Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Numerous discussions highlight the R0 value of SARS-CoV-2, with individuals quoting estimates from studies, such as 'the intrinsic R0 is estimated to be around 5.7'. Many posts express urgency and concern using phrases like 'this is significant' to emphasize the implications for public health measures. The tone throughout conveys a mix of alarm and the necessity for informed actions, showcasing a deep engagement with the research.
Many discussions reflect support for the publication's findings regarding the contagiousness of the virus.
There is a clear curiosity evident in the discussions, with users sharing and seeking more information about R0 values and disease transmission.
Participants engage at a moderate level, often referencing specific data from the study and its implications regarding policy and public health.
The discussions indicate that users perceive the publication to have significant implications for understanding the virus's spread and controlling the pandemic.
Mathematically, seasonality for SARS2 should have *never* been the default assumption given: (1) the *intrinsic R0* of 5.7 for the original strain; (2) the global mutation rate; and (3) the lack of durable immunity post-infection and -vax. https://t.co/Uik9EBA367 https://t.co/nb6tI7wUSN
Btw, this isn't difficult to understand. Even GPT4 can do the math (see below). Go ahead and apply only a 0.4% CFR: your spreading SARS2 still killed someone. And that was w/ancestral strain, which was less inherently transmissible than later variants. https://t.co/Rusp1Gub6P https://t.co/3Lswm1OlG1
Is it though? 1) Estimates for R0 of measles range from 5 to 20+ (see thread) 2) Other estimates for R0 of SARS2 are as high as 11.. 3) Why wasn't TB plotted? Its an Airborne virus and the R0 is ~3
武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - https://t.co/4vVsyHMFkp @CDCgovさんから
4⃣ 48F1 is mentioned again in "High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2". Note that 48F1 has onset of Dec 10, 2019. This is probably from same National Health Commission database. 10.3201/eid2607.200282 https://t.co/DEukLuS5kA
科学的文献。ご参考まで ”High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2” https://t.co/lF8aiUHgOC ‘‘Herd Immunity’’: A Rough Guide (PDF) https://t.co/2Z76pisqrR
This video explores the clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic COVID-19 infections identified among close contacts in Nanjing, China. It highlights the transmission potential of asymptomatic carriers and emphasizes…
In this video, we provide an educational overview of COVID-19 and vaccination. We discuss the high contagiousness of SARS-CoV-2, the rapid spread of infections, and strategies for control such as active surveillance and…
RT @RadCentrism: Mathematically, seasonality for SARS2 should have *never* been the default assumption given: (1) the *intrinsic R0* of 5.…
RT @RadCentrism: Mathematically, seasonality for SARS2 should have *never* been the default assumption given: (1) the *intrinsic R0* of 5.…
RT @RadCentrism: Mathematically, seasonality for SARS2 should have *never* been the default assumption given: (1) the *intrinsic R0* of 5.…
RT @RadCentrism: Mathematically, seasonality for SARS2 should have *never* been the default assumption given: (1) the *intrinsic R0* of 5.…
RT @RadCentrism: Mathematically, seasonality for SARS2 should have *never* been the default assumption given: (1) the *intrinsic R0* of 5.…
Mathematically, seasonality for SARS2 should have *never* been the default assumption given: (1) the *intrinsic R0* of 5.7 for the original strain; (2) the global mutation rate; and (3) the lack of durable immunity post-infection and -vax. https://t.co/Uik9EBA367 https://t.co/nb6tI7wUSN
RT @Engineer2The: 4⃣ 48F1 is mentioned again in "High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2".…
Jan 4 is earlier cases https://t.co/RqM8h61rQj Jan 11 is when the world got told about H2H transmission https://t.co/KEaP5z5AWO That’s enough for now, DM if you have any questions, I covered early COVID outbreak in Australia. This was covered up by states
RT @Engineer2The: 4⃣ 48F1 is mentioned again in "High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2".…
@ColleenLW @DannyExplor1ng @ToeNegro Definitely. https://t.co/Uik9EBA367 https://t.co/5b04vtKs9F
@praeteritia @Derek_a_Franks @CDCgov Each person can infect 5-6 others if still contagious, and only 50% of cases were caught by the 5 day rec as is. https://t.co/zOaTbNeqwC Regardless, from the sounds of it our priorities are in different places. I've passed along research. I'll leave it here.
@Adede2023 This is in contrast to the natural R0 of SARS2—a pandemic pathogen: https://t.co/Uik9EBA367 https://t.co/asBbErfoYQ
RT @Engineer2The: 4⃣ 48F1 is mentioned again in "High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2".…
RT @Engineer2The: 4⃣ 48F1 is mentioned again in "High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2".…
RT @Engineer2The: 4⃣ 48F1 is mentioned again in "High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2".…
RT @Engineer2The: 4⃣ 48F1 is mentioned again in "High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2".…
4⃣ 48F1 is mentioned again in "High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2". Note that 48F1 has onset of Dec 10, 2019. This is probably from same National Health Commission database. 10.3201/eid2607.200282 https://t.co/DEukLuS5kA
@ejustin46 @falsel_net @SolidEvidence @COVIDPoops19 @siamosolocani @UseBy2022 @kallmemeg @MarionKoopmans @DavidJoffe64 @Antonio_Caramia @gwladwr @JPWeiland @RolandBakerIII @Asinickle1 @1goodtern @Alexander_Tin @RajlabN @outbreakupdates @triangle24 @Rrenzokutai Intrinsic R0 of current variants are extremely high. Likely far higher than 8. Ancestral was likely ~5.7, perhaps much higher. Intrinsic/“natural” R0 is all/mostly all that matters once nAb levels wane. https://t.co/Uik9EBzvgz https://t.co/yUY2GCW9sD
Again, irrelevant/false, as it is documented the virus was spreading earlier--globally--than any potential Huanan Market superspreader. The intrinsic/"natural" R0 of ancestral strain was also calculated to be ~5.7 by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). https://t.co/Uik9EBA367 https://t.co/LIuYcUT4ct
RT @RadCentrism: @peterstaley @sullydish This is what it should be: R0 of ancestral strain was 5.7 https://t.co/Uik9EBhTRZ https://t.co/V…
RT @RadCentrism: Btw, this isn't difficult to understand. Even GPT4 can do the math (see below). Go ahead and apply only a 0.4% CFR: your…
RT @RadCentrism: Btw, this isn't difficult to understand. Even GPT4 can do the math (see below). Go ahead and apply only a 0.4% CFR: your…
RT @RadCentrism: Btw, this isn't difficult to understand. Even GPT4 can do the math (see below). Go ahead and apply only a 0.4% CFR: your…
RT @RadCentrism: Btw, this isn't difficult to understand. Even GPT4 can do the math (see below). Go ahead and apply only a 0.4% CFR: your…
Btw, this isn't difficult to understand. Even GPT4 can do the math (see below). Go ahead and apply only a 0.4% CFR: your spreading SARS2 still killed someone. And that was w/ancestral strain, which was less inherently transmissible than later variants. https://t.co/Rusp1Gub6P https://t.co/3Lswm1OlG1
@gwfcbayern @ParlayKingLG @TheMikeMorton @KanekoaTheGreat i mean r0 clearly bigger - flu is considered 1.3 vs covid calculated at *5.7*. https://t.co/RUVslAKXiD
@massy_4444 @whitepatrick @TinyTon_e @GrumpyCatterman @bennyjohnson You obviously understand exponential growth & math, don’t you? it was 300% higher, btw, Archimedes https://t.co/WtfiCVxSn3
@Dr_JubJub @fucnpr2 @R_H_Ebright Some see it a bit differently: https://t.co/8cHleaxLIj
@polmplm @goddeketal @DrLoupis https://t.co/NUtDMLbo0z ‘Initial estimate’
@PiazzapulitaLA7 @alessiolasta 2. poi R0=2 é basso, in letteratura per i coronavirus era stimato (in maniera errata) R0=2,2-2,7 ma già con il preliminare che ho letto ad Apr'20di CDC https://t.co/r06T6zUbUL indica il valore mediano R0 di 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9)su dati di Wuhan prima delle misure di contenimento
@Angsty_Face @Debunk_the_Funk @DrLoupis Covid has a median Ro value of 5.7, with some sub-variants as high as 18.6(comparable to measles). Flu has an Ro value of between 1 & 2. Facts don't care about feelings my guy... https://t.co/2isjEyGe54
RT @RadCentrism: @Marc_Veld @MarvinH2_G2 @microlabdoc LANL calculated: https://t.co/5Jsp96j05Q https://t.co/Uik9EBA367 https://t.co/sYjEm…
@Marc_Veld @MarvinH2_G2 @microlabdoc LANL calculated: https://t.co/5Jsp96j05Q https://t.co/Uik9EBA367 https://t.co/sYjEm7CeqZ
@merissahansen17 When I saw a listing of the R(0) for COVID-19 @ median 5.7 .. had > doubled? Not https://t.co/YcGrhO6C4F
@Dr_D_Man @TWood20229662 #LieBetter The R0 for COVID-19 is a median of 5.7, according to a study published online in Emerging Infectious Diseases. That puts #COVID19 just behind small pox and polio in terms of infectiousness. https://t.co/BsVuIguC9Y
@jumpinin1 @jburnmurdoch https://t.co/UBsLTgRpe7 median r0 5.7 mid 2020... global pandemic began fall 2019... do the math
@RobiVil @Reflexionist_ 2. Non credo che nell'Europa Occidentale vaccinata la #Omicron avrà una diffusione come in UK dove sono state abolite le misure di contenimento, senza quelle misure anche la variante alfa ha un R0 alto R0 di 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9) https://t.co/r06T6zUbUL
@itosettiMD_MBA @E_Ros1978 @giorgiogilestro @RobiVil 2. Ad esempio qui https://t.co/r06T6zUbUL troverai median R0 value of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9) che indica che la contagiosità della variante alfa era 5,7 senza misure di contenimento e che nell'intervallo 3.8-8,9 ricadeva il 95% dei casi con tasso di raddoppio ogni 2.3–3.3 giorni
RT @yaneerbaryam: @JenniferKShea @jmcrookston Here: R0 estimated to be 5.7 "Results show that the doubling time early in the epidemic in W…
@inewton31536845 @carlsmythe @TakethatCt @TheFrankmanMN @mcfunny @TweetOfSteiner @Monstercoyliar @Ender205 @provaxtexan @WendyOrent @MaureenStroud @riderwbow @IamTybalt79 @AndrewLazarus4 @SkepticalMutant @Tony__Heller @GeoffSchuler @GoSteelers2019 @Bosky83 @zeetubes @Fleur_Ru11 @melcake1000 @AkireTe @Kathmarval @AJL037 @SultaneAlexand1 @JimeeLiberty @michaelbranniga @MsTrixter @FactPhily @ItsScienceJim @T33879 @TonyBaduy @MichaelBuerger8 @CptMutant @StephenBevan15 @andylumm @OldIowaGirl @realPitBullDog @ActivistChick7 @RickLazzarini @krebiozen @Ryanleitch18 @Sallysheeple @AndrewBowdenSm1 @MrDarcy1815 @Shared_facts @LargeCoffee2Go @21WIRE @SeriousSkeptic No, it's not "basic probability". It's called infectious disease transmission dynamics. The R0 of SARS-CoV-2 is significantly higher than influenza (~5.7 and ~2.0 respectively). /1 https://t.co/IA93OqPwbS
@010wijk11 @maradonnyvdb @mmeeuw Baude statements Jan. In welke studie staat dat de IFR in de buurt van de griep ligt? Meeste studies die nu lopen geven een voorzichtige inschatting (JAMA https://t.co/9QbHairhje) van tussen 2 en 3 tot zelfs 6 (CDC https://t.co/GfUISPHXqA) waar de seizoensgriep op 1,4 ligt.
@DavidECathey2 https://t.co/9U789oLBCF This study has it a little closer to 6 actually. Either way it is much more contagious than the flu.
https://t.co/r06T6zUbUL
@CuriosityBert @Starpam @SebGorka @ProTraderAlan Congrats, You've gotten very lucky Your N of 1 is inconsequential in light of the data... https://t.co/3dREteHPBK
@pennychenx1982 @mpconn @CTVNews The R0 for the flu of 1.3. Covid possibly between 2-3 although some studies show as high as 6... Also other than vaccination flu has never been actively reacted to with Social Distancing and Masking... https://t.co/3dREteHPBK
@peterstaley @sullydish This is what it should be: R0 of ancestral strain was 5.7 https://t.co/Uik9EBhTRZ https://t.co/VhB1MdzGFk
@eyemightbewrong @liensofnewyork https://t.co/5b6jiEUHVy
@Bob_Wachter There's no way that R naught of the original SARS2 virus was under 3. I'm not convinced that it was 5.7, as noted in the following paper, but what happened in March 2020 wasn't due to an R0 of <3... https://t.co/GwVYvQYabG
More than twice as easily? So, you're saying that Delta has an R0 of over 10? Or are you referring to the early (faulty) models that placed OG-covid at 2.7%? Damn, I thought this was the party of science... https://t.co/GwVYvQYabG https://t.co/18P7W6p6KJ
Please get vaccinated if you haven't already wear your mask This is no joke https://t.co/AQDPML8Yh6
RT @LaurelCoons: Reproduction Number (R0):
#Ro = 5,7 (Sanche, Steven; Lin, Yen Tin; Xu, Chonggang; Others. **High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2** (en inglés estadounidense). Centro para el Control y Prevención de Enfermedades. doi: 1023201/eid2607.200282)
@MrDax30 @VaushV @Timcast More contagious than the flu by 2-3 times. https://t.co/SSAOMx0ba3
@eniluapnelra @go_dore https://t.co/X0Jz1daj7v
@random_poisson @lyniay Le R0 "en open bar" en agglomération faisait doubler les cas à Wuhan en quelques jours, ce qui est incompatible avec 1,3. Des études plus tardives l'estimaient à 5,7 (95% CI 3,8-8,9) : https://t.co/sF93YCXg0X
@RychezM @Grzegor71050803 @WojTyr68 @ragh_nsg @janusz_ucki @synxchaosu @MZ_GOV_PL Na Covid-19 mimo strategii prewencyjnych zapobiegających rozprzestrzenianiu się tego (bardziej zaraźliwego niż grypa https://t.co/AzAGqKfKR4 https://t.co/hZFGHf8kxr) wirusa zmarły już prawie 4 miliony ludzi światowo https://t.co/CwRtwMNpjY Proszę o źródło twoich danych jeśli mogę
@JanMak62165851 @mlyvla Není to nesmysl. Původní kmen viru má R0 cca necelých 6. CDC 5.7 https://t.co/sbssLJNc8M, dle studie 5.8 USA a 3.6-6.1 různé země Evropy https://t.co/if3nlej8dk Pak 1,5x alfa mutace a znovu 1,5x delta mutace. R0 v praxi nevidíme, lidé se nějak chovají a není vše free a je léto.
халдвар авах учраас нийтээрээ тун автлаа тусгаарлалт маш сайн барих хэрэгтэй. Бас одоо Long Covid хэмээн ихээр ярих болсон. 1918 оны ханиадын R0 1.4-1.6 байсан бол энэ вирүсийнх 2.6-5.7 байгаа нь 2, 3 дахь давалгаа манайд болохыг үгүйсгэх аргагүй. Бас https://t.co/xR0PfqL1vQ https://t.co/eBWXllDtH0
@eugyppius1 @ExpatAftermath Most people who catch COVID don't give it to anyone, strangely. A minority are superspreaders and are just unbelievably contagious. No one knows why. https://t.co/onfxGRyvys
RT @CarlvKeirsbilck: @kwinkslager @chrisboyleuven @BenWeyts Hier gingen ze voor de oorspronkelijke variant al uit van een R0 van 5.7. : "…
@kwinkslager @chrisboyleuven @BenWeyts Hier gingen ze voor de oorspronkelijke variant al uit van een R0 van 5.7. : "we calculated a median R0 value of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9)" => 5.7 x1.6 (Britse variant) x 1.6 (delta) = 15 https://t.co/nyDi3QPwDL
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @ret_ward: Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7…
RT @LonnieRhea: Early Release @CDCMMWR | High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 #SARSCoV2…
@globalhlthtwit "R nought" vs. "Effective R". The former is R0, the latter is R. The CDC calculated a median R0 (initial Wuhan strain) of 5.7 https://t.co/4SwfBWs4Cd Whitty and Vallance always called the R0 much lower, I never saw the evidence upon which they were basing their statements.
This analysis was subsequently redone by Sanche et al. at Los Alamos in March (not published in EID until July), who found a range of R0 values 3.8 - 8.9, with a median of 5.7, in substantial agreement with the earlier estimate by Tang et al. https://t.co/M3Mqoxsn4u
@richetchell Well looking at the rate deaths were rising in the UK in wave 1, it was clearly well above 3. But its not something thats easy to calculate. 5.7 is from here: https://t.co/nligJSEqXQ
@909_Art @chrischirp Depends which study you look at. I've seen 5.7 quoted... https://t.co/nligJSEqXQ
@benlandis A report at the CDC in June, 2020, showed the median R0 value for the SARS-CoV-2 virus to be ~5.7, not 2.5. Unless there's newer information to the contrary. https://t.co/jlul2zTeoT
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/ZFDqHh9E5Q via @CDCgov
RT @jlz0z: @dgurdasani1 @DFisman The CDC calculated a median R0 value of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9). This is a lot higher than first thought and…
@talkRADIO Some estimates of R0 (original variant) were higher - this paper suggests 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9) https://t.co/SxOLp46sYC 2/
@DevanSinha Some of the initial baseline estimates for R0 in Wuhan in Jan/Feb 2020 were >5 https://t.co/im8ZfVBMTj https://t.co/xXHNmnAKKD [so before we'd any knowledge, didn't isolate on even bad symptoms, zero precautions].
@CelsoMirandaSa1 @Tom_Babington1 @Pythagoras526 @aoswari @WillPrydain @DaveKeto @GenMedDoc @FatEmperor I have a C1 diploma in Spanish and was already familiar with the concepts of R0 and herd immunity. Your blog article did a good job of presenting them. My issue is that you're using an outdated R0 estimate. According to the CDC it's between 3.8 and 8.9: https://t.co/NsFO8eXvlf
The herd immunity formula is (R0-1)/R0. If R0=3 then 66% need infected or vaccinated If R0=4 then 75% If R0=5 then 80% The CDC calculated a median R0 (initial pre-Kent strain) of 5.7 https://t.co/4SwfBWs4Cd If R0=5.7 then 82.45% need infected or vaccinated
RT @CPita3: Is it though? 1) Estimates for R0 of measles range from 5 to 20+ (see thread) 2) Other estimates for R0 of SARS2 are as high a…
@NC_updipchick @petd111 @ptdecker @CDCgov @CDCMMWR Yes, because 5.7 is unheard of.
RT @CPita3: Is it though? 1) Estimates for R0 of measles range from 5 to 20+ (see thread) 2) Other estimates for R0 of SARS2 are as high a…
RT @CPita3: Is it though? 1) Estimates for R0 of measles range from 5 to 20+ (see thread) 2) Other estimates for R0 of SARS2 are as high a…
RT @CPita3: Is it though? 1) Estimates for R0 of measles range from 5 to 20+ (see thread) 2) Other estimates for R0 of SARS2 are as high a…
RT @CPita3: Is it though? 1) Estimates for R0 of measles range from 5 to 20+ (see thread) 2) Other estimates for R0 of SARS2 are as high a…
RT @CPita3: Is it though? 1) Estimates for R0 of measles range from 5 to 20+ (see thread) 2) Other estimates for R0 of SARS2 are as high a…
RT @CPita3: Is it though? 1) Estimates for R0 of measles range from 5 to 20+ (see thread) 2) Other estimates for R0 of SARS2 are as high a…
Is it though? 1) Estimates for R0 of measles range from 5 to 20+ (see thread) 2) Other estimates for R0 of SARS2 are as high as 11.. 3) Why wasn't TB plotted? Its an Airborne virus and the R0 is ~3
RT @IftikharFirdous: With an R-nought value of median 5.7, to interrupt transmission of the Corona Virus, 82 percent of the population need…
RT @IftikharFirdous: With an R-nought value of median 5.7, to interrupt transmission of the Corona Virus, 82 percent of the population need…
With an R-nought value of median 5.7, to interrupt transmission of the Corona Virus, 82 percent of the population needs to be vaccinated or develop immunity against the virus. https://t.co/ReHysrCOuU https://t.co/g2c7EIqZ5Q https://t.co/RoJe5LiMtu
https://t.co/Doy46vhorc
@ghawk787 @TheCarlMac @Chesschick01 This is my reference which reported the median R naught as 5.7. This was published in 7/2020 so it might not include any of the variants which are circulating now & are felt to be more contagious. Here's the link to the research. https://t.co/j8wbS2RS7R
@JenniferKShea @jmcrookston Here: R0 estimated to be 5.7 "Results show that the doubling time early in the epidemic in Wuhan was 2.3–3.3 days. Assuming a serial interval of 6–9 days, we calculated a median R0 value of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9)." https://t.co/AZaPBzhmER
@jeffstone500 @skeatings @BuzzFeedNews Disease extinction is calculated as 1 – 1/R0. At R0 = 2.2, this threshold is only 55%. But at R0 = 82% (i.e., >82% of the population has to be immune, through either vaccination or prior infection, to achieve herd immunity to stop transmission).https://t.co/YVbQKjuMFv
@martinscpfc @ONS An open access and peer reviewed publication suggests herd immunity sits within the range 55% (R=2.2) - 82% (R=5.7). This was analysis done on the initial unconstrained Wuhan epidemic https://t.co/KIUKKxbgBq
@charlesarthur @Ayjchan @ianbirrell https://t.co/EYJLmzj2Vw
@casco28 @soopiya @Andyrewkirk @danwootton Herd immunity threshold can be calculated from the R0 value (in an unrestricted, totally susceptible population). HI threshold = 1-1/R0 R0 is somewhere around 5.7 (some variation seen if different locations). https://t.co/GdxdXMO3yP That give a HI threshold of about 82.5%
@C_A_Gustave @gro_tsen Quant au R0 de Wuhan, il est estimé aux environs de 5,7 (95% CI 3.8-8.9) par d'autres études. https://t.co/sF93YCXg0X
@egarridf @jeeva_vlc @el_pais Pues va a resultar que en una breve búsqueda por la intenné, me he topado con el "estudio"...que en realidad es un PREPRINT, uséase que no ha pasado la revisión por pares y publicado...hasta JULIO DE 2020
@UpliftDemocracy @SethAbramson You are confusing the base reproduction number R0 with an effective reproduction number; that's my point. https://t.co/scXEYzbieV
@UpliftDemocracy @SethAbramson It's from a CDC publication, the median of a confidence interval in their estimate of R0. And, yes, the base reproduction number is a norm, not to be confused with the effective reproduction number. https://t.co/scXEYzbieV
@baert_cedric @SMeerbeeck @SDicht @k_sienaert @DasUlrike @Tweedle65921973 @HarrySpoelstra Allez, laten we nu uitgaan van 50%. Hypothetisch. R0 corona = 5.7 (CDC) https://t.co/nyDi3QPwDL R0 griep (waar kinderen zonder twijfel driver van zijn) = 1 à 2. 5.7/2 = 2.85. Zelfs met 50% zijn ze nog steeds een pak besmettelijker dan met griep het geval is.
@SirJelle @DasUlrike @Tweedle65921973 Maar stel nu heel even, hypothetisch dat minderjarigen maar HALF zo besmettelijk zijn. R0 (oude varianten!) = 5.7! https://t.co/nyDi3QPwDL R0 griep = 1 à 2 5.7/2 = 2.85. Zelfs indien maar HALF zo besmettelijk blijven ze ZEER besmettelijk, en besmettelijker dan bij griep.
@cosmicthing44 @SandraWeeden @DerekCoates @YourNewPm1 @mode_soleil @SonderEXE @Delilah71847825 And here’s another. I’ve searched Medline and there’s literally thousands of studies. This is the problem with people relying on cherry picked studies and news articles they’ve seen on social media. It in no way reflects the extent of scientific research. https://t.co/KZyCkCsnvb
The contagiousness of #SARSCoV2 might be higher than expected. R(0) of ~ 5 has often been described. https://t.co/qyiLlrtIVn https://t.co/3bH3jcW6N2
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal [ad_1] Severe acute respiratory syndro...11450https://omarhamad.com/?feed_id=191270post_urlhttps://oma... https://t.co/IJzL4eziNG
@nonexistentuse4 @AuroriaTwittori @KubeCatherine Your personal anecdote is meaningless. The R0 for Covid-19 is 3.8-8.9, which is not as contagious as measles, but a lot more contagious than seasonal influenza i.e. highly contagious. https://t.co/mHsu1vhThv
@AuroriaTwittori @nonexistentuse4 @KubeCatherine The R0 for Covid-19 is 3.8-8.9, whereas R0 for seasonal influenza is 0.9–2.1. https://t.co/mHsu1vhThv https://t.co/qpA0iT8ILo
@JahD1191 @GovMikeDeWine Source (2 of 2): https://t.co/CRpUA8TS6D
@p_jvanos @DasUlrike @Tweedle65921973 @SMeerbeeck @k_sienaert @HarrySpoelstra "we calculated a median R0 value of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9)" https://t.co/nyDi3QPwDL
@dgurdasani1 @DFisman The CDC calculated a median R0 value of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9). This is a lot higher than first thought and is pre the Kent variant too. https://t.co/4SwfBWs4Cd An R0 of 5.7 would mean an 83.46% herd immunity threshold. Pursuing a #ZeroCovid strategy will be required too.
@ArtAngus1 @clutter_bug49 @washingtonpost This is patently false. Contagiousness can only be estimated, but these estimates are quite accurate and precise. Here’s one such study from the summer: https://t.co/0ExKqEVdod
RT @DanielWiczew: A CDC's research shows that COVID-19 has R0 of about 5.7 (Flu has about 1.3). R0 is how many people an infected person ca…
A CDC's research shows that COVID-19 has R0 of about 5.7 (Flu has about 1.3). R0 is how many people an infected person can infect on average. Furthermore, new strain which is about 50% more infectious, might have R0 8.7. https://t.co/98i3rdATlp #COVID19 #Covid19NewStrain https://t.co/HtEQr33NFt
@Gregory_Verdugo @Hergeloffeni @vincentglad effectifs. Cependant Manaus n'est pas du tout dans une situation sans aucune restriction. C'est très troublant. Source pour le R0 réévalué : https://t.co/sF93YCXg0X
@DBlameble @Fabien_L Les premières estimations, oui. Mais des études complémentaires ont relevé ce chiffre à la hausse : https://t.co/sF93YCXg0X
@JolieEmile @Fabien_L Le R0 de Wuhan en janvier 2020, avec 0 gestes barrières, avait été réévalué à une médiane de 5,7 : https://t.co/sF93YCXg0X
@jcollins12671 @BrandonStraka 1. https://t.co/GVZZvb6uNz 2. https://t.co/PxEst70VnA 3. https://t.co/C5F3rd8fqm
RT @chikawatanabe: Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome; estimated R0 =5.7 ロスアラモス国立研究…
https://t.co/Ej8AWmr6xi https://t.co/yLXZLk82Uv
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/JXlQLx16pb
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal [ad_1] Severe acute respiratory syndro...11450https://omarhamad.c... https://t.co/ql4CfnaH8m
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7（95％CI 3.8〜8.9）と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7（95％CI 3.8〜8.9）と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7（95％CI 3.8〜8.9）と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/uOQt5jHQab
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal [ad_1] Severe acute respiratory syndro...11450https://omarhamad.c... https://t.co/wvOOx01ZSP
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7（95％CI 3.8〜8.9）と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7（95％CI 3.8〜8.9）と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7（95％CI 3.8〜8.9）と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7（95％CI 3.8〜8.9）と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7（95％CI 3.8〜8.9）と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
RT @carpe_diem0820: 中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7（95％CI 3.8〜8.9）と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and R…
中国武漢でのCOVID-19流行初期に患者数が倍増する期間は2.3〜3.3日、再生産数(R0)値の中央値は5.7（95％CI 3.8〜8.9）と推計、初期の推計値よりも感染力が高い結果 High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/zA2PP95gIf https://t.co/xLEKfPBPo1
RT @CDC_EIDjournal: High contagiousness and rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome #coronavirus 2, #EIDjournal, https://t.co/jg5…
RT @CDC_EIDjournal: High contagiousness and rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome #coronavirus 2, #EIDjournal, https://t.co/jg5…
High contagiousness and rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome #coronavirus 2, #EIDjournal, https://t.co/jg5y6G9gbz (#COVID19, #SARSCoV2) https://t.co/lA4eunzHr7
https://t.co/qltRwV7XTi
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/ErEAmRoFQQ via @CDCgov
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/Dl3bIbm87I
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC @StuHirstInfoSec good research this one. https://t.co/0uChmEMlY6
Just a reminder via @CDC_NCEZID High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome #Coronavirus 2 [#SARSCoV2] https://t.co/x58Nb51qvc https://t.co/WlGmJkhnFH
RT @wgraham927: Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number…
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal [ad_1] Severe acute respiratory syndro...937https://omarhamad.com... https://t.co/CtvRdNgimc
Assuming a serial interval of 6–9 days, we calculated a median R0 value of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9). Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/epluryXKRT
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC @Twenty7dollars https://t.co/akQnWGksfy
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/0wZ4FQHm5B
Today we are discussing R0 and Pandemics during our @ohiostatemed Pandemic course. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/iQmfJNXPpk via @CDCgov
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/JygqhLb3Ti
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC #España @abc_es @elmundoes @AFPespanol https://t.co/J2DXo9eEJr
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal [ad_1] Severe acute respiratory syndro...937https://omarhamad.com... https://t.co/CDtjHuOW5V
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/H3SlNUrkfg
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/J2RtbgKGZD
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/cy1P9qBhvm via @CDCgov
RT @WestEssexNOW:
RT @CaptainAV: #R0 is much higher than initially estimated! New estimated #R0 is 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9, with incubation period 4.2 days, ons…
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/ufHJ2cXB4W vía @CDCgov
Sanche S, Lin YT, Xu C, Romero-Severson E, Hengartner N, Ke R. High contagiousness and rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul. https://t.co/V3cRPSiTvu
RT @chikawatanabe: 科学的文献。ご参考まで ”High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2” https://t.co/lF8…
RT @chikawatanabe: 科学的文献。ご参考まで ”High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2” https://t.co/lF8…
RT @chikawatanabe: 科学的文献。ご参考まで ”High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2” https://t.co/lF8…
RT @chikawatanabe: 科学的文献。ご参考まで ”High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2” https://t.co/lF8…
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/LnpYqVDJH6 via @CDCgov
RT @chikawatanabe: 科学的文献。ご参考まで ”High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2” https://t.co/lF8…
科学的文献。ご参考まで ”High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2” https://t.co/lF8aiUHgOC ‘‘Herd Immunity’’: A Rough Guide (PDF) https://t.co/2Z76pisqrR
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/lTUHVYvLnS
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/az5TH8oHJ5
RT @chikawatanabe: Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome; estimated R0 =5.7 ロスアラモス国立研究…
RT @vgaldana: Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7…
RT @chikawatanabe: Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome; estimated R0 =5.7 ロスアラモス国立研究…
RT @vgaldana: Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7…
RT @vgaldana: Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7…
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/k26bXRMEN6 vía @CDCgov
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC - 80-85% immunity needs to be reached to have effective ‘herd immunity’ https://t.co/s76e4xxuAi
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/8UWv1dBeXZ
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/p5SsBh5wza
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/Jqu2zcVEFc
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - PubMed @AlboMP @albericie @AOC @billbowtell https://t.co/FOni2V9nwg
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/fdNlvkAB6i vía @CDCgov
RT @miyatamitsuru: 武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rap…
RT @miyatamitsuru: 武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rap…
RT @miyatamitsuru: 武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rap…
RT @miyatamitsuru: 武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rap…
RT @miyatamitsuru: 武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rap…
RT @miyatamitsuru: 武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rap…
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/mbsN5zBNSd via @CDCgov
RT @miyatamitsuru: 武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rap…
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC [… median R0 value of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9)] https://t.co/jhSaNh8vlZ
RT @miyatamitsuru: 武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rap…
RT @miyatamitsuru: 武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rap…
RT @miyatamitsuru: 武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rap…
武漢の新型コロナウイルス感染の調査レポート（CDC、EID Journal20年7月号）。再生産数=5.7は驚異的な数字。日本では2.5を想定して対策中 Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - https://t.co/4vVsyHMFkp @CDCgovさんから
RT @chikawatanabe: Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome; estimated R0 =5.7 ロスアラモス国立研究…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/J2RtbgKGZD
Early Release - High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC https://t.co/WUVvdnD4ih
RT @manal_mehta: @peterbachmd @EricTopol @JNBPage @rtnarch @MichaelPellini @mattocko @Stanford @CarolynBertozzi @Varro_Analytics I can't re…
RT @DrMooh_: “Assuming a serial interval of 6-9 days, we calculated a median R0 value of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8-8.9). We further show that active…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @manal_mehta: @peterbachmd @EricTopol @JNBPage @rtnarch @MichaelPellini @mattocko @Stanford @CarolynBertozzi @Varro_Analytics I can't re…
@peterbachmd @EricTopol @JNBPage @rtnarch @MichaelPellini @mattocko @Stanford @CarolynBertozzi @Varro_Analytics I can't reconcile seroprevalence data from Wuhan & Santa Clara (1-4%) with this from the @NIH: "Assuming a serial interval of 6-9 days, we calculated a median R0 value of 5.7" These data points seem at odds. https://t.co/JB6a6EfAM4 Any thoughts, @AndyBiotech @ScottGottliebMD?
RT @AndrewW66619812: @peterjukes @bbcnickrobinson The worry is that the actual R0 of SARS-CoV-2 may actually be >5.7, not the ~ 2.5 as prev…
@raphaeldogg @D_Raval This study, from mass testing in China, showed that the R0 of SARS-CoV-2 is likely to be >5.7, instead of the ~2.2<>2.7 previously thought. Only mass testing will confirm if the lockdown can realistically end, despite the media hopes #TestTraceIsolate https://t.co/SOuz7jCutV
@peterjukes @bbcnickrobinson The worry is that the actual R0 of SARS-CoV-2 may actually be >5.7, not the ~ 2.5 as previously thought. Studies of mass testing in China have brought this to light. There has been no mass testing here, so statements about the R0 in the UK are suspect. https://t.co/SOuz7jCutV
The new R0 for COVID19 in studies like this is staggering 5.7. This may tell two things 1) Significant amount of population has already contracted/recovered from the disease( my estimate 15-20% and more for some countries) 2) Antibody testing is critical https://t.co/gKd4eiP3AJ
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @CaptainAV: #R0 is much higher than initially estimated! New estimated #R0 is 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9, with incubation period 4.2 days, ons…
RT @CaptainAV: #R0 is much higher than initially estimated! New estimated #R0 is 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9, with incubation period 4.2 days, ons…
RT @CaptainAV: #R0 is much higher than initially estimated! New estimated #R0 is 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9, with incubation period 4.2 days, ons…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
#R0 is much higher than initially estimated! New estimated #R0 is 5.7 (95% CI 3.8–8.9, with incubation period 4.2 days, onset to hospitalization 1.5 days, onset to death 16.1 days, #doublingtime 2.3–3.3 days. Sanche et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul. https://t.co/2sfuStBSNa https://t.co/Z1nlD2h8et
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @SammerTang: Let’s hope this is an exceptional pessimistic modeling to calculate R0 for SARS-COV-2. R0 of 5.7 is nearly double on what w…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @nursingdean: High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/clhhrwp9zg
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/clhhrwp9zg
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
@agaviriau Alejandro, este artículo define un R0 de 5.7, entendiendo que como en el caso del uso del tapaboca, el cual se revisó, ¿podría considerarse esta info en modelos en previsión de que los picos de contagio puedan tener otra dinámica? https://t.co/jDJFA2C2zE
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
Social distancing and transmission of the CoV-2 virus: https://t.co/VeyxQYilop
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
Especially if this report is right and the RO is over 5. https://t.co/OnEC18GTVA https://t.co/Szd8opDX2b
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @martinwhite33: Estimated R0 of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8-8.9), which explains why countries that focused on preventing spread, rather than managi…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
RT @normanswan: Just one study but scary if true. Social distancing is the main defence. High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acu…
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 - PubMed https://t.co/h8pnabh8lt
RT @martinwhite33: Estimated R0 of 5.7 (95% CI 3.8-8.9), which explains why countries that focused on preventing spread, rather than managi…
A estimativa mais recente (ainda queria mais estudos confirmando) para o começo da epidemia na China aponta que a taxa de transmissão mais assumida (2 a 3) poderia ser o dobro na verdade (5,7): https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0282_article
virus." Ummm.... https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0282_article
RT @kermitmurray: High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/dfd74Znlb8
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 https://t.co/dfd74Znlb8
Jesus, Covid has an R0 of 5.7!? That means for every person infected, on average, they infect 5 to 6 more people!? https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0282_article
CDC: R0 onkin 5.7 . #koronavirusfi #koronafi #covid19fi #covid19finland #COVID2019 https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0282_article
RD
CP
新
T
C
PB
PP
JL
EG
N
ML
T
E
B
CL
J
Nম
HB
MS
SS
BA
L
SD
V
T
GR
K
MC
TB
D
P
VC
RB
W
CK
Z
CC
JW
R
A
BC
M
S
KA
JB
M
SN
GV
CK
B
L
A
CN
BP
IS
DD
PE
PI
D
K
A
DP
AB
DT
?
SB
WG
AN
IF
AE
YY
BO
MT
SF
M
DG
WE
E
L
OH
K
EJ
PC
L
NB
FO
EQ
HB
RM
K人
YB
S
B
たア
た
青
若
新
M無
M
A
EJ
PR
EC
S
RF
CH
KH
H
AB
NK
LR
MS
WG
RR
KY
CN
HB
JG
RR
ꪊꫀ
YP
田
M
Bم
高
KH
V
こ止
MS
B
JS
JM
VA
MF
H
SI
HP
FR
CC
に投
O
HB
巳
か
PM
トテ
SS
NS
らP
黒
安ア
MB
BA
SL
EA
LC
B
MM
L
AW
CC
K
L
GD
AK
AM
T
I
KK
DM
WM
AM
LB
SS
I
AG
KC
F
Ж
M
I
G
MW
A
K
OG
TH
WN
M
VA
TS
JU
BB
PW
KN
JE
M
PD
L
TJ
W
PO
DP
PH
NC
DN
CM
WB
LG
J
SM
T
C
F
RF
GG
CH
RB
PS
RR
PT
Y
JM
PW
LB
O
EA
KM