J Strength Cond Res July 2020 PMID 32282627

A Comparison of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables During the Pull From the Knee and Hang Pull, Across Loads.

David Meechan, John J McMahon, Timothy J Suchomel, Paul Comfort

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 3 in Apr 2020

across 2 sources since Apr 2020

Extended reach

71,071

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

2,265

Mentions per month

Apr 2020 – Oct 2022

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter4 posts
YouTube3 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions reveal appreciation for the study's comparison of pulling methods, with comments like 'highlighting how the hang pull produces higher force,' and references to its training benefits, indicating a balanced mix of interest and recognition of the research's significance. The use of phrases like 'important findings' and references to publication details show moderate engagement and impact, emphasizing the relevance of the study for practitioners and researchers alike.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the value of the study, indicating moderate agreement especially with the highlighted findings on the hang pull's effectiveness.

InterestModerate interest

Participants show a general curiosity about the methodology and implications, reflecting moderate interest in strength training research.

EngagementModerate engagement

The discourse includes references to publication details and the significance of the results, demonstrating a decent level of engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The shared excitement about practical applications, such as improved training techniques, suggests the discussions could influence future research or training practices.

Abstract in brief

The study compares kinetic and kinematic variables during the pull from the knee (PFK) and hang pull (HP) across various loads, finding that the hang pull generally produces greater force and velocity measures.
Key metrics like mean force, peak velocity, and power were significantly higher in the hang pull, especially at heavier loads (100-140% of 1RM), indicating it may be more effective for developing force-time characteristics.
Overall, the results suggest that the hang pull may be more beneficial than the pull from the knee for strength training, particularly when working with near-maximal loads (1RM).]

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Trap Bar Hang Pull for Athletic Performance Enhancement

A alternative to the common weight lifting exercise the hang clean pull. Using a trap bar offers variations in exercise prescription and potentially a more comfortable loading position. Removing catch and recovery…

University of Salford - Strength and Conditioning · Oct 15, 2022 920 views

Hang Clean Pull: Enhancing Force and Velocity in Strength Training

This video explains the mechanics of the hang clean pull, highlighting its effectiveness in developing force and velocity, especially with supramaximal loads. It compares kinetic and kinematic variables during the pull…

University of Salford - Strength and Conditioning · Oct 5, 2022 833 views

Enhancing Strength with the Hang Pull in Weightlifting Training

The study compares kinetic and kinematic variables during the pull from the knee and hang pull across various loads. The hang pull generally produces greater force and velocity measures, making it more effective for…

University of Salford - Strength and Conditioning · Oct 5, 2022 513 views

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

@JSCRonline · X

Current Issue: A Comparison of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables During the Pull From the Knee and Hang Pull, Across Loads, by @meechan1983 et al. https://t.co/bIartnDNFi @NSCA https://t.co/IT5a2SbS7u

Jul 1, 2020 · 10 likes · 16,903 followers View post →

Sprint Science

@spikesonly · X

RT @JSCRonline: Publish Ahead-of-Print: A Comparison of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables During the Pull From the Knee and Hang Pull, Across…

Apr 15, 2020 · 3 shares · 34,062 followers View post →

daniel varela PhD

@dr_dvarela_P4T · X