatsuguSakata: ネットワークメタアナリシスの信頼性を評価、CINeMA。 実はそのうちやりたいテーマがあって、ついていけるだろうか。。。 #PLOSMedicine: CINeMA: An approach for assessing confiden…

Jul 5, 2021 · 3 shares · 3,045 followers View post →
Dr.Rana AlBalawi | د. رنا البلوي
@drranaahmed88 · X

RT @KSR_SysRev: CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis: https://t.co/QnkJPLlfhk via @PLOSMe…

Jun 16, 2020 · 4 shares · 1,029 followers View post →
Abraham E. Gracia R.
@Abraham_RMI · X

RT @KSR_SysRev: CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis: https://t.co/QnkJPLlfhk via @PLOSMe…

May 6, 2020 · 4 shares · 4,682 followers View post →
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @KSR_SysRev: CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis: https://t.co/QnkJPLlfhk via @PLOSMe…

May 6, 2020 · 4 shares · 6,718 followers View post →
KSR Systematic Reviews
@KSR_SysRev · X

CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis: https://t.co/QnkJPLlfhk via @PLOSMedicine @unibern #OA #openaccess #NMA #MetaAnalysis #SystematicReviews #Methodology #CINeMA Image credit: Nikolakopoulou et al. 2020 https://t.co/pMsDNNlOSz

May 6, 2020 · 3 likes · 4 shares · 356 followers View post →
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @Info4Practice: New on https://t.co/8pxKdRDxAR | CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis…

May 2, 2020 · 1 share · 6,718 followers View post →
PLOS Medicine
@PLOSMedicine · X

Adriani Nikolakopoulou and co-authors discuss CINeMA, an approach for evaluating the findings of network meta-analyses https://t.co/1ELYOds5Lx @ISPMBern

Apr 14, 2020 · 1 like · 58,026 followers View post →
Rebecca Sear
@RebeccaSear · X

CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis https://t.co/WSRAlv6r86

Apr 13, 2020 · 12,720 followers View post →
坂田 昌嗣 Masa Sakata, PhD
@MasatsuguSakata · X

ネットワークメタアナリシスの信頼性を評価、CINeMA。 実はそのうちやりたいテーマがあって、ついていけるだろうか。。。 #PLOSMedicine: CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis https://t.co/BvaLinPr68

Apr 10, 2020 · 1 like · 3 shares · 3,045 followers View post →
Miyoung Choi
@gracecmy · X

RT @jomck15: Great to see this paper in press! Provides a clear description of the CINeMA methodology, along with examples. #PLOSMedicine:…

Apr 8, 2020 · 5 shares · 54 followers View post →
Jeremy Grimshaw
@GrimshawJeremy · X

RT @jomck15: Great to see this paper in press! Provides a clear description of the CINeMA methodology, along with examples. #PLOSMedicine:…

Apr 8, 2020 · 5 shares · 5,174 followers View post →
Matthias Egger
@eggersnsf · X

RT @CinziaGiovane: During the lockdown, what's better than going to the virtual CINeMA and assess confidence in the results of a network me…

Apr 8, 2020 · 2 shares · 9,891 followers View post →
Joerg J Meerpohl
@meerpohl · X

RT @jomck15: Great to see this paper in press! Provides a clear description of the CINeMA methodology, along with examples. #PLOSMedicine:…

Apr 8, 2020 · 5 shares · 1,963 followers View post →
Dr Kerry Dwan
@dwan_kerry · X

RT @jomck15: Great to see this paper in press! Provides a clear description of the CINeMA methodology, along with examples. #PLOSMedicine:…

Apr 8, 2020 · 5 shares · 376 followers View post →
Cinzia Del Giovane
@CinziaGiovane · X

During the lockdown, what's better than going to the virtual CINeMA and assess confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis? @tpapak114 @Geointheworld @eggersnsf https://t.co/z93qyCeTqN

Apr 8, 2020 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 108 followers View post →
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @jomck15: Great to see this paper in press! Provides a clear description of the CINeMA methodology, along with examples. #PLOSMedicine:…

Apr 8, 2020 · 5 shares · 6,718 followers View post →
Arnaud Chiolero
@swissepi · X

#evidence synthesis: a method to ascertain confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis

Apr 8, 2020 · 1 like · 932 followers View post →
Continuum AEP
@ContinuumAEP · X

#PlosMedicine CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis https://t.co/Kr6jPGRcK4

Apr 3, 2020 · 10,759 followers View post →