Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The collective reactions demonstrate strong agreement with the research, as users cite scientific studies, such as Konda et al. (2020), to support fabric masks and emphasize multilayered designs, using technical terms and referencing specific filtration efficiencies. The tone varies from scientific analysis to skepticism, reflecting active engagement and a shared desire to understand mask efficacy, which underscores the importance and influence of the publication.
Most discussions support the article, highlighting fabric combinations and real-world mask effectiveness.
Participants show high interest by referencing detailed studies and debating mask performance.
Many users critically analyze findings, cite scientific papers, and respond to differing opinions.
While discussions reinforce masks' benefits, some skepticism about their effectiveness limits overall influence.
Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle, #Naturseide und #Chiffon >50 Prozent abschied, und dichter gewebte #Baumwolle eine Abscheidung von 79 bis 98 Prozent erreichte https://t.co/V1yCieYwi1 https://t.co/oEqqai4EZ2
بلازما المتعافين لعلاج الكورونا https://t.co/ZlO4dR9kld via @YouTube
SOME FACTS: You can go to https://t.co/lxuRvTOCdj and do a search if you're looking for peer reviewed science rather than infotainment. Here's a few that might be of interest after a 3 second search: https://t.co/iNUZezGviP https://t.co/a5vb3xSH7w https://t.co/KDdEDUGgiv
امتى نخلص من الكورونا ؟ https://t.co/GdDrVwQdW0 via @YouTube
@nlmb_uchiha @Ch4ryXp Hmmmm, the science says otherwise, particularly when you understand the difference between close contact, clinical settings, and being indoors in public spaces https://t.co/LgOaLm7Led
@angelicaguirele @brunocavasana @soth37 @EricaOlvsantos @oatila https://t.co/98HN63VW19 https://t.co/EHz88PoTzk https://t.co/0AsqFmy7RX Nenhum artigo fala que a transmissão é reduzida em 100% utilizando máscaras de tecido, mas é significativa quando comparada a não utilizar nenhuma máscara.
This video demonstrates how to make a lighter, more comfortable mask that offers improved safety. It explores fabric filtration efficiencies and emphasizes proper fit for optimal protection against aerosols and…
This video discusses the importance of diverse evidence in evaluating face coverings during COVID-19. It emphasizes scientific, epidemiological, and real-world data, defending conclusions against critics and urging a…
The author emphasizes the importance of diverse types of evidence, including science, epidemiology, and real-world case studies, rather than relying solely on systematic reviews. They defend their conclusions supported…
The video discusses the increasing number of people ending COVID restrictions, highlighting debates over mask policies. It emphasizes the importance of diverse scientific evidence and real-world data in shaping public…
This video emphasizes the importance of diverse scientific and observational evidence in assessing the effectiveness of face coverings during COVID-19, advocating for a comprehensive approach to public health…
Learn to make a safe and comfortable face mask using two different materials. The video covers fabric choices, construction tips, and emphasizes proper fit to improve filtration efficiency and reduce virus transmission.
Self-reported olfactory loss has emerged as a key indicator in the outpatient care of COVID-19 patients. This video delves into the relationship between anosmia and clinical outcomes, highlighting findings from a study…
Self-reported olfactory loss is a significant indicator of the outpatient care for COVID-19 patients. A study showed that anosmia correlates with a milder clinical course, where patients retaining their sense of smell…
This video explores how masks filter particles and whether they effectively protect against respiratory illnesses like COVID-19. Filtration efficiency varies across fabrics, with layered masks offering better…
This video examines state mandates for face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting their significant impact on reducing infection rates. It references studies that show these measures may have helped prevent…
On this episode of Science Sundays, we discuss the effectiveness of cloth masks in reducing COVID-19 transmission. Proper use and hygiene are vital for public health. Join us as we explore the evidence supporting…
This video explains the types of masks for COVID-19, proper selection, and usage, highlighting that widespread mask adoption significantly reduces disease spread and hospitalizations, even when masks aren't perfect.
Dr Sheila Dobee discusses how different fabrics in cloth masks filter aerosol particles, emphasizing the importance of proper fit and layering to enhance protection. This information is useful for both healthcare…
Researchers from the Australian University found that a single layer of fabrics does not offer good protection, but layered fabrics can block over 80% of particles below 300 nanometres, including viruses like COVID-19…
This video evaluates the efficacy of cloth masks in protecting against the coronavirus. Research shows varying filtration efficiencies, with some materials filtering only 5-25%. Understanding these findings can inform…
Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, we provide comprehensive information about facemasks, their types, usage, and disposal. This video discusses the effectiveness of cloth masks in reducing transmission and their critical…
ShapeMask95 fabrics are high-quality 3-ply materials designed for effective respiratory protection. They are anti-air, anti-microbial, anti-noda, washable, and provide a high level of filtration efficiency, making them…
This study evaluates how well different common fabrics used in cloth masks can filter aerosol particles, emphasizing the importance of layering, fabric type, and mask fit in optimizing protection against respiratory…
This video discusses a study on how well common fabrics used in cloth masks filter aerosol particles, which is crucial for preventing respiratory illnesses like COVID-19. Proper fit also significantly impacts mask…
This video evaluates the aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in cloth masks. It discusses how layering and fabric combinations can significantly improve mask performance, emphasizing the importance of a…
This video discusses the filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in masks, emphasizing the importance of fabric layers, combinations, and proper fit to improve protection against respiratory particles and prevent…
RT @EmilyVBurns: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper fr…
@SebF344235 @AlainPatenaude7 Konda, A., et al. (2020). Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks. ACS Nano. — Measured filtration across particle sizes for many fabrics and fabric combinations; found some multilayer combinations approach surgical-mask performance
RT @AbraarKaran: This article really caught my eye. Researchers found that using a combination of cotton w/ other materials (silk, chiffo…
@pXGGVG0kHhNspxl @UlZjvKwA8UnQyH @wRUtBqxhuGlhQ1o pXGGVG0kHhNspxl 呼吸換気エネルギー（流速u）と粒子振動エネルギー（kT）はPéclet数Pe=u d_f / D（D=kT/(6πηa)）で比較され、Pe=10³～10⁴でもブラウン拡散が捕捉を強化（ACS Nano 2020, doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c03252）。研究で<100nm粒子捕捉率>80%。前提欠如なく、論理矛盾なし。
@pXGGVG0kHhNspxl @UlZjvKwA8UnQyH @wRUtBqxhuGlhQ1o いいえ、呼吸換気圧力（ΔP≈2.5Pa、流量35-90L/min）を考慮した実験で、ブラウン運動はナノ粒子(<100nm)の拡散を駆動し、気流ベクトル下でも捕捉率>80%を実現（ACS Nano 2020, doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c03252）。粒子は内側で繊維に衝突・捕捉され、外へ透過しにくく、現実検証済みです。
In addition, any cloth mask can be made better by multiple differing layers. Besides Marr's recommended 3 layers shown below, https://t.co/mpdNYxP1I7 A combination of silk and cotton as from this study for electrostatic goodness. https://t.co/VfM1U0Ex6M https://t.co/jXKzE2AjJ6
@3rdworldAmerika @AaronBlake T shirts are made out of cloth. He didn't pull it out of his butt, there was research prior to the covid outbreak on DIY masks and how they can help in a gen pop to reduce spread. Early pandemic, some engineering studies were done also: https://t.co/QM3XX6CCx3
@GruffGraph @andrewmato @TheAlphaStance @strollbrows @BulletProofMus1 @RetroAgent12 That's bullshit. Masks DO protect people. Let's see your studies saying they don't work. https://t.co/bk6yXWlxgf https://t.co/eJjypz6pem https://t.co/fsiWGdc3Vx https://t.co/PwYTQq7jrQ https://t.co/38Pod20K7a https://t.co/PwPtJrh0ED https://t.co/gifdCJOfWW
@do_do_do_do_do だから飛沫核とエアロゾルですね。ウイルスがいくつかクラスターになった塊です。その除去率は示しましたよ。この論文がいいかもしれませんね。 https://t.co/TzX7rPuVGX
@mecandacie @WendesMuniz @luiz99818 @ludmilagrilo11 Desonesta, não adianta, refuta mais "Aiiinnn meu deus mascara precisa ser eficiente" boa sorte em defender burrices Dessa vez leia antes de dizer bobagem https://t.co/h5m9IBIC0l https://t.co/5n1G4hvsPk https://t.co/rkhWbR7G2J https://t.co/k6Sd6qsPQq
@ancapchequei Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks segue debate
@theerrantknight @ScottRies7 @DavidJuurlink https://t.co/LqNjj8J0D9
@ramb0shi @ScottRies7 @DavidJuurlink A properly fitted n95 mask is actually very good. Others help but not as efficiently. https://t.co/LqNjj8J0D9
@monkey449 @CarmeloTallasT @IanCopeland5 1. You fell for the bait. 2. You're wrong. https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8A https://t.co/YQzxFuvh0z
Übersicht über Aerosol-Filterleistung von Masken von 2020 https://t.co/q40G5E2CQT #Gesundheit #HealthAwareness #Covid @Karl_Lauterbach @MASFG_SL
@psychunseen @acritschristoph @MichaelWorobey @angie_rasmussen @flodebarre Joe Pierre, MD, “Pangolins Harbor SARS-CoV-2 Related Coronaviruses” (pub. 10April2020) https://t.co/L1mzm9rgVf Also, we already by knew then that SARS-CoV-2 was spread by airborne transmission. “ACS Nano…”https://t.co/cRTsNwGUWM Enjoy
@ChronicBabak @Francien_NL @HundredCarWar @quay_dr You go tell the ACS that, because that is what they measured. And with NaCl (salt) aerosols. Hint: they respond very nicely to electrostatic effects. Virons, not so much. https://t.co/CxbZBC3eNw
@ChronicBabak @HundredCarWar @Francien_NL @quay_dr Shit, you are dense. Try reading the litterature I reference. Here they use N95 as a baseline. https://t.co/CxbZBC3eNw https://t.co/Zt4VbvXbnW
@WakeUpthenormie @DrSusanOliver1 https://t.co/NK35bMN1GO https://t.co/tSEULR4sWx
@AViperDen Overall, combinations of various commonly available fabrics used in cloth masks can potentially provide significant protection against the transmission of aerosol particles. https://t.co/IgjHEvUBUq
@PeopleLegend1 @ZacATucker @MA1776 @thehill https://t.co/L8ONtvHHsu
@Sam3352 Here’s the next one cited in the thread, which compared different types of mask fabrics (not N95s) https://t.co/YJFoF3VkQD https://t.co/uQwnr9tfzr
@VirusSmThanHole @RagToo We knew they were effective way before Covid-19 came around. Nothing changed. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8A https://t.co/YQzxFuvh0z
@Seph_Nagatman @MixtUpMixy @floofadootz This paper talks about cloth masks but the efficiency is much better with n95s. And the mechanisms are the same. Namely brownian motion and elecrostatic attraction. https://t.co/wIzleSvMit https://t.co/p4DhAJOlyD
@booyah2yah @ianmSC @targettories @ScholerinED performance is higher in the lab than it would be expected to be for use in the real world. For example: https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/G2UzIQ9MR2 https://t.co/to9EM1u4uL https://t.co/vJSp1swPOb https://t.co/PUIU0OGa8N https://t.co/y7itcyiWdX 3/3 https://t.co/rYqiYfv5Vl
@OpticalMagician @ThatDudesMother @JohnKleinRegina @KayleWarkentin @barniefh1999 @trainwithtish 1) see link below 2) the gentleman died of Covid https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@JefferysSteven @Julxxx0 @TalionJustice79 @Majick666 @gator_gum Pre Covid study so completely objective https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@Vasserbee @jessyroos @steadybacon1 N95s are certified based on testing of 300nm particles. When tested against particles/aerosols in the relevant size range for respiratory viruses, they perform poorly, even under ideal conditions in labs (clamped to a test tube for a few mins)
@JuliaHB1 @thatsnotmine125 Did you really, or did you just look for information to confirm your bias Here read this https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@VPrasadMDMPH @AdeAdamson Source of picture... https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ
@AnnadeBuisseret @juanlibre1950 This one states otherwise https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@AnnadeBuisseret Yes the masks do work, the research backs it. The PCR is accurate, & you are more likely to be struck by lightning than affected by a vaccine. Back to your old ways of spouting total & utter bollocks https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@JamesR40889022 @DrNice2022 @NB9058343185701 @kevinnbass @JosephWarren999 Your screenshots are definitely facts https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@katariinatwi @caritarauha Jo alussa '20-'21 VTT:n tutkija Ari Harlin selitti sitä tv:ssä. Ja kansakin saattoi hätävarana tehdä itse vastaavan jos yhdisti eri aineita, esim. puuvilla+sifonki: https://t.co/tlESHceFtq https://t.co/jacdaoDy7z
@gcugrey_area @Rabelais1492 @kevinnbass https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@SorenUchiha @msabouri @Rabelais1492 @kevinnbass List the paper here, seems to contradict this study https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@JulieBarnes_614 @Rabelais1492 @kevinnbass Like this? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@LegalizeItLala_ @katieappleseed7 Hi Lauren, since you clearly don’t have mental illness, can you provide your evidence- because your claim goes against actual studies https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@GerardoRiordan8 @turdsley @teachertwit2 @LongCovidHell 'reduce' and 'eliminate' do not mean the same thing. They do reduce transmission, but not as well. High thread count cotton cloth masks do a pretty good job. Here's a study https://t.co/cBRj1V0oTl
@thehealthb0t And another https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@ANTlWEF But then mask work very well https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
@trutharmyfilms Masks do work, time to read actual research rather than something someone else posted on twitter https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
@ghhughes @mkarolian @TaylorLorenz @amazon @masknerd @CriticalAerosol I had some of these made and used them when supplies were tight on everything else. Never had the ability to test them formally but I didn't get covid
@FusionProgGuy @DirtyBalls1350 @MsJulieSLam @Uber @TogetherWeMask That's false. It's well-known that the MPPS for N95s is lower than 0.3 microns and rather in the relevant range for respiratory viruses. https://t.co/6Iy57A2xVG https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/fdp9Ku88Al
@julie4butte5 @ValZimmer2 Research states otherwise https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@CaptJill2021 @TheFarceFeed @FiveTimesAugust Yes https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@Davc2663882792 @Patrickdery Why do you lie? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@BigKazy8_50 @Patrickdery Do you actually have a link? Or just trust me bro? Because this precious study is objective and disproves your claim https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@crosscheck93441 Why is it only antivaxers abd antimaskers that call masks useless? This study predates Covid so it is objective. https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@zappaspeaks @MarkOFarrell9 @forevaeva79 https://t.co/0tf1ABPuVG
@vnorian @BohemianAtmosp1 Where’s your proof ? Oh that’s right…. None https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@kristenmag @Magic14272090 Any link to theses studies? This one predates Covid so objective in terms of recent mask “debates” https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@Lawrence_505 @TwoBitWhackJob @rorivas8 @MumsyNancy @kristenmag @RoomHelper @GrantAcosta5 Anything to back up your lie? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@suzy_redd @catfish8888 And with that we see you are basically an idiot. Despite the evidence you think you know better, but you don’t. All this is doing is showing your ignorance on this matter. https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@KLVeritas But they do work & you’re just some grifting kook that should have all accreditation removed https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@Nahanchi7068 @CPCDouches @IanCopeland5 Funny how you avoid answering such a simple question and funny how you do t offer any proof of your claim and funny how this study pre Covid negates your claim https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@kristenmag Odd the research on masks say otherwise, but don’t let facts get in the way of your BS https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@Libby_115 @gator_gum @ryangerritsen Libby let me guess you saw that online? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@BohemianAtmosp1 Right. Conveniently you fail to provide any facts to your BS https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@Rod__Mason @paulvmarks Ah there’s the level of stupidity we have come to expect from conspiracy fools. They can’t form a valid argument so resort to other unfounded BS. https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@JoeClemente1 @stkirsch It obviously offends as why mention it. As for critical thinking, you really don’t have the skill set as seen by your post. How do you know what their status is or any comorbidities they may have. Or simply you fail to understand how a mask works https://t.co/tc2DZU7kh2
@svemirsko_jaje @Branka0505050 @Serbona2 i medicini to primetili. Ne možete baš da žustro pričate jer se zagreva taj predeo ali to je to. Disanje je slobodno. 1. Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics https://t.co/grr75SbPAS 2.Modes of transmission of virus causing C-19 https://t.co/EDEuAkAieZ
@UnMaskd_Truth @MartMichaelis @yaneerbaryam Here is the study you failed to link to: https://t.co/B5Hw3Ecw2K
@beverleyturner @surfdoctor @thewhitecompany Are you looking for evidence like this https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@yeahnaa333 @N1otAnotherName @ID_Denmark @yaneerbaryam Screenshots from: https://t.co/6Iy57A2xVG And: https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ Some other sources: https://t.co/L2MAFlpcpr https://t.co/8y7zYmXS0u https://t.co/vJSp1swPOb https://t.co/to9EM1u4uL 2/2
@CovidConfusion That's the story, but the actual science shows they aren't effective against respiratory viruses - every single RCT on N95s has failed to find any effect. Even clamped to a test tube in a lab for a few minutes they don't work in the nano (<300nm) range
@LRMC_C @shawneriksmith @anon_welsh @DocAhmadMalik Sweetie I referenced multiple global countries in there, not just Japan. Wow you are narrow minded. And here, knock yourself out https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@f_philippot https://t.co/mI1Pm79GBR
@patriotes_93 @SamsonLNoir @f_philippot https://t.co/mI1Pm79GBR
@BKofke @shawneofthedead Wearing a mask is kind. This is because, as studies show, cloth masks are effective for protecting others from the wearer’s aerosol sprayed germs during coughing and sneezing. https://t.co/YrN03FVFuK
@DJJonnyTravieso Oh you haven't seen any of the lab studies that use equipment that can measure particles/aerosols in the relevant range for airborne viruses? Are you going to see if you can find opinion pieces to refute them?! https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ Here's a few more if you're interested
@LoonaOT124ever @sameo416 That's the only study I've seen that doesn't give any setup/measurement specifics... no info about what size particles they use or what filtration is at different size ranges! Based on the commentary, it appears they measure only mech filtration (>300nm). https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ
@JJJJenniferrrr2 @ianmSC https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ
@ian36613527 @letsgotwitt_er @WangCandice @JDeuvall @deonandan https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ
@canadastrong @DrJ56013122 @RachelEph77 @deonandan Nope, not flawed at all. Results are similar for N95s clamped to a test tube using NaCl aerosols. Did you know that N95s are tested using 300nm aerosols and that in studies when they are tested on smaller aerosols/particles, they fail? https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/JT3eJTltXE
@DrEricDing Masks (even N95s clamped to a test tube for a few minutes in a lab) don't block fine aerosols/particles in the relevant size range for respiratory viruses (<300nm)... That's why in all of the highest quality studies (RCTs) they fail every single time. https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/ZJxd3YtNz4
@3DiMMUNE @jljcolorado Well, the actual science shows that masks (even N95s clamped to a test tube for a few minutes in a lab) don't block fine aerosols/particles in the relevant size range for respiratory viruses (<300nm)... https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/KDo0HvpIR1
@fritsander @jljcolorado Well the actual science shows that masks (even N95s clamped to a test tube for a few minutes in a lab) don't block fine aerosols/particles in the relevant size range for respiratory viruses (<300nm)... https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/IOcZ3DePcR
@ProfEmer @jljcolorado Well the actual science shows that masks (even N95s clamped to a test tube for a few minutes in a lab) don't block fine aerosols/particles in the relevant size range for respiratory viruses (<300nm)... https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/PkHwMzgZ4v
@ghhughes @jljcolorado Except the actual science shows that masks (even N95s clamped to a test tube for a few minutes in a lab) don't block fine aerosols/particles in the relevant size range for respiratory viruses (<300nm)... https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/WuaXkTWFI4
@DrEricDing @ABridgen @jljcolorado Except the actual science shows that masks (even N95s clamped to a test tube for a few minutes in a lab) don't block fine aerosols/particles in the relevant size range for respiratory viruses (<300nm)... https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/2TbWwhtohg
@jljcolorado Except the actual science shows that masks (even N95s clamped to a test tube for a few minutes in a lab) don't block fine aerosols/particles in the relevant size range for respiratory viruses (<300nm)... https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/L4uEPP3fus
@RichardWWard1 @ID_Denmark @greg_travis https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ The issue is that the claim that the MPPS is 300nm is based on instruments that don't properly/accurately measure particles/aerosols <300nm.
@UnMaskd_Truth @SeattleiteLeo @willcollier Also, Fig 4A => ↑ efficiency of fabrics (no gaps) and authors say "Overall, we find that combinations of various commonly available fabrics used in cloth masks can potentially provide significant protection against the transmission of aerosol particles." https://t.co/YkmdijQMXA
@James___Morris @SeattleiteLeo Not really. https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/cXb4IZ8z3s
@JamestNichols @SeattleiteLeo They simply don't measure particles < 300nm and claim that is the MPPS. https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/kghW6uq1Rw
@ID_Denmark @granit29 @SeattleiteLeo It really doesn't make sense for anyone, once you realise that even N95s (clamped to a test tube for a few minutes in a laboratory environment) don't block smaller aerosols... https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/6NcY18olol
@EbonyJHilton_MD @projectn95 I'm not scientifically educated enough to know if this article proves that high thread count cotton 3 layer masks are as good as N95 but I think it might be saying so: https://t.co/cBRj1V0oTl
@Kyle_Long123 @Meagain10411919 @AJKayWriter https://t.co/jeTePRHXZZ
@ColinDebunks @FLSurgeonGen this study (below) used a separate technology for that range & found that far more than 5% of particles in some of these lower size ranges penetrated the N95, even under lab conditions (a new/clean/dry mask clamped to a test tube for a few minutes). 2/2 https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/azwTbRGnaB
@Sarahjanecares @Silver_Lining76 @Paul38722059 @aftab_usa That's a propaganda video. It's based on the theory that 300nm is the MPPS for N95s (which is based on limitations of the equipment typically used to measure particle penetration) and other theories that don't hold true in practice. For eg., see... https://t.co/MY4vUHvZYi 1/3 https://t.co/LHGuR0tMa8
@KristenMeghan @JDVance1 Did you see this study? It's dated 2020, but I hadn't seen it. It seems to show N95s (clamped to a tube in a lab) let through a significant proportion of particles <300nm (weighted ave FE 85% in this range, but goes much lower) even at low flow rates... https://t.co/MY4vUHwxNQ https://t.co/jJsxuYWcxO
@jmcnaughtonjc @KristiNoem https://t.co/UkODxIgjkj https://t.co/mxfeg9aPSy https://t.co/9YUV9rfRb6 https://t.co/3j7n0vhu9h https://t.co/P4D6HtCJ8C https://t.co/NVfnK377U1 https://t.co/uLEbKGZeck https://t.co/mrHn09j0yo https://t.co/KIY8nqUCaF https://t.co/faqCjb3OnD
@DanCoop33206515 @patgotweet @ThomasPaineBand @RandPaul Scientists change their views based on the latest data. Coronaviruses were studied in bats at Wuhan by Shi Zenghli. Natural immunity mimics the vaccine, as both start waning around 6 months. Masks work. https://t.co/eJjypz6X3U https://t.co/qPfLNaw2PN https://t.co/qaiao6aZEE
@ClayTravis @CNN One study out of many doesn't prove anything. https://t.co/cdGDxv2sIY https://t.co/eJjypz6X3U https://t.co/qPfLNaw2PN https://t.co/qaiao6aZEE https://t.co/rQxa1zrarE
@Shimmering777 @stkirsch If you layer silk with cotton (both tightly woven), you can get a mask with a static charge that has comparable effectiveness to N95s (assuming very good fit). Very early on when supplies were tight, I had some homemade masks like this. https://t.co/YuQ5cCnfTF
@toddmodem @DrEliDavid No, you need to wake up, comparing the virus size is useless as masks work by trapping the droplets and particles that are contaminated with the virus, not free floating virus. That masks can stop aerosols and droplets are well researched. https://t.co/xhvmisXPMz
@DanishScience @AmiriKing @pettypodcast1 Aerosols are also filtered by masks: https://t.co/xhvmisXPMz
@DanishScience @AmiriKing This study shows that the fabric also protects against aerosols as well as droplets. https://t.co/xhvmisXPMz
@DanishScience @AmiriKing Here's a study that shows that mask fabric stops droplets and aerosols in the air that may contain virus. https://t.co/xhvmisXPMz
@kidrangeree @Wulden83 Here is a study done on the effectiveness of cloth masks. https://t.co/z2jO54TAUz
@ianmSC @CollignonPeter Odd that actual research disagrees with your opinion https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
Konda, A. et al. (2020) - "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks" - この研究では、一般的な生地を使用した布製マスクのエアロゾル除去効率について評価されています。
@Beverle51995260 @JohnBoweActor "Useless and harmful masks" No. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8A https://t.co/YQzxFuvh0z
@LiberteSagesse @BiologyAwesome @tatiann69922625 @AnteMedicus https://t.co/mI1Pm79GBR
@AXELKAISER Aun no se como estas en la testera Estudio 1: "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks" (2020) Este estudio, publicado en la revista ACS Nano, evaluó la eficiencia de filtración de aerosoles de diferentes tipos de telas.
@dubbyruntle N95 obviously best, as I think most people know these days. But anything better than nothing if that’s all people have. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
@sival84 @TheDrJon @SeattleiteLeo @DrJBhattacharya @kberkopes @iPolicy @YouTube @RonDeSantisFL @CDCgov https://t.co/XaeOdj856h
@MetalChick616 @Rodney_ii_back @Metsfan281 @nypost above 50% in the entire 10 nm (0.01 micron) to 6.0 micron range, provided they have a tight weave." -National Center for Biotechnology Information, Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks." https://t.co/NMeiCGQ30r
@JerLeff @aaronsimpson @nathaliejacoby1 This one is interesting too: “Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks” https://t.co/Cc5k6FIrR6
@VyvyFindsWords @catladyactivist @kdqd3 N-95 and other masks also provide some filtration as well, per "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks" that also compared to #N95 masks. https://t.co/6fxFeNL2Wm https://t.co/3i1mSoak3O
RT @WeingartenDE: Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle,…
@DellAnnaLuca @ClarkeMicah Again the 'EC' property is irrelevant; duly as the populous use cloth masks, why I referred to standardMasks earlier in our exchange. In ref to *aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth mask there's no viral barriers = hence, 0.175 micron gap (s).
RT @WeingartenDE: Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle,…
RT @WeingartenDE: Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle,…
@c_thinking24_7 @The_OtherET @JReinerMD @VPrasadMDMPH https://t.co/ABPGivUvwS https://t.co/JVKlVqCtPm https://t.co/tltZluyCwe https://t.co/ZOU0x9KIoN https://t.co/RRmU4mCeiL https://t.co/6gabiVThuH https://t.co/nKqv9i2G9w https://t.co/OhM3JotgyV 2/x
@Djenr8 @richdatasci 13/70"Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks" Konda et al., ACS Nano, April 24 2020: https://t.co/YYY6gYWDyP …
@Gigi51669370 @czar19842012 Here's a few studies. There are a lot more studies on the efficacy of masks where these came from. I guess you side with the CDC. https://t.co/7SjxflN460 https://t.co/PwPtJqZpg3 https://t.co/eJjypzo05U https://t.co/eKg6pO4uIN https://t.co/cdGDxvjvKY https://t.co/eJjypzo05U
@iKilledKenny_44 This has a lot of good educational material on cloth masks. https://t.co/eqW540mYrg
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/iBesXeE0vT
@BU_Tweets Boston University, https://t.co/cRTsNwYvOk Four layer silk mask >80 vs. KN-95 mask >95 . Materials Science, location, setting, crowd density, time duration, room air filtration, wearability, durability, comfort, fashion & more…someone is developing an App for it. Enjoy :-)
@__elDuderino_ @andrewbostom @benshapiro Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/R8ZyD8eLMs https://t.co/oQD1s5OuBX
@Asta_de_B @joeyfox85 Study for them. Cloth mask vs N-95 mask debate, during #COVID19 pandemic, has been studied. Cloth mask advocates miss obvious data #N95 masks should be used. N-95 mask designed for 300 nm filtration efficiency function of aerosol particles https://t.co/ktKW1LDVkY
@balinda0906 @JTornbury @Stealthfs @ElectionWiz According to a study called "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks" (funded by the NIH) the efficacy rate of standard 2-layer cloth masks is only roughly 82%.
@jDaz @DanCrenshawTX Read a study or two before making a misinformed comment like that. Let me help you out: https://t.co/qaiao5SQqw https://t.co/U1IdvxhDom https://t.co/dtpiy944JG https://t.co/qPfLNaN5RN https://t.co/eJjypzo05U https://t.co/cdGDxvjvKY https://t.co/rQxa1zIdtE
@fabulasbab @MPretekin @CatBennett77 @CoventryShayne @jasimanski "One recent study looked at the aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth msks, finding that efficacy varied widely, from 12 to 99.9%,at flow rates lower than at-rest respiration (89).Many materials had ≥96% filtration..." https://t.co/Lizg7imRz4
13/70"Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks" Konda et al., ACS Nano, April 24 2020: https://t.co/YYY6gYWDyP …
@therockett @Femi_Sorry Here is a paper which explains exactly that https://t.co/nZky95WOeO Looks at "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks"
@reygriva @eugen_trischke @princemyshkinnn @msvetov https://t.co/lHjd0GwN2k давно не участвовал в твиттер срачах, забыл о такой дикой твиттерской плотности уязвленных троллей.
@eugen_trischke @princemyshkinnn @msvetov пипец остроумно. если по делу то вот: https://t.co/lHjd0GwN2k
#COVID19 #Masques Je pose ça là... pour y réfléchir ultérieurement. Efficacité des masques en population générale https://t.co/Gae3e2OoQ4 https://t.co/GoxavZ1pKF https://t.co/sRNBqRH7uj Sur les masques en coton https://t.co/bltxMlnY5m Réutilisation NK95 https://t.co/HzoNxpMpa1
@dragonflies999 @LeGunnerDoc @mcfadzean_neil @NathanMackBrown @JamesBurnie2 Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks Abhiteja Konda, Abhinav Prakash, Gregory A. Moss, Michael Schmoldt, Gregory D. Grant, and Supratik Guha* There’s two. You can do your o review if you want more. BotirtedBAerosol Filtration Effici
@OHAinContext @ORhunter @RockHound47 One recent study looked at the aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks, finding that efficacy varied widely, from 12 to 99.9%, at flow rates lower than at-rest respiration
@priyology Especially when there are papers out there demonstrating that masks with combos of fabric (like cotton + silk, cotton + chiffon, cotton + flannel) are on par with N95s & better than surgical masks at blocking aerosols! Konda et al. 2020! https://t.co/kcvIkGwcmJ
@macroliter I mean, 5–80% (depending on the tightness of the threads)—it could be worse
@be_pauly https://t.co/eXPbArLQVM https://t.co/idy2cZEias
@Remindme2forget @KXAN_News 25. Konda A., Prakash A., Moss G.A., Schmoldt M., Grant G.D., Guha S. Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks. ACS Nano. 2020;14:6339–6347. PMC Article
@The_Poolshark Here’s one from the NIH. This is with diesel particles testing. https://t.co/xNalpblId7 And this one is for mask type material: https://t.co/gaiS6585NO
@LTebart @PatOderSo @Hoellenaufsicht @nielsbock Physikalische Untersuchung der Filtereffizienz von Filtermaterialien: https://t.co/tuymnxgOiX
RT @donrafa_jr: ¿Qué tal me protege mi cubrebocas? Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https:/…
¿Qué tal me protege mi cubrebocas? Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/VDaFClWeql
RT @NashisSage: Somethin I never thought I’d be researching,aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks…
Somethin I never thought I’d be researching,aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks in an effort to avoid polypropylene inhalation &its affects on the respiratory system. In short ima bout to make a bunch of masks to peer reviewed standards
@BasilNestor @wendyp4545 @joobawhale https://t.co/k2SAOFNgqK
@farmboy8655 @JackieGolub @laurenboebert You don't know what you are talking about. Here's a FEW of the studies on mask wearing. I can't wait to see your studies. https://t.co/PwPtJqZpg3 https://t.co/cdGDxvjvKY https://t.co/eJjypzo05U https://t.co/gFKwlZVvwX https://t.co/qaiao5SQqw https://t.co/rQxa1zIdtE
@GooseButter00 @leibofestsdad @henryjdavid @DonaldJTrumpJr @laurenboebert Prevent 100%? No. They do reduce the amount of virus inhaled and lower the risk. When combined with the reduction of the amount of virus expelled, masks wearing helps a lot to reduce spread and risk. https://t.co/jNqgQhHkR4
@EAHippie @AlanSmi16732190 @TDuuuuval @KatTimpf Masks work. Let's see your studies. BTW, there are many more studies than these . https://t.co/qaiao5SQqw https://t.co/eJjypzo05U https://t.co/rQxa1zIdtE https://t.co/cdGDxvjvKY https://t.co/S0Ix5MamXU https://t.co/U1IdvxhDom
RT @drjohnmorley: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/x38N61gsyj
RT @drjohnmorley: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/x38N61gsyj
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/x38N61gsyj
@carlos66462921 @ComicDaveSmith "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks | ACS Nano" https://t.co/NERrg8Yvz6
RT @DmitryMedv: @pkasyanov_wos Химия и науки о материалах: https://t.co/MD7564I4OH https://t.co/CPvMnke6lu https://t.co/yajmQzbA5o https://…
@pkasyanov_wos Химия и науки о материалах: https://t.co/MD7564I4OH https://t.co/CPvMnke6lu https://t.co/yajmQzbA5o https://t.co/khOPU3UNIg https://t.co/3XzXgLjybd .
RT @WeingartenDE: Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle,…
@russnelson @porterguy1 @aninthe1 @Shadowbird Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks - Konda et al. 2020 Effectiveness of Face Masks in Preventing Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 - Ueki et al. 2020
@ScottySmash @DrMayssaID @EWoodhouse7 @tfouge Here you are, friend. https://t.co/9gb9s9cm0v
@EWoodhouse7 @tfouge Sure it can. You're apparently unfamiliar with electrostatic filtration. https://t.co/9gb9s9cm0v
@J2KChoiceCuts @PartyPlayusa @AnnastaciaMP @LeeanneEnoch @DiFarmerMP Might pay to read the corrections "Comment on “Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks” | ACS Nano" https://t.co/PByyUKzr5V
@ieatthetacos @AJMovieMaker @PlateauUkok @JackPosobiec 110. A Konda, et al., Response to letters to the editor on aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks: Revised and expanded results. ACS Nano 14, 10764–10770 (2020).
RT @BWB79: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/VQ9IyG7MJh
RT @BWB79: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/VQ9IyG7MJh
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/VQ9IyG7MJh
@Scotty_2017 @SciencePharmer "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks | ACS Nano" https://t.co/QYVptw7ayU
Another study he linked (#25) only discusses the efficacy of different types of fabrics in face masks. https://t.co/WqmS8NGnF3 Another trial (#19) concluded that cloth face masks were not sufficient for health care workers and that medical grade masks performed better,
@oproprioguto Leia e verá que a máscara com várias camadas resolve sim .Não sei pq a resistência em usar ! Isso poderia evitar outras coisas. https://t.co/aMsTeZijCW
@renato_aloi @Sg12712258 @oproprioguto @levisback Leia e verá que a máscara com várias camadas resolve sim .Não sei pq a resistência em usar ! Isso poderia evitar outras coisas. https://t.co/aMsTeZijCW
RT @WeingartenDE: Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle,…
@NatFilosof @tjonesy_14 @BenjaminCurran5 @therecount You should really read this from the National Institutes of Health regarding masks and aerosol particles to educate yourself a bit. https://t.co/807CwzGYos
@ATLbpckr @AP https://t.co/3lQsH4IXpY https://t.co/3lQsH4IXpY https://t.co/9ONRPM7h3c https://t.co/T6z9t1eHGm https://t.co/YQQdWgNwCp https://t.co/RoVd8U7t39 https://t.co/UNckWhrenN https://t.co/8ApHFZiOxI https://t.co/jEJF6cUcLB A year into the pandemic & still debating mask use
En este vídeo de un tal Sergio Hidalgo lo explica muy bien basándose en 8 documentos de diferentes fuentes: https://t.co/3u5O0fMHXT
RT @WeingartenDE: Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle,…
Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle, #Naturseide und #Chiffon >50 Prozent abschied, und dichter gewebte #Baumwolle eine Abscheidung von 79 bis 98 Prozent erreichte https://t.co/V1yCieYwi1 https://t.co/oEqqai4EZ2
@Saville1559 @ReformedBroHood @LutheranKlinean @seamuscmacaoidh @TWRjack I’m glad you asked. May this season be a humbling experience, seeing
@memorybutter @tamaravotes @kroger The masks don't work. https://t.co/2eZhYc8B3Y https://t.co/Z1WMscAw1W
@Cvyrtlick Konda A, Prakash A, Moss GA, Schmoldt M, Grant GD, Guha S. Aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks. ACS Nano. 2020;14:6339–47
@PeterSu18080286 @mikelovestweets @Gilead2020 @LLorraine_lolly @BorisJohnson @MattHancock @MarkDrakeford @vaughangething @NicolaSturgeon Well Peter, here is the very first paper I pulled off a site called PubMed where we often publish our peer reviewed papers. This one deals just with material masks and their benefits. There are hundreds of others. Institutions and authors are listed. https://t.co/nXQrAgW4Wh
RT @plasmankado: （覚書）早期(５月)の布マスクとメルトブローン不織布マスクについての比較論文についての所感覚書： // Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory C…
（覚書）早期(５月)の布マスクとメルトブローン不織布マスクについての比較論文についての所感覚書： // Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks[ https://t.co/8eUPEn9JDR] https://t.co/8dECuiDGWt
@triplea87 Ahmed Abdul Azim, It's a good thread. 24 April 2020, "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks"ACS Nano https://t.co/DbMYDyKpgO Enjoy :-)
RT @lorene1voice: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/UtDD9W2GR9 Differences with…
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/UtDD9W2GR9 Differences with fabrics + fit of mask. Gaps significantly reduce effectiveness.
RT @ElinSilveous: Correction to Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks | ACS Nano https://t.co/HsK…
RT @ElinSilveous: Correction to Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks | ACS Nano https://t.co/HsK…
Correction to Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks | ACS Nano https://t.co/HsKGBnXSqU
@michael_kisner @Code_Her @laurenboebert You are confusing the concept of ideal use and actual practice. Multi-layer cloth masks with a good fit reduce 80% of particles <300nm and 90% >300nm. Masks work if used correctly. https://t.co/91xOZpMsgg
@Slibertarian_ @madorni Seguís sin leer el hilo. Es falso. Sólo que hay que usar los que tienen doble o triple capa. https://t.co/lQQwbCoWCE
RT @jagmistereus: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks - Pub Med Overall, we find that combinat…
@Reeshofwarmte @hugodejonge @rivm @Nieuwsuur Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks | ACS Nano. https://t.co/CKUY9FPySU
@quaintcrab @pdpuk2 @MayorofLondon Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/kD3ym69DuL
@BlackSheepRSA @Unathi_Kwaza Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/wahMQtKdFj
@mamacoleman63 @CDCgov Yeah I looked at the ones linked in that article: Low Confidence (more confident on n95s vs cloth) https://t.co/TzvmkkuBm5 Looks like a lab test vs community test: https://t.co/pib2WU5M5T https://t.co/cj8crceVVc
RT @ThomTvR: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/wahMQtKdFj
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/wahMQtKdFj
@alonsoMant1 @Pamerz06 @1_sandracortes @Mister_Wolf_0 @Pajarobere Estudio de la efectividad de mascarillas de tela, obviamente no todas sirven, su efectividad bordea el 80% cuando esta confeccionada con doble tela ( de diferentes tipos). -Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/sPzCJeUt3K
@BuilderKapono The viruses don't travel on their own, they are in aerosolized particles of mucus and saliva, which are much larger and are stopped by masks. Here's an actual scientific journal: https://t.co/fR62s2X45Q
@DriversAmerican @SanDiegoCounty @fox5sandiego Konda A, Prakash A, Moss GA, Schmoldt M, Grant GD, Guha S. Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks. ACS Nano. 2020;14(5):6339-6347.10.1021/acsnano.0c03252. https://t.co/Zn6Rz4zCBw
@eleonorasfalcon Maybe you haven't been looking?https://t.co/XNHmkO8wE2 https://t.co/k0Jt6JZwsQ https://t.co/wDjotnIH8j https://t.co/D30vqd4QIp https://t.co/KxtOYRAttu et al, etc. etc.
Hay gente que dice que los tapabocas caseros no sirven. Es falso. Sólo que hay que usar los que tienen doble o triple capa. https://t.co/lQQwbCoWCE
RT @ReidRomance: SOME FACTS: You can go to https://t.co/lxuRvTOCdj and do a search if you're looking for peer reviewed science rather than…
SOME FACTS: You can go to https://t.co/lxuRvTOCdj and do a search if you're looking for peer reviewed science rather than infotainment. Here's a few that might be of interest after a 3 second search: https://t.co/iNUZezGviP https://t.co/a5vb3xSH7w https://t.co/KDdEDUGgiv
@angelicaguirele @brunocavasana @soth37 @EricaOlvsantos @oatila https://t.co/98HN63VW19 https://t.co/EHz88PoTzk https://t.co/0AsqFmy7RX Nenhum artigo fala que a transmissão é reduzida em 100% utilizando máscaras de tecido, mas é significativa quando comparada a não utilizar nenhuma máscara.
@dsmbellboy 2009, 2013, 2018, 2017 https://t.co/bDH8tHo3DP
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/uHnMH7KUva
@kaiansamuel1 @WalkenesLagares @PaduPrado https://t.co/DAyHbCjIPj https://t.co/J0g6JYw8gE https://t.co/P453syVzQZ https://t.co/FpUrK3FG27 https://t.co/nKZa5bGtnF https://t.co/2Br4LWHuft
@StandsWthTruth @FrankCWillson @JCwikJr @GovMikeDeWine https://t.co/mdR6RK4lmv
RT @NanoSceal: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/ODM2KeNcxF
RT @NanoSceal: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/ODM2KeNcxF
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/ODM2KeNcxF
@Mightyanchove @fakeriwnl @ShowElisabeth @LaraLeaTrump ACS Nano: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/thapINEhDy
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Cloth Masks | Filtration efficiencies of hybrids (cotton-silk, cotton-chiffon, etc.): >80% (for particles <300 nm), >90% (for particles >300 nm) (via mechanical and electrostatic-based filtration). https://t.co/q1qg2qPcjc
@the_ghost_hosts @nyjerrykane @sean_antrim @stillgray Konda A, Prakash A, Moss GA, Schmoldt M, Grant GD, Guha S. Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks. ACS Nano. 2020;14(5):6339-47. https://t.co/2MBaLrbqt1
RT @gyrhead: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/LCecX1Fblp
The journal article: "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks" #sewing https://t.co/HpMqhu7i3w
@DancerDad @duckford10 Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks Abhiteja Konda, Abhinav Prakash, Gregory A. Moss, Michael Schmoldt, Gregory D. Grant, and Supratik Guha ACS Nano 2020 14 (5), 6339-6347 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c03252 https://t.co/sWXCItp27U
@Rachelswims68 @genleyai @TimSmithMP Give it a go for yourself: https://t.co/zRAUwD2CWl, https://t.co/z8sSeccrzW, https://t.co/UzpUDKNint, https://t.co/a0k0av4FHJ, https://t.co/4N2nIb0KkK. https://t.co/jSVDx1YyU4, https://t.co/Xpo4DaMGjb, https://t.co/TIW6hzSQrV, https://t.co/itoSXTDA0E, https://t.co/AkvvscGcru
@AdorDNI @CarlosMaslaton @ImNotValenArias Es falso que los tapabocas caseros no sirvan de nada. Sólo que hay que usar los que tienen doble o triple capa. https://t.co/lQQwbCoWCE
@gallaghermike @jdixonbyrne @MollyJongFast @ron_fournier https://t.co/6Q76Urmm2n
@Trumplican17 @nateduchene @CarlosHappyNPO ...“cloth masks can potentially provide significant protection against the transmission of particles in the aerosol size range.” Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks. #masks #clothmasks #PPE https://t.co/bJESlt4yhR
@AntonellaTellar @AlatiGiulio @vitalbaa @OmnibusLa7 @gaiatortora https://t.co/lgpfPq2XXe C'è anche questo articolo https://t.co/mhDDCiOyMC
@kochy25c @GJulrin Ein letztes Mal: https://t.co/zIypkeVNQi https://t.co/Ek81tV6liW https://t.co/4zKnumhLBG https://t.co/dT8l1JjlsY
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @ToniFolgar: @Rolod14 @Nozick1 A ver si os vais enterando los desinformadores que dais vergüencita. https://t.co/qln9jI8wBz
@DrBibu @doofy_duck @DIEZEIT oder auch noch mehr Studien für Maskenverweigerer: https://t.co/zIypkeVNQi https://t.co/Ek81tV6liW https://t.co/4zKnumhLBG https://t.co/dT8l1JjlsY https://t.co/cqovNSPwyk
@Rolod14 @Nozick1 A ver si os vais enterando los desinformadores que dais vergüencita. https://t.co/qln9jI8wBz
@JoeBiden https://t.co/QDalJNDMBc
@WildFotos agreed, but the recommendation still appears to be to wear a mask. Other studies have they are effective to reduce the likelihood of transmission even if it doesn't eliminate all risk. https://t.co/S8DBnmnnq4 linked source from the CDC
@WoodyChestnut @CNNSotu @jaketapper I had already read this one before. It was in your article. Notice everything they say is, might help. No definitives. That cdc study I posted had randomized controlled studies. They have a definitive, no significant effect... Masks are near useless https://t.co/TZne2prv2L
@DanBrino @907tweeter @realDonaldTrump Abhiteja Konda, Abhinav Prakash, Gregory A. Moss, Michael Schmoldt, Gregory D. Grant, and Supratik Guha. Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks. ACS Nano Article https://t.co/dfCTJKG0OV
@InderSinghBoss @FrancescoTesti9 @SheerlyQueer @janetgernand @HKrassenstein @realDonaldTrump No, but these fine folks did.... https://t.co/xtXJqbzpoc
@shrimperbhoy @Bullwinkle19 @RestorerStone @DPJHodges through it, then it will be of no benefit’ Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks The effect of gaps between the contour of the face and the mask as caused by an improper fit will affect the efficiency of any face mask. 1/
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
RT @linseymarr: Response to Letters to the Editor on Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks: Revis…
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks https://t.co/vLZXGyx8ub
@TULlP_Ohare عن رو متخصص نیستم، ولی این لینک یه مقاله که میگه: Significantly reduces the chance of catching it Link: https://t.co/MbSHUL1Jvu https://t.co/55XNs44zS2
@CheckOrphan @AndrewAtter @DrAseemMalhotra There are numerous studies that confirm filtration efficiencies for aerosols of different size. https://t.co/lr2yoUbVcs ... and additional studies linked on this page.
1/The Evidence Behind: Fit Matters Our graphic is based two scientific articles that measures and compares the filtration efficiency of various types of masks. https://t.co/EbTk8gK76s https://t.co/kyXlDExXMu #Science #WearAMask
@katepsychfem @eileeniorio @Hal81002301 Here's a study that shows even greater protection. https://t.co/eJjypzo05U
@PaloozaMitch @ForTheWin https://t.co/IHhK1YNeXe https://t.co/WCD7E0oOIN https://t.co/FYO1Jsfs96 https://t.co/Ete62NnVDc https://t.co/Ete62NnVDc
@DianaAlaska1 @JReinerMD Not true. CDC, WHO studies and OSHA guidelines say otherwise https://t.co/fYQpuiseXL… N95 masks are designed to filter bacteria eg. TB not viruses 20x smaller. Cloth is worthless https://t.co/ynbMpS3GIG Respirators better & must be fitted, properly handled & changed regularly. https://t.co/cKCgh4DCdA
RT @M0kujin: @nlmb_uchiha @Ch4ryXp Hmmmm, the science says otherwise, particularly when you understand the difference between close contact…
@nlmb_uchiha @Ch4ryXp Hmmmm, the science says otherwise, particularly when you understand the difference between close contact, clinical settings, and being indoors in public spaces https://t.co/LgOaLm7Led
@DMyer4 @aplunk1 @allenskillicorn https://t.co/4KMTs5J83K
@Matter_of_Grey @ruprechtsfork @IngrahamAngle Well, here's a recent study: https://t.co/aBDqtqp2Lz And this: https://t.co/u3O4n2dDEu Not sure why the government of the Netherlands is somehow more trustworthy than the CDC. Especially given the recent upswing in infections in the Netherlands (no masks) vs UK (mandate) https://t.co/8E1t2eo3Yo
@WeatherManCoder @blogNekoRandom @Kimmi1965 @haileybranson If you don’t wear a seatbelt and you get in a car crash, the person most likely to die is you. Seatbelts are also mandatory by law. Your point about masks is objectively incorrect. Source 1: https://t.co/GEgxuu9poG Source 2: https://t.co/INmGtbqML1
RT @drannehuang: @AntibioticDoc @imgrund @SaskHealth @drsusanshaw Also see this previously published paper. As expected, in addition to i…
@AntibioticDoc @imgrund @SaskHealth @drsusanshaw Also see this previously published paper. As expected, in addition to intrinsic filtration efficiency of the materials, *fit* (ie. amount of leakage) affect actual performance of homemade masks. Cotton quilt performed well due to the batting fiber. https://t.co/5baBreLp7C
@Texas_Ginger @cain_nate Again, spewing ignorance. You should step outside of your box and attempt to disprove your assumptions. Cloth masks are effective filtration with an electrostatic and a tight weave layer. The concerns are fit and proper wear. https://t.co/f0jrKrlMAN
@JonatanSchloss @beth_lilja @Apotekerne Ift. det spørgsmål er her to af de kilder CDC henviser til i forbindelse med deres anbefaling af dem: https://t.co/8h83BEHCNH https://t.co/8ePQ7SBF4T
@opticpros Asking for pre-COVID-19 studies about COVID-19 doesn't make sense. CDC cited this: "We find that (...) available fabrics used in cloth masks can potentially provide significant protection against the transmission of aerosol particles." https://t.co/rP5G9597fw
@srskr7 @JonathanMar_180 @rif_du_80 @LTP_Officiel @Conflits_FR Si si : https://t.co/ojcCcfeWvH https://t.co/lFQ4DhKZRj https://t.co/P7RNFSa1VG https://t.co/l9aNRcL334 https://t.co/sqJVeisyJ6 https://t.co/KgaRlEn7B9 https://t.co/EhAqioWoTE https://t.co/f2y60MkxPq
@JasonRHoney These are too https://t.co/mue7q1gS7q https://t.co/O5pUXxbmFc https://t.co/SM7t3yYKTm https://t.co/gQwsaGkOuf https://t.co/iEmcJYeYvx https://t.co/O5pUXxbmFc
@josh_barrie @graceemilydoug @JtESPN991 Hey man - hope these studies clear some of the questions you might have up. I know I always like to read the primary sources too. https://t.co/QEEoxjbrSh https://t.co/eD1HfSZlM9 https://t.co/kj2jBbxxg6 https://t.co/kCkRAKGgwu https://t.co/PARoMpS98g https://t.co/eD1HfSZlM9
¿Cómo funcionan las mascarillas? ¿Realmente sirven? https://t.co/QU1mEMC0gp a través de @YouTube
@mrati2d @richardmarx You realize that applies to your own position yeah? Meanwhile, https://t.co/1VK4JcNhep
@cicidog2 @richardmarx Or not reading any studies at all? https://t.co/1VK4JcNhep
@watch_sc @TheMikelCrump It stops a significant proportion of the particles. https://t.co/VTuDhqdUp9
@StevenHughes129 @royboy_78 @stephenfell0ws @dibbbling @BBCBreaking It’s important to discuss it and tackle the issues people have directly so we can all learn.
@glencoco4u @ChrisSugar4 @GloriaD53469398 @xinjing999 @ABCDefg14571023 @peaceandhvac @meldub79 @GavinNewsom While I'd love to discuss more, I'm not a materials scientist (biochemistry PhD student), so this isn't exactly my expertise. But this article suggests that they are still effective: https://t.co/cb1qEt9NIW
@NormiesProgress Couple of standouts cited by the CDC, since politicians aren't in the business of "data" so much as scientists: https://t.co/7cW7r8Ltye and https://t.co/LRQu6keHo7. What's it to me is that people not wearing masks means more potential spread of this virus.
@ALLisON17497749 @spex69 @AP https://t.co/HmI1NPO05V
RT @avivajazz: Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks | Gaps from improper fit, resulting in bidir…
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks | Gaps from improper fit, resulting in bidirectional airflow around the mask’s periphery, can result in >60% decrease in filtration efficiency. https://t.co/2QO1DlJg7W
Filtration efficiencies of hybrids (e.g.; cotton-chiffon) was >80% (for particles <300 nm) and >90% (for particles >300 nm). The enhanced performance of the hybrids is likely due to the combined effect of mechanical and electrostatic-based filtration. https://t.co/2QO1DlJg7W
RT @maher30448107: د/احمد ابراهيم بيقدم المعلومه العلميه بشكل سهل وبسيط عشان توصل للناس https://t.co/lHoPB3iMr2
د/احمد ابراهيم بيقدم المعلومه العلميه بشكل سهل وبسيط عشان توصل للناس https://t.co/lHoPB3iMr2
@richdavisphd @PaoloViscardi @providence_phc A paper showed that adding a chiffon or silk layer to a mask made from tightly-woven cotton would block almost all droplets by adding an electrostatic trap https://t.co/OjSaaoasOZ
@Kenan_muhala1 @sahaider75 ليس تهويلا إنما هو إطلاع على الحقائق بحجمها الفعلي و اتخاذ الحيطه والحذر افضل من دس الراس في الرمال https://t.co/GVV6pQr6qb
RT @DrChemist2: امتى نخلص من الكورونا ؟ https://t.co/GdDrVwQdW0 via @YouTube
امتى نخلص من الكورونا ؟ https://t.co/GdDrVwQdW0 via @YouTube
بلازما المتعافين لعلاج الكورونا https://t.co/ZlO4dR9kld via @YouTube
https://t.co/Jh1Xroi7r0
https://t.co/eOLgpOHhtU
RT @_Truth_Matters: (1) BEST MATERIALS & MANUFACTURE FOR CLOTH FACEMASKS The American Chemical Society Journal, ACS Nano, has published th…
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsnano.0c03252
Mascherine fai da te: i migliori tessuti low-cost da utilizzare. Uno studio mostra che mascherine con strati di cotone a trama stretta e chiffon/seta hanno prestazioni comparabili a quelle FFP3. Attenzione comunque alla perfetta vestibilità. https://t.co/xgyVfL2jdc
COVID-19 Research Papers: My Three Favourites https://t.co/4J1hIt113f #COVIDー19 #COVID19 #CoronaVirusPakistan #Corona #coronavirusuk #Coronavirusireland https://t.co/Ix8cFDBWqS
@absinor @medicalaxioms @nicoletranger Amen. https://t.co/8yBZZr9HDs
@jenbrea @medicalaxioms @nicoletranger Amen. https://t.co/8yBZZr9HDs
@absinor @medicalaxioms @nicoletranger https://t.co/8yBZZr9HDs
@nicoletranger @absinor @medicalaxioms See: Konda A et al., Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks; https://t.co/8yBZZr9HDs
RT @_Truth_Matters: (1) BEST MATERIALS & MANUFACTURE FOR CLOTH FACEMASKS The American Chemical Society Journal, ACS Nano, has published th…
RT @_Truth_Matters: (1) BEST MATERIALS & MANUFACTURE FOR CLOTH FACEMASKS The American Chemical Society Journal, ACS Nano, has published th…
RT @_Truth_Matters: (1) BEST MATERIALS & MANUFACTURE FOR CLOTH FACEMASKS The American Chemical Society Journal, ACS Nano, has published th…
(1) BEST MATERIALS & MANUFACTURE FOR CLOTH FACEMASKS The American Chemical Society Journal, ACS Nano, has published the latest research study on the subject, with the recommendations of its authors (21/04/2020): Free access during the Covid pandemic: https://t.co/vlJqyG1PtM
@temiokomi @RitaOnwurah @seleijewere Published article April 24 2020 Title:Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Mask https://t.co/YCxP9w5PIx This is not by MIT sha
if you want to make a mask at home, what is the best material? https://t.co/gY4WHcBNNR ACS NANO https://t.co/JindWT5Wzb
M
TB
DS